Connecticut's Bold Move: Official Scientific UFO Investigation | Ft Rep. Joe Hoxha
🛒 Good Feels Cannabis Seltzer Get 20% OFF with code: DISCLOSURE https://shop.getgoodfeels.com/discount/DISCLOSURE
🛒 Strong Coffee Company - Protein Coffee 💰 Get 20% OFF | Promo Code: DISCLOSURE https://strongcoffeecompany.com/discount/DISCLOSURE
🔗 All Links & Platforms: https://allmylinks.com/total-disclosure
📺 Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
🔻 SUPPORT THE SHOW 💰 Direct Support (No Fees – PayPal): https://www.paypal.me/TDPstudios767?locale.x=en_US
⭐ YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
🔥 Patreon (Exclusive Content): https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure
🔻 FOLLOW & CONNECT X (Twitter): https://x.com/DisclosurePod
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/DisclosurePod
Facebook: https://facebook.com/@ty.totaldisclosure
Business Inquiries / Media Use: 📧 [email protected]
🔻 LISTEN TO THE PODCAST 🎧 Spreaker (Direct Support): https://www.spreaker.com/show/total-disclosure-ufos-cover-ups-and-cons
🍎 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-culture-corner/id1544297063
🟢 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0Yq6Iceyh7o24DG8tq4kvO
📦 Amazon / Audible: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08JJSX9GF
🔻 ABOUT THE CHANNEL: Total Disclosure Podcast explores UFOs, government cover-ups, conspiracies, paranormal encounters, and hidden truths through interviews, investigations, and deep-dive storytelling.
Hosted by Ty Roberts of TDP Studios, bringing firsthand accounts, expert insights, and uncensored discussions to uncover what lies beyond the official narrative.
Special thanks to all supporters, members, and listeners—this show exists because of you.
🔻 DISCLAIMER: Copyright Disclaimer (Section 107 of...
Speaker 1: Siste.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to Total Disclosure. My name is Tay and
Speaker 2: I am so happy to be here today, coming at
Speaker 2: you Live from Boston. Today, we have a special show
Speaker 2: on Total Disclosure. We're joined today by Joe Hawksa, a
Speaker 2: state representative in Connecticut's General Assembly. He's a researcher and
Speaker 2: one of the first legislators in the country to push
Speaker 2: forward UAP focused legislation. He's born in a post communist
Speaker 2: Albania and raised in Bristol, Connecticut. Joe's journey SPAN's public
Speaker 2: service academia and a lifelong curiosity about the unknown sparks
Speaker 2: early on by shows like The X Files and In
Speaker 2: Search of Now. He's bringing that curiosity into the halls
Speaker 2: of government, introducing legislation to formally study the UAP phenomena
Speaker 2: at the state level. This is a conversation that the
Speaker 2: intersection of policy and the unknown. My favorite. Let's welcome
Speaker 2: Joe Hawksa. Is that right? Hot?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 2: I didn't even ask no.
Speaker 3: I was like, yeah, yeah, oh yeah, no, that's exactly
Speaker 3: how it's pronounced in the United States of America.
Speaker 2: Well, it's such a pleasure to have you have you
Speaker 2: here today. I guess first what most people want to
Speaker 2: know is why or how someone like you brought this
Speaker 2: kind of legislation. So maybe we'll just start at your
Speaker 2: origins and tell me how you kind of even got
Speaker 2: into thinking about this stuff.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, great question, And yeah, it look like you said.
Speaker 3: You know, I've sort of had a lifelong curiosity about
Speaker 3: the topic. Uh, you know, any documentary, anything worth watching
Speaker 3: or reading I would always uh uh stay on top
Speaker 3: of and you know, make sure I watched the latest
Speaker 3: documentary or read, you know, the latest article or book
Speaker 3: that I could you know, that I could find on
Speaker 3: the topic. You know, and it's one of these things
Speaker 3: that for a lot of people, it's still very much
Speaker 3: so taboo, and I make it, you know, even like
Speaker 3: with the bill, I made sure to really keep the
Speaker 3: scope of you know, the the the bill and the
Speaker 3: intent of what we're trying to accomplish as narrow as
Speaker 3: possible because and even even though I did, the media
Speaker 3: still ran with it, and you know, put flying saucers
Speaker 3: above my head like I was gonna abducted by aliens.
Speaker 2: And exactly called me.
Speaker 3: You know, people on mine call me ufo Joe. They
Speaker 3: you know, I think that's taken. Yeah, you know, talk
Speaker 3: about Little Green Men, and there's no there's nothing about
Speaker 3: any of that in the bill. So I mean, I've
Speaker 3: always tried to The reason I bring that up is
Speaker 3: because I've always tried to make this pursuit as professional
Speaker 3: and as evidence based, science based as possible, and not
Speaker 3: about you know, hey, let's just you know, let our
Speaker 3: fantasies run wild here, and you know, it's it's never
Speaker 3: really you know, it's always been a very scientific based pursuit.
Speaker 3: But it was sparked by you said, you know, sort
Speaker 3: of fictional shows like The X Files. An intro of
Speaker 3: that show, you know, etched into my memory and it
Speaker 3: was such a cool show. And basically like the genesis
Speaker 3: of this curiosity started on a late summer morning. I
Speaker 3: was like seven or eight years old. It was summer vacation,
Speaker 3: and you know, I'm I'm I'm home alone. I think
Speaker 3: maybe my mom was grocery shopping or something like that.
Speaker 2: And back then we could be alone.
Speaker 3: Yes, exactly right, no babysitter.
Speaker 2: Mom was like, hey, I'm running out you.
Speaker 3: Good, Yeah, exactly exactly. And so you know, I'm just
Speaker 3: flipping through the channels, you know, trying to find someone
Speaker 3: to watch, you know, and I come across this show,
Speaker 3: and it happened to be that on that particular episode,
Speaker 3: they were discussing some UFO related phenomenon. I don't know
Speaker 3: if it was. I don't remember the details exactly. It
Speaker 3: might have been Roswell, it might have been you know,
Speaker 3: but I just remember seeing like a flying saucer in
Speaker 3: the picture and I was like, whoa this is This
Speaker 3: is really interesting? And why is this on the History Channel? Right?
Speaker 3: Like the History Channel talks about like presidents and wars
Speaker 3: and things that are facts, things that are real, right,
Speaker 3: Like I always told this, you know, aliens of UFOs.
Speaker 3: This is science fiction, you know, in the same category
Speaker 3: of you know, the Boogeyman and the tooth theory and
Speaker 3: you know, things like that. So why is you know
Speaker 3: this you know, credible program on this, you know, credible
Speaker 3: science history fact based channel.
Speaker 2: Uh you know back then again more history based. That
Speaker 2: is a good observation. Yeah, sorry to cut you.
Speaker 3: Off there, Yeah, yeah, no, And uh, you know I
Speaker 3: was kind of a bit a nerd really a large
Speaker 3: part of my life, but especially back then. You know,
Speaker 3: I loved reading about American history and you know, like
Speaker 3: like you said, you know, I wasn't born in this country.
Speaker 3: But I was, you know, pretty much raised your ninety
Speaker 3: nine percent of my life, and I always had like
Speaker 3: a deep appreciation for American history and American politics. So okay, yeah, so.
Speaker 2: You're watching you're watching this on the History Channel. Your
Speaker 2: mom's away. She already told you UFOs are part of
Speaker 2: myth fairy tale and you know, things that go things
Speaker 2: that just you know are legend. Right then you're seeing
Speaker 2: it on credible programming. What's I mean? Did you ask
Speaker 2: your mom like, hey, I thought you told me that
Speaker 2: was bullshit?
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly right. You know, I don't remember the exact details,
Speaker 3: but it was something like that, like it was like
Speaker 3: a you know, a question at some point, you know, like, hey,
Speaker 3: you know, I you know, I saw this like on TV.
Speaker 3: You thought you said it wasn't real, and you know,
Speaker 3: she kind of just brushed it off, like, oh, you know,
Speaker 3: did I say that? Okay? Whatever, you know, It's like,
Speaker 3: it's just it's what you know, that's it wasn't a
Speaker 3: big deal, you know what I mean? And for many
Speaker 3: people it still isn't. And and you know, part of
Speaker 3: what I'm trying to do with this legislation is trying
Speaker 3: to change that attitude, right, But yeah, I mean it
Speaker 3: was just like one of those things. It's like how
Speaker 3: we got bigger things to worry about, Like, what are
Speaker 3: you talking about?
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 3: UFOs?
Speaker 2: That is an interesting point too. It is because oftentimes
Speaker 2: we do we get ahead of ourselves and thinking this
Speaker 2: topic is number one, but there are actual issues going
Speaker 2: on with real like events like where you know, kids
Speaker 2: are getting blown up. You know, it's like, how does
Speaker 2: UFOs take precedent over something like what's happening in say
Speaker 2: Gaza or you know anywhere else? Right, how does that
Speaker 2: take And it's it's shouldn't, but it also shouldn't get
Speaker 2: left behind just because of that either, right. So there's
Speaker 2: this weird dichotomy, And there's honestly this weird dichotomy between
Speaker 2: your story and mine, the way your mother interacted with
Speaker 2: you and the way mine interacted with me, because when
Speaker 2: I saw what I saw, when I asked her about it,
Speaker 2: she was like, you saw UFO. She let me know.
Speaker 2: Early on, we didn't know all the answers, so you
Speaker 2: know what I mean. I grew up like, Okay, it's on, right,
Speaker 2: especially after I saw one myself, right, I was like,
Speaker 2: it's on. And then you know. So it's weird how
Speaker 2: our parents can really either open the aperture or close it.
Speaker 2: And I think and I think part of the problem
Speaker 2: and part of the solution now is the older generation
Speaker 2: versus the newer generation. The stigma's gone away. People like you,
Speaker 2: like myself, who are now in government, we're more open
Speaker 2: to it. Whereas the World War one guys, World War
Speaker 2: two guys, Yeah, it's not real, right, right, exactly, you're
Speaker 2: talking fairy tales exactly.
Speaker 3: Yeah, on the right line. Absolutely, And I think that's
Speaker 3: you know, the the general attitude with just you know,
Speaker 3: of that time period across many topics, right like, and
Speaker 3: you know, getting things to change requires a lot of effort,
Speaker 3: and most of the times it's not gonna The old
Speaker 3: guard isn't going to be the one to change its ways.
Speaker 3: It's a new sort of force or movement has to
Speaker 3: emerge to change the old. The old isn't going to
Speaker 3: change itself, so to speak, the old way of thinking
Speaker 3: is it isn't going to change itself, you know. It's
Speaker 3: it really takes you know, a new way of thinking,
Speaker 3: a new generation, uh to bring about that change. And yeah, no,
Speaker 3: it's it's really interesting because you know, and I've talked
Speaker 3: to like other people on you know, about this topic
Speaker 3: and of many different you know, generations, ages, you know,
Speaker 3: walks of life, and you know, ninety percent of the
Speaker 3: time it's like, oh yeah, you know, it's it's an
Speaker 3: interesting thing to discuss, but I've never had a personal
Speaker 3: experience or that, you know, you know, it's it's not
Speaker 3: like you said, there's so many other things, especially nowadays,
Speaker 3: competing for people's attention, you know, and quite frankly, just
Speaker 3: more existential, you know, more of you know, so many
Speaker 3: more things going on now that are of an existential
Speaker 3: nature than the UFO topic. But the UFO topic it's
Speaker 3: really hard to define. Like you know, we was talking
Speaker 3: to Gene earlier. It's it's so all and it's the
Speaker 3: we don't know what we don't know. And depending on
Speaker 3: how far the government is willing to explore this topic
Speaker 3: and dedicate resources to it, there's really no there's no limit.
