DISCLOSED! The "Age Of Disclosure" LANDS Release| Alex Jones & Legal Issues
DISLCOSED Is Co Hosted By Kari Lindsay--> x.com/@FiresofTruth
LINK THREAD—https://allmylinks.com/total-disclosure
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube—— www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
Support TY and TDP Studios directly VIA PayPal (No FEES)— https://www.paypal.me/TDPstudios767?locale.x=en_US
YOUTUBE MEMBER—-https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
PATREON MEMBER—https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure?fan_landing=true&view_as=public
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-podcast--5975113/support.
CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —[email protected]
Special Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can’t do this WITHOUT YOU!
-COPYRIGHT-2020-
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
Speaker 1: A welcome back everyone too disclosed. My name's Ty Roberts,
Speaker 1: and I am the host creator of the UH program,
Speaker 1: and my lovely co host, Kyrile Lindsay will be right in.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to start off by saying thank you
Speaker 1: to everyone. UH. It's been really really fun to get
Speaker 1: back in the groove of doing these weekly live shows
Speaker 1: and and getting engaged with the audience in addition to
Speaker 1: putting out other content UH like the podcast, which Kry
Speaker 1: is great with editing. We have Peter Robbins coming up tomorrow,
Speaker 1: so it's already out on the audio feeds, and just
Speaker 1: an absolutely incredible conversation, absolutely incredible editing job by Cary.
Speaker 1: And today we're gonna be diving into a few topics.
Speaker 1: UFO stuff was a little dry, I guess this week.
Speaker 1: So I've kind of talked to carry you and back
Speaker 1: and forth and you know what should we talking to
Speaker 1: this about and discuss about? And I was like, you
Speaker 1: know what, let's just kind of kick back and really
Speaker 1: have an open discussion before we get into it. Make
Speaker 1: sure to like, share and subscribe if you want to
Speaker 1: help support the show, obviously, you can hit join on YouTube.
Speaker 1: I think it's even coming to iOS devices finally, so
Speaker 1: you can join on Apple or click the link in
Speaker 1: the description below and become a member. You can also
Speaker 1: send a superchat during the show, especially shows like tonight
Speaker 1: where we're kind of be you know, the audience is
Speaker 1: definitely the third member of the hosting platform. Send your questions,
Speaker 1: let's engage each other, and uh yeah, let's have some
Speaker 1: fun with that being said. Cary, welcome, Hi, Hi.
Speaker 2: My name is Cary. I am the cohurst of this show.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, hell, last week we ended the show and
Speaker 1: we started talking, well, so we we had an idea
Speaker 1: of talking about Dylan Borland. I hadn't had a chance
Speaker 1: to kind of get in this testimony that the episode
Speaker 1: did get in fact, a little heated towards the end
Speaker 1: with our differences and opinions. But again, I just want
Speaker 1: to start this show by saying that that is kind
Speaker 1: of the point.
Speaker 2: So I mean, sorry, you keep good.
Speaker 1: Finishing off. I do want to let you kind of
Speaker 1: you said you wanted to to talk about that. Aside
Speaker 1: from the actual case, I think we've made it pretty
Speaker 1: clear on different sides of this. What was it that
Speaker 1: you wanted to mention?
Speaker 2: It's just coffee debate. I had a lot of coffee,
Speaker 2: so it got a little intense. My aim is not
Speaker 2: to be that intense, like we can like so like
Speaker 2: I watched it back and was just like too much coffee. Well, so,
Speaker 2: whilst it was fun and is the point to have
Speaker 2: those kind of debates and it's fun to disagree and
Speaker 2: kind of poke and prod and push each other, I
Speaker 2: don't I never want to give the audience the impression
Speaker 2: that I'm a dick, So like I just want to
Speaker 2: like ease off the gas there a little.
Speaker 1: So I think I think I had a lot of fun.
Speaker 1: I had a lot of fun.
Speaker 2: I had a lot of fun. Just like you said,
Speaker 2: the audience is a third member in this conversation, so.
Speaker 1: I want to Ironically, I was actually watching the first
Speaker 1: half of the latest episode of Weaponized, and in the
Speaker 1: beginning of the episode they start talking about that the
Speaker 1: latest guy who had this the sighting an egg lit
Speaker 1: and Jeremy was bringing up maps and talking about angles
Speaker 1: of observation. I found it quite funny and ironic that
Speaker 1: all of a sudden they were looking at like basis
Speaker 1: of the maps of the base on Google and looking
Speaker 1: at angle of observation and where he saw it at
Speaker 1: Eglin and you know, we had just had that debate
Speaker 1: about Borland, so I don't know.
Speaker 2: What of what magic powers time I knew everything.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, I want to start today's show. Also, Well,
Speaker 1: obviously thanks for getting that out of the way, and listen.
Speaker 1: I think that's the point is, you know, we come
Speaker 1: from very different backgrounds, We come from very different places
Speaker 1: and corners of the community, and I think naturally that's
Speaker 1: that's kind of what the draw might be, is getting
Speaker 1: that angle of observation from your side, from mind side,
Speaker 1: and you know, displaying that for everyone to ask the
Speaker 1: right questions, to spoon feed them any answers. But speaking
Speaker 1: of I don't speaking of confusion. There's a documentary that
Speaker 1: was shown in March at south By Southwest all you know,
Speaker 1: every every person that went, all the big content creators.
Speaker 1: Rogan actually he's really the only one I can think
Speaker 1: of right now. Rogan. Uh, he's been talking about this
Speaker 1: Age of Disclosure documentary.
Speaker 2: Maybe yeah, rings about I could.
Speaker 1: Be wrong that that. Well, he does Tenfoil Hat and
Speaker 1: Friends with Corbels. Now Andy's a comedian, so that would
Speaker 1: make sense as well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I cut you off. You were talking about Age
Speaker 2: of disclosure.
Speaker 1: Sorry, I know what does so as filmmakers and as
Speaker 1: people who make content, I think there's a confusion among
Speaker 1: the UFO community on how phil are distributed and how
Speaker 1: they I mean, you can just debut it on YouTube,
Speaker 1: but there especially this marketing itself as having thirty four
Speaker 1: you know, former government officials, military folk, you know this,
Speaker 1: Dan Farrah, you know, having worked with Spielberg and taking
Speaker 1: on this documentary, he wants to sell this for the
Speaker 1: highest price. And I don't think people really understand that
Speaker 1: this is not disclosure does have a price. Unfortunately when
Speaker 1: it comes to be you know, the money that was
Speaker 1: put into it to produce it. Now you have to
Speaker 1: satisfy the producers who bought in originally to fund it,
Speaker 1: and you have to make that money back plus some. So,
Speaker 1: I mean a lot of people are talking about where
Speaker 1: it might go. Is that it's going to have a
Speaker 1: limited run in theaters. What's your take on age of disclosure.
Speaker 1: I want to watch the trailer. I haven't seen it
Speaker 1: in I haven't seen the newest one. But what's your
Speaker 1: take on the whole process.
Speaker 2: I think it's been a bit long winded. I do too,
Speaker 2: and the fact that so I don't know. I'm not
Speaker 2: sure how much interest there was after south By Southwest.
Speaker 2: You know, it's not something that we're like, it's not
Speaker 2: like we're anybody's on the inside of the you know,
Speaker 2: these meetings and development and everything. So I don't know,
Speaker 2: it's it's just taken a very long time. I will
Speaker 2: say this though, This new trailer doesn't have James Crapper
Speaker 2: in it, which is that's always a plus side in
Speaker 2: my boat. You know why we'll see why is that
Speaker 2: because he's terrible? I know, I know he's terrible.
Speaker 1: You said, you said, you pulled up the trailer. I
Speaker 1: want to because I want to watch it and I
Speaker 1: want to talk a little bit about age of disclosure.
Speaker 1: But I think there's there is that misconception about how
Speaker 1: things are distributed. So again, there's a process to on
Speaker 1: the film. Uh and you fund So it's this film
Speaker 1: has been funded, it's been produced, it's been edited, like,
Speaker 1: it's paid for. Now what they're looking for is the
Speaker 1: company that's going to distribute it to the masses. And
Speaker 1: I think it's either going to go Apple or Amazon.
Speaker 1: People have thought Netflix. I don't think it's Netflix. I
Speaker 1: don't think Netflix is has them. Has that ready?
Speaker 2: Have you not seen what's been going on today? No? Okay,
Speaker 2: so we have a release date and an exclusivity with Prime.
Speaker 1: Oh oh shit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they've announced the exclusivity window with Prime, which
Speaker 2: it kind of sounded whoey. But then there's someone on
Speaker 2: the executive level that Amazon made a statement, not confirming it,
Speaker 2: but saying how excited there is corporate talk. So that's
Speaker 2: saying how excited they are to ring the film and
Speaker 2: broaden their platform whatever. Well it's not, that's not like
Speaker 2: glowing endorsement, but it's it's some kind of confirmation from
Speaker 2: the executive level of Prime Video. Okay, this that there
Speaker 2: is an exclusivity deal.
Speaker 1: Do you think that was the smartest move.
Speaker 2: I think it was the only move they could get.
Speaker 2: And you know it's been this long and he so
Speaker 2: Dan Farrer created his own distribution company in order to
Speaker 2: be able to get this onto Prime because you have
Speaker 2: to do it. So it was like two weeks ago,
Speaker 2: three weeks ago he made his own publishing company called
Speaker 2: Relentless Releasing Now and now there's an exclusivity deal with Amazon,
Speaker 2: which I think he made the company probably to be
Speaker 2: able to get this deal.
Speaker 1: That's the thing. So I actually, really I was more
Speaker 1: expecting it to go Apple. I swear I was. I
Speaker 1: was expecting because I figured it was going to have
Speaker 1: a big price tag on it. But the longer it waited,
Speaker 1: the more likely that again that price goes down, because
Speaker 1: I mean it is if they win any longer, like
Speaker 1: Stratton's book's gonna come out like the big peal of
Speaker 1: this is. You know, Stratton's in it, and he makes
Speaker 1: them you know, even in the trailer there was a
Speaker 1: pretty wild claim from Stratton himself saying, you know, I've
Speaker 1: seen the bodies now you can from what you know,
Speaker 1: from what I know, he doesn't really go far past that.
Speaker 1: And you know, from what Rogan has said and other
Speaker 1: content creators that were there at By Southwest, this movie
Speaker 1: isn't disclosure. But then you got guys like you know,
Speaker 1: Tim Burchett who says like, get Ready America, And I
Speaker 1: can't tell if that's him actually saying and endorsing like
Speaker 1: this is going to change the game, or if it
Speaker 1: just I'm in this. Get Ready.
Speaker 2: It's all the work, brother, This is just pare It's
Speaker 2: literally or just Pare. Well also like yes, excited, they
Speaker 2: want you to be excited, but they're going to say
Speaker 2: that anyway, So it's not really like it's an exciting
Speaker 2: statement to say, buckle up America.
Speaker 1: Okay, but interesting, interesting, Well I didn't.
Speaker 2: I do want to. I do want to. I want
Speaker 2: to comment highlight a comment from an old, an old
Speaker 2: Totty Wabs show fan called Enzo. I actually know Enzo
Speaker 2: in real life. He's saying that something I missed out,
Speaker 2: there's a limited theatrical release that is going is gonna
Speaker 2: enable it to be Oscar called it.
Speaker 1: That's what I was. Yeah, that's in my head. I'm
Speaker 1: going they want at least a limited release.
Speaker 2: Like twenty one days in three cities.
Speaker 1: I think. Yeah, that's why I said I don't think
Speaker 1: Netflix would be a contender because I don't think Netflix
Speaker 1: likes that model. Because you know, that's not true.
Speaker 2: I actually saw recently that they are. They're actually for
Speaker 2: the first time allowing a film to do like an
Speaker 2: exclusive theatrical run before coming to Netflix.
Speaker 1: Yeah, for the first time, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's at least of being open to it. It's
Speaker 2: not like it's outside the.
Speaker 1: I believe Amazon's done it multiple times, you know, so
Speaker 1: they're kind of like that they understand the reasoning why
Speaker 1: a filmmaker want to do it, but also having the
Speaker 1: east because like, at least I don't know many people
Speaker 1: who don't have a Prime membership, like whether it's shopping
Speaker 1: just for shopping and they have a Prime membership, Like
Speaker 1: everyone has Prime at least like a lot of people,
Speaker 1: a lot of people I know, and a lot of
Speaker 1: people in the market that I know have Amazon Prime,
Speaker 1: Like it's it's a thing that everybody has, especially after
Speaker 1: the pandemic days. So I thought it would be Like
Speaker 1: I said, I thought Amazon and Apple I didn't know
Speaker 1: is actually confirmed? So what what's it?
Speaker 3: Was?
Speaker 1: The date November twenty four.
Speaker 2: So I have I have the article? Should just pull
Speaker 2: up the article? Yeah, okay, do share this.
Speaker 1: Time said it's a bold move. Con it is. It
Speaker 1: is a bold view, So get the spanner out of
Speaker 1: the way.
Speaker 2: The Age of Disclosure, an explosive documentary that makes a
Speaker 2: strong case for the existence of non human intelligent life
Speaker 2: unidentified the anomalous phenomena of visiting our planet, will get
Speaker 2: a robust Oscar qualifying run and worldwide release on Prime video.
Speaker 2: Film directed by Dan Farrer, will be released theatrically on
Speaker 2: November twenty first in York City, not New York City
Speaker 2: and York City, Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and stream the
Speaker 2: same day on Prime video. And it's also gonna I guess,
Speaker 2: like what was it? Did you say? How many how
Speaker 2: many days? How many days does the film have to
Speaker 2: be in theaters to qualify someone in the chat find
Speaker 2: I think it.
Speaker 1: Would have to be at least at least a fourteen
Speaker 1: to twenty one day run.
Speaker 2: I'd say twenty one days.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that sounds right, That sounds about right.
Speaker 2: She takes them up to Christmas, and then they would
Speaker 2: cinemas are closed over Christmas anyway?
Speaker 1: Not here? Oh yeah, it's like you guys, to.
Speaker 2: Be fair, they just closed. They just close the cinemas here.
Speaker 2: So like, seriously, I I don't have a local cinema anymore.
Speaker 2: I can't go to the films. That's insane, sucks. Like
Speaker 2: the closest one is like a thirty five minute ride.
Speaker 1: Interesting. Interesting, well you know here, like it's like a
Speaker 1: kind of it's funny you say, because it's like a
Speaker 1: tradition for my family we go to the movies.
Speaker 2: On Christmas, Like because I mean they probably are they
Speaker 2: probably are just I just don't think of them as open.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Star Wars like always since the Force the way
Speaker 1: bar Wars has been doing Christmas releases. But yeah, so
Speaker 1: pull that the pull that trailer wrap. Let's let's give
Speaker 1: it a whole watch of Rooty.
Speaker 2: Yes Shore this time instead. All right? Are we are we? So?
Speaker 2: Are we fair using this?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 2: So we have to stop every twenty seconds and talk about.
Speaker 1: No, no, no go if they if they tag it, I'll
Speaker 1: I'll clip it out.
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, we'll lose the we'll lose the life
Speaker 2: chot or whatever. All right, I'm hitting play.
Speaker 5: I've had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace
Speaker 5: over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours.
Speaker 2: These are other worldly things that are performing maneuvers that
Speaker 2: haven't been seen.
Speaker 1: Save videos.
Speaker 2: I have seen it in my own eyes, non human
Speaker 2: craft and non human beings. This is so secret.
Speaker 3: There have been very few people in our entire government
Speaker 3: that have been allowed or provided access to it.
Speaker 5: Even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis.
Speaker 5: But that begins to ramp out of control.