Speaker 3: There's really no limit. And you know, it could it
Speaker 3: could be you know, we could be pursuing this and
Speaker 3: it hits a dead end, or you know, the government
Speaker 3: does make like a good faith effort to get to
Speaker 3: the bottom.
Speaker 2: Of this, they might not be a bottom.
Speaker 3: There might not be a bottom, right, right, And and
Speaker 3: that's the thing. But I'm but but here's the thing.
Speaker 3: They can create one and tell us that it is
Speaker 3: the bottom line, and we almost have like no choice
Speaker 3: but to like have to take their word for it, right, right,
Speaker 3: And the truth could be that there's more more to
Speaker 3: learn and more to see, but we'll never know, right.
Speaker 3: So I think when you add all that together, I
Speaker 3: think most most people's attitude, the average person's attitude is,
Speaker 3: like you just said, I'm paying a lot in taxes,
Speaker 3: I could barely afford to put groceries on the table.
Speaker 3: I'm having trouble paying my electric bill. You know, there's
Speaker 3: there's a war going on in Gaza, there's a war
Speaker 3: going on in Ukraine. There's a war going on in Iran. Like,
Speaker 3: there's a lot of stuff going on competing for people's attention.
Speaker 3: But does that does that mean that like the doctor,
Speaker 3: the medical doctor, because there's a war going on in
Speaker 3: God's Iran and Ukraine needs not to keep up on
Speaker 3: medical research? Does that mean right? Does that mean that
Speaker 3: the the rocket scientists because you know, because rocket technology
Speaker 3: is being used to to you know, basically project bombs,
Speaker 3: halfway across the world, that we need not continue to
Speaker 3: research rocket technology and propulsion technology and and transportation technology
Speaker 3: because it could be used for bad you know. Unfortunately,
Speaker 3: the world is always gonna have sucky situations. But we
Speaker 3: need to you know, care about those things and bring
Speaker 3: about positive change. But at the same time, we also
Speaker 3: need that little you know time that that that that
Speaker 3: time to uh kind of expand our horizons, you know,
Speaker 3: uh do something uh that progresses our society. And you
Speaker 3: know it's.
Speaker 2: Take a risk. Yeah, take a risk, get out on
Speaker 2: a limb, and taking risk is something especially in government.
Speaker 2: So to backtrack on that, because I don't want to
Speaker 2: go too far deep, what has been the response from
Speaker 2: your colleagues, because I know you said the media put
Speaker 2: UFOs over your head and stuff, as anyone like, what's
Speaker 2: been the general consensus of your colleagues, I would.
Speaker 3: Say majority supportive, But then again, even the ones that
Speaker 3: have actually supported the bill and even voted for the bill,
Speaker 3: you know, injected a little bit of humor into the
Speaker 3: into the topic, which I don't mind at all. I
Speaker 3: mean I don't I'm not somebody to take myself really seriously,
Speaker 3: and I take this topic seriously. But somebody injecting humor
Speaker 3: into it is not going to make it any less
Speaker 3: or you know, any less serious. But it's sort of like,
Speaker 3: you know, there was enough support on without you know,
Speaker 3: getting too you know political here. But obviously you know,
Speaker 3: as you know here in Massachusetts and similarly in Connecticut, Uh,
Speaker 3: there's one party that kind of dominates the political scene
Speaker 3: right now, and it's not the party I belonged to.
Speaker 3: So our our bills, you know, the bills proposed by
Speaker 3: the party I belonged to do not usually get taken up.
Speaker 3: Maybe some concepts can be incorporated into you know, the
Speaker 3: builds of the majority party, but our like standalone bills
Speaker 3: usually do not get taken up.
Speaker 2: And yeah, however, yeah, even at the national level, UAP
Speaker 2: seemed to be.
Speaker 3: Very bipartisans absolutely, so it passed. So it passed essentially
Speaker 3: when it when this had a public hearing, there was
Speaker 3: a few people that spoke in favor of it, nobody
Speaker 3: really spoke against it. And then when it came time
Speaker 3: to do a committee vote, you know that there was
Speaker 3: a couple of people that you know, spoke on the bill,
Speaker 3: and I was obviously one of them because it was
Speaker 3: my bill and you know, I had people that voted
Speaker 3: no within my own party. I had people that voted
Speaker 3: no in the you know, in the opposition party, and
Speaker 3: people have voted for it in my party. People have
Speaker 3: voted for it in the opposition party enough on both
Speaker 3: sides that it passed by a pretty good margin actually,
Speaker 3: And I would say that, you know, even the people
Speaker 3: that voted against it, they didn't vote it against it
Speaker 3: because they thought that it wasn't necessarily a topic, uh,
Speaker 3: not worth pursuing at some level. They just did an
Speaker 3: agree with the fact that, you know, we would have
Speaker 3: to pay for this study, and the budget is really
Speaker 3: tight right now in Connecticut, and you know, we have
Speaker 3: all sorts of issues with deficits and you know, surpluses
Speaker 3: and things like that, or lack of surpluses, I should say,
Speaker 3: and so every we're you know, we're trying to pinch
Speaker 3: as many pennies as possible here. So you know, a
Speaker 3: lot of people just viewed it as a as an
Speaker 3: economic thing and not worth.
Speaker 2: Right, going back to that point about this doesn't rank
Speaker 2: high enough on the list to pay for exactly. However
Speaker 2: it passes. Now, do you has anyone come up to
Speaker 2: you and you know, out of those who voted no,
Speaker 2: have you seen any inkling of hey, you shouldn't be
Speaker 2: dabbling with this stuff.
Speaker 3: No, No, not at all. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 3: the the the the exact opposite. There was a representative
Speaker 3: that covers an area where there's a military base that
Speaker 3: that supported the bill, co sponsored the bill, came up
Speaker 3: to me and said, you know, I've been looking to
Speaker 3: do something similar to this in the past, couldn't really
Speaker 3: quite find the right person on the other side of
Speaker 3: the aisle to like, you know, work with on this.
Speaker 3: And I'm I'm glad you you know, came forward, you know,
Speaker 3: on your own and and introduced something like this, and
Speaker 3: you know, uh, this is something definitely worth pursuing, even
Speaker 3: in its small scope. And uh yeah, I've had a
Speaker 3: lot of people, you know, support the concept absolutely.
Speaker 2: So quickly because you just oh man, you opened my
Speaker 2: mind there. Can you just summarize the bill? Yeah, and
Speaker 2: what it's going to do for what your what what
Speaker 2: is the action of it?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, no, great question. So basically, so this bill
Speaker 3: ran through a Probes Appropriate the Appropriations Committee, which, for
Speaker 3: your listeners that aren't too political, essentially all that means
Speaker 3: is the committee that decides where the you know, money goes.
Speaker 3: So most bills start off in another committee first, and
Speaker 3: then we'll go to a probes because a bill could
Speaker 3: be could have something to do with transportation, it could
Speaker 3: have something to do with education, it could have something
Speaker 3: to do with housing, and it starts off as a
Speaker 3: concept and then we'll get referred over to appropriations to
Speaker 3: get a fiscal. No, it's called a fiscal basically just
Speaker 3: you know, it tells us how much this idea is
Speaker 3: going to cost. So, but mind went straight to appropriations,
Speaker 3: which was a really good sign because then there was
Speaker 3: one less hoop it needed to jump. And essentially the
Speaker 3: bill allocates something like three hundred thousand dollars to the
Speaker 3: connect to a big money, right, big bucks. Three hundred
Speaker 3: thousand dollars for the Connecticut Academy of Science and Engineering
Speaker 3: to basically conduct a study and form a committee to
Speaker 3: conduct this study. It originally was going to go to
Speaker 3: Yukon the University of Connecticut, and it got moved over
Speaker 3: to case the Connecticut Academy of Science and Engineering.
Speaker 2: Right, Do you think it's better suited there?
Speaker 3: Yes, it is, because they're very more you know science,
Speaker 3: a science based organization and they've done things of this
Speaker 3: scope before, you know, studies of scientific you know things,
Speaker 3: And so I ended up meeting with the guy that's
Speaker 3: you know, kind of going to be overseeing this and
Speaker 3: basically the money is going to be used, like I
Speaker 3: was telling you guys before, you know, to hire a
Speaker 3: very qualified scientist that will then form a committee around
Speaker 3: and uh, then we're going to put into place some
Speaker 3: sort of system to record any anomalous sightings, whether they're
Speaker 3: on earth, whether you know, meaning whether they're on the ground,
Speaker 3: water or sky.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: That's that's why the bill, you know, I think they
Speaker 3: called it UFOs, but it was supposed to be UAPs
Speaker 3: and identified anomalous phenomenon because as enthusiasts like myself and you,
Speaker 3: uh no, you know, these unidentified events could happen and
Speaker 3: water could happen on the ground, could happen in the sky.
Speaker 3: It's not just in the skies most people are used to.
Speaker 2: In fact, most of it's not. I would I would
Speaker 2: argue that most of it if you call it, if
Speaker 2: you if you were to label it a UFO, you
Speaker 2: would be limiting the scope of you know, what you
Speaker 2: what you're actually looking at. That's why I think arrow
Speaker 2: does label everything is we have no credible evidence of
Speaker 2: extra terrestrial Like why use that word specifically?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Because they what if they're a two dimensional then you're
Speaker 2: you're not lying, but you're not telling.
Speaker 3: The truth, right, right exactly?
Speaker 2: So I like what you did there with the land,
Speaker 2: air and sea. Yeah, you can't go into space because
Speaker 2: of no right, right, you can't go above eighty thousand.
Speaker 3: Case is all federal I guess owned by the federal government.
Speaker 2: But okay, so I gotta know what sparked this now.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so great question. So you know, you sort of
Speaker 3: got my my genesis story here with the whole X
Speaker 3: files and in search of with Leonard need moy and everything,
Speaker 3: and but now you know, I gotta tell you a
Speaker 3: little bit about this, you know, sort of the recent
Speaker 3: events that transpired that prompted me to finally say, you
Speaker 3: know what, I'm going to use my authority to try
Speaker 3: to shine some light on this subject. So in recent years,
Speaker 3: obviously we've seen you know, congressional testimony by people like
Speaker 3: David Grush, Lieutenant Colonel David Fraverer, you know, the whole
Speaker 3: Ryan Graves. Yeah, you know, so many credible people, uh,
Speaker 3: stepping forward and sharing their UAP stories and you don't
Speaker 3: have to take their word for it. They actually have footage.
Speaker 3: It's not just I, you know, was out in the
Speaker 3: middle of you know, the desert and I saw something
Speaker 3: and and oh it's like, oh, well, you're sure you
Speaker 3: weren't smoking anything, you know whatever. It's these are credible
Speaker 3: people on the job in uniform reporting these things. So
Speaker 3: you know that. It also even before that, you know,
Speaker 3: just you know, the topic was sort of simmering and
Speaker 3: now it's kind of blown up. You know, Trump is
Speaker 3: talking about it. You know, President of the United States
Speaker 3: is talking about it. Just yesterday he said something, you know,
Speaker 3: said that something you know, major was going to get
Speaker 3: delivered to the American people soon. You know, as far
Speaker 3: as you know information what that is, I mean, I
Speaker 3: don't you do.
Speaker 2: I think it's going to be the forty six videos
Speaker 2: that Rep. Luna requested from the d D O W
Speaker 2: Now Department or war. I'm Pete hag Seth because even
Speaker 2: going back and forth on that, So that's what I
Speaker 2: think is would beat Yeah. Yeah, So with all that movement,
Speaker 2: like you said, continue.
Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, no, no, no, no, no, thank you. Yeah, I mean,
Speaker 3: it could be that maybe it's something else. You never know.
Speaker 3: With Trump, he's always.
Speaker 2: A wild card, truly a wild card.
Speaker 3: And you know he's done some great things, you know,
Speaker 3: and I you know, supported him, but you know, I
Speaker 3: don't carte blanche support, you know, uh, anything and everything
Speaker 3: everyone says, you know, regardless of uh, you know, even
Speaker 3: if they're somebody within my own party. You know, I
Speaker 3: am you know, sort of look at things and assessed
Speaker 3: with my own eyes and years and my own brain,
Speaker 3: eyes and years. You know, I don't just go with what,
Speaker 3: you know, with what the party line is, as they
Speaker 3: say in politics, right exactly. Yeah, I try at least, yeah,
Speaker 3: and you know, but I'm this topic. I mean, he's
Speaker 3: done more than any other president has. And I give
Speaker 3: kudos to Obama too. I mean he broached the topic
Speaker 3: a little bit, you know, George Bush and Bill Clinton.
Speaker 3: I think we're asked about it and typical.
Speaker 2: Kind of even back to Jimmy Carter.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Jimmy Carter. Oh yeah, we know about Jimmy Carter.
Speaker 3: He reported to move on. Yeah, Siding Key had and
Speaker 3: and Ronald Reagan had one too when he was under
Speaker 3: of California. So it's like, I guys, if I'm crazy
Speaker 3: for putting up, you know, putting in a bill to
Speaker 3: study the subject. Then I guess Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, Obama,
Speaker 3: George Bush, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump, they're all crazy.
Speaker 2: Obama is funding a Betty and Barney Hill film.
Speaker 3: I heard about that Netflix like original Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I mean you gotta ask, yeah, why why?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Right? Yeah, And you know it could be just like
Speaker 2: good you know, good old fashioned you know, venture capitalism
Speaker 2: and like getting into like new new things. Yeah, but
Speaker 2: there's also a big component to that story of the
Speaker 2: interracial ass Like, yes, that's Barney was heavily into the
Speaker 2: civil rights right, so I think I think he respects
Speaker 2: that part of their degree.
Speaker 3: And Obama has done I think, like a Netflix movie before.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Oddly enough he has like actually dabbled into the movie production.
Speaker 2: But regardless, again, regardless, And so you made a point
Speaker 2: earlier that I wanted to touch on, And it seems that
Speaker 2: when whether it's a president, a person like me, uh
Speaker 2: like Gene, a producer, or anyone, doesn't matter where you
Speaker 2: are in the world, when you have one of these sightings,
Speaker 2: it fundamentally alters you to a degree where you may
Speaker 2: have had a certain trajectory prior after the incident. This
Speaker 2: is the only topic I've ever seen that will change
Speaker 2: someone's life course. The rest of their life is dedicated
Speaker 2: to figuring out what that was. Yes, yeah, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: and it blows my mind.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, exactly. And you know, I was eventually going
Speaker 3: to bring this up, and I guess now would be
Speaker 3: a great opportunity to bring this up. That the sort
Speaker 3: of the fifty ton whatever elephant in the room when
Speaker 3: it comes to any of these discussions about UFOs and extraterrestrials, whatever,
Speaker 3: is well, if we discover that it is an extraterrestrial
Speaker 3: or non human intelligence behind these things, then what that's
Speaker 3: really what all of this boils down to. All the studies,
Speaker 3: all all the hearings, all the you know, the whole
Speaker 3: pursuit of this is to when we finally pull the
Speaker 3: you know, the veil off, and we find that we're
Speaker 3: truly out alone, then what then then, what it's like
Speaker 3: do people go crazy because of you know, strongly held
Speaker 3: religious or spiritual views that maybe humans as we know
Speaker 3: them earthlings were the only, uh, we're God's only creatures
Speaker 3: in the universe, which I don't believe in I don't
Speaker 3: think there's actually any evidence for that in any sort
Speaker 3: of Judeo Christian scripture either. But there's some people that
Speaker 3: do see the world that way, like uh, you know,
Speaker 3: like people would go crazy, right, And people that have
Speaker 3: had sightings on an individual basis, right, have like you said,
Speaker 3: been fundamentally changed for the rest of their lives because
Speaker 3: they've seen something or I've believed to see something that
Speaker 3: like they they're a human brain just couldn't handle. So
Speaker 3: that's why this topic is just infinitely interesting. And you know,
Speaker 3: with this bill, we're just pursuing a very very like
Speaker 3: you know, uh, a shaving off of the tip of
Speaker 3: the iceberg. Honestly, if you if you want to look
Speaker 3: at the potential of the whole topic, this what I'm
Speaker 3: doing is just a little shaving off the tip of
Speaker 3: the iceberg.
Speaker 2: Well you got to you gotta start cutting suff exactly right.
Speaker 2: So back to because I know where this I know
Speaker 2: where it's going. What what kicked this off? I kind
Speaker 2: of we kind of got off top, not off topic.
Speaker 2: I think that was great. Yeah, So what sparked this
Speaker 2: movement in you?
Speaker 3: Yeah, so you know, just like seeing this growing interest
Speaker 3: coming from the national level, and from uh scientists, you know,
Speaker 3: like you know we're talking. You know, I follow, you know,
Speaker 3: doctor Stephen Greer, I follow you know, like a v lobe.
Speaker 3: You know a lot of like these other people, and
Speaker 3: you know it's like we could all have, you know,
Speaker 3: our opinions on them, but I I try to follow
Speaker 3: as much as I can from everyone that's that's you know,
Speaker 3: has a level of credibility on this topic language. Yeah,
Speaker 3: And and it's like it's just becoming you know, you're
Speaker 3: seeing more documentaries pop up on like Prime Video, on Netflix,
Speaker 3: on you know TV shows. Obviously Ancient Aliens has been
Speaker 3: you know, on forever and you know, rip to Nick Pope,
Speaker 3: who you know sadly just passed away.
Speaker 2: I gotta give you credence, man, you know your stuff, Yeah,
Speaker 2: I know your stuff.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Nick was Yeah, yeah, great guy. Yeah. And I saw
Speaker 3: him live once in Torrington, Connecticut.
Speaker 2: Actually I was at Contact in the Desert with him
Speaker 2: last year. Yeah, and I got to sit in a
Speaker 2: room with him for like thirty thirty minutes and we
Speaker 2: just just me and him talk really wow. Yeah, it
Speaker 2: was it was, it was, it was so ancient aliens. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that stuff, you know.
Speaker 3: So you know, ancient aliens again on the History Channel,
Speaker 3: you know, and the History Channel I think still has
Speaker 3: a decent amount of credibility. It depends on what you're watching, right,
Speaker 3: But like all these things are like real things, I think,
Speaker 3: you know sometimes you know, because since the advent, this
Speaker 3: is a totally different rabbit hole and topic we could
Speaker 3: get into. And I actually want to feel almost like
Speaker 3: just to you know, know, almost as much about as
Speaker 3: as UFO is actually maybe even more than the sole
Speaker 3: era of social media, right, content kind of gets garbled
Speaker 3: into this you know, new dimension known as social media,
Speaker 3: and because it's now called you know, social media content
Speaker 3: or Internet content that you know, it kind of gets
Speaker 3: lumped in with thing that things that are just like
Speaker 3: not have no use, you know, like brain rot and
Speaker 3: you know, all this other garbage that's on the Internet, right,
Speaker 3: And because it exists on that platform, it doesn't mean
Speaker 3: that it's that thing, right, Like we're talking about like
Speaker 3: you said, Betty and Barney Hill, that story has been
Speaker 3: around forever, but it only existed in the domain of
Speaker 3: print media, and you know sort of just this you know,
Speaker 3: oral retelling of the story. You know, there wasn't really
Speaker 3: like you know, like a center for the study of
Speaker 3: this phenomenon that happened to these people to like give
Speaker 3: it sort of that like academic level like stamp of
Speaker 3: like credibility, right, so, you know, as because it's not
Speaker 3: it hasn't been taken seriously. This topic hasn't been taken
Speaker 3: seriously to that level. These stories had to go somewhere
Speaker 3: and they went on.
Speaker 2: You know, the internet, national acchoir exactly, stuff.
Speaker 3: Like that, exactly. And it's unfortunate, right, And because of
Speaker 3: the way we're just wired as human beings, we associate things, right,
Speaker 3: So like if I saw this on Instagram, or if
Speaker 3: I saw this on you know, YouTube, or if I
Speaker 3: saw this on Alex Jones or something, it's.
Speaker 2: It's inherently less credible exactly, right, even though and but
Speaker 2: guess who's saying that.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, right right.
Speaker 2: The ones who like who gave them the right. It's
Speaker 2: like you guys are playing pharmaceutical ads every every thirty seconds,
Speaker 2: I know where your allegiance.
Speaker 3: Is, right, come on, right, And I think more people
Speaker 3: are smartening up and they're seeing things for what they
Speaker 3: are and not pre judging things because of stupid you
Speaker 3: know things like that, like oh, you know, you know,
Speaker 3: it's funny. It's like, you know, you go you know,
Speaker 3: you go to the doctors, or you go to you know,
Speaker 3: some like professional right, or you go to your your
Speaker 3: banker or whatever, you know, somebody that holds a professional position, right,
Speaker 3: And I work in banking. You know, it's like my
Speaker 3: other job, Like I'm we don't make enough money to
Speaker 3: be full time politicians. We're only part time, so you
Speaker 3: gotta have another job, right, Yeah, that's a problem. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3: So you know it's like you go to like, you know,
Speaker 3: the authorities. I guess that's the term. I was looking
Speaker 3: for the authorities, right, the professionals, the authorities about a
Speaker 3: particular topic. Like you go to your doctor and you
Speaker 3: talk about you know, like hey, I heard you know,
Speaker 3: maybe this diet is better than that diet or taking
Speaker 3: this supplements has like been shown to you know, to
Speaker 3: have this positive effect. And immediately these people in these
Speaker 3: positions of authority, they'll go, oh, or just see that
Speaker 3: on the internet. Yeah I did, and saying I saw
Speaker 3: that on the internet as a kid to saying yeah,
Speaker 3: I took out a book on that subject in the library.
Speaker 3: The internet isn't all bad, and it's not all junk.
Speaker 3: It's you got to judge things on a case by
Speaker 3: case basis. If I'm producing you a document that is
Speaker 3: a study that was published somewhere on the internet, it
Speaker 3: could have been from the official like government source, it
Speaker 3: could have been from like, you know, the National Health
Speaker 3: you know department or whatever. You know, it's like just
Speaker 3: because it's on the right. And I think, again, going
Speaker 3: back to that whole older generation thing, I think that
Speaker 3: it's tough, you know, with people that, especially with professionals
Speaker 3: in their respective fields, it's really tough for them to
Speaker 3: go against the grain of how their profession has taught
Speaker 3: them to think on a particular subject. It's really difficult.
Speaker 3: And there's a few people that are able to sort
Speaker 3: of unshackle themselves from that way of thinking and rise
Speaker 3: above it and welcome new information that comes in right,
Speaker 3: and use that information and judge it on its own
Speaker 3: merits instead of pre judging it from the lens of
Speaker 3: the previous paradigm that they were in.