Speaker 1: It's not acceptable to have secret parts of government that
Speaker 1: no one ever sees. People have been hurt protecting and
Speaker 1: hiding this information.
Speaker 5: Some people claim it would cost them their lives, and
Speaker 5: they spoke out about these things.
Speaker 3: You had information being locked away that could change the
Speaker 3: trajectory for species.
Speaker 5: This is the biggest discovery in human history.
Speaker 1: How many takes for that one? All right, dude, I mean,
Speaker 1: I'll say this, the cinematography in it, the editing style,
Speaker 1: the kind of official nature that it that it does have. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it. It feels like it's going to
Speaker 1: be monumental. However, I just I don't think that that
Speaker 1: any film. I mean, here's what Here's the scenario I
Speaker 1: could see, right, is this movie debuts and then so
Speaker 1: it's through word of mouth, the buzz gets like deafening.
Speaker 1: General public interest is at a fever pitch. Right, Atlas
Speaker 1: is coming in. People are talking about Atlas a velobes
Speaker 1: on every news channel that will literally air him. You know,
Speaker 1: everyone's talking Aliens. Spielberg's making this new disclosure uh movie,
Speaker 1: which I've heard I can't say, you know, I'm not
Speaker 1: afraid to say it. I've heard from my own back
Speaker 1: channels in Hollywood that the new Spielberg movie is going
Speaker 1: to be set in the same world as Close Encounters
Speaker 1: of the Third kind. It's going to be called Disclosure,
Speaker 1: set in the world after the moment and after the
Speaker 1: events of Close Encounters that the third All right, so
Speaker 1: it's going to be a post disclosure film. Does that?
Speaker 1: Does that make sense?
Speaker 2: That's actually I feel like that's like the only place
Speaker 2: that Spielberg could really take it. He's done the he's
Speaker 2: done the Benevolent One, he's done et he's done Word
Speaker 2: of the World. It's like, yep, So that makes a
Speaker 2: lot of sense with actually with reports I heard where
Speaker 2: there was a nun who's in who you know, lives
Speaker 2: in a church or a monastery. Spielberg's film was filming there.
Speaker 2: They were filming, so obviously it's going to touch on
Speaker 2: religion and stuff. So that actually does tie in to that.
Speaker 1: So yeah, yeah, So I wouldn't be surprised if that
Speaker 1: because now when that got there's a bunch of headlines
Speaker 1: for it. When it got it came out and like
Speaker 1: Luna was sharing it and was like, you know, Disclosures coming,
Speaker 1: and you know she's you just got to ask yourself
Speaker 1: like why why? And I think there is this notion
Speaker 1: that you know, the UFO world is kind of always
Speaker 1: known or at least talked about that. Lawmakers and policymakers
Speaker 1: and you know, people in the government and military. You know,
Speaker 1: they do talk to Hollywood and they do exchange information,
Speaker 1: and you know, by virtuous of association, some of that
Speaker 1: stuff ends up in the films you go see, and
Speaker 1: you know, whether you want to call that propaganda or
Speaker 1: you know, slipping in the truth. You know, a lot
Speaker 1: of sci fi I think has been riddled with these.
Speaker 2: Little sci fi I mean zero Doc thirty had a
Speaker 2: lot of details of the assassinate Osama bin Laden which
Speaker 2: when not public, and that movie got Catherine Bigelow in
Speaker 2: quite a bit of trouble, Yeah, because she included so
Speaker 2: much like real world detail that Yeah, watching it, you
Speaker 2: wouldn't know that that's actually, like really what happened, but
Speaker 2: it is. And it pissed the people off who were
Speaker 2: supposed to keep that secret.
Speaker 1: So, yeah, did that. That woman that it's based on,
Speaker 1: they still don't know who it is. They still no
Speaker 1: one knows who that woman is.
Speaker 2: And it's not one woman, it's it's a there's a documentary.
Speaker 2: There's a group of there was a group of women
Speaker 2: in size.
Speaker 1: Like a group of analysts that just a group of
Speaker 1: group of analysts woke up every day and literally woke
Speaker 1: up every day and breathed and lived like uh.
Speaker 2: Like Jessicatin's character is an amalgamation of these analysts. It's
Speaker 2: it's like an analogue. It's just a compilation of different
Speaker 2: different storybits put into a character. Because obviously you can't
Speaker 2: have if you want to center the movie around someone,
Speaker 2: you can't have it be an entire team because then
Speaker 2: it gets too big in scope with everything else to do.
Speaker 2: So they slim it down to just one character who's
Speaker 2: like the Mary Sue of the intelligence world, who can oh,
Speaker 2: I know where our summer is? And Jason Clark's like, okay.
Speaker 1: You know, I'll say I'll say this. I just stuttered
Speaker 1: like a real hard Uh. You know if if if
Speaker 1: interviews that I conduct here in studio aren't always going
Speaker 1: to be UFO like disclosure base, I do want to
Speaker 1: do some like military and for like, uh, if anyone
Speaker 1: watches Julian Dorry or like Danny Jones, they have a
Speaker 1: lot of military like x C I A x x FBI,
Speaker 1: I do want to have some of those conversations. And
Speaker 1: because I do find spycraft very interesting thing. So it's
Speaker 1: it's something I do want to branch out into. But
Speaker 1: it's also an easy way to kind of go back
Speaker 1: into disclosure because UFOs is such UFOs and UAPs and
Speaker 1: you know, arguably even the paranormal and consciousness more consciousness
Speaker 1: based stuff. You know, those people tend to be interested
Speaker 1: in that kind of topic. So I think it's an
Speaker 1: easy bridge to gap. And I bring it up because
Speaker 1: this movie, this Age of Disclosure movie is touting that
Speaker 1: has thirty four you know, a military government officials now
Speaker 1: scrap off the top, as gonna say, scrape off the
Speaker 1: top like Birchet, you know, probably Luna Mace and then Elizondo,
Speaker 1: Jase Stratt, like everyone that we see in the trailer
Speaker 1: scratch them out. That still leaves a good amount of
Speaker 1: people that we don't know, like.
Speaker 2: At least twenty people, right, I mean, so who could
Speaker 2: that conceive it?
Speaker 1: My question to the audience and to you, Sidy. You know,
Speaker 1: the scenario I pitched is you know, it's spreading word
Speaker 1: of mouth, you know, combining with good timing. Maybe the
Speaker 1: timing was I don't know, essential uh, you know, I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe that was do you think you can
Speaker 1: move the needle.
Speaker 2: Here's my counter question, which we'll answer your question. Do
Speaker 2: you think that if the movie was immediately picked up
Speaker 2: itself by Southwest, the UAP Disclosure Act would have passed?
Speaker 2: Because releasing it after it's failed for the fourth time
Speaker 2: just seems kind of like.
Speaker 1: That's a good ques, you know what, that's a good question.
Speaker 1: That is a good question. Whow Okay, don't don't want
Speaker 1: to go there. I don't know. I don't I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'd hate to suggests. I I'd hate to suggest anything
Speaker 1: or get anyone upset or mad in this context because
Speaker 1: I think the UAP Disclosure Act it's interesting when you
Speaker 1: start looking at it, and you start looking at you know,
Speaker 1: who publicly is willing to talk about it, but then
Speaker 1: when it really comes time to you know, kind of
Speaker 1: slam the gavel down, if you will, who don't do it?
Speaker 1: They're also the same people that, like when the Epstein
Speaker 1: vote goes out, right, like only only two Republicans voted
Speaker 1: to release the Epstein files.
Speaker 2: As a non American, what the is going on? What
Speaker 2: you guys? Okay, do you need a hug? Like?
Speaker 1: What's going on? Is going on?
Speaker 2: Like you guys, you look, you look schizophrenic as a
Speaker 2: nation when when you do this ship and we when
Speaker 2: the whole world's kind of watching you, guys look insane,
Speaker 2: and it's like that would never happen here. Yeah, well okay,
Speaker 2: maybe in the UK it probably would happen, but like
Speaker 2: other civilized societies much matter, I think it would happen.
Speaker 1: But yeah, it does it. But that's why. And you
Speaker 1: know what, this is a little bit of a segue here.
Speaker 1: I saw that you thought and and listen, it's cool,
Speaker 1: Like just remember, it's cool. Right, We're good. I've found
Speaker 1: a you know, about to go in on you. That's
Speaker 1: what I've That's what that means. So you called out
Speaker 1: a guy that I have been really fascinated with lately, Yes,
Speaker 1: and I have been. I think he's the only now,
Speaker 1: given whatever you're about to say, given whatever intro, you know, whatever.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to stay come.
Speaker 1: Whatever company he's kept in the past, I think Jason
Speaker 1: does have a very good kind of foundational look at
Speaker 1: the UFO phenomena. He really and this is something I've
Speaker 1: been saying, and I guess it's maybe the reason I
Speaker 1: like him so much right now is because when listening
Speaker 1: to him, He's bringing up a lot of points that
Speaker 1: have raised for so long, like that, what are the
Speaker 1: chances that the guys that are running or the people
Speaker 1: that I should say the deep state quote unquote, that
Speaker 1: are running these Epstein's and Ditties of the world are
Speaker 1: what are the chances that are those aren't the same
Speaker 1: people that are keeping this technology secret and hiding it
Speaker 1: from the public and you know, going around and making
Speaker 1: sure that certain politicians vote in certain ways. Right. UAPDA
Speaker 1: does in fact come up Why is the Ohio congressman
Speaker 1: the biggest challenge when it comes to passing anything with
Speaker 1: the uap related Because because, yes, because of private aerospace
Speaker 1: and the ability for lobbying campaigns and all these donors
Speaker 1: to basically influence like the the whole fucking system is broken.
Speaker 1: It's so broken. And Georgiohnny's bringing up a lot of
Speaker 1: good points about why, Like, listen, you know, I think
Speaker 1: these are the same people, and he's not afraid to
Speaker 1: go in those dark corners and am I saying everyone's perfect? No,
Speaker 1: far from it, But he raises a very valid point
Speaker 1: about how a lot of these early like the Adamskis
Speaker 1: and how they really had cia handlers, and why have
Speaker 1: we been fed this Nordics and you know archetypal alien
Speaker 1: grays like angel looking beings, and then what you would
Speaker 1: considered to be a demon looking being, something that has
Speaker 1: no soul? Right that that that's.
Speaker 2: The biggest I think I answer that question.
Speaker 1: But you see what I'm going like, Georgiohnny is talking
Speaker 1: about a lot of things that I've been asking about,
Speaker 1: like why did we shed our fur only need to
Speaker 1: need pelts in the winter. Why is our biological clock
Speaker 1: more tuned to Mars than it is to Earth?
Speaker 2: Why are we the oil We're so our biological clocks
Speaker 2: are not in tune with the Earth? Are and chowne
Speaker 2: with Mars?
Speaker 1: Yeah, our actual biological clock is more attuned to the
Speaker 1: Martian day than it is to the Earth.
Speaker 2: What qualitative data are people using to make that?
Speaker 1: It's that compounded with many other things, like the fact
Speaker 1: that we think, you know, we could be planet hopping
Speaker 1: and we find the chemical the zion one the big
Speaker 1: scar across Mars, Like there's a we we could have
Speaker 1: been of you know, not of Earth originally, but of Mars,
Speaker 1: and we'd planted hopped here after some sort of cataclysm.
Speaker 1: So he's kind of drawing lines and he is making
Speaker 1: some assumptions and speculation, but he makes it clear when
Speaker 1: he's speculating. Okay, why was that? Why were the Nazis
Speaker 1: so obsessed with the Aryan race? The white blonde haired person?
Speaker 1: Why is why? Why is Epstein? Why is it that
Speaker 1: they were interested in like Julane Maxwell, all of her handlers,
Speaker 1: like her boys that she would keep. They were all
Speaker 1: of Swedish descent, and like there's one of them that
Speaker 1: talks about it about how he would shower and Glene
Speaker 1: Mack like he would shower in the in the house
Speaker 1: and like, you know how your hair goes into the drain,
Speaker 1: Like his hair would be missing from the drain when
Speaker 1: he got home, and you, like you start asking these questions.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying that might be very very I just
Speaker 1: might have dropped so much.
Speaker 2: But where do I even start with that?
Speaker 1: All right, well, let's rock it back to starting with
Speaker 1: Georgianni just in general.
Speaker 2: Okay, just for context, So I have you know, I
Speaker 2: have to go through the context of why you're you're
Speaker 2: you're putting to georgiourney to me because of what I said,
Speaker 2: I pointed out correctly that about eight years ago, he
Speaker 2: worked with Richard Spencer, the Neo NATI, to try and
Speaker 2: take over and announce ownership of the alt right, which
Speaker 2: he then since says he walked away and it was
Speaker 2: a big mistake. I think it backfired pr wise. I
Speaker 2: think that's what happened, honestly. And then I had a
Speaker 2: couple of years ago I looked into him and I
Speaker 2: read he's got like this manifesto called Prometheism, which is
Speaker 2: just it wouldn't be out of place on Guya dot com, just.
Speaker 1: Saying, Okay, I think that's fair. That's fair.
Speaker 2: So my my main problem though, is the creeping fascism
Speaker 2: people like that you've got. You've got to keep an
Speaker 2: eye on them and check them.
Speaker 1: But he's I see, I don't understand where you're coming
Speaker 1: from on this because he's on these shows talking and
Speaker 1: bringing it to light that we are being fed this this.
Speaker 2: I mean, honest, I don't listen to shows because he
Speaker 2: worked with Richard Spencer, the Neo Nazi, Like this automatic
Speaker 2: I'm not clicking that video because I know that that
Speaker 2: guy worked with the Neo Nazi, Like why would why
Speaker 2: would I do that?
Speaker 1: I will say this, it was very interesting. In his
Speaker 1: most recent appearance on Jesse Michaels that the entire No,
Speaker 1: I don't know whose choice this was, who's set design
Speaker 1: this was inspired by I'm assuming it was set up
Speaker 1: by Jesse and his team, But it was like all
Speaker 1: white and like gave really like a weird heavy vibe.
Speaker 1: Like there was this like carpet that was only there
Speaker 1: for camera depth that you could tell, but it was
Speaker 1: also white on the ta. Now I'm not sure if
Speaker 1: it was just like I said said, no, this was
Speaker 1: a very new looking like not not the regular.
Speaker 2: Jesse Michael house.
Speaker 1: There's no way, dude, go look at the video. It's
Speaker 1: it is odd that it's filmed that way. But again
Speaker 1: I don't think that's Georgiohnny himself making that decision because
Speaker 1: it's for American Alchemy and Jesse Michaels. It was just weird.
Speaker 1: It was hard to watch because it's just constant whiteness.
Speaker 1: Like the whole background, there's no nothing, no thing, literally
Speaker 1: it's just white. It looks like that movie that that
Speaker 1: like remember when in the in the Matrix when like
Speaker 1: the guns are about to come, like that white emptiness,
Speaker 1: And that's what it felt like. But Georgiohnny, I think
Speaker 1: it is. I think, you know, if he would, if
Speaker 1: he agrees, like I, I'm going to bring him to
Speaker 1: the studio. I want to talk to him. I don't think.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying that he should be canceled. My point was,
Speaker 2: I don't I mean, I don't watch this stuff, but
Speaker 2: I haven't seen anybody else talking about it, so I
Speaker 2: assume it hasn't been brought up. No, I don't see
Speaker 2: anybody checking him on this, Like he's talking all of
Speaker 2: this subject all the subjects he talks about, these are
Speaker 2: all things that have come from this ideology called Prometheism
Speaker 2: that he carries. So it's like interrogating the ideas without
Speaker 2: looking at the underlying like ideology and philosophy there. That's
Speaker 2: one level, but there's also unless someone can it can
Speaker 2: time code and send it to me because I don't
Speaker 2: have time to sit and watch eight episodes or whatever.
Speaker 2: I don't think. I don't think anybody's checked him and gone, hey,
Speaker 2: like eight years ago, you were literally trying to take
Speaker 2: over the right, So like, what's going on, buddy, Okay,
Speaker 2: that's all I want. I'm not saying, like, cancel him
Speaker 2: and talk to him or anything like that. But I
Speaker 2: think he should be interrogated on this stuff.
Speaker 1: And can't use that word. Though you cannot use that.
Speaker 2: You can interrogate. I interrogate and interrogate ideas, interrogating events
Speaker 2: that happened. All right, I see, I don't mean. I
Speaker 2: don't mean it in like the I think that there
Speaker 2: is a negative connotation or outcome to it, but I'm
Speaker 2: interrogating the idea of that. It's it's it's an English
Speaker 2: way of saying.
Speaker 1: Okay, well, okay here when you say interrogate, I I want.
Speaker 2: To be clear. I'm not saying like he has done
Speaker 2: anything wrong or.
Speaker 1: Okay, so you know, anything like that. But you know,
Speaker 1: given that, I think there are many, many, many individuals
Speaker 1: in the UFO community that you could arguably pull up
Speaker 1: something not similar but like.
Speaker 2: Not as egregious. But I mean, yeah, and I think
Speaker 2: a lot of those people. I wouldn't consider myself like
Speaker 2: a leftist.
Speaker 1: But I don't even see the connection that you're like,
Speaker 1: I don't.
Speaker 2: There is a lot of connections between the fascist right
Speaker 2: and euthology. There's a lot of linkage through the New
Speaker 2: Age world and like the real society and oh, Germany
Speaker 2: had secret space programs, and they're making diaglogue, you know,
Speaker 2: all mythology that came from the seventies from neo Nazi groups.
Speaker 1: I see where you're going with this.
Speaker 2: So if you actually trace the history of a lot
Speaker 2: of this stuff back, a lot of this kind German
Speaker 2: ideal ideation of trying to make the Nazis look like
Speaker 2: they were more successful, it's almost like it's a response
Speaker 2: to the American exceptionalism that drove this whiteness of the
Speaker 2: Nordics and all of this, all of these alien races
Speaker 2: that came back in the fifties when America was a
Speaker 2: very white Christian nation in a Cold War looking to
Speaker 2: have a marketing age over its enemy. That's why they
Speaker 2: had spacemen in flying sauces and all of this stuff.
Speaker 1: Valiant Thor, right.
Speaker 2: Valiant Thor is literally like a comic, a real life
Speaker 2: comic book character to promote American exceptionalism and white America essentially.
Speaker 1: But then they're like, okay, but by the same token,
Speaker 1: people like why why are we not asking questions? Who's
Speaker 1: the guy that built the the what?
Speaker 2: Echo is making a very very good point. It's called
Speaker 2: the new age to alt right pipeline and there's books
Speaker 2: about it. Oh well, so if you get stuck, if
Speaker 2: you get stuck in to the New Age world like Gia,
Speaker 2: Gia is a massive pipeline to being exposed to like eugenics,
Speaker 2: stuff like the ancient Aliens, anunarchy, all of this stuff
Speaker 2: is like white centric.
Speaker 1: What are you talking The Annaki comes from the Sumerian tablets.
Speaker 1: That's like from the cradle of civilization. They're clearly not white, right,
Speaker 1: that's clearly I don't see how that gets thrown in there.
Speaker 2: I mean, maybe not white.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I mean I think that's like.
Speaker 2: The Nordics, like the My main point here is the
Speaker 2: early alien races, especially the ones that you brought up
Speaker 2: as Jason bringing up these questions. I've thought about those
Speaker 2: questions too, and it's it's not like a profound thing,
Speaker 2: it's it was literally just white Christian America. As Christianity
Speaker 2: was waning, sci fi went on the rise because people
Speaker 2: weren't afraid to kind of go outside tenets of Christianity
Speaker 2: to find entertainment and whatever. And at the same time,
Speaker 2: you're in the Cold War of Russia that wants to
Speaker 2: promote American exceptionalism through marketing. And at the same time,
Speaker 2: you've got sci fi going everywhere, so you mix and
Speaker 2: you're right, you mix all those in the part and
Speaker 2: you get white savior aliens. That's why I keep saying
Speaker 2: they're very white, because they are. They're white. It's almost
Speaker 2: the same as like the Aryan genetic thing. But that's
Speaker 2: where that's where the linkage comes in. Is because the
Speaker 2: the the whiteness of like the Nordics. That's why, like
Speaker 2: the neo Nazi movement has kind of stolen the idea
Speaker 2: of like the Galactic Federation and the Nordics and and
Speaker 2: and from the New Age because it's similar. Look if
Speaker 2: you get.
Speaker 1: What I mean, Okay, Okay, here's my thing. Okay, what
Speaker 1: if what like what if it were like why were
Speaker 1: the Nazis so fixated on blonde haired, blue eyed people
Speaker 1: and that that you know, we that build and type
Speaker 1: of person like you know.
Speaker 2: Why type of person was not Jewish.
Speaker 1: Specifically, like why why would you want to eliminate? Like
Speaker 1: I feel like what the at least what I'm getting
Speaker 1: out of what Georgianni is saying right is is he's
Speaker 1: he's pointing at it and saying, why are these why
Speaker 1: do they want like, why is that seemingly what we've
Speaker 1: been told for so long is that there's these angeled
Speaker 1: Like he's he's pointing it out. I can't see why
Speaker 1: he would be promoting it at Like he seems to
Speaker 1: be the one that at least now is calling it.
Speaker 2: Out because Okay, that's that's good.
Speaker 1: He's he's brought that to my attention, right, that this
Speaker 1: whole the idea that there's the two races and that
Speaker 1: one is the other, one is angels, one is demons,
Speaker 1: and I mean, I.
Speaker 2: Mean I haven't heard it described like that. I heard
Speaker 2: the New Age has a lot more races going on, right,
Speaker 2: It's not just this good bad dichotomy's.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah.
Speaker 2: This is where the whole idea of the Galactic Federation
Speaker 2: comes from, is that there's there's like twenty seven different
Speaker 2: species and they're all there's a little different law and
Speaker 2: whatever going on, none of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I I that I didn't want to spin that out,
Speaker 1: but I do think there are like a lot of
Speaker 1: things that that that do fascinate me in the terms
Speaker 1: of like what's that, what's that thing that I went
Speaker 1: to it? Oh God, I can't even remember it was
Speaker 1: built at like in near Palm Springs, it was in
Speaker 1: it's in California. It's that it was supposed to be
Speaker 1: a UFO integer chon, thank you who it was.
Speaker 2: It wasn't a U. It was a healing that's right, right,
Speaker 2: right right.
Speaker 1: But that guy literally was a Nazi sympathizer. Like he
Speaker 1: he had his didn't he have like people his family
Speaker 1: living under a rock of of a known Nazi sympathizer
Speaker 1: who ended up blowing himself up and blew his brains
Speaker 1: all over the wall of this wint Stones ask house
Speaker 1: that he had his family in. And then George Fantasal
Speaker 1: buys the place, puts his family in there and starts
Speaker 1: building the integratron, and then him and a Dabsky are
Speaker 1: are They both seemingly have these intelligence connections, one having
Speaker 1: a CIA handler and the other, you know, being some
Speaker 1: sort of like you know.
Speaker 2: You're interesting. Giant Rock wasn't airport like you need like
Speaker 2: back then like now, it's just it's just a plot
Speaker 2: of land. You can drive up and see the rock
Speaker 2: that you lived on. But back then so ridiculous where
Speaker 2: they held the the the UFO, I mean literally literally
Speaker 2: literally the rock he lived on in fact, I'm going
Speaker 2: to get some photos to illustrate what I'm talking about.
Speaker 2: Nineteen fifty three. Sorry it's very loud.
Speaker 1: But so Georgianni is, So I'm gonna mute you for
Speaker 1: a second while you type like a my coworker, God,
Speaker 1: my coworker types. She like has one of those keyboards
Speaker 1: that's meant to click. It drives me crazy, like I
Speaker 1: have to go in the other room. It's wild. So
Speaker 1: what's your point with all this?
Speaker 2: So I just wanted to illustrate. So back then, here's
Speaker 2: the rock, Here's where he lived under the rock.
Speaker 1: And so you know what Nazi sympathizer blew himself up
Speaker 1: in that rock? Right?
Speaker 2: I did not know that. I probably I probably did,
Speaker 2: but it was it's not like super important to the
Speaker 2: idea of what when I was. It wasn't important to
Speaker 2: what I was doing.
Speaker 1: But but yeah, so Georgianni is bringing that up, saying,
Speaker 1: you know why is is?
Speaker 2: This is what I was going to say in response
Speaker 2: to that. I find this is why I bring up
Speaker 2: the fact it was an airport. Back then, you had
Speaker 2: like a fledgling intelligence service, and you've got a guy
Speaker 2: with a very private airfield out in the desert's perfect.
Speaker 2: It's very useful, right, that's very useful. That guy starts
Speaker 2: pushing stories that it inevitably pushed the idea of white
Speaker 2: savior aliens and I guess American exceptionalism because he's the
Speaker 2: one having contact now, so the the split between him
Speaker 2: and Roger what's his face? It's in the beginning of
Speaker 2: the documentary. I made a Darcy wear I honestly can't remember.
Speaker 1: Which for anyone doesn't know, it's a Dark Alliance available
Speaker 1: anywhere you get your films, Amazon, Apple, all those places
Speaker 1: by it.
Speaker 2: Now, that was a fantastic promoter.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'll take that check.
Speaker 2: So he he he ended up having like a big
Speaker 2: sp lit with this guy. And this is where the
Speaker 2: Ashtark command comes from. So Ashtark command was actually I know,
Speaker 2: we were kind of off track of Georgiohnny book.
Speaker 1: No, it's actually all along the same So.
Speaker 2: I actually this is why a bookended Dark Alliance one
Speaker 2: with this story when when I was writing. Because the
Speaker 2: idea of like ownership over contact narratives is something that
Speaker 2: that film investigates with Corey Good and David Wilcock, especially
Speaker 2: Corey Good and his his want to trademark Space Program,
Speaker 2: the Secret Space all this stuff. So back then Van
Speaker 2: Tassell had a friend who was like, he was publishing
Speaker 2: like Interplanetary Weekly, which was a publication.
Speaker 1: And probably under mocking Bird this is another thing.
Speaker 2: But he he wanted to he wanted to like monetize it.
Speaker 2: He wanted to push it out to the masses. He
Speaker 2: wanted big billboards. And Van Tassel was more like, no,
Speaker 2: I think we should just keep it more humble, like
Speaker 2: it's about introspection and connection like and that split is
Speaker 2: how it's basically this this this other.
Speaker 1: Guy Roger Eger. No, I can't I can't remember I
Speaker 1: can't I remember the last name.
Speaker 4: Anyway anyway, so he he, he goes off and creates
Speaker 4: Ashtark Command, and then Van Tassel had to release a
Speaker 4: big statement saying this Ashtark command has nothing to do
Speaker 4: with my own ashtar, which again is an echo of
Speaker 4: Corey good saying I'm the only person that can have
Speaker 4: contact with these beings.
Speaker 1: Which is so can we can? Can I bookend here
Speaker 1: that Corey is such he is so greedy, that he's
Speaker 1: so stupid, because dude, when someone comes up and says, hey, dude,
Speaker 1: I was in the Secret space program to twenty year back,
Speaker 1: fucking Urah dude, you embrace that instead this fucking idiot
Speaker 1: like can't even look the guy in the eye right,
Speaker 1: Like it's so weird, Like, ah, dude, it drives me insane,
Speaker 1: how stupid and greedy he is. Like you should have
Speaker 1: leaned it. If you were really trying to sell this,
Speaker 1: you should have leaned in, and you should have said, yeah,
Speaker 1: you were in fucking twenty and back. This is fucking great,
Speaker 1: we have another witness. Let's lie together.
Speaker 2: What yes, if your primary motivation wasn't the ultimate ownership
Speaker 2: of that narrative, which that was his plan the whole time, allegedly, But.
Speaker 1: Then it's worth the thing. You see what I'm see
Speaker 1: him going though, Like if it ultimately comes out that
Speaker 1: it's his intellectual property and no one else could possibly
Speaker 1: be involved, Well, yet he cites other people being involved.
Speaker 2: Right, but if he if he allowed other people to
Speaker 2: use his IP and it came out that they made
Speaker 2: it up again put him at risk. So I get it.
Speaker 2: It's stupid. I get it. And if you're trying to
Speaker 2: protect an IP, it makes sense if you're trying to
Speaker 2: get your story out there, because it's true then yeah,
Speaker 2: obviously you'd embrace it, you'd be you'd own it and
Speaker 2: be looking for other people. There was a moment early
Speaker 2: on in Cosmic Disclosure where he said, eventually I want
Speaker 2: other people to be coming out and talking about their
Speaker 2: own contact with these beings, and then when they did,
Speaker 2: he like ruined their careers or you know, like Jason
Speaker 2: Rice literally lost his job at NASA for to bew
Speaker 2: Like whether it's true or not, I doubt, but they
Speaker 2: brigaded the fact he spoke out on Gaya, and then
Speaker 2: guy Corey and his group allegedly went to NASA and
Speaker 2: brigaded them until they quietly let Jason go. And Jason
Speaker 2: has only been seen like a handful of time since.
Speaker 2: Really yeah, he pops up at conferences every now and
Speaker 2: then it's like, oh shit, that's Jason.
Speaker 1: Right, So that part of it had always seemed very,
Speaker 1: very stupid to me, that he had kind of almost
Speaker 1: self sabotaged because then you know, he ends up in court.
Speaker 1: But yeah, anyway, I just you know what I find
Speaker 1: really like really bizarre about this whole thing, you know,
Speaker 1: because Corey Good has kind of went away for the
Speaker 1: most part, like people know, like people know that he's
Speaker 1: bullshit enough to the fact enough at least there are faction.
Speaker 1: I understand that there's like this weird faction of people
Speaker 1: that that definitely probably still stand with Gory to some degree.
Speaker 1: Uh maybe some that are private. But why how is
Speaker 1: David Wilcox still profiting off of this nonsensical I.
Speaker 2: Think you know, well, I mean that the original wepisodes
Speaker 2: across my disclosure were taken off of Gaya when they
Speaker 2: left the movies. That profit nobody's been paid out from
Speaker 2: those movies. Like that's why there's all these court cases.
Speaker 2: So he doesn't get profit from Corey. His main source
Speaker 2: of profit is YouTube.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, and doesn't he have hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: us like watchers and they're always giving donations and so.
Speaker 2: He's not talking about Corey though. So he's getting a lot,
Speaker 2: he gets money, but like he's selling this new age bullshit,
Speaker 2: but he's not he's not making money of Corey.
Speaker 1: Specifically understood, I'm saying Corey only comes into the picture
Speaker 1: with David. So how is David not implicated in the
Speaker 1: Corey good like grift? If you will like what I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously it did end up hurting David. You know, like
Speaker 1: most of his actions. I mean, he kind of built
Speaker 1: a career around this, this this idea that the world
Speaker 1: was gonna end in twenty twelve and or at least
Speaker 1: our content. You know, you know the story better than
Speaker 1: I do, and we should probably move on in a minute.
Speaker 1: But how I mean so, I guess I did maybe
Speaker 1: answer my own question because he did lose like the
Speaker 1: ancient alien stuff. He lost like any credibility and like
Speaker 1: actual documentary filmmaking with other people in the disclosure movement
Speaker 1: because his name had become tainted, so that relegated him
Speaker 1: just to the faces of YouTube and new age you have.