Speaker 2: Right, do you think there's a problem in government where
Speaker 2: maybe some of the older generational people or even younger people,
Speaker 2: it's kind of taken off with that the younger generation
Speaker 2: now as well. But this really hardline religious belief where
Speaker 2: they think that we're dealing with angels and demons and
Speaker 2: we're invoking, inherently invoking demonic whatever, right just by dabbling
Speaker 2: in it. Do you think that that, even if it's
Speaker 2: not spoken out loud, do you think that that could
Speaker 2: be a problem.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I do, actually, and I think I've heard that
Speaker 3: a lot, and I've heard it from some younger people.
Speaker 3: I've also heard it from some older folks. I have
Speaker 3: a good friend who would probably be a great guest
Speaker 3: on this podcast actually recommend Yes, absolutely, I really want to.
Speaker 2: Talk to the person who's doing the study too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh yeah, that's yeah. I can definitely put you
Speaker 3: in touch with him. Oh yeah. And and part of
Speaker 3: what the study in Vaz is using that money to
Speaker 3: hire like a professor who's going to be doing this
Speaker 3: like full time. So we have we have some people
Speaker 3: on the shortlist, and I could run that shortlist value
Speaker 3: and see what you think of those people. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: But you know, getting back to what I was saying,
Speaker 3: You know this this friend of mine, an older gentleman
Speaker 3: who has a military background, like like Genie here, and
Speaker 3: has worked in you know, intelligence and all that stuff.
Speaker 3: You know as he was, you know, actually a component
Speaker 3: of me, you know, finally, you know, sort of taking
Speaker 3: the step to bring this bill forward because of all
Speaker 3: the things that he told me that I couldn't believe
Speaker 3: we're true, but actually we're true. And so when so
Speaker 3: again it comes it comes down to people that are
Speaker 3: in positions of authority, right, or that were in positions
Speaker 3: of authority that we're part of the power structure, if
Speaker 3: there breaking off and they're saying, hey, what we've told
Speaker 3: you was not true, this is actually what happened, and
Speaker 3: this is actually how it worked. Uh that is I mean,
Speaker 3: you can't get any more credible than that, right, You
Speaker 3: can't get any closer to the source than somebody that
Speaker 3: was a part of the source telling you that what
Speaker 3: you're seeing on TV or what we've told you is
Speaker 3: not true.
Speaker 2: I agree.
Speaker 3: So that could have, you know, sparked more motivation and
Speaker 3: just more of a desire to bring this topic to
Speaker 3: use my capacity as an elected official to yeah I hear. Yeah,
Speaker 3: definitely an electric vehicle.
Speaker 2: I think it's a literal uf O.
Speaker 3: I love the sound those vehicles make.
Speaker 2: Literal yeah, neighbor.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And so where I was going with that was
Speaker 3: remind me again. So we were talking about my friend who.
Speaker 2: So what sparked the you taking the next time?
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, so you know, seeing you know how all
Speaker 3: these things are coming to uh you know, uh being
Speaker 3: brought into the mainstream and really important people in government
Speaker 3: are discussing these things. I said, look, it's now or never.
Speaker 3: This is this is the time for me to really,
Speaker 3: you know, use my my position, my tiny little position
Speaker 3: of authority here might but one that offers me a
Speaker 3: platform two to bring this subject into the mainstream. And
Speaker 3: if and if it accomplishes nothing else other than allowing
Speaker 3: more people to come forward, more you know, uh, scientists,
Speaker 3: ex military people to hop on this bandwagon, if nothing else,
Speaker 3: if it only results in that, then it'll it'll have
Speaker 3: accomplished its mission.
Speaker 2: I agree. I agree. So you told me on the phone. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and I want to segue here. You were in New Jersey, Yeah,
Speaker 2: during the quote unquote New Jersey drone incursions.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Can you tell me what that was like and what
Speaker 2: you were seeing? Yeah, you know what you felt and
Speaker 2: what was what was the Yeah.
Speaker 3: So this was late mid to late November of two
Speaker 3: thousand and twenty four. I was taking a road trip actually,
Speaker 3: to Arizona. Funny enough, I actually don't like to fly.
Speaker 3: I'm very interested in unidentified flying objects, but I myself
Speaker 3: do not like to fly.
Speaker 2: You're not going to take a ride in the UFO.
Speaker 3: If one was offered to actually believe it or not
Speaker 3: have one. If one was offered to me, i'd probably
Speaker 3: I'd probably take Yeah, like I would probably, you know, Yeah,
Speaker 3: you don't like fly, yeah, exactly, But I don't like
Speaker 3: to fly in commercial airplanes UFOs. I'm fine with them.
Speaker 3: So anyway, I had to go to this conference and
Speaker 3: in Arizona. It wasn't a UFO conference, it was something
Speaker 3: unrelated and I had some time, I guess, you know whatever.
Speaker 3: It was like during like Thanksgiving. So I had a
Speaker 3: few days off from work, and so I drove to Arizona.
Speaker 3: It was like a two day trip. I'd love to drive,
Speaker 3: I don't. I could drive like sixteen hours NonStop. I
Speaker 3: don't mind it at all, especially if it's going somewhere
Speaker 3: new that I haven't seen before. That constant like stimulation
Speaker 3: of you know, seeing new new landscapes and new cities
Speaker 3: is enough to keep me awake. But so I'm driving
Speaker 3: through New Jersey and I left it around like three
Speaker 3: or four o'clock PM, and it's it's already like dark
Speaker 3: by then, you know, that time of year. So but
Speaker 3: I'm at the part now where it's like leaving New
Speaker 3: Jersey going into like Pennsylvania, but still sort of on
Speaker 3: the New Jersey side. And from that point and until
Speaker 3: I got to about halfway through Virginia, there was a
Speaker 3: stretch of highway where every five minutes there was the
Speaker 3: red and green like flashing indicative of a drone or
Speaker 3: that you know, that particular sort of flashing that is
Speaker 3: required by law to you know, to be to be
Speaker 3: on a drone. Every five minutes or so, there was
Speaker 3: like a new one sort of just like hanging about
Speaker 3: one hundred or two hundred feet above the highway, and
Speaker 3: then you know, you would drive by because it was
Speaker 3: literally just standing in place, it wasn't like moving, and
Speaker 3: then five minutes later another one would appear, and every
Speaker 3: five to ten minutes for like about two and a
Speaker 3: half hours from New Jersey to Virginia, rotating through. It's
Speaker 3: rotating through. And the funniest and craziest thing was that
Speaker 3: there was literally signs on this highway that said that
Speaker 3: there could be like low hanging craft or aerial photography happened.
Speaker 3: So I said, Okay, that's that's what it is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, were these signs that seemed like they were just
Speaker 2: put up?
Speaker 3: Or no, no, no, they were like yeah, it seemed like
Speaker 3: they were there. They were like newer signs. I actually
Speaker 3: thought that too. I was like, is this something that
Speaker 3: they just put up or has this been a fixture
Speaker 3: on this highway for a while, and leaning more towards
Speaker 3: the ladder that it was, you know, a permanent fixture
Speaker 3: on the highway. But I just found it like really strange, like, hey,
Speaker 3: there's these signs that are warning us, warning or letting
Speaker 3: us know that there is these craft. And well, actually
Speaker 3: that made that sort of alleviated some of my you know,
Speaker 3: anxiety about these things because I saw these signs and
Speaker 3: it explained potentially what these were. But then when I
Speaker 3: go when I get to like when I finally like
Speaker 3: stop for the night or the next day or whatever,
Speaker 3: and I'm get a chance to look through my phone
Speaker 3: and catch up on the news or whatever, this had
Speaker 3: like made the news that there was like drones all
Speaker 3: over like this part of New Jersey that I was
Speaker 3: literally driving through, and I could safely say that they
Speaker 3: appeared to be drones. Did they want UFOs? They weren't
Speaker 3: things that were unidentified by me. They looked like drones.
Speaker 3: I could sort of make out the shape of the
Speaker 3: actual craft, and also based off the lighting, they looked
Speaker 3: like drones. But why there was dozens of drones along
Speaker 3: that stretch of highway on that night, I cannot tell
Speaker 3: you for the life of me.
Speaker 2: Right, right, So you're and that's very interesting, you know,
Speaker 2: because I had I had a member of Congress tell me, now,
Speaker 2: I think it's kind of come out and like a
Speaker 2: company kind of took responsibility and was like, no, you know,
Speaker 2: that's our stuff. But there's not a lot of drones
Speaker 2: that can fly at night, you know, because you need
Speaker 2: a certain thermal Like there's no sense in flying a
Speaker 2: drone at night because a lot of them don't have
Speaker 2: like the right cameras, like you're blind in the sky.
Speaker 2: But apparently they have these radiation seeking drones, thermal drones, right,
Speaker 2: So that's what's up there. And I had a member
Speaker 2: of Congress tell me on a on an encryptied chat
Speaker 2: to not go there, because I was like, Hey, I
Speaker 2: want to go and I want to see these things
Speaker 2: and he was like, I wouldn't. He's like, I'm not
Speaker 2: convinced that there's not a dirty dirt, dirty nuke that
Speaker 2: they're like a bomb looking for that they were looking for.
Speaker 2: He's like, I don't know if it's war games or not,
Speaker 2: but he's like, I just wouldn't take the chance. And
Speaker 2: I didn't. I didn't take the chance I wanted to.
Speaker 2: But it's odd, you know what it reminds me of
Speaker 2: because these things were breaching bases like Langley. They were
Speaker 2: breaching bases that you know, like right Pat and we'll
Speaker 2: get the right Pat and a few of them with
Speaker 2: the missing scientists and generals. I don't want to get
Speaker 2: into after the break, but there is how are these
Speaker 2: things a staying up for so long without you know,
Speaker 2: the size they were? It just none of it made sense.
Speaker 2: So a lot of people were saying, like, you know,
Speaker 2: there was a mix of UFOs and drones, and maybe
Speaker 2: the UFOs. The drones were there because of the UFOs,
Speaker 2: and you know that's how the UFO community spins every day. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but these things were also shutting down facilities like our
Speaker 2: sensitive facilities. So every drone I know of, you can't
Speaker 2: even cross into an airport without it shutting itself down, right, right,
Speaker 2: So who got who has that capability?
Speaker 3: Yeah, these were definitely special drones. They weren't, you know,
Speaker 3: And I kind of had that feeling, you know, just
Speaker 3: looking at them and the way that they were moving
Speaker 3: and the fact that they were sort of synchronized to
Speaker 3: like kind of take over rotate shifts every like ten
Speaker 3: minutes or so. That's almost kind of like what it
Speaker 3: felt like, because you would see one and it was
Speaker 3: about you know, maybe like a couple miles away or whatever,
Speaker 3: five hundred yards a couple of miles away, like you
Speaker 3: would see it as you would get closer, like it
Speaker 3: wasn't moving, because it would get bigger if it was
Speaker 3: moving the way or closer to you would either get
Speaker 3: bigger really faster, you continue to stay small in your
Speaker 3: sort of field of vision. But it was just hover
Speaker 3: there and it was about two hundred three hundred feet
Speaker 3: above ground, and there was a sign that said aerial photography.
Speaker 3: Maybe it's some sort of craft that's taking pictures of
Speaker 3: the highway or I.
Speaker 2: Don't know, right, your your your brains like yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah. But then it's like it would leave, it
Speaker 3: would just literally leave. It would be like it would
Speaker 3: just go and then like five minutes down the road,
Speaker 3: down the highway, there'd be another one in the same position,
Speaker 3: you know, just like sort of floating, you know, maybe
Speaker 3: not exactly staying still, but like you know, kind of current,
Speaker 3: like the current. Yeah. So it did that for like
Speaker 3: three hours, and that on the stretch a highway from
Speaker 3: New Jersey to Virginia.