Speaker 2: As soon as he hit Geya, the only like he
Speaker 2: couldn't get into other things once he was on Guy,
Speaker 2: it was like they locked him down. It probably also
Speaker 2: controlled could It's probably we couldn't just go do other documentaries.
Speaker 2: That's why they waited until after they left GIA to
Speaker 2: release Above Top Secret and the cosmet oh Secret, right right?
Speaker 1: Or yeah Majestic Yeah, which you know again, like it's
Speaker 1: kind of crazy to me thinking about it, because you know,
Speaker 1: I really do eat up all like the UFO documentaries,
Speaker 1: and for a while I was watching all of them
Speaker 1: it didn't matter, like it didn't matter who was making it.
Speaker 1: You know. I wouldn't go back to like the Strange
Speaker 1: Harvest Days, but anything that was like two thousand post
Speaker 1: two thousand and one I would. I would watch and
Speaker 1: just like whether it was popcorn movie watching it or
Speaker 1: I was consuming it all and that stuff interested me.
Speaker 1: But I never got to the point of like subscribing
Speaker 1: to Gaya and don't like donating to David Wilcox or
Speaker 1: anything like that. And I know that some people's lives,
Speaker 1: like some people's lives were ruined in the course of
Speaker 1: this whole secret Space program nonsense. So it like we
Speaker 1: have to be cognizant as a community that there are
Speaker 1: people that are trying to take advantage of you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And that is a good segue because the next thing
Speaker 1: that I want to talk about is something that it's
Speaker 1: it's hard to talk about, but it's also easy to
Speaker 1: talk about. And the reason I say it's hard to
Speaker 1: talk about is because it's almost like if you talk
Speaker 1: about it, you're giving it merit. We're in one of
Speaker 1: those situations, uh, the UFO community. And the reason I
Speaker 1: bring it up is because I know Jene Sticcko and
Speaker 1: a video came out on ex Twitter whatever you call
Speaker 1: it of Jean who had met up with lou Elizondo
Speaker 1: and I've Jeane called me and texted me like right
Speaker 1: after it happened, and I was like, oh, that's cool whatever.
Speaker 1: But little did I know there was a video and
Speaker 1: there was It went out on Disco Disclosure tonight. I
Speaker 1: think it's the show with Thomas Wessler and Mike something
Speaker 1: whistling mic on X and essentially there's like this war
Speaker 1: of the narratives going around, and this is something I
Speaker 1: think that has been a very big presence in the
Speaker 1: on And I want to stress this the online UFO
Speaker 1: community because nowhere, to my knowledge, on paper or in
Speaker 1: real life, is any of this talked about. I've been
Speaker 1: to contact in the desert, I've been to different conferences.
Speaker 1: None of this is ever really playing. I've never seen it,
Speaker 1: you know, as a presentation or this or that. It's
Speaker 1: seemingly only on X and the UFO quote unquote community.
Speaker 1: And I don't say that because like red Pandicuala or Tupacabra,
Speaker 1: they don't make videos and they don't I'm not saying that,
Speaker 1: and I'm not saying Alizado them theyn't make videos and
Speaker 1: aren't relevant. I'm saying, the drama of trying, you know,
Speaker 1: to get each other deplatform, demonetize, I mean, and the
Speaker 1: illegality of it. I'm really unclear as to what is
Speaker 1: going on. It's very hard to follow. And it seems
Speaker 1: like the UFO communities almost and I say this like
Speaker 1: really with the most sincerity. It seems like we can
Speaker 1: be our own worst enemy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And so the video in the video, it's Jane sitting
Speaker 1: down with Elizondo and I know where they were because
Speaker 1: Gene told me and he sent me the picture and
Speaker 1: I knew where they were, and he ivan handled the
Speaker 1: lawyer and Jane, you know, they made Lewis in town
Speaker 1: and he's like, oh, I'll go see him. So then
Speaker 1: Geene is good friends with Mike and Tom of Disclosure
Speaker 1: Tonight and he call like did like a live call
Speaker 1: in on Disclosure tonight because that's how that's run. And
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's really just caused a lot of waves.
Speaker 1: Did you see the video?
Speaker 2: Nope? Oh I don't watch.
Speaker 1: Just slammed a brick wall right there.
Speaker 2: Also, I heard about it. I heard about it.
Speaker 1: But backtracking, Echo, thank you for the super chat again.
Speaker 1: We are guys, we are here, going to be here
Speaker 1: live every Thursday. Your super chats are super encouraged and
Speaker 1: really really help going into keeping the lights on literally
Speaker 1: and paying keeping Yeah should Yeah, that would be a
Speaker 1: good idea. But I want the audience to be as
Speaker 1: engaged as possible, and I want you guys to ask questions.
Speaker 1: And I want you guys you know, if you disagree
Speaker 1: or I think someone called us, I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: think it's acceptable to use the R word anymore. Uh,
Speaker 1: But I mean, listen, you want to say that that's cool?
Speaker 1: Like me, right, he called us a retard, which I
Speaker 1: think is cancel that man, cancel him, but give your thoughts.
Speaker 1: Become the third uh, the third host.
Speaker 2: Become the awkward third third wheel in the sport.
Speaker 1: Yeah, eventually you want to break this up into segments
Speaker 1: and have some stuff. But yeah, so there's just a
Speaker 1: lot of a lot of a lot of drama in
Speaker 1: the community online. No. The thing is is it's been
Speaker 1: happening for so long. Uh Like, whether it's guys like KMF,
Speaker 1: it seems like and hear me out on this, it
Speaker 1: seems like but and I cannot say that if al
Speaker 1: Zonda was not sitting right here that I wouldn't be
Speaker 1: interested in asking questions and having a discussion. I absolutely would.
Speaker 1: My questions would be a little bit different than the
Speaker 1: ones that have been asked of him now or to
Speaker 1: this time. But I think that's what would make it interesting.
Speaker 1: And you know it's being talked about. I do know Ivan,
Speaker 1: So I plan on having Tim Phillips on and now
Speaker 1: I can say that because we've confirmed it, and the
Speaker 1: questions I ask him are going to be hard. The
Speaker 1: point is to, you know, ask the questions that no
Speaker 1: one else is willing to ask.
Speaker 2: And can I just put a pin on that. Yeah,
Speaker 2: Whilst you ask those questions, it's important to give meaningful
Speaker 2: pushback when answers don't necessarily make sense. Yeah, because like
Speaker 2: asking those questions but just getting a stock reply, then
Speaker 2: you've done absolutely no.
Speaker 1: Work, right, There has to be a knack for So
Speaker 1: this is my point is a lot of people and
Speaker 1: you know my heart Like I love Chris Ramsey. I've
Speaker 1: I say that like in a non weird way. I
Speaker 1: think he has one of the I mean, his studio
Speaker 1: is amazing, His ability to produce the stuff that he
Speaker 1: produces amazing, Like guy who got who isn't just famous
Speaker 1: for UFO stuff, you know, was an illusionist, a magician
Speaker 1: and really made his first real big name by doing
Speaker 1: that and then having that interest in the UFO world,
Speaker 1: you know, creating Area fifty two. But when he interviewed Alexondo,
Speaker 1: it was just like just he took everything at fakes value,
Speaker 1: and I'm like pushback, Like all I wanted was just
Speaker 1: even a little bit of follow up to this something
Speaker 1: that didn't quite make sense right, and you know, he'd
Speaker 1: even ask for clarity. And he's not the only one,
Speaker 1: make no mistake about it, But it seems that Alizondo,
Speaker 1: in the interviews that he gets, there is a lot
Speaker 1: of like there is a lot of things that the
Speaker 1: host is just seeming not willing to do. And it
Speaker 1: also bothered me when like Rogan had how put off
Speaker 1: on and not once does he bring up scientology after
Speaker 1: having lea remedion and making huge deals about scientology and
Speaker 1: what they're doing. And you know, not to not to
Speaker 1: sugarcoat things because I love Danny Jones as well, but
Speaker 1: Danny Jones just had Luna on and there was a
Speaker 1: couple of times that I would have pushed back, but
Speaker 1: Danny just took took it all and just you know,
Speaker 1: it's I understand what it's like to have one of these,
Speaker 1: like really high profile guests and you want to appease them.
Speaker 1: But listen, we need to hold ourselves to that journalistic standard.
Speaker 1: As podcasters and as interviewers amen to that. So that's
Speaker 1: some of the stuff that bothers me in the community
Speaker 1: a big you know, I don't know, do you what's
Speaker 1: your I just want to ask you a question. Okay,
Speaker 1: being who you are.
Speaker 2: I am me, I may meet the other me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, what is your take on the ALEC? What is
Speaker 1: your take on Alex Jones.
Speaker 2: Is a mimetic machine who said some really stupid shit.
Speaker 2: I think he stole with Bill Cooper's grift. But yeah,
Speaker 2: I mean, I mean if you'd asked me ten to
Speaker 2: fifteen years ago, yes, but I grew up, so I
Speaker 2: now recognize the harm that he has done through erroneous reporting.
Speaker 2: But he's also been right about a lot of shit.
Speaker 2: So it's like, I'm not going to discount him completely.
Speaker 2: I think he's just an idiot, Like he's an idiot
Speaker 2: with an organization that's right quite a lot of the time.
Speaker 2: But it's also wrong a lot of the time, like
Speaker 2: hilariously wrong. Just full disclosure for the audio. By the
Speaker 2: age of like twelve, I was watching info Wars. My
Speaker 2: first game attack was terror Storm, which is the name
Speaker 2: of Alex Jones' two thousand and four documentary. Like, I
Speaker 2: was all in on Alex Drurans from like a very
Speaker 2: early age, and then I grew up. So like I've
Speaker 2: grown up with Alex Drurance. He's almost like a weird uncle,
Speaker 2: you know, because I've just I've literally been watching him
Speaker 2: since I was a child almost, So it be I
Speaker 2: can't conceive of a world of an Internet because he
Speaker 2: was there for basically when I got on the Internet.
Speaker 2: I can't conceive of an Internet that doesn't contain.
Speaker 1: Alex rand right and war.
Speaker 2: And yeah, Info Wars kind of went away with the
Speaker 2: whole Sandy Hook thing anyway, now it's the Alex Stroones show.
Speaker 2: But yeah, so if he loses the trademark to Info Wars,
Speaker 2: it's really.
Speaker 1: Well, that's what I wanted to bring up. So the Onion,
Speaker 1: I think it was last year the Onion had picked
Speaker 1: up and bought Info Wars, and the Onion is is
Speaker 1: uh pretty satirical in nature in its nature. Uh so
Speaker 1: I thought it was. I mean, it made sense why
Speaker 1: they would buy info Wars, but they seem to have purchased,
Speaker 1: you know, a lot of debt from what it from
Speaker 1: what it seemed like it was going to happen now
Speaker 1: he owes. So the judge just ruled again, so not
Speaker 1: in favor of Alex to appeal. The one point for uh?
Speaker 1: Is it billion dollars?
Speaker 2: Something like that?
Speaker 1: I can't hear anybody can't hear me? Is it just me?
Speaker 1: Can anyone hear Cary?
Speaker 2: Hell? Are testing testing?
Speaker 1: I can't hear you? Can someone in the comments let
Speaker 1: us know? Is can you hear Cary?
Speaker 2: What's happened?
Speaker 1: Okay, it's just you must be me? Oh yeah, that's what.
Speaker 1: That's weird.
Speaker 2: What was the question?
Speaker 1: Wait? What the hell?
Speaker 2: What we have here is a failure to communicate?
Speaker 1: Why did I one second? I'm gonna have to back
Speaker 1: out in real time.
Speaker 2: I'm the captain now, welcome to the carriage show. Can
Speaker 2: I get rid of that? Can I? Can I get
Speaker 2: rid of the thing? I hope no one screenshots this.
Speaker 2: I can't go behind it. Damn it. I was trying
Speaker 2: to what I was trying to cover up the total
Speaker 2: disclosure logo because it's the carriage show now. Now now,
Speaker 2: people are probably just gonna screenshot me. And it looks
Speaker 2: like I'm doing the Nazi salute, so you're welcome.
Speaker 1: What do you you.
Speaker 2: Wait, isn't isn't that? Isn't the Nazi sweet with the
Speaker 2: left hand?
Speaker 1: I don't know. Uh no, it'd be the right because
Speaker 1: it's coming.
Speaker 2: Over your heart right. I didn't do it like that.
Speaker 2: I just just did that. But like it looks bad, right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it looks pretty bad when you do anything like this.
Speaker 1: Don't wave anyone off anymore. Like it's just it's seen
Speaker 1: certain way.
Speaker 2: It's okay, you just did it way more than I did,
Speaker 2: like five times.
Speaker 1: If anyone wants.
Speaker 2: Don't, don't. Okay, I thought you just got to do it.
Speaker 2: I was.
Speaker 1: Sich, don't do it. He's behind the scenes, Like, fuck, dude,
Speaker 1: we haven't even got started. Yeah, we're already out of
Speaker 1: the game. Also, guys, if you want to, you can
Speaker 1: scare the QR codes up in the corner to you know,
Speaker 1: given a donation. Uh on PayPal. We don't get charged
Speaker 1: for those ones aside from the cash out fee. But yeah,
Speaker 1: so and then there are multiple QR codes that the
Speaker 1: black one is for all my links and that includes
Speaker 1: Care's links as well, so it just brings you all
Speaker 1: my links.
Speaker 2: You know what we need to do. We need to
Speaker 2: add a link to the dock Lines documentary to the
Speaker 2: description of the videos as well as my Twitter account. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I've just realized in real time we need to do this.
Speaker 2: So look, actually you're seeing the show being constructed in
Speaker 2: real time.
Speaker 1: As we Yeah, I actually do.
Speaker 2: You're in at the ground floor.
Speaker 1: No, we did get an offer. So there's something I
Speaker 1: wanted to talk to you about offscreen. But there's a
Speaker 1: cannabis seltzer company that wants us to do an ad
Speaker 1: read So.
Speaker 2: I mean, actually can I don't. I'm not sure that
Speaker 2: I can have that shipped to me here in the UK.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'll do it so it's legal. But there's also
Speaker 1: another one Strong Coffee. It's called the brand is Strong Coffe.
Speaker 2: I could absolutely review that coffee.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So look, people are already seeing that the show
Speaker 1: is interesting enough to do that. So Alex Jones Info
Speaker 1: Wars again kind of bet as he's he's been a
Speaker 1: staple of like Conspira. He's like if conspiracy, you know,
Speaker 1: is in like the dictionary and it is like jokingly,
Speaker 1: there would be a picture of him next to it. Right,
Speaker 1: he seems to throw shit at the wall and whatever
Speaker 1: stick sticks. But in the nineties he was doing some
Speaker 1: actually good like journalism, like breaking into like not breaking in,
Speaker 1: but he was got he did break in.
Speaker 2: I stole Bill Cooper's grift because when Bill Cooper died
Speaker 2: in November of two thousand and one, right after nine
Speaker 2: to eleven, Bill Cooper predicted nine to eleven.
Speaker 1: By the way, yeah, but it's.
Speaker 2: Funny because Alex terrarn says I predicted nine to eleven
Speaker 2: when Bill Cooper went on his radio show and predicted
Speaker 2: nine to eleven. But even the next day, the next day,
Speaker 2: Alex sturns steals that idea and prediction, and there's it
Speaker 2: on his show and goes, see I predicted nine eleven.
Speaker 2: It's like, no, you didn't, Bill Cooper. Did you just
Speaker 2: stole his report? Everyone can.
Speaker 1: Even Tucker Carlson had Alex on and was like, you know.
Speaker 2: That happened like two days ago.
Speaker 1: Right, No, this is this is actually he just did
Speaker 1: another interview and a new one's called What's what Comes
Speaker 1: next or whatever, But the one he had done with
Speaker 1: Alex recently. And listen, Alex has like really gotten he
Speaker 1: It seems like the court stuff kind of like got
Speaker 1: in his head and he was drinking a lot. And listen,
Speaker 1: I as a as a as someone who sobered myself.
Speaker 1: I'm not giving Alex a pass on the stuff that
Speaker 1: he said about anything about that, because he has got
Speaker 1: a lot, right, you are right, and you know he is.
Speaker 1: He's controversial in in the in the way that you
Speaker 1: know your conspiratorial uncle Joe at Thanksgiving is like that
Speaker 1: there's always one in the family, right, And like Alex
Speaker 1: is like the top up of the pier that stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, he's the he's famous for, you know, being
Speaker 1: on Rogan half in the bag, you know, screaming at
Speaker 1: Joe about how the frogs are gay, and like turns
Speaker 1: out that's it was actually true to a degree that
Speaker 1: they would turning the frog. Yeah. So like it's just
Speaker 1: the weirdest shit, and like it makes you think, like
Speaker 1: if this isn't by the way, if we're in the
Speaker 1: matrix and and we have some writers, they deserve awards
Speaker 1: for what they've come up with the past, you know,
Speaker 1: twenty thirty forty years, Because I mean God damn. They
Speaker 1: told a good story, a tragic story, but a good one.
Speaker 2: Two years.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they're doing a reboot.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're they're currently changed. The story, arcs have changed.
Speaker 2: I don't know what the end thing is going to
Speaker 2: be anymore.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like a new season a doctor Who. Right,
Speaker 1: they're recasting everyone, but Alex could do you think that
Speaker 1: Alex Jones is going to do you think that he's
Speaker 1: going to essentially be thrust into bankruptcy because the the
Speaker 1: victims the quote unquote like because victims is used in, Yeah,
Speaker 1: victims is used in a really weird way here because
Speaker 1: they are actually victims. They did have losses in Sandy
Speaker 1: Hook from that the right the thing, and so they
Speaker 1: are victims. But then they're also the that they're utilizing
Speaker 1: the word victim in this is victims of the defamation.
Speaker 1: That's that is specifically what's on trial here. It's not
Speaker 1: the fact, it's not anything else aside from that.
Speaker 2: It's the fast many it's mainly that parent that was
Speaker 2: like kind of.
Speaker 1: But they want to take they they don't they say
Speaker 1: this is what they say. They don't care about the money.
Speaker 1: They want him off the air, and they won't stop
Speaker 1: until he's off the air.
Speaker 2: Do you think that that's not that's no, because that's
Speaker 2: not how the fucking First Amendment works.
Speaker 1: Like, thank you so much, thank you?
Speaker 2: Like, do I disagree with what he said and did? Yes?
Speaker 2: But he had like as.
Speaker 1: Well, No, no, no, no, you know you don't.
Speaker 2: No, no, I don't.
Speaker 1: Okay, yes, pull that back.
Speaker 2: You're like, do I agree with what he said? No?
Speaker 2: But yes, I agree that I jumped like four words
Speaker 2: in my sense, I know, I know. I thank you
Speaker 2: for catching me because I even notice I've done that.
Speaker 2: So yeah, like I disagree with that, but I agree
Speaker 2: that he has the right to say it as long
Speaker 2: as he's not inciting violence or directing anything towards a
Speaker 2: specific individual or I guess in this situation. Yeah, he
Speaker 2: he defamed, right, he defamed the parents and implied their
Speaker 2: crisis actor the stuff. Yep, that obviously wrong, huge mistake.
Speaker 2: But apart from that, he didn't violate any constitutional law.
Speaker 2: He didn't violate or he doesn't deserve to have his
Speaker 2: constitutional rights violated to appease the emotions of some people
Speaker 2: that he defamed. That's not how that's not how the
Speaker 2: constitution works. So yeah, find him, liquidate info Wars as
Speaker 2: a brand, do all of that stuff to satisfy this
Speaker 2: this this bloodlust for vengeance, which probably does come.
Speaker 1: It has become that because it's almost like it's almost
Speaker 1: like and I hate to say this, but you know
Speaker 1: that the loss of the the loss of somebody is
Speaker 1: a very strong motivator, right yea, And especially the scenario that.
Speaker 2: This is why I don't think the parents are wrong
Speaker 2: for Chase.
Speaker 1: I don't either.
Speaker 2: I just think the stated goal being we're not going
Speaker 2: to stop until he's off the air, well, you can't
Speaker 2: tape his mouth shut, you can't keep him off the internet.
Speaker 2: Like that's not an objective, that's actually reasonable, even though
Speaker 2: that's my problem with it.
Speaker 1: He was really the first person to be canceled in
Speaker 1: the modern day media. So he was removed in one day.
Speaker 1: He was removed from Apple, YouTube x on Twitter at
Speaker 1: the time.
Speaker 2: I believe, right, just the situation that led to him
Speaker 2: being because it wasn't soundyho, what was I think it was?
Speaker 2: It wasn't in twenty twelve, This was in like twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: twenty eight, nineteen. Well, I want to think it was
Speaker 2: like stuff and q Q and if anyone in anyone
Speaker 2: else why Alex Rans was deleted from it from X
Speaker 2: and Twitter and Facebook and Apple and everything in twenty eighteen,
Speaker 2: twenty nineteen era.
Speaker 1: And here's the thing, So that is legal. It is
Speaker 1: those are private so right now, for instance, we are
Speaker 1: on YouTube, we're on Rumble, and we're on Acts right now,
Speaker 1: So those are private entities. They have every right to
Speaker 1: take you and remove you and ban you from their
Speaker 1: private platform, right.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's that is in life, if you.
Speaker 1: Create your own website.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like he has done what he can't He can
Speaker 2: just say whatever he wants on the show because it's
Speaker 2: broadcast primarily to his own website. Now they'd have to
Speaker 2: go after the server farm is it Amazon Web Services?
Speaker 1: Is it?
Speaker 2: Or has he brought his own servers to host the show,
Speaker 2: which given his infrastructure, probably wouldn't be that hard for him.
Speaker 1: I think he does, right, So it's.
Speaker 2: I Whilst I'm sympathetic to what they're doing, the stated
Speaker 2: goal is not reasonable and not achievable, so they should
Speaker 2: take the payout and go and live their lives.
Speaker 1: But it's not behind.
Speaker 2: Once once they get the money, there's nothing more that
Speaker 2: they can get. There's nothing, there's no other judgment that
Speaker 2: they can get for it.
Speaker 1: Well, they want they want.
Speaker 2: Alex jump Scare, they want.
Speaker 1: Alex off the air. They want him, they want info
Speaker 1: Wars gone, they want Alex Jahn. And like I said,
Speaker 1: I've now this. That is a direct quote. They that
Speaker 1: multiple people. There's a quote from them saying the money
Speaker 1: is not what we're after here. It's the fact that
Speaker 1: Alex is still able to broadcast. And you know that
Speaker 1: is again it brings up this fundamental like this this
Speaker 1: really interesting talk about free speech and the right a
Speaker 1: free a free press in the United States and the constitution,
Speaker 1: like because the internet, the Constitution was always like people think,
Speaker 1: like even when it comes to gun laws, they're like, okay,
Speaker 1: the laws are antiquated, right, Well, it was always meant
Speaker 1: to be able to adapt. That's why amendments were a thing. Right,
Speaker 1: It was always meant to change and and change with
Speaker 1: the times to be the best version of self governance.
Speaker 2: Isn't it as long as the amendment doesn't actually violate
Speaker 2: the constitutional statute that it's amending the fundamentally change the
Speaker 2: the what was codified in the original in the original
Speaker 2: like amendment to the Constitution.
Speaker 1: Right right, right, right. So the fact that the Internet
Speaker 1: came around and it really became like it became whether
Speaker 1: it wanted to or not. You start asking like is
Speaker 1: X is Facebook? Are these especially post pandemic and the
Speaker 1: way that society is heading? Are these places? Do they
Speaker 1: represent free speech? They are they a right? At this point?
Speaker 1: Like where is that line? Eventually? You know it's going
Speaker 1: to have to be addressed, because it's it's this very
Speaker 1: weird like limb that we're in because you know, people
Speaker 1: people are obviously have their opinions in real life and
Speaker 1: like what I call quote unquote real life. But the
Speaker 1: fact is the Internet and social media is life like
Speaker 1: it is part of life now. And you know people
Speaker 1: are getting arrested in certain countries over posts and I
Speaker 1: mean it's it's just it's becoming this Orwellian nightmare.
Speaker 2: Yes, well, I agree with the a Wellian nightmare bit.
Speaker 1: For sure, especially in your country, bro.
Speaker 2: I mean yeah, I mean I don't really pay attention
Speaker 2: to that kind of stuff because I know that.
Speaker 1: The comedian arrested for five.
Speaker 2: Like, there's gonna it's they're gonna hit a wall with
Speaker 2: it where the people go enough is enough because I
Speaker 2: know what I know what my country is like. So
Speaker 2: I'm not too worried about. But anyway back, yeah, in
Speaker 2: terms of the Constitution and whether platforms have constitutional protections. See,
Speaker 2: this is this is a really this is a very
Speaker 2: complicated issue. Of course it is because this gets into
Speaker 2: what's what's the act that protects protects platforms from speech
Speaker 2: made on the platform. I can't remember the I don't
Speaker 2: know which one it is, but you know.
Speaker 1: Yes, it's it's I think it's like, oh god, it's
Speaker 1: on the tip of my tongue. It was put in
Speaker 1: the place so that, like you said, the the user
Speaker 1: and what they said. So again it's it's it's like
Speaker 1: proposition something I think I believe it's.
Speaker 2: Called something like that.
Speaker 1: But it protects like X itself from like say, Hamas
Speaker 1: is tweeting God, I think, like I'm pretty sure organized
Speaker 1: like terrorist organizations have a kind of and they tweet
Speaker 1: like they post.
Speaker 2: And I've seen them.
Speaker 1: There's protection there that so that X cannot be held
Speaker 1: liable for what the user says. However, they are obligated
Speaker 1: in a sense. Yes, section I knew it was like
Speaker 1: proposition or section. But there is also this fine line between.
Speaker 1: So you see that the lines are getting blurred, right,
Speaker 1: and that like newspapers are going away, so journalism is
Speaker 1: now like substack medium that kind of thing.
Speaker 2: SOMs. Text media that's been decentralized. Now we're getting to
Speaker 2: the point where video news production that's getting decentralized right
Speaker 2: where everybody's running their own their own network like candae
Speaker 2: Oms or Tarker Carlson or extras. Like Funnily enough, all
Speaker 2: conservative people. I don't see anybody on the left having
Speaker 2: their own network a really.
Speaker 1: Well that's their problem, that's one of their issue thing. Well,
Speaker 1: like even Gavin Newsome as a podcast now and they
Speaker 1: think they're all like they think they're.
Speaker 2: Like, yeah, this is the other things. There's this oh
Speaker 2: I've got my own network. It's like, no, you've got
Speaker 2: a website and a podcast. Yeah, does not a network
Speaker 2: make Yeah?
Speaker 1: All right, push him back, pushing, push him back, Push
Speaker 1: him back. Alex Jones, though, you know, did you I
Speaker 1: remember he had uh Lou on And you know what's
Speaker 1: weird if you actually go back and watch the coverage
Speaker 1: that he has had of Lou since then, he's actually
Speaker 1: been very critical.
Speaker 2: Of them and who had Lou on?
Speaker 1: Sorry Jones, Alex Jones had him on, you know for
Speaker 1: Wars is like twenty four to seven.
Speaker 2: On Alex.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, when did that happen? A while back?
Speaker 1: A while back, But since then he's been sort of
Speaker 1: critical of.
Speaker 2: Of Yeah because they smell fed. Literally was like, ah,
Speaker 2: these guys are running disclosure. Yeah, well I just I
Speaker 2: just want to address Colm Buckley. I'm not sure if
Speaker 2: we actually did say it earlier. So November twenty first,
Speaker 2: I think we didn't say it. November twenty first is
Speaker 2: when Age of Disclosure comes out on Prime Video, and it.
Speaker 1: Will be also rerun simultaneously in three cities for a
Speaker 1: at least we're guessing fourteen to twenty one day theatrical run.
Speaker 2: Right, and so actually chimed in earlier that it's a
Speaker 2: seven day minimum for OSCAR qualification, with a longer run
Speaker 2: required for best Picture.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right, that's right. Ah, And I should
Speaker 1: know that stuff because I I literally was anyway, Ah,
Speaker 1: you had some things you wanted to show.
Speaker 2: I think I did. I did. I had a bunch
Speaker 2: of all right, I let you, I let you drive
Speaker 2: the boat today.
Speaker 1: So yeah, pick one and let's go. So we're gonna
Speaker 1: go to a quick uh tension palette cleanser. Oh, what's
Speaker 1: the Age of Disclosure? Pig shows up there?
Speaker 2: Do you work for Dan?
Speaker 1: Yeah? I think I have a stock in Age of
Speaker 1: Disclosure documentary. I knew it.
Speaker 2: That's that's what I am.
Speaker 1: One of the producers. Actually, just kidding, I wish, just kidding.
Speaker 2: Actually you felt thet.
Speaker 1: Yep, all right, so what is it? But Dronah Paloza
Speaker 1: does continue in the in the in the Europe area.
Speaker 2: Oh ship, I got too many? No, not that one.
Speaker 2: I can't bloody go that one. So this one is in.
Speaker 2: You think it's a UFO, but it's not. So there's
Speaker 2: this spiral video going around.
Speaker 1: Then get rid of the batter. This one full screens.
Speaker 1: So oh that does look very interesting. But it seems this.
Speaker 2: Week's Oh my god, I can't believe people believe this video.
Speaker 2: We've got to name the segment. We've got to name
Speaker 2: the segment.
Speaker 1: But the obvious AI, yeah this is.
Speaker 2: But it's it's an it's an example.
Speaker 1: It's getting way too good though, that is way too good.
Speaker 2: This isn't even new. This is the thing. So this
Speaker 2: was actually meant that you're sorry, that's all right, it's
Speaker 2: from five years ago.
Speaker 1: So and they're repurposing and saying happened yesterday or whatever.
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, so like this is a repert this even
Speaker 2: be hard you look at that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but they like made it grainy, and that's that's
Speaker 1: a huge tell, at least in my opinion, because but
Speaker 1: there is a point at one point when they zoom
Speaker 1: in and it does that like like the thing that
Speaker 1: the iPhone does when you zoom and it gets like
Speaker 1: lighter to darker. It goes like a really quick transition.
Speaker 1: So this seems like it's some sort of video that
Speaker 1: was put you know that was our that was filmed
Speaker 1: with nothing and then something was added in, like the
Speaker 1: craft is added in to follow and track the motion.
Speaker 2: I think this was done with an app and then
Speaker 2: they applied grain to it.
Speaker 1: After Yeah, but you said it was five years old,
Speaker 1: so there's no AI in it then.
Speaker 2: Right, Well no, it would just be an app or
Speaker 2: it's it's someone just animated it and then grain over.
Speaker 1: Right. So that's what I mean. So for people who
Speaker 1: don't people watching, so oftentimes when you're watching a fake
Speaker 1: UFO video, there's there's these weird things they do that
Speaker 1: are that that should be red flags immediately. And that
Speaker 1: is very like distortions of the actual picture, like over over, grainy,
Speaker 1: over exposed, like some something that will mask the fact
Speaker 1: that there are sloppy cuts and mask the fact that
Speaker 1: there's an you know, a blemish or an imperfection in
Speaker 1: the actual effect that they're trying to achieve.