Speaker 2: That's odd. I mean it's odd.
Speaker 3: Yeah, right.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: And then so that so that has to be something
Speaker 2: that at least because have you ever seen a UFO.
Speaker 3: I've never seen one. I know people that have. Actually
Speaker 3: a family member of mine just told me that she
Speaker 3: had seen one.
Speaker 2: Well, once he become the UFO.
Speaker 3: Guy, yeah, people start coming.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they're going to feel a lot more comfortable
Speaker 2: with you going forward.
Speaker 3: Yeah, what's that?
Speaker 2: So you don't have to tell me her name what
Speaker 2: she is, but what did she tell you?
Speaker 3: So this was in a city in Connecticut and she
Speaker 3: saw a like classic like disc shape and she was
Speaker 3: with like another friend that like flew above their heads.
Speaker 3: When I say above their heads on I mean like
Speaker 3: right above their heads, but like you know, five six
Speaker 3: hundred feet above their heads, and that it just sort
Speaker 3: of like vanished, Like it didn't drift off into a direction,
Speaker 3: it just disappeared.
Speaker 2: Can you can you guys get me the the average
Speaker 2: count of UFO sidings in Connecticut? I think move on
Speaker 2: has it? Yeah, I want to know how many cases
Speaker 2: are reported there.
Speaker 3: Connecticut is high. It is high, right, that's part of
Speaker 3: you know, the the justification for the study is that
Speaker 3: Connecticut has some of the highest you know, UFO sidings
Speaker 3: per capita, and you know, don't we want like a
Speaker 3: central repository to collect this information and a sort of
Speaker 3: systemic scientific way to analyze it. I think so, especially
Speaker 3: for the discount discounted rate of two hundred and seventy
Speaker 3: five thousand US your connect A taxpayers.
Speaker 2: So oh man, so per month.
Speaker 3: It's a lot.
Speaker 2: That's actually that is a lot.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean we're right between Boston and New York.
Speaker 3: I mean, the two most arguably two of the most
Speaker 3: important cities in the country.
Speaker 2: Like, is there is there any bases in Connecticut that
Speaker 2: are noteworthy? Hey you brought one up?
Speaker 3: Yeah, Groton, Yeah, you got Grounton, Connecticut. You have the
Speaker 3: headquarters of raytheon down the street here.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, the headquarters of Raytheons in Connecticut, no.
Speaker 3: No, no, in mass in mass yeah, yeah yeah. And
Speaker 3: Gronton's a nuclear basin right on the corner of Rhode
Speaker 3: Island and Connecticut there. And then of course, you know
Speaker 3: you have like anything that could come from the Hudson
Speaker 3: Valley in New York. That's a hot spot historically, Whitley Stream, Yeah.
Speaker 2: The whole, that whole.
Speaker 3: Uh yeah.
Speaker 2: During the eighties there was a huge wait, what do
Speaker 2: you think about abductions?
Speaker 3: So my view on that is I always defer to
Speaker 3: people that like have have talked to the alleged abductees
Speaker 3: and are privy to more information than I am. And
Speaker 3: I really like, like, I really like doctor Greer's UH
Speaker 3: answers to a lot of these questions, which is UH.
Speaker 3: And I firmly believe this because of conversations that I've
Speaker 3: had with people like Jean and my friend that I
Speaker 3: was referencing earlier, that the United States government has has
Speaker 3: capabilities that like the public will never know about.
Speaker 2: Can I stop you from the because you just just
Speaker 2: because I don't think this will be able to insert
Speaker 2: this and anywhere else? Yeah, do you hear about this
Speaker 2: ghost murmur thing?
Speaker 3: Ghost?
Speaker 2: What ghost murmur No with how they found that pilot
Speaker 2: that went down in Iran? No, they did. Can you
Speaker 2: guys bring this up the ghost murmur So? First off,
Speaker 2: whoever named it? Great job? Great job. So you know
Speaker 2: the pilot that went down in Iran?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, we recovered him, I think, right.
Speaker 2: You know how we did that, Well, the CIA has
Speaker 2: this technology where they can detect a heartbeat, and they
Speaker 2: did it from thirty nine point something miles out and
Speaker 2: he Now, mind you, you have to separate animals heart beats,
Speaker 2: everything that has a heartbeat, and they found this guy.
Speaker 2: Now again I think take it with a grain of salt,
Speaker 2: because whether we want to believe it or not, we
Speaker 2: are in wartime.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and when you want.
Speaker 2: To scare your enemy and to think and you have
Speaker 2: some fucking crazy yeah you know technology, uh you know
Speaker 2: you but could it be a half truth? But yeah,
Speaker 2: they detected this guy's heartbeat from forty almost forty miles
Speaker 2: out and he was in a crevice. And the first
Speaker 2: thing he said back that he sent back, according to
Speaker 2: Pete Eggzeth, who I'm not believing that this is what
Speaker 2: he said first was God is good. That's not my
Speaker 2: first message back. It's like get me the gout of here, right,
Speaker 2: get me out of here? Not God is good, So
Speaker 2: I think that maybe the third or fourth right, right, right,
Speaker 2: like once you're getting contact of God is right. But anyway,
Speaker 2: but yeah, yeah, I mean that's crazy. That's and if
Speaker 2: that's what they're telling us, we am right.
Speaker 3: Imagine what we actually have. Look, I have constituents who
Speaker 3: have come to me really hard with things like this
Speaker 3: because it's it's like they could be crazy. But what
Speaker 3: if they're not right? And I've had constituents that have
Speaker 3: come to me and have said, oh, I'm sorry, Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's just one. One constituent has come to me and
Speaker 3: has said that he believes he was being targeted by
Speaker 3: like a like a directed energy weapon, right, yes, and
Speaker 3: can everybody described so he described like this like nothing
Speaker 3: overtly physical, but that he would kind of here like
Speaker 3: in the middle of night, like clockwork. And again this
Speaker 3: is also something people that are suffering from you know,
Speaker 3: genuine and mental health issues could probably experience as well.
Speaker 3: But he was describing a sort of like metallic noise
Speaker 3: like uh, like nails like coming down on like your roof,
Speaker 3: and headaches associated with it. Every single you know, every
Speaker 3: other night or something not like late at night, like
Speaker 3: eight nine o'clock at night or something like that. Like
Speaker 3: most people are still up by then, you know, unless
Speaker 3: you have some like crazy job you're getting up at
Speaker 3: like four. Most people are still up and like pretty
Speaker 3: alert at like eight or nine o'clock. And at least
Speaker 3: I am, I mean alert, Yeah, exactly right, that's when
Speaker 3: a lot of people are most alert. And you know,
Speaker 3: and this person, it's like, you know, when you talk
Speaker 3: to him and he's not talking about this subject, he
Speaker 3: seems like pretty normal, like a little eccentric, you know,
Speaker 3: but like seems pretty normal. And I've been trying to
Speaker 3: help this guy out a lot, and I've actually helped
Speaker 3: him out my story. No, he didn't know. He didn't
Speaker 3: serve in the military.
Speaker 2: Military. Do you work on anything?
Speaker 3: To tell you? It's hard. It's hard to do. No,
Speaker 3: I know, I mean I would, I mean I would.
Speaker 3: I wish I knew more about him. I don't really
Speaker 3: know too much about his personal life. Maybe that's something
Speaker 3: I could ask him about. But he's like sort of
Speaker 3: like a musician type, you know, and like just.
Speaker 2: Not boxes me. Yeah, yeah, there's something about it. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the metallic sounds and there's other stuff too. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: then just you tend to see a lot of creative.
Speaker 3: Creative people, Yeah, people being.
Speaker 2: Associated with this interesting. So you know, i'd be interested
Speaker 2: to know what he did.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, And I'll talk to him. And you know,
Speaker 3: he's having a hard time, you know with that's crazy.
Speaker 2: No burning inside though, no like internal like like feels
Speaker 2: like his insides are. I'm not trying to lead you.
Speaker 3: I think describes a lot of like it's that sort
Speaker 3: of stuff in his head, like.
Speaker 2: Interesting like interesting stuff. I would implore you to look
Speaker 2: into something called Havana syndrome.
Speaker 3: That's what he described it as.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, but yeah, yeah, that's that's deep.
Speaker 3: So it's definitely something to look into. And I mean,
Speaker 3: I'm happy to do it for him, and I try
Speaker 3: to help him out as much as I can. But
Speaker 3: but I mean, anyhow, I mean, we were, you know,
Speaker 3: we were talking about you know, abductees and things like that,
Speaker 3: and that actually brought me to thinking about a point
Speaker 3: that I was trying to make earlier about the angels
Speaker 3: and demons, and the same individual that's you know, told
Speaker 3: me about things that you know, the government, nothing classified,
Speaker 3: just you know, things that he was privy to that
Speaker 3: you know now has become declassified, but that he knew
Speaker 3: four thirty forty years ago. But that individual believes he's
Speaker 3: a big Roman Catholic and he believes that UFOs could
Speaker 3: be like demons, right or you know sort of you know,
Speaker 3: spirits or something. And you know, I said to him, well,
Speaker 3: you know, Jim, his name's Jim. I said, maybe maybe
Speaker 3: some of it is right. And again going back to
Speaker 3: the Stephen doctor Stephen Greer thing, he says, eighty or
Speaker 3: ninety percent of the things that we see in the skies,
Speaker 3: you know, are probably man made. Ten to twenty percent
Speaker 3: are truly unidentified. Now in that ten to twenty percent category,
Speaker 3: maybe some of these things do have like an interdimensional
Speaker 3: or spiritual you know component, like in the way a
Speaker 3: traditional Roman Catholic or religious person understands the existence of
Speaker 3: these things via their scripture, and in that same categor
Speaker 3: where it could be true extraterrestrial presence. But I really
Speaker 3: do think that it just makes a lot of sense
Speaker 3: at eighty to ninety percent of like what we've seen
Speaker 3: in the skuys is probably just Raytheon and probably just
Speaker 3: Lockheed Martin or Northward Runman or some of these black projects,
Speaker 3: you know departments, black budget departments or whatever, you know,
Speaker 3: testing their you know.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're their next gens, their next.
Speaker 3: Gens and things that may we may never see.
Speaker 2: And you know, it's crazy to me that we've got
Speaker 2: to this point where it's not even that we deny it.
Speaker 2: We're not even denying anymore. We just go, yeah, it's
Speaker 2: probably black but black budget tech. Yeah, right, that's the deferral.
Speaker 2: Yeah right, it's not.
Speaker 3: No, you're crazy, you're crazy, right, No, it's it's.
Speaker 2: It's like, no, that's when we got cooking with Darba.
Speaker 3: I don't totally agree. I think, you know, this would
Speaker 3: probably have been a better way to start this whole conversation, uh,
Speaker 3: you know, with which is that I think the Overton
Speaker 3: window has moved right, Like, these conversations are not starting
Speaker 3: from the point of the person that is reporting a
Speaker 3: UFO first having to prove they're not crazy and then
Speaker 3: having to prove that they actually saw what they have
Speaker 3: to saw. I think we've moved past to the point
Speaker 3: now where it's like, Okay, describe to me specifically what
Speaker 3: you saw, and I can tell you whether it's something
Speaker 3: that is probably connected to something humans are doing or
Speaker 3: something that is truly unidentified or unexplained, right, like.
Speaker 2: If it's a bead of lights in the sky, probably starlink.