Speaker 2: Yep, so like this, like this, what makes it not
Speaker 2: make sense is this light over here?
Speaker 1: There's no boat off of the light. What is that?
Speaker 2: Like it would be distorting the view.
Speaker 1: But see how it gets darker right there. So it's
Speaker 1: like he took the greeny It's like he took the
Speaker 1: grainy filter off and cut in that moment back to
Speaker 1: the actual sort of.
Speaker 2: Did you see it?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 3: So did you?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Slow motion because.
Speaker 1: Yeah so so it's like it goes back, the greeniness
Speaker 1: disappears and it's hidden in that moment. See how it
Speaker 1: just it fades. No greenness, that doesn't fade like that?
Speaker 1: What are you fucking crazy?
Speaker 2: That could be that could be just ramping down the
Speaker 2: ramping down the brightness or whatever. But I was more
Speaker 2: interested in the clear key framing on the transition where
Speaker 2: it starts to move it you could see the look
Speaker 2: at it, so look in relation to this light. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: you see the shrink shrink in the swerve. Yes, so
Speaker 2: that that was not a natural lens phenomenon.
Speaker 1: So this is yeah, okay, that's funny, good good good
Speaker 1: good fake though like.
Speaker 2: For yeah, it was an interest. It's a good example
Speaker 2: of like how many views does it have? Seven thousand
Speaker 2: views over five years and then four thousand views on
Speaker 2: that tweet, So no, it's not super viral, but I
Speaker 2: thought it was an example of like one of these
Speaker 2: videos that gets shared around is like old and fake
Speaker 2: and gets repurposed. And that's that's something I want to
Speaker 2: do at least once every show is call out these
Speaker 2: idiotic accounts that repurpose videos because.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of them X that do it.
Speaker 2: There are a lot of them.
Speaker 1: Those are the ones we should be watching and calling out.
Speaker 1: So what else do you get for us for a video?
Speaker 6: I have.
Speaker 1: This time?
Speaker 2: Instead? This was I actual meant to show this last week.
Speaker 2: I got distrected.
Speaker 1: So this is Washington.
Speaker 2: Wait for it? You see it? Oh ship spoke the clouds.
Speaker 1: And it curved if I'm not mistaken, right, Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: like hooks like it's it's on a oh and then
Speaker 1: it turns again.
Speaker 2: What is that? I don't know what it is what.
Speaker 1: So this is a city cam again, so I'm seeing
Speaker 1: a city camp again. That one an awfully good detail.
Speaker 1: That is right over the capitol too.
Speaker 2: Dude, I'm not going to say that's Aliens, but I
Speaker 2: can't identify that from the footage, so that's definitely unidentified.
Speaker 1: So look it goes.
Speaker 2: Warp from the original series movies.
Speaker 1: Right, but you see at the end there, So I've
Speaker 1: I've noticed that at least in the videos I that
Speaker 1: I kind of have the most intrigue in they They
Speaker 1: they sort of have this like ripple effect behind them.
Speaker 1: It's almost like it's uh distorted, and it's like skipping,
Speaker 1: and it has it right at the end, right as
Speaker 1: it gets to the top of the frame, it does
Speaker 1: that like skipping thing distorts. So watch here as it
Speaker 1: goes up, it curls around and then it makes kind
Speaker 1: of like one final change of course and then it
Speaker 1: skips a couple of times. See that. But I'm actually
Speaker 1: i'd be really can you send me this? Yeah, I'd
Speaker 1: like to put this into ah, but we don't have
Speaker 1: the original source video, do we.
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: Ah, that's what we have to do a good job of.
Speaker 1: We have to build a team like that. That's that's
Speaker 1: what I want, Brion, and.
Speaker 2: Uh, good luck.
Speaker 1: I want a team. We're gonna build a Christina Goz.
Speaker 1: We're gonna build. We're gonna build.
Speaker 2: But there's no way you never get come down from us. Friend,
Speaker 2: it's never gonna happen.
Speaker 1: Pree, come on for you, come down one day.
Speaker 2: One day. I'll get the goat doesn't The goat doesn't.
Speaker 1: Guess what's coming tomorrow?
Speaker 2: What's coming tomorrow?
Speaker 1: Tyler camera switcher like in studio. Yeah, and so you
Speaker 1: can have angles. I can have four angles.
Speaker 2: Oh, I mean I have a webcam as well, so
Speaker 2: maybe I could say to angles.
Speaker 1: Just to be yeah, we can actual Well, so we
Speaker 1: got the we got the ship. I don't know what
Speaker 1: model it is, but it's got fo Yeah. Anyway, for
Speaker 1: you nerds out there for content creation, uh, you know
Speaker 1: the I have an audio box that the microphone goes
Speaker 1: into for in studio. And you know the point is
Speaker 1: what we're trying to do is eventually get car to
Speaker 1: uh come live in the United States and then be
Speaker 1: the in house Jamie of of the my Rogan and
Speaker 1: have it you know him in studio producing the show,
Speaker 1: the podcast aspect of it, and you know, while we're
Speaker 1: doing this eventually, so that's that's our goals. Those are
Speaker 1: our goals. So you know, with your help, with some
Speaker 1: super chats, uh, with some memberships, and you know, we'll
Speaker 1: we'll we'll be what we really do. We're gonna be
Speaker 1: putting a lot of effort into the podcast, uh, the
Speaker 1: live show weekly and you know, doing a lot more
Speaker 1: fun stuff as well. You know, I have ideas for
Speaker 1: a certain show that I pitched to Cary, and I think,
Speaker 1: you know, the debate is whether it's shooting it practical,
Speaker 1: but it's it's really cool. So uh yeah, anyway, that
Speaker 1: was I wanted to.
Speaker 2: Just I wanted to just segue onto that. But tomorrow
Speaker 2: we have the premiere of the edit.
Speaker 1: Which is already available for members. By the way, as
Speaker 1: soon as Cary gets it to me, I put it
Speaker 1: right up for members. I might even.
Speaker 2: I haven't spoken to you about because.
Speaker 1: Again, shot it contact in the desert, just a simple
Speaker 1: two camera angle. I could have sent you the angles
Speaker 1: that the cameraman shot, but I really didn't want to go,
Speaker 1: you know, with a with a sweeping cam on this
Speaker 1: one because it was this one was the first one
Speaker 1: we shot when we got to Contact. I actually the
Speaker 1: first one I shot was with Greg Rodgers, but that
Speaker 1: was at the hotel. The first interview I shot in
Speaker 1: the media room at Contact was with Peter, so we
Speaker 1: were still kind of like shaking off and getting used
Speaker 1: to the setup. So, but fascinating conversation about you know,
Speaker 1: Peter's you know, Peter was kind of lost a lot
Speaker 1: of credibility at one point for his for his investigation
Speaker 1: into Randallsham and he has since gained it back. And
Speaker 1: then I worked at them again at the Exeter UFO Festival,
Speaker 1: and I really, I really love Peter.
Speaker 2: I really do like a cool production story. I didn't
Speaker 2: know about that until I didn't know he was. Someone
Speaker 2: pointed it out to me on next and I was like, wait,
Speaker 2: what that's the thing.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So again that was me not having the information,
Speaker 1: and you know, you weren't there, We didn't really know
Speaker 1: each other when we weren't really working like that together yet.
Speaker 2: Yeah, not at that point.
Speaker 1: But the Contact Desert twenty twenty six. You better believe
Speaker 1: that Cary and I are going and you better believe
Speaker 1: that the content that we produce out of that like
Speaker 1: it's going to be fucking incredible. It's gone.
Speaker 2: I'm excited for it. I know there are people in
Speaker 2: the chat watching, so Enzo I hope will be a contact.
Speaker 2: I've met him at Contact a few times. Who else
Speaker 2: I think maybe Echo Echo might come.
Speaker 1: Well. This the contact in Contact twenty twenty five was
Speaker 1: the biggest one, the most attendance they've had ever, and
Speaker 1: I think next year is going to be even bigger,
Speaker 1: just because you know, these kind of things build. You know,
Speaker 1: I walked in so I you know, Contact of the
Speaker 1: Desert was fucking crazy for me, Like it was the
Speaker 1: first time I had ever been. I got, you know,
Speaker 1: Earl Gray Anderson, who was a mentor of mine, passes away, right,
Speaker 1: and he's supposed to do some some introductions because he's
Speaker 1: early and he's Earl fucking Anderson, and you know, he's
Speaker 1: the he was the Moufon director for Southern California.
Speaker 2: It's the that's the like as I met him in
Speaker 2: twenty four years.
Speaker 1: Yeah, as a director of any chapter of Moufon Southern
Speaker 1: California is that is the one, right, that's the chapter
Speaker 1: of Moufon. So there was a lot of stress involved
Speaker 1: in that job. It's a it's a volunteer job. There
Speaker 1: is a lot of cases in southern California, so Earl
Speaker 1: ends up tragically tragically passing away, and it's kind of
Speaker 1: fitting in a way that then you know I had
Speaker 1: made a good impression on some of the people that
Speaker 1: are behind the scenes at Contact by having you on
Speaker 1: to talk about Dark Alliance, and then I bonded with
Speaker 1: those persons over you and the similarities, and I think
Speaker 1: the realness that that person saw that I had. They
Speaker 1: were like, hey, when so when the when the unfortunate
Speaker 1: opportunity was there, they asked me to fill in. I
Speaker 1: got to introduce. They shifted it around, so then I
Speaker 1: introduced Chris Bledsoe. Introducing Chris bledso is not easy. It's
Speaker 1: so I had to get up on stage for the
Speaker 1: for the first time ever at a Contacts at a
Speaker 1: UFO conference. I'd done comic cons and other things like that,
Speaker 1: but at the biggest UFO conference, I had to get
Speaker 1: up in front of the people and introduce someone like
Speaker 1: Chris Bledsoe and I got I was shaking, but then
Speaker 1: I fell Earl and uh, you know he he had
Speaker 1: the record I think for most appearances on my podcast,
Speaker 1: aside from Bassett which is the next interview you're working on,
Speaker 1: ironically the one we filmed there. But that's what I
Speaker 1: mean when I say that I've been fortunate enough to
Speaker 1: be in the right place at the right time so
Speaker 1: many times, whether it was to facilitate conversations with nuclear
Speaker 1: witnesses like Salas and Mace and Salas and Burleson at
Speaker 1: both the hearings, you know, I found what I was
Speaker 1: meant to do, and I was meant to facilitate conversation,
Speaker 1: to produce this kind of content and work with someone
Speaker 1: like you. I found my place, and I feel like
Speaker 1: a lot of people in the UFO community, And I
Speaker 1: guess that's the moral to all of this, to everything
Speaker 1: that I've been saying, is instead of sitting on X
Speaker 1: and just falling into the drama of the Lou cru
Speaker 1: versus Den Lou crew or this and that, if we're
Speaker 1: defending and I've said this many times, if you're defending
Speaker 1: your favorite UFO researcher or experiencer or advocate like it's
Speaker 1: your fantasy football team, then you have an issue. We
Speaker 1: need to step back. This is a team sport and
Speaker 1: everyone's vowing to be the quarterback. It's like we need
Speaker 1: special teams. We need the punter, we need the offensive line,
Speaker 1: we need a united front.
Speaker 2: And now I feel like we need I feel like
Speaker 2: we need the silent.
Speaker 1: Middle to like, yeah, we need the spectators.
Speaker 2: Not be silent anymore. When you've got both extremes on
Speaker 2: on the spectrum. You've got the super believers and the
Speaker 2: super whatever the heck they are fighting and dosing and
Speaker 2: it's just been this never ending war and people get
Speaker 2: used as porns. And if you associate with one personnel
Speaker 2: and then you're bind by the other group and then
Speaker 2: they swell room. It's all this stuff. It's never ending.
Speaker 2: I mean, this has been I mean I've been tangentially
Speaker 2: involved in some of this since since to twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: Just because some people on one side didn't like my
Speaker 2: opinion about luel Azando, I get roped into this huge thing.
Speaker 2: So I know all about it. And I feel like
Speaker 2: there's a huge majority in the middle who have nothing
Speaker 2: to do with any of this, and all of it's
Speaker 2: just being fired over their heads and they're just like,
Speaker 2: they don't say anything. They see it happening, and it's
Speaker 2: just what it is, right right, And I feel like
Speaker 2: that group of people that silent majority in the middle
Speaker 2: should be less silent and say, hey, fucking knock it off,
Speaker 2: both sides of you, like this is not substantively important.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, I would agree. I would agree, and
Speaker 1: I think, but what I mean is like when you
Speaker 1: get out there, when you get out there and you
Speaker 1: go to something like a hearing, and when like I
Speaker 1: can't describe it, but when you're in the room and
Speaker 1: you're watching silence brief a sitting member of Congress, and
Speaker 1: you made that happen right without you? That without you,
Speaker 1: that does not happen simply period. It doesn't happen. You
Speaker 1: put your ego aside, like I was, so I and
Speaker 1: I'm not like I hear. I'm not like like pumping
Speaker 1: air at myself. What I'm saying is and I'm not
Speaker 1: better than anyone. Like I can be fucking petty, and
Speaker 1: I can be annoying, and I can be you know, condescending,
Speaker 1: and I know all these things because I'm very self
Speaker 1: aware about it, and I try to be the best
Speaker 1: version I can be for the most part, and I
Speaker 1: think I am. I try to stay neutral. You know,
Speaker 1: I've made mistakes, but we all, we all need to
Speaker 1: be able to put our like I wish more people
Speaker 1: could experience things in like like actually, whether it's investigating
Speaker 1: a case and becoming an investigator for whatever entity, whether
Speaker 1: it's move On or the International Uphobia or whatever, or
Speaker 1: like doing actual work, like whether it's volunteer work or
Speaker 1: you work with whatever, whatever it is, once you find
Speaker 1: an actual place something you're passionate about, whether that's you know,
Speaker 1: talking to members of Congress and interviewing like people, whatever
Speaker 1: it ends up being, you know, being a producer on
Speaker 1: a show that you know does this, does story, whatever
Speaker 1: it contributes them this way, like if more people can
Speaker 1: find their place and what they like and what they
Speaker 1: want to get, get out there and get it. Go
Speaker 1: change it. You don't like it, go change it. If
Speaker 1: you don't like it, stand out, speak on it, like
Speaker 1: get involved other than tweeting.
Speaker 2: Well, I feel like there's a lot that there's a
Speaker 2: large sector of euthology that doesn't take place on Twitter.
Speaker 2: So I mean that's what I mean, Like it's an
Speaker 2: echo chamber. It's a very loud, loud minority on both
Speaker 2: sides that fight each other and act like what they're
Speaker 2: doing on a microblogging site means anything at all, which
Speaker 2: I not really in the grand scheme of things, like, yeah,
Speaker 2: you might get an occasional quote from someone in a space,
Speaker 2: or you might break the story, but like it's more
Speaker 2: for like real time news and not like doing important work,
Speaker 2: if that makes any sense. Like important work in this
Speaker 2: subject is not going to take place in a Twitter space.
Speaker 2: It's just not. It's it's too low boundaridth for that kind.
Speaker 1: Of work, right, But it has its place, It has its.
Speaker 2: I would disagree with that, but that's just a me
Speaker 2: thing because I absolutely hate pot spaces.
Speaker 1: But but but I'm saying spaces are you know, spaces
Speaker 1: aside because space, you can argue what we're doing is
Speaker 1: a glorified space, right, It's just a different way of
Speaker 1: doing it.
Speaker 2: Oh well no, no, no, I mean we're able to
Speaker 2: see each other and communicate and actually discourse instead of
Speaker 2: it being and then have it or you can pop
Speaker 2: in and talk ship.