Speaker 3: Exactly most starlink I've seen. And I thought I had
Speaker 3: my first UFO encounter. I was actually on a face
Speaker 3: it and I had no idea what starlink was. I
Speaker 3: was three or four years ago. I was on a
Speaker 3: ferry from Connecticut to Long Island and as we were
Speaker 3: coming back from the Long Island side to Connecticut. Uh,
Speaker 3: it was the middle of the night. I think it
Speaker 3: was like eight o'clock at night, and uh, it wasn't
Speaker 3: quite summer yet. I don't think or it might have
Speaker 3: been like fall. And because it was, it was very dark.
Speaker 3: It might've even been like later than eight o'clock. It
Speaker 3: was really dark. And you know, they were in the
Speaker 3: middle of the sound there and there's no light, so
Speaker 3: it's just like really dark. And I look up and
Speaker 3: I see you know, like these things almost like uh
Speaker 3: meteorites or you know, flying uh like comments or something
Speaker 3: you know, like things like almost like burning in like
Speaker 3: the the atmosphere. And I was like, holy crap, Like
Speaker 3: I see a UFO pe yeah, right, And then I
Speaker 3: like I see somebody else like looking at it. I'm like, dude,
Speaker 3: you see this and he's like he has like a
Speaker 3: head of like his headphones in, and like he takes
Speaker 3: off his headphones and he's like what. He's like, do
Speaker 3: you see this? And he's like, oh yeah, that's that's
Speaker 3: a starlink.
Speaker 2: Here's a good here's an interesting thing though, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: did you not feel a little like a ship, like
Speaker 2: you almost want to believe?
Speaker 3: Oh yeah?
Speaker 2: And he like almost crushes you, oh yeah, being like,
Speaker 2: oh no, that's us starlink because it's like you you're thinking,
Speaker 2: you're like, oh my god, this is great. Yeah, and
Speaker 2: then someone's like, dude, starling and you're like, oh yeah,
Speaker 2: it makes and it kind of takes the wind out
Speaker 2: of your sails.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah.
Speaker 2: So you can see why people when they do have
Speaker 2: these sightings, they get defensive when they get explained prosaically.
Speaker 2: So we do have that as a problem. But any
Speaker 2: good UFO investigator researcher, they know that ninety percent, and
Speaker 2: that's being generous if not ninety five percent can be
Speaker 2: explained prosaically. Yeah, the five percent, that's what needs further investigation.
Speaker 2: And I assume that that's what you guys are going
Speaker 2: to want to see absolutely, Now, what kind of sensors
Speaker 2: and stuff are you guys going to be putting cameras?
Speaker 2: Are you going to be using existing astronomy you know,
Speaker 2: I know you met with Mark D'Antonio front of the show.
Speaker 2: He's got his observatories.
Speaker 3: Yep in Arizona, which is really cool. So basically, the
Speaker 3: funds for the study are gonna really only be going
Speaker 3: to paying the director and a couple of people that
Speaker 3: he's gonna have to sort of subcontract with. And then
Speaker 3: I think, because this is being run through the State
Speaker 3: of Connecticut, any resources and any detection software or anything
Speaker 3: that is watching the skies via the State of Connecticut's network,
Speaker 3: I think will be made available to the committee at
Speaker 3: no charge. Traffic camps, stuff like that. Yeah, really, like
Speaker 3: I think anything that like this guy is going to
Speaker 3: need that like the State of Connecticut owns, I think
Speaker 3: will be made available, like you know, free of charge
Speaker 3: because it's intra yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, So anything obviously
Speaker 3: that would be federal, we'll try to get, you know,
Speaker 3: like free of charge, but like if there's a charge
Speaker 3: or if we can't get because it's classified.
Speaker 2: Or as be interesting to see what they push back on.
Speaker 3: Right right, and and well that's the thing that'll also
Speaker 3: let us know where your boundaries are, where.
Speaker 2: You're yeah yeah, yeah, for lack of yeah, and also
Speaker 2: show as you ah, where they draw the line, you know,
Speaker 2: like it's anyway, So are you Are you a religious person?
Speaker 2: You don't have to answer yeah, but like, do you
Speaker 2: believe in a creator?
Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, I know, I think I do. And
Speaker 3: I think the best way I could answer that is
Speaker 3: there there was a guy that I follow who passed away.
Speaker 3: His name is Jordan Maxwell. Yeah, and I follow a
Speaker 3: lot of the work that he did. I'm not saying
Speaker 3: all of it was, you know, accurate or he was
Speaker 3: right about everything, but he had this one really really
Speaker 3: good quote that I love using, and he always said that,
Speaker 3: you know, he was just an ordinary man pursuing extraordinary knowledge.
Speaker 3: And he also had another really good quote on the
Speaker 3: religious side of things, which was that if you claim
Speaker 3: to know God, then you probably don't. So that's and
Speaker 3: that's where I stand. I think, you know, there a
Speaker 3: God exists, a creator exists, but me trying to understand
Speaker 3: what that is is is a futile endeavor. So I
Speaker 3: just appreciate what it produces and what it what it's
Speaker 3: you know, given to us. And this you know universe
Speaker 3: we live in and it's up to us to explore
Speaker 3: it and understand it better. But to understand why God
Speaker 3: did what he did and all that stuff is I
Speaker 3: think it's it's a futile pursuit. And you know, especially
Speaker 3: the way like you know, uh, organized religion kind of
Speaker 3: you know, creates this terrain where uh people, you know,
Speaker 3: they're pitting people against each other, Like I mean, I
Speaker 3: don't I don't consider myself like a Christian. Do I
Speaker 3: believe Jesus existed? Yeah, Jesus probably existed. Was Jesus divine
Speaker 3: in any way? Maybe? Maybe not? I don't know. I'm
Speaker 3: not ruling it out. I'm not don't have any evidence
Speaker 3: to show that he that he that you know, other
Speaker 3: than I witness is. And you know, things that are
Speaker 3: in the Bible, the Gospels and.
Speaker 2: Men and men can be flawed.
Speaker 3: They could be flawed, they could be tampered with, they
Speaker 3: could be corrupted.
Speaker 2: And we know the Council in Ico is they chose
Speaker 2: certain works and left others out. I mean, the Book
Speaker 2: of Enough, you know, Dead Sea Squirrel all that kind
Speaker 2: of stuff. So it's like it comes down to and
Speaker 2: that's why I think kind of an interesting caveat to
Speaker 2: this is while I do agree that the anthropic principle,
Speaker 2: you know, our universe, it's perfect, and it's so perfect
Speaker 2: for life, right that it seems from the micro to
Speaker 2: the macro intelligently designed. Right, So I'll give them that
Speaker 2: there is an intelligent design for sure. Like you look
Speaker 2: around and you just go, this can't be no reason.
Speaker 2: Like so when scientists, you know, talk about the Big
Speaker 2: Bang and then you know someone religious said God said
Speaker 2: let there be light, I say, you're saying the same thing,
Speaker 2: just do different lens. So when it comes to these
Speaker 2: UFOs or beings, are we just what they called angels
Speaker 2: and demons? Are we calling aliens right? Or extraterrestrial non
Speaker 2: human intelligence? I mean angels and demons by definition are
Speaker 2: non human intelligence. And an interesting case is the Virginia case.
Speaker 2: Gene and I actually took a trip down to not
Speaker 2: to Virginia, We're going, I have the connections to go,
Speaker 2: but we went to the National pres Club event. I
Speaker 2: spoke to some of the Carlos de SUSA, all them,
Speaker 2: and you know what stuck out to me, is this
Speaker 2: smell of sulfur? Because what is associated with demons? Red eyes,
Speaker 2: horns smelled like sulfur. Well, that sounds like you. If
Speaker 2: I saw that, I'd be like, that's a demon the right,
Speaker 2: So just again to me, I'm going I think what
Speaker 2: we're dealing with is this is not black and white.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, for sure black and white. For sure, it's
Speaker 3: not black and white. And yeah, I'm very familiar with
Speaker 3: the Virginia case. I've seen I haven't seen the latest
Speaker 3: documentary on it by James James.
Speaker 2: Yeah what James Fox Fox, Yeah, I implore you too.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah, but I've seen other documentaries on it,
Speaker 3: and I've seen, you know, uh, like an older one
Speaker 3: where you know, there's footage from ninety six where there
Speaker 3: are people are being interviewed and they're talking about this
Speaker 3: thing like it's just like they're like you, these are
Speaker 3: like villagers, Like they're not paid actors. These are like
Speaker 3: people working at a hospital trying to make ends meet
Speaker 3: in like an impoverished area of Brazil. Like they're not
Speaker 3: You could see the blood and sweat on their face and.
Speaker 2: Then the then yeah, it's like this is real, man,
Speaker 2: what this the neurosurgeon. Yeah, I got we got to
Speaker 2: meet him. Oh yeah, okay, he worked on the beat.
Speaker 2: Like this guy has no reason to lie. He's still
Speaker 2: one of the most highly regarded neurosurgeons in that area.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Like this guy, he's got money, he's get you know,
Speaker 2: there's no benefit to him coming forward seemingly. So you know,
Speaker 2: that's where I start to ask. And again, you know,
Speaker 2: the new Jersey drone thing brought something up from me.
Speaker 2: And again you know, uh, are you familiar with like
Speaker 2: the the late sixties incursions of like Malmstrom and mine
Speaker 2: not where UFOs shut down news. Yes, yes, well I
Speaker 2: know those men personally, like Robert Sallas, Dave Shindeley. From them,
Speaker 2: I can introduce you sometimes for you to talk to them.
Speaker 2: But I walked Bob into a representative Mace's office and
Speaker 2: allowed him to brief her and then later on Burlssen.
Speaker 2: So no one in fifty years had been able to
Speaker 2: do that for him. And I did, you know, not
Speaker 2: tooting my own horn. But that's what I do. That's
Speaker 2: I don't that gives me, that's my purpose in this field.
Speaker 2: I know what my job is, right, But don't you
Speaker 2: think it's a little weird that craft have been routinely
Speaker 2: since the sixties, at a minimum, breaching our most sensitive facilities.
Speaker 2: And it's it's what not not on not on anyone's radar.
Speaker 3: Yeah it is. It's it's mind boggling, it really is,
Speaker 3: and it definitely is on someone's radar.
Speaker 2: And these guys are no joke. You know. They have
Speaker 2: to report when they take IV prof and they're on
Speaker 2: the the what is it, the personal yeah PRP, So
Speaker 2: they have to like report everything that they do psychologically
Speaker 2: all of that. So when those guys speak, I because
Speaker 2: I owe it to.
Speaker 3: Them and like, yeah, I know, I know exactly what
Speaker 3: you mean. Yeah, you're you're doing yourself at the service
Speaker 3: by not paying close attention to you know when when
Speaker 3: somebody like that speaks absolutely yeah, and I've come I've
Speaker 3: met people like that before.
Speaker 2: Is there a back to you know? So you you
Speaker 2: do believe that there's intelligent design in the anthropic principle? Again,
Speaker 2: our universe does seem you know, very very perfect, almost
Speaker 2: too perfect, like it was intelligently created. But there's this
Speaker 2: weird like what if we had you know, and again
Speaker 2: this is speculative, I suppose, But do you think that
Speaker 2: there may be a possibility that we find out that
Speaker 2: some of these beings maybe had a hand in our creation.
Speaker 3: Oh, that would be interesting.
Speaker 2: It's a tough, tough conversation, right.
Speaker 3: It's a tough conversation. And I don't know, I don't think.