Speaker 1: But I guess, okay, I see that it has as
Speaker 1: its place. But the like Internet, like it does have
Speaker 1: its place, like when Alexando or someone shows a picture
Speaker 1: and it can immediately be debunked, like with what happened
Speaker 1: at the thing in Congress where Alexander Unfortunately, I'm bringing
Speaker 1: Alexando up again. And I don't mean to pick on him,
Speaker 1: because you know, I really don't. Yeah, I I, like
Speaker 1: I said, I would love to interview Alexando. I have
Speaker 1: a lot of I have a lot of questions, uh,
Speaker 1: and I would very much treat him respectively, respectfully, with
Speaker 1: respect and you know, cordially. But I would ask very
Speaker 1: good questions and you know, not be afraid, uh to
Speaker 1: to ask the ones that some people might not be
Speaker 1: comfortable with.
Speaker 2: I think the most important thing that people can ask
Speaker 2: in an interview or do in an interview is when
Speaker 2: you ask a question and they didn't fucking answer it.
Speaker 2: You say, I'm sorry, but that was not that was
Speaker 2: an answer to some question, but unfortunately it wasn't an
Speaker 2: answer to my question.
Speaker 1: And it was really good at that and I recommend
Speaker 1: the content. Uh So it's this God, oh my god,
Speaker 1: why is this happening to me today? I can't remember anybody?
Speaker 2: Geez is it the financial guy? No user comes to mind.
Speaker 2: There's a guy who the interviews like young young zoomers
Speaker 2: or whatever about zoomers.
Speaker 1: The hell's a zoomer?
Speaker 2: Oh my god, you really are a boom Tyler.
Speaker 1: Millennia. I think I was born in ninety three.
Speaker 2: I mean, so was I.
Speaker 1: But okay, I'm definitely that boomer mindset.
Speaker 2: I guess zoomer is like, what's the opposite of a boomer?
Speaker 1: A zoomer is the opposite of a boomer that doesn't
Speaker 1: give you a clear picture, or what's a boomer? Uh,
Speaker 1: they're an old person, well not an older person who like,
Speaker 1: for me, the ideal boomer is like a Fox News dad.
Speaker 2: I don't think there's any ideal ideal in the boomer industry.
Speaker 2: But a zoomer is basically is basically anyone born after
Speaker 2: the millennium.
Speaker 1: All right, yeah, I don't I can't keep up with
Speaker 1: that ship. So I think it's Alex g No, that
Speaker 1: can't be right.
Speaker 2: Oh right, that's what I would saying. So this guy
Speaker 2: has like young young people on who are like in
Speaker 2: debt or they they made bad financial decisions, and then
Speaker 2: he like he'll he'll like quiz them on it, and
Speaker 2: then they'll give some bullshit answer and then he's like, well,
Speaker 2: you're not answering my question.
Speaker 6: Like that.
Speaker 2: Those are the best interviews, Like, yeah, you're never gonna
Speaker 2: get everybody because once people know that that's your interview style,
Speaker 2: or that can be your interview style. Either they're gonna
Speaker 2: put stipulations or they flat out won't go on your
Speaker 2: show because most people want pr they.
Speaker 1: Don't want Tommy G. Sorry guys. So Tommy G on
Speaker 1: YouTube Amazing Amazing Amazing channel does a lot of like
Speaker 1: documentary style videos. But he is he he's like this
Speaker 1: very soft spoken like he's he's got this like he
Speaker 1: you know, not not not not that high. I'm making
Speaker 1: him sound very like kind of like feminine, but I
Speaker 1: don't really do impressions well. But he's got this like
Speaker 1: kind of like his very unique voice and it's like hi,
Speaker 1: you like, but he's also like very jacked. So he's
Speaker 1: got he's got this big he's got this big presence,
Speaker 1: but it kind of a softer voice. And but someone
Speaker 1: will like steam roll him or try to steam roll him,
Speaker 1: and then he'll go like, wait, you just steamrolled me,
Speaker 1: like you didn't answer the question. Then like he'll like
Speaker 1: he'll just like call it out like very very like
Speaker 1: like like it's I hate to even say it, but
Speaker 1: like maybe on the spectrum a little bit like the
Speaker 1: way he calls it out, like my the girl I
Speaker 1: am dating is on the spectrum, so like I see
Speaker 1: the same thing in her. He's like, there's that I
Speaker 1: And I mean that with sincerity like and genuineness, like
Speaker 1: the way he like he won't if you don't answer
Speaker 1: his question, he just circles back and then tells you
Speaker 1: exactly how you just like circled around it. It's just
Speaker 1: it's very.
Speaker 2: You need something like that. For a while, I thought
Speaker 2: about making you know, like content copy content cop. I
Speaker 2: wanted to do that for upology, like UFO content cop,
Speaker 2: but I just never got around to it.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but it would have been like it would have
Speaker 2: been that, it would have been examining these interviews and
Speaker 2: saying exactly what they fucking did wrong.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Shout out shout out to Tommy G for tackling
Speaker 1: the subjects that rarely get talked about or rarely get
Speaker 1: like the people he has involved. Although if I could
Speaker 1: give him some advice, I would say, stop shooting at
Speaker 1: such a high frame rate. His car's gonna go watch
Speaker 1: and see what I mean now, But he shoots a
Speaker 1: very high frame rate.
Speaker 2: It gives it this like very Oh, I'll just be
Speaker 2: sixty fbs. Yeah, it's just like we're at thirty right now,
Speaker 2: and it's it's.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he shoots a hot like super high frame rate
Speaker 1: and I'm like, oh god, it's like it's like it's
Speaker 1: it's like when you've taken mushrooms and you get HD vision.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I was.
Speaker 2: Gonna use So you remember when the first Hobbit movie
Speaker 2: came out and they released it in forty eight frames
Speaker 2: for like some weird reason they tried to.
Speaker 1: I didn't watch it.
Speaker 2: I saw that in the theaters and forty eight frames
Speaker 2: a second and it was the worst fucking film experience
Speaker 2: of my life. And I'd waited so long to see
Speaker 2: the Hobbit movie and I'm sitting there like, what the
Speaker 2: fuck is this?
Speaker 1: Like the whole thing is like a odd frame rate
Speaker 1: to choose what.
Speaker 2: It's double twenty four right, so it's just double. They're
Speaker 2: just doubling the speed at which the film is is
Speaker 2: exposed and.
Speaker 1: It yeah, no, but if it doesn't do any think
Speaker 1: for the actual like if it doesn't add to.
Speaker 2: The I mean it did, it made it. I know
Speaker 2: it made it. It made it smoother, but it was
Speaker 2: also it felt so artificial compared to normal film. Right,
Speaker 2: It was like how I never want to see this again.
Speaker 2: Like I was always I'm a PC player right on gaming,
Speaker 2: so I'm always like I'm trying to get sixty frames
Speaker 2: and trying to get over over one hundred frames whatever.
Speaker 2: That one cinema experience proved to me that cinema needs
Speaker 2: to be twenty four frames a second. Yeah, Like it
Speaker 2: just has to be, because that's that's just how we're
Speaker 2: how we've been culturally ingrained.
Speaker 1: For something you can play with aspect ratios, but you
Speaker 1: can't really you can't really like.
Speaker 2: The only time you want to shoot in the higher
Speaker 2: frame rate is if you're going to slow it down.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, very good point, very good point. And
Speaker 1: that's what like Zack Snyder is like his slow most
Speaker 1: of is I could you it's really just like films. Yeah, arguably,
Speaker 1: But what James I thought, you know, with Superman and
Speaker 1: even with the Suicide Squad. Uh, you could start and
Speaker 1: I'm about to nerd out here, uh and kind of
Speaker 1: like reach back into my old days of podcasting with
Speaker 1: Pop Culture Corner. But what I really like what James
Speaker 1: Gunn is doing with DC so starting because with Guardians
Speaker 1: he was very rigid his his shooting style. It was
Speaker 1: very you know paint by numbers, play by the like,
Speaker 1: play by the rules. Yeah, of course, and he wanted
Speaker 1: to get it right right, he wanted to get and
Speaker 1: there was no Again, the studios made by I mean,
Speaker 1: films made by committee ultimately suffer like the created, the
Speaker 1: creator creation and the creator suffer and it's terrible. But
Speaker 1: and that's the problem. That was the huge problem at DC,
Speaker 1: even though it was in a different way. Leadership kept
Speaker 1: coming in and fucking everything up. But with James Gunn
Speaker 1: and Saffron, what I really like what James Gunn is
Speaker 1: doing is exploring camera movement. And you know, I think
Speaker 1: he used a a really wide angle lens for some
Speaker 1: of the shots of Superman flying and people had it
Speaker 1: was kind of like jarring people, jarring to people. And
Speaker 1: like they said, David corn Sweat was like it looked
Speaker 1: like there was you know, his face was like it
Speaker 1: made him look uglier.
Speaker 2: And again like how they shot that, I saw like
Speaker 2: a behind the scenes thing where he's something like he's
Speaker 2: laying on the gyro and then you know, like the
Speaker 2: rack around scene.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I watched the whole thing. Yeah, so that for
Speaker 1: the audience, like.
Speaker 2: They so then they wrap around the sky as he's
Speaker 2: flying by and they blow wind and whatever in his face.
Speaker 2: So although didn't they see g as eyes or something? No, No,
Speaker 2: James gun He related, he released he removed the shot
Speaker 2: I remember now. He removed the shot from the final
Speaker 2: from the final card changed it. Yeah. Oh no, there's
Speaker 2: one shot where in the original trailer Can hits him
Speaker 2: on the back of the head, and they changed that
Speaker 2: shot to change that, and then they changed the one
Speaker 2: of Superman flying where he looks like his cross eyed.
Speaker 2: They got rid of that shot.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So, but James Gunn confirmed that there was no
Speaker 1: c G. I in, there is no CGI used on
Speaker 1: David gordanswhen in those shots of him.
Speaker 2: Flying helicopter shot and a physical wrap around on the
Speaker 2: actual screen, why, I thought it was awesome. I was like,
Speaker 2: that's that's actually like better than you would have got
Speaker 2: from Man of Steel and Steel was good. But that
Speaker 2: was all CG.
Speaker 1: So yeah, very very CG. But uh anyway, yeah, back
Speaker 1: on uh, back on track here. So tonight uh we
Speaker 1: covered uh Alex Jones and the Court's ruling against his appeal.
Speaker 1: Uh for the one point for I think it's billion
Speaker 1: dollars settlement and you know the inevitable bankruptcy of Info
Speaker 1: Wars and Alex Jones. I think that would pretty much
Speaker 1: cause it. Uh so there's a huge, you know debate about, uh,
Speaker 1: what happens next for Alex. We also covered uh, some
Speaker 1: weird drama with Alzando and how that took place and
Speaker 1: the date that Age of Disclosure will debut, what its
Speaker 1: theatrical run will bring, and why they've chosen the route chosen.
Speaker 1: Is there anything else that you wanted.
Speaker 2: To not especially I do want so anybody listening, obviously,
Speaker 2: if you're listening to the audio, this is a very
Speaker 2: visual show, so we highly advise you come over to
Speaker 2: YouTube or x or rumble. I think that's where we
Speaker 2: are and check the well. Yeah, I had another thing
Speaker 2: I was going to say, and I've totally forgotten it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: scan the QR codes, hit the like button. Oh that
Speaker 2: was it. If anybody in the chat, anybody listening or watching,
Speaker 2: is going going to go physically to a premiere showing
Speaker 2: of Age of Disclosure, let us know. We love to
Speaker 2: the interview.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that would be great.
Speaker 2: I'd love to talk to somebody that physically.
Speaker 1: It's pretty d C and l A very fitting. That's
Speaker 1: a smart choice for d C obviously having a lot
Speaker 1: of people in d C in it. That's pretty smart move.
Speaker 1: And it's like it's also meant for that marketing kind of.
Speaker 1: It's like it's definitely used marketing wise. So that's gonna
Speaker 1: be cool to see it finally and see what it
Speaker 1: has to offer. Uh, last question, do you think it
Speaker 1: will move the needle at all?
Speaker 2: The needle is a lie, that's my answer. Where can
Speaker 2: people find you? Tyler?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: God, Well, you can find me on X Disclosure pod
Speaker 1: or search Total Disclosure. Look for the red ufo on
Speaker 1: any platform like YouTube. The podcast is on any podcast platform,
Speaker 1: so you're gonna just search Total Disclosure. All the wigs
Speaker 1: are in the description below. What about you, Cary? Where
Speaker 1: can they find you?
Speaker 2: You can find me on the internet at Fires of Truth.
Speaker 1: Waiting for a cub.
Speaker 2: I was waiting for a cube.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: I thought you were gonna go out Where can they
Speaker 2: find you? But it's okay, you can find me.
Speaker 1: Oh Jesus, yeah, I didn't think it was that loud.
Speaker 2: That's very loud. You find me on Twitter at Fires
Speaker 2: the Truth. You can find me moderating the chat in
Speaker 2: the truth Seekers Discord or the Truth seekers show. If
Speaker 2: you like documentary films, there is one on Amazon Prime
Speaker 2: or two B or Apple TV called Dark Alliance The
Speaker 2: Inside Story of the Cosmic con Go watch it. I
Speaker 2: had a huge hand in the in the making of it.
Speaker 2: I made it with Darcy Weir. I narrate it, and
Speaker 2: I have a cameo. Very cool. There are there's two versions,
Speaker 2: but they're the same. They're the same thing. There's there's
Speaker 2: you can watch it in episodic form, or you can
Speaker 2: buy it as one long flow with just the credits
Speaker 2: between one and two cut out.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I watched it as a wonner.
Speaker 2: Right. Well, the reason we did that is because Amazon
Speaker 2: TV doesn't like TV shows like the way that the
Speaker 2: algorithm works. Amazon Prime Video doesn't like TV shows. They
Speaker 2: actually like films way more.
Speaker 1: So.
Speaker 2: That's why we recut it because it was it got
Speaker 2: it had like no visibility in the algorithm because it
Speaker 2: was it was like a self published TV show as
Speaker 2: opposed to a self published movie. Well, yeah, we just
Speaker 2: redid it.
Speaker 1: Darcy also released the past.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so that's again I was like, why did you
Speaker 2: do that? I think that's why After that release, I
Speaker 2: think that's why we we pivoted away with because I mean,
Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know yes or no with that.
Speaker 2: But I assume the reason that we that Dark Lights
Speaker 2: one was recut and re released as a film was
Speaker 2: because the visibility of the series is series series.
Speaker 1: And that because Dark Alliance, you know what, that's kind
Speaker 1: of I need.
Speaker 2: To I watched the Pascal Google one when it came out.
Speaker 2: I need to rewatch that because I remember it being
Speaker 2: pretty good.
Speaker 1: Is there a trailer for Dark Alliance that we could show?
Speaker 1: I don't think we've showed it, yes yet on the show.
Speaker 2: Come on, it's on the IMDb page.
Speaker 1: Come on, pull it out. I have an im We'll
Speaker 1: pull out on that. I have an IMDb page too.
Speaker 1: Come on, let's get real.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you worked in Hollywood. I'm a country bumpkin from
Speaker 2: the UK. I shouldn't be here, dude.
Speaker 1: Anyone is a filmmaker. If they pick up a camera,
Speaker 1: just go make a movie. Do Do Do Do Do
Speaker 1: Do Do Do.
Speaker 2: So. I would love it if anybody watching could go
Speaker 2: and check out this film that I made with Darcy.
Speaker 1: It's actually really good.
Speaker 2: It's like I had a lot of fun. It's like
Speaker 2: four years. That's great.
Speaker 1: Gaya and the cybersuckers are the dark forces.