Speaker 3: I don't know that I collectively will ever get to
Speaker 3: that point, because I think that would be too too
Speaker 3: hot for many people to handle.
Speaker 2: Would you be able to handle it?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, I think so, because I mean I kind
Speaker 3: of like already sort of believe that now, you know,
Speaker 3: I think that, like you know, it's sort of like
Speaker 3: I don't know if it was with you that I
Speaker 3: that I we used this analogia with Mark. I think
Speaker 3: it was with Mark when we had lunch the other day.
Speaker 3: That you know ants, right, like when you know, the
Speaker 3: proverbial kid with a magnifying glass trying, you know, burning
Speaker 3: the ants just for fun. You know, the ants don't
Speaker 3: necessarily know that there's somebody messing around with their lives
Speaker 3: for fun, using this you know, beam of heat to
Speaker 3: burn them. They just know that, oh shit, we're having this.
Speaker 3: We're getting burned here. We got to move out of
Speaker 3: the way, you know, just instinctively, I don't think ants
Speaker 3: have problem, yeah, move right, Like like an ant will know,
Speaker 3: Like if you put your finger next to an ant,
Speaker 3: like it'll sensor something there and it will go around.
Speaker 3: So that's some level of intelligence, right. So I think
Speaker 3: the way to like try to grapple with that scenario
Speaker 3: that you laid out was to think of it this way,
Speaker 3: Like we would probably react the same way the ants
Speaker 3: react when there's somebody trying to burn them with a
Speaker 3: magnifying glass, which is we would just be so caught
Speaker 3: up and the emotional state of what that sort of
Speaker 3: disclosure brings that, Like, I don't think we could ever
Speaker 3: get out of that headspace to collectively collectively. Obviously individuals might,
Speaker 3: there's some people that think this way now, but collectively
Speaker 3: I don't think we could handle it as a society
Speaker 3: to get out of like panic mode and to understanding mode.
Speaker 3: Right the same way. Ants will never get to that.
Speaker 3: They're just looking to get out of the way. They're
Speaker 3: never looking to go what's causing this? Right?
Speaker 2: You know, I'll take you one further before we take
Speaker 2: a break. We because I think it's more in line
Speaker 2: with something like this, right, because we didn't create ants, right,
Speaker 2: But I see the analogy that everyone uses that one,
Speaker 2: and I like it. I tried, because I do think
Speaker 2: the intelligence differential it's probably spot on, but I like
Speaker 2: I liking it to dogs. We took wolves that We
Speaker 2: took wolves, right, and we we altered their genetics because
Speaker 2: for our benefit, you know, not just because we won't
Speaker 2: need a friend. But the wolves that were that that
Speaker 2: followed early humans around with you know, and and picked
Speaker 2: up off their scraps. Oh the he and goes, well,
Speaker 2: you know, I could use you to alert if something
Speaker 2: comes into the area. Right. So then along the lines,
Speaker 2: then we have dogs. And now I have one sitting
Speaker 2: in the room with us, right right. I love him
Speaker 2: and I do anything for him, right anything. He is
Speaker 2: my world. He has saved me multiple times. Right. But
Speaker 2: I also some days feel bad for him because I'm like,
Speaker 2: you can't experience the way I experience. So I liken
Speaker 2: it to that where maybe these things came along they
Speaker 2: saw primates and they go, we can use you, yeah,
Speaker 2: alter the DNA, right, and then Homo sapien comes out
Speaker 2: of that, and that could explain why every other creature
Speaker 2: on this earth seems to benefit some sort of ecosystem.
Speaker 3: And we don't we.
Speaker 2: Shed our fur only to need pelts in the winter.
Speaker 2: We stood up only to have back problems, We get
Speaker 2: burned by the sun. Yeah, none of it makes sense.
Speaker 3: We're not natural, right, yeah, I think we are the aliens.
Speaker 2: Yeah, right, it it makes no sense. And and and
Speaker 2: the brain doubled cosmically overnight. The evidence is there.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, I totally agree with you. I've always that's
Speaker 3: been that. This is like an ongoing thought I have,
Speaker 3: which is like, we are so unnatural to our environment, you.
Speaker 2: Know, and we all we want to do is create, create, create.
Speaker 2: We could where's my phone?
Speaker 3: And why is nothing? And if we're really, if we
Speaker 3: really evolved from some sort of ape like creature, why
Speaker 3: is nothing else of all?
Speaker 2: Think this? You know right, you think this this phone? Right?
Speaker 2: We could stop right here. Yeah, we could stop innovating
Speaker 2: the phone right here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and we would be golden yeah.
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, everything looking around us, Look at all the
Speaker 2: stuff we have. This is going to be broadcast through
Speaker 2: the airwaves and you've seen in Australia wherever, and the UK,
Speaker 2: it's going to be all over the like, this will
Speaker 2: be seen globally. Right. We can stop right now and
Speaker 2: we could be good. But we can't humans, we just go, go,
Speaker 2: go go. Why is that? It reminds me of the
Speaker 2: story of the ancient Sumerian tablets. We were created by
Speaker 2: a race of from the sky. They came, not in Aki.
Speaker 2: They created us to mine gold. And I'm not saying
Speaker 2: again take this as just like a bullet point. I'm
Speaker 2: not saying that. I believe it's ay, it is the
Speaker 2: Inachi and we were created to mind gold. But I'm
Speaker 2: saying something like that. I do think it is very
Speaker 2: least yeah, categorically true. Yeah right, And I think the
Speaker 2: Church they were like, no, yeah, no, we can't have this.
Speaker 3: Well, going back to Jordan Naxwell, right, another one of
Speaker 3: his famous sayings of me. I don't know how famous
Speaker 3: it is, but he would he always would say that
Speaker 3: every religious movement is a little political, and every political
Speaker 3: movement is a little religious because you need It's almost
Speaker 3: like you need both of those components. Let me think
Speaker 3: about it, like you know, And I have a lot
Speaker 3: of friends who are Catholic. I thank Connecticut, the Northeast
Speaker 3: is very Catholic past and obviously Irish Catholic and whatnot.
Speaker 3: And I have a lot of a lot of my
Speaker 3: friends are Catholics, and I love going at it with
Speaker 3: Catholics and because I'm like, you know, I really think
Speaker 3: that the true, the true Christians are like the ones
Speaker 3: that are worshiping out of like right next to a bodega. Right.
Speaker 3: We've seen those churches, right, I don't even know what
Speaker 3: denomination that is, but they're like some form of Protestant
Speaker 3: because you know, they're really like, you know, like you
Speaker 3: guys have like these beautiful churches like you need like you.
Speaker 2: Got see that see that skull thing? Yeah we uh,
Speaker 2: I gotta say this because I just thought of it.
Speaker 2: And I can see that she thought of it too.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: We painted that at plaster fun time and there was
Speaker 2: just this church next door. Bro, the whole mall was
Speaker 2: ship Yeah yeah, like they party, right, but yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: You know, no, no, no no. And you know I've
Speaker 3: been to like Catholic Mass, and you know, I've been
Speaker 3: to Protestant churches and you know, all sorts of denominations.
Speaker 3: I've been to like almost every religious establishment you could
Speaker 3: think of. You know, what's it called Buddhist temple mosques
Speaker 3: and things like that, And I love to dabble in
Speaker 3: all of it. I love to talk to people about
Speaker 3: their their beliefs, their faith and everything. And I have
Speaker 3: a lot of Catholic friends and I love to tease
Speaker 3: them and I say, listen, they're really like you know,
Speaker 3: they're they're the true believers, man. I mean, they don't
Speaker 3: need this like beautiful, elaborate church. You guys need to
Speaker 3: like feel Jesus like they're in this like you know,
Speaker 3: next door to like a bodega. And and they're they're just
Speaker 3: as much in line with Jesus as you guys are
Speaker 3: in this church. Like and you know what I was trying.
Speaker 3: What I'm trying to get at, and this is a
Speaker 3: legitimate criticism of the Catholic Church, is that like they're
Speaker 3: almost like a corporation. They're very hierarchical, right, like you know,
Speaker 3: things come down from the Pope and through the cardinals
Speaker 3: and the bishops. And forgive me if I'm you know,
Speaker 3: not one hundred percent accurate with the way things operate,
Speaker 3: but it is very very hierarchical.
Speaker 2: And that they property that is always.
Speaker 3: A red flag to me because when any time you
Speaker 3: are and they don't pay tax, they don't pay tax. Well,
Speaker 3: I mean there's probably other religious institutions that don't pay tax.
Speaker 3: But the point is this, anytime you create this sort
Speaker 3: of like complex, hierarchical, almost corporate like structure around around
Speaker 3: faith and around you know, uh, like the spirituality, it
Speaker 3: always like raises a red flag for me, like you
Speaker 3: don't need you don't even need to go to church
Speaker 3: to you.
Speaker 2: Know, you are the church, right right? This is what
Speaker 2: was actually said, and and that's again these are the
Speaker 2: things that were taken out of the original translation because
Speaker 2: if everyone knew that, I mean, they say it the
Speaker 2: blood blood of what is it that I'm not com.
Speaker 3: Drink the blood of Christ.
Speaker 2: Drink the blood of Christ and the body of Christ.
Speaker 2: You are the church, right.
Speaker 3: Right, right right right?
Speaker 2: That's now, you know, that's that whole thing is you know,
Speaker 2: a church is is just a place to congregate. It's
Speaker 2: the building you bring in there. So and this could
Speaker 2: be a church, right right.
Speaker 3: That's the point.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So I think that again it's been lost and
Speaker 2: don't get me started. We're here in Boston where oh
Speaker 2: of course, yeah you know what happened, h yeah, what
Speaker 2: got broken open? And if God let that shit fly?
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, And again that's I don't necessarily think that's
Speaker 3: the work of God. I think that's the work of man.
Speaker 3: And I'm very open about this subject. Like, I think
Speaker 3: that the reason that happens is, like, it can't be
Speaker 3: the case that bad people want to become priests at
Speaker 3: that level to the like the amount of like, you know,
Speaker 3: child abuse that has happened within the Catholic Church. So
Speaker 3: you mean to tell me that people that are sex offenders,
Speaker 3: that are predators want to become priests so they can
Speaker 3: have access to children. That's a theory, I guess. But
Speaker 3: you could also be a pastor and have access to children.
Speaker 3: You could also be a I don't know something else,
Speaker 3: a teacher and have access to children. Are we saying that, like,
Speaker 3: you know, oh, there's a problem in academia with teachers,
Speaker 3: you know, molesting children. No, it doesn't happen, of course
Speaker 3: it has, of course. But what I think it is
Speaker 3: is that like these individuals, humans, men, human beings, right,
Speaker 3: not gods, are taking these positions and you know, they're
Speaker 3: not getting married, they're not you know, they're not allowed
Speaker 3: to engage in, you know, sexual activity, and I think
Speaker 3: that's causing them to a switch may flip in their
Speaker 3: head at some point when somebody gets d you know,
Speaker 3: gets removed from their natural state.
Speaker 2: Of same way someone doesn't jail, right.
Speaker 3: And I think that that's what's happening. And I mean, unfortunately,
Speaker 3: you committed the act, you're you've got to pay the consequences.
Speaker 3: But we are the Catholic Church is setting these people
Speaker 3: up for failure really because so few people I think
Speaker 3: can put up with that, like you know, not being
Speaker 3: in that sort of those sort of confines, you know,
Speaker 3: moral and you know, physical confines and all these things.