Speaker 2: All right, So my clients are not the dark force.
Speaker 7: No, But I would say to those of you that
Speaker 7: are supporting him and helping him to defend himself, what's
Speaker 7: he defending himself from? Who is the dark side? Because see,
Speaker 7: if you really look at it and dissect it, no
Speaker 7: one is suing Corey. He's the one suing everybody. Nobody's
Speaker 7: suing him.
Speaker 1: Who is the dark force? Who is the cabal? Yeah,
Speaker 1: the cab?
Speaker 3: You know. He said things like I couldn't couldn't believe,
Speaker 3: to be honest with He told me he was talking
Speaker 3: about twenty and back and bases.
Speaker 1: On Mars and the moon and all this, although none
Speaker 1: of that was in his book.
Speaker 3: I do believe that there was an information contamination.
Speaker 6: I was contacted by Roger Ranso or Roger Richards, who
Speaker 6: at the time was Corey Goods business partner manager, something
Speaker 6: to that effect. I believe he contacted me in about
Speaker 6: March twenty seventeen. I think if you look up sensational
Speaker 6: in the dictionary, you'll probably find David Wilcock's face in there.
Speaker 6: Like it is kind of like a cult cult tactics,
Speaker 6: cult like behaviors that are going on around that group.
Speaker 7: So I called Corey and I said, Corey, I'm calling
Speaker 7: on behalf of David. How much of a percentage is
Speaker 7: David gonna get? Corey said to me, I'm not giving
Speaker 7: David a percentage.
Speaker 6: Corey literally called himself the Enoch of our modern times.
Speaker 6: And David claims to have all these insiders and they
Speaker 6: propped themselves up to be these larger than life personalities.
Speaker 7: Hundreds of people have been on Guya having different TV
Speaker 7: shows and different personalities. Have any of them turned around
Speaker 7: and sued Gaya nobody, but we're good.
Speaker 1: David is going to lead a con conversation to raise
Speaker 1: our classes.
Speaker 2: To Bill William Popkins.
Speaker 3: I forget the name of the company that created the
Speaker 3: sky net in the Terminator films. He said he started
Speaker 3: Cyberdye years before the Terminator film came out.
Speaker 6: Jesus, let's go back to the beginning. I first met
Speaker 6: Corey and David. Well, let me back up a little
Speaker 6: bit from there.
Speaker 1: So I.
Speaker 2: Urke alliance. So so I see someone in the chat going,
Speaker 2: oh my god, haven't seen this. Please go check that out.
Speaker 2: That's something that I worked on for a long time.
Speaker 2: I wrote a large majority of it. I know rated it.
Speaker 2: Please go and go and watch it. Watching it back
Speaker 2: at the beginning, I was like, wait a minute, I
Speaker 2: remember that's actually the old version of the trailer. I
Speaker 2: rescored it within the Hall of the Mountain King. I
Speaker 2: have it somewhere. It's so much better. But that's not
Speaker 2: a bad trailer by any stretch of the imagination. But
Speaker 2: I remember there was I had to do some work
Speaker 2: and rescore that trailer, so I added in the Hall
Speaker 2: of the Mountain King and it fit perfectly. It was
Speaker 2: like such an inspired choice, and I wish that I
Speaker 2: had shown that version because it was a lot more
Speaker 2: upbeat than the the cult thrillery vibe we got from them,
Speaker 2: which is still accurate to what we did.
Speaker 1: Well. I think overall, that is actually a pretty pretty
Speaker 1: great trailer for Yeah.
Speaker 2: It's a great trailer, and it does you know, someone
Speaker 2: said it did the great job for the first six months,
Speaker 2: and it really.
Speaker 1: It really is like it's almost like one of those
Speaker 1: Netflix documentaries about a cult. It's just this also has
Speaker 1: to do with the UFO, and it's primarily based on
Speaker 1: the like the clear vacuum that this topic occupies of
Speaker 1: people's lives. Because it's everything. It's it becomes like a religion, right,
Speaker 1: like it's it's your reality, and people get so vested
Speaker 1: into these these narratives. And again, I think that's one
Speaker 1: of the fundamental problems here, is like we're dealing with
Speaker 1: such a complex and it's crazy to think about we're
Speaker 1: dealing with such a complex phenomena and you think that
Speaker 1: like like the top minds and beyond it, and you know,
Speaker 1: we're talking about like life after death, what happens? What
Speaker 1: is the soul? Like these New Age kind of like
Speaker 1: questions and like the things that we all wonder, are
Speaker 1: we alone in the universe? What happens after life? I mean,
Speaker 1: what happens through death? Is there afterlife? They're old questions,
Speaker 1: but like the New Age perspective on it and the
Speaker 1: old old perspective on it are similar, but two different worlds. Well,
Speaker 1: it became religion back then, like it morphed into modern
Speaker 1: day religion, and like now people look at it, they're
Speaker 1: a little bit less religious, but they're they're more spiritual.
Speaker 1: But then they are, you know, the ones that like
Speaker 1: to talk about like living in the astral plane and
Speaker 1: like traveling to like other planets for the galactic federation.
Speaker 1: That's also comes with the territory. It's like we there's
Speaker 1: the smartest people, but there's also the most gullible people.
Speaker 2: Well it's a spectrum. You've got serious research all the
Speaker 2: way down to religious appeasement.
Speaker 1: Right, But like what I'm saying is advanced mathematician, Like
Speaker 1: you're going to your community is going to be advanced mathematicians.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 1: It's just the UFO community allows for like really really
Speaker 1: like intelligent people, but then it's also susceptible to people
Speaker 1: that want to take advantage of others and on their
Speaker 1: their their want to believe. That's why it's like it's
Speaker 1: it's cutting edge of of philosophical of like every it's
Speaker 1: the most important story, right, but it's also the most flawed.
Speaker 2: And I saw you actually you posted a comment on
Speaker 2: my post about this exact problem about that being no
Speaker 2: established metric, and my my comment about it was more
Speaker 2: geared towards So say you debunk a video and like
Speaker 2: you can very much prove that that was key framed whatever,
Speaker 2: and then the next day ten accounts will post that
Speaker 2: same video and go oh my god, a UFO and
Speaker 2: they get like two hundred thousand views and if you
Speaker 2: call them out like oh, I'm just asking questions, man,
Speaker 2: It's like that, it just makes the value of debunking
Speaker 2: a video pointless, absolutely pointless. When unless you it's funny
Speaker 2: actually that I said this in the post, like, unless
Speaker 2: unless you go on Joe Rogan or you've got your
Speaker 2: own massive reach, then it's pointless. And then today it's funny.
Speaker 2: I said that because then today I saw a video.
Speaker 2: I actually had it ready to share, but we haven't
Speaker 2: got time today.
Speaker 6: Uh.
Speaker 2: If someone went on Joe Rogan and said that the
Speaker 2: hell fire video was real, and I'm like, this is
Speaker 2: this is exactly what I'm fucking talking about.
Speaker 1: Well, Luna Luna on Danny Jones was like, when he
Speaker 1: asked her what the most like incredible thing that she's seen,
Speaker 1: she said the hell fire missile video.
Speaker 2: And I was like, she has no understanding of parallax.
Speaker 1: I was like, what the fuck? Why would like really
Speaker 1: the hell fire missile video. You couldn't have picked anything else.
Speaker 1: You had default to the latest thing, which is clearly
Speaker 1: like has its issues.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but because it's currently even the.
Speaker 1: Gas station guy that knows me as the UFO guy,
Speaker 1: because we have the studio here, and the gas stations
Speaker 1: right there, so like the studio is visible, and uh
Speaker 1: so people know that I do the podcast and they're
Speaker 1: interested in it. And uh there's actually one guy I
Speaker 1: want to bring on because he's like in a Buddhist
Speaker 1: monk as well, and he and he works at the
Speaker 1: gas station.
Speaker 2: Is like A.
Speaker 1: Like, I don't know, I don't he really doesn't. No, yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess you could say that, but the guy is
Speaker 1: so interesting and every time I have a conversation with him,
Speaker 1: it's like the deepest conversation I've ever had, and it's
Speaker 1: a I was like, dude, I gotta bring you on
Speaker 1: the show.
Speaker 2: Get that man in the in the in the seat, d.
Speaker 1: So as it said, as it as it stands.
Speaker 2: When I'm you know, well, okay, here's my question, and
Speaker 2: then we'll lend on this question because I think it's
Speaker 2: it's good for the audience to think about. So you're
Speaker 2: talking about how there's like these New Age beliefs and
Speaker 2: these extreme beliefs surrounding surrounding UFOs and whatnot, So I
Speaker 2: have a question. Generally, our idea of what a UFO
Speaker 2: craft is has evolved over the years, as in line
Speaker 2: with our own technological understanding. Yes, So like back in
Speaker 2: the fifties it was flying sources and boomerang type shapes
Speaker 2: and it was.
Speaker 1: Cigar eighteen hundred airships.
Speaker 2: Right, So like that connection there leads me to think
Speaker 2: that there is some kind of perceptual aspect to this
Speaker 2: where it's like it exists on the fringes of what
Speaker 2: we think is possible as a collective consciousness, not to
Speaker 2: say to new age, but like collectively, what our vibe is,
Speaker 2: what our technological level is, what the extreme level of
Speaker 2: our imagination. I mean, now we're in the future, so
Speaker 2: it's all orbs, and it's all non non Euclidean shapes
Speaker 2: and warping orbs and all this stuff we don't really
Speaker 2: hear about physical craft. Even the tic TACs of the
Speaker 2: tic tac craft is a smooth, oblong shape. It's no
Speaker 2: longer like mechanical sources or anything like that. So I
Speaker 2: feel like, what's the next step. That's the question I've
Speaker 2: got is what's after orbs? But what's after orbs?
Speaker 1: After orbs?
Speaker 2: I think if we keep following this concept, this this
Speaker 2: like process of it kind of evolving as we evolve
Speaker 2: our scientific scientific knowledge of the universe, what's what's after?
Speaker 2: That's that's my question, and I'm gonna end on religion.
Speaker 1: Religion is just a cult plus one hundred years.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan has actually like a a really good bit
Speaker 1: about this, and he says, to some degree, he says,
Speaker 1: what is the difference between a religion and a cult?
Speaker 1: And he said, well, the only difference is there's that
Speaker 1: the one guy that made it up and knows it's
Speaker 1: bullshit is dead. That's the only difference, right, the guy
Speaker 1: that that started it was.
Speaker 2: I mean, scientology is an example. Hubbet dies and becomes
Speaker 2: religion between within like three years, Miss Gavage manages to like,
Speaker 2: the war is over, We've beaten the I R S.
Speaker 1: So it did take one guy that knows this bullshit
Speaker 1: and then he dies and it comes to religion.
Speaker 2: Right, isn't that what happened with Joseph.
Speaker 1: Smith scientology, with with the with like the Jonestown well
Speaker 1: they didn't get like but it was all headed like
Speaker 1: the cults. The cult side of it you can see
Speaker 1: was there right, like the Jim Jones side of it.
Speaker 1: But also in scientology they have the rigidness of.
Speaker 2: You know, well, Jim Jones charismatic psychopath.
Speaker 1: But yeah, it's just like it's just repackaged like scientology
Speaker 1: could have could could you know, like I put it
Speaker 1: in the same bracket as all that stuff. But it's
Speaker 1: just like more organized and you know, like the Christianity.
Speaker 2: But the thing, the thing with John Styne is once
Speaker 2: Jim Jones was dead, it didn't like expand it didn't go, oh,
Speaker 2: he's dead, let's create fifty more Jonestownes.
Speaker 1: Let's then there's like Heaven's Gate that was like literal
Speaker 1: UFO cult. Yeah it's Marshall and if if if AI
Speaker 1: keeps going the way it's going, then there's going to
Speaker 1: become like I could see a time where what's next
Speaker 1: is people form religion around the alien beings, this this
Speaker 1: idea of aliens instead of like God. I know, and
Speaker 1: that's what I mean.
Speaker 2: Like this that's the New Age is a new religious
Speaker 2: next that hasn't reached the level of being a bona
Speaker 2: fide religion. In some cases, it's reached a cult level
Speaker 2: status in certain insular groups, but as a whole, the
Speaker 2: New Age is very fractured and splintered, so it can't
Speaker 2: reach that kind of crescendo moment kind of thing. Thank you, Jeremiah.
Speaker 2: I hope you check out the film. I hope you
Speaker 2: enjoy it. So keep your minds open and doing the
Speaker 2: Lord's work. They just misspelled that that lords the Lords.
Speaker 1: Thank you, We thank you for the for the for them.
Speaker 2: Praise the cash is just I want to see you
Speaker 2: here next Thursday.
Speaker 1: Praise the cash.
Speaker 2: Praise the cash. We do praise the cash here.
Speaker 1: Yes, we should make a little No, if you do
Speaker 1: become a member, I call you an asset though. It's
Speaker 1: something I told Cary and he was like, that's so
Speaker 1: blame and I was like, come on, come on. I
Speaker 1: was like, it's fun. It's kind of fun, but all right,
Speaker 1: we'll end it there.
Speaker 2: Uh, it would be just trashing your whole business models
Speaker 2: on the show.
Speaker 1: Would that being said? Become an asset?
Speaker 2: Get so I can being an asset?
Speaker 1: What's your clearance level?
Speaker 2: My level is river Moon coffee.
Speaker 1: Coffee? No, what's your clearance level?
Speaker 6: Get a.
Speaker 2: Bradley Whitford just sent me a message. What the fuck? No,
Speaker 2: we did, literally did. Bradley Whitford. Thanks for the love
Speaker 2: and support. What is my life right now? I'm a
Speaker 2: massive west Wing fan. If this is real, I'm gonna die.
Speaker 2: Just look, I'm checking this on there. Let's look, I
Speaker 2: want to know Bradley Whitford, the actor. You've never heard
Speaker 2: Bradley Whitford. Am I losing my mind?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: I just got to check this because if that's real,
Speaker 2: I want to I want to be like, hey, oh
Speaker 2: my god, it's real. I can't even get to his
Speaker 2: profile from his chat. What the fuck?
Speaker 1: Well? I would like to wrap up and eat all right,
Speaker 1: So alright, I had a great Sorry time, I had
Speaker 1: a great time.
Speaker 2: Me too. Sorry for that random distraction at the end.
Speaker 2: But when when you get.
Speaker 1: Report back that what's going on there? But anyway to everyone, yes,
Speaker 1: become an asset, hit join if you want, or send
Speaker 1: super chats or whatever. And during the live shows weekly
Speaker 1: live shows every Thursday at six thirty pm Eastern Standard Time,
Speaker 1: and then the podcast debuts. Well tomorrow, it's Friday, but
Speaker 1: I'm still working on what day that should be, you know,
Speaker 1: consistently in the future. But the audio debuted a day before.
Speaker 1: But I'm a little bit on a weird release schedule
Speaker 1: right now, so I got to fix that and change
Speaker 1: that so it'll be Friday.
Speaker 2: My aim is to have edits done so we can
Speaker 2: primarily during this show. That's my that's my in my head.
Speaker 2: Whether we get there or not is another thing.
Speaker 1: So but I'll keep it updated on that. I mean,
Speaker 1: it doesn't you know, as long as I come out.
Speaker 1: But consistency is key. And if you can leave a
Speaker 1: rating and a review, if you're listening on a great
Speaker 1: podcast platform in the future, it really really helped. And
Speaker 1: it's free, takes twenty seconds, same thing asking, sharing and
Speaker 1: subscribing your friends, share your friends, your family, the enemies,
Speaker 1: the grays when they abduct you. It's all the same
Speaker 1: to us. No discrimination, And as I like to say
Speaker 1: to everyone, I'll see you on the other side.
Podbean