Speaker 3: And it doesn't happen at the same rate on the
Speaker 3: like the non Catholic side, like with pastors, like in
Speaker 3: other Christian denominations, you don't hear about pastors as much,
Speaker 3: you know, molesting children as as you do with with
Speaker 3: the Catholic priests. Yes, so it's unfortunate. I mean, I know,
Speaker 3: like I said, a lot of my friends are Catholics.
Speaker 3: I you know, I have nothing against them. I you know,
Speaker 3: I love them, you know, equally. But it's it's a
Speaker 3: problem with the institution. And like with so many other things,
Speaker 3: it's always with the system. It's with the institution. You know,
Speaker 3: you put you put a good person in a bad
Speaker 3: situation in bad circumstances, they're gonna they're gonna do bad things.
Speaker 2: Sometimes, absolutely, So after the break, we're gonna take quick,
Speaker 2: uh five minute break. When we get back, I really
Speaker 2: want to start diving into the missing scientists and military
Speaker 2: officials as well. I want to get into a little
Speaker 2: bit of the Epstein file stuff, and then a few
Speaker 2: other things that I will Uh, I'm not going to
Speaker 2: bury the lead here. I'm going to save it as
Speaker 2: a secret. We have a couple of topics to get
Speaker 2: to when we get back. But I have a this
Speaker 2: has already been an amazing conversation, so we'll be We'll
Speaker 2: be right back. You're gonna hear from our sponsor right now.
Speaker 2: Make sure to like share and subscribe. If you want
Speaker 2: to help support the channel, become a member. Literally to
Speaker 2: keep all these lights on, it does cost money, so
Speaker 2: if you want to help support, of course, like share
Speaker 2: subscribe is a free way to do that. But if
Speaker 2: you want to take a step further, become a member
Speaker 2: and you'll gain access to early and ad free episodes,
Speaker 2: sometimes weeks in advance. So with that being said, we'll
Speaker 2: be right back. Yeah. I was a little bit shocked.
Speaker 2: He was working on something very secret.
Speaker 3: History is real inaccurate.
Speaker 4: What is this saying, Oh, it's technical specifications of the UFO,
Speaker 4: the electrical engineering Israel inaccurate.
Speaker 2: It was a manual how to construct the UFO.
Speaker 3: That original math is accurate.
Speaker 2: It was literally a blueprint.
Speaker 4: These documents were part of the official Soviet program.
Speaker 3: It's legit material.
Speaker 2: People are a little little upset that this book is
Speaker 2: out there.
Speaker 4: This was dangerous form to put it out.
Speaker 2: The people that it seemed to benefit the most were
Speaker 2: the ones pushing back the hardest, which raised a really
Speaker 2: big alarm bell for me.
Speaker 4: Logic and reason would tell me they shouldn't match anything.
Speaker 3: Technology he describes is not twenty first centuries like twenty
Speaker 3: second centurists.
Speaker 4: And all of the science points tore into the United
Speaker 4: States government.
Speaker 2: You think that that would be something that they want,
Speaker 2: because the people deserve to know the truth.
Speaker 4: There's things in there that can change humanity.
Speaker 2: I don't think they really want to see any change.
Speaker 2: He didn't have to fight anymore because other people fighting
Speaker 2: for him. The future doesn't belong in classified vaults. Back
Speaker 2: here at Total Disclosure TDP Studios in Boston. My guest,
Speaker 2: Joe Hawk's a state representative in Connecticut passed a very
Speaker 2: very very pretty remarkable bill bipartisan. You know, we kind
Speaker 2: of went through all that. Now I'm like kind of
Speaker 2: broaden our horizons here a little bit if you don't mind.
Speaker 3: No, of course, have.
Speaker 2: You been keeping track of some of the headlines regarding
Speaker 2: these missing scientists, missing generals, and just missing people that
Speaker 2: have ties or worked close to black programs, to nuclear
Speaker 2: aerospace and all those sectors.
Speaker 3: Have you been Yeah? Yeah, no I have, And I'm
Speaker 3: looking up at your screen right.
Speaker 2: Here, and so we have about ten of those.
Speaker 3: Ten right now. Yeah, and it spans a couple of years,
Speaker 3: I think.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because we could even start with Amy Eskridge. Okay,
Speaker 2: So she who was working on breakthrough technology, break through
Speaker 2: aerospace technology and propulsion technolog found dead. Right this is
Speaker 2: twenty twenty two, and now we're at twenty twenty six
Speaker 2: for you, and you know, Amy's case is very very odd.
Speaker 2: I implore you to look into it. Can you What
Speaker 2: do we have for Amy? She was again working in
Speaker 2: the aerospace and like the she she had a top
Speaker 2: secret clearance. She had warned on streams and on different
Speaker 2: podcasts that she felt she was in danger and then
Speaker 2: she gets found unalived and under you know, some odd
Speaker 2: circumstances we have to play the video or anything. But
Speaker 2: she was doing you know a bunch of these kind
Speaker 2: of streams with people, and she was, you know, talking,
Speaker 2: she was openly talking. So it kind of starts there,
Speaker 2: but then it weaves its way through ends up really
Speaker 2: making headlines with General mccaslan.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Right, yeah, So are you familiar with these?
Speaker 3: Yes? Yeah, So the previous podcast that I did, it
Speaker 3: would it was a part I was a part of.
Speaker 3: My segment was a part of the show that covered
Speaker 3: General McCasland. And after watching the podcast I was on
Speaker 3: after it was released, I saw that they were talking
Speaker 3: about General mcaslym and I looked into his case and everything,
Speaker 3: and what's what's interesting to know and what I am
Speaker 3: gonna you know, when I go back home and you know,
Speaker 3: dig into this a little deeper, is I really want
Speaker 3: to make sure that these aren't just because I mean,
Speaker 3: you know, you know, the thing with like statistics and data,
Speaker 3: like you can manipulate it to kind of like drying
Speaker 3: the conclusion you want if you're good enough with manipulating
Speaker 3: that sort of stuff. And I'm not saying that that's
Speaker 3: what this is by any stretch of the imagination. But
Speaker 3: what I wanted to know was is direct connection between
Speaker 3: all these people and one particular project. That's the thing,
Speaker 3: because you know, to say, like even in you know,
Speaker 3: we were talking about the new Bob Lazar documentary.
Speaker 2: You know, have you watched that I have?
Speaker 3: I have, and you know, just one of the like
Speaker 3: not even like directly related to the subject matter. Things
Speaker 3: that I noticed about the documentary was that, like in
Speaker 3: the directory for the company that he worked for, there
Speaker 3: was like three other Lazar's if you like look like
Speaker 3: they cut to like, you know, an image of the director.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that's the Low Alums National exactly.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And there was like a lot of there was
Speaker 3: like three people with like the name Lazarre or like
Speaker 3: Lazarre in the name, which I found interesting. So I
Speaker 3: guess what I'm trying to say is that, you know,
Speaker 3: there's so many people that work in defense X amount
Speaker 3: of them dying a year is bound to happen for
Speaker 3: any reason. What's going to be interesting to see is
Speaker 3: how they were related. And you know, you're talking about
Speaker 3: some pretty high up it shouldn't be hard to find.
Speaker 2: Mccassle and what's interesting about him is the fact that
Speaker 2: he oversaw the budget, the black budget, specifically on a
Speaker 2: lot of this aerospace stuff. And he's working out of
Speaker 2: right pat which you know long Ben rumored in the
Speaker 2: UFO lore to have housed material because that's where our
Speaker 2: uh was it weapons research lab is, so you know,
Speaker 2: where we develop and and you know, make those next
Speaker 2: next generation kind of weaponry project out of there as well,
Speaker 2: which is again and there's allegedly this room on right back,
Speaker 2: they call it the red room or the blue room
Speaker 2: where you know the roswell material is where beings are
Speaker 2: being held.
Speaker 3: So worked out of there and saw some beings.
Speaker 2: Yeah again you know your stuff. So in mccaslan he
Speaker 2: just you know, Trump, Trump says, I'm going to classify
Speaker 2: the UFO files. This guy had been not outed but
Speaker 2: years prior. Remember that Wiki leaks thing where all the
Speaker 2: emails came out for the DNC. In that set of
Speaker 2: emails were emails between McCasland and Blink one eighty two
Speaker 2: star Tom DeLong, who is starting to the Star's academy
Speaker 2: with guys like how put Off, Elisondo, Kate Green, you know,
Speaker 2: former skunk works like the who's who of this that world? Right?
Speaker 2: And you know, you just start to ask questions why
Speaker 2: these people? Why now? And what do they all have
Speaker 2: in common?
Speaker 3: What do they all have in common? Yeah, like you said,
Speaker 3: I think that's the key to on my.
Speaker 2: Current thread is black programs.
Speaker 3: I think that's the current a specific program.
Speaker 2: We can't get that information, right, but at least two
Speaker 2: of the mcaslin and his research assistant or his science assistant.
Speaker 2: She is one of them, so she worked with him
Speaker 2: at his lab and those two are missing. That alone,
Speaker 2: those two warrant some sort of serial activity. So have
Speaker 2: you ever seen the three Body problem?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: Oh? Man?
Speaker 2: So the three Body problem is this science fiction book
Speaker 2: that was turned into a film into a series, and
Speaker 2: essentially what the storyline is, without getting too deep off
Speaker 2: the course, here is our top scientists in a specific
Speaker 2: field start to go missing. Yeah, okay, and it's some
Speaker 2: alien intelligence that wants to take our planet because theirs
Speaker 2: is dying.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: And again you look at these things like Project mocking
Speaker 2: Bird and all these things where Hollywood's been used as
Speaker 2: kind of a soft disclosure of sorts, right, Uh, to
Speaker 2: soften the blow, you know, normalize ideas before they hit
Speaker 2: the you know, hit the real real world. Yeah, so
Speaker 2: I got to ask, yes, where what is happening right
Speaker 2: now as our top scientists in generals are either they
Speaker 2: know that something's coming and they're scattering and going into hiding,
Speaker 2: and some of them are because some of them are dying,
Speaker 2: or we have some real issue inherently that they're all
Speaker 2: going to disappearing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean I wish, honestly, I wish I knew
Speaker 3: more about uh, you know, the the series and book
Speaker 3: you're referencing and how it ties into this. It is,
Speaker 3: It is concerning, It is alarming. On my personal like
Speaker 3: Facebook and social media, I share this stuff all the
Speaker 3: time and it gets some level of engagement. But I again,
Speaker 3: going back to what we were you know, talking about
Speaker 3: before in the first you know segment, that is just
Speaker 3: like not really at the forefront of people's attentions yet.
Speaker 3: And I think that, you know, more stuff needs to
Speaker 3: come out from uh, government officials, from people that have
Speaker 3: a huge following, more like concrete stuff like you know,
Speaker 3: we're kind of caught in this loop and of like, oh,
Speaker 3: you know, we keep punting the ball on this in
Speaker 3: one way or another, and it's like and a lot
Speaker 3: of people are guilty of that. It's not one person
Speaker 3: or the other. And it makes you wonder, right, like
Speaker 3: why like why do we keep you alluded to this
Speaker 3: a little a little bit beforehand. It's like with the
Speaker 3: Epstein files, right, like, we're going to release the Epstein files.
Speaker 3: We're going to release the Epstein files, and a lot
Speaker 3: has been released. I'll give Trump a lot of credit.
Speaker 3: Biden didn't release anything. Obama didn't release anything. Bush didn't
Speaker 3: release anything. These files were Clinton didn't release anything. These
Speaker 3: His activity was spanned the course of many presidents, five presidents, right,
Speaker 3: they all could have released something, but it's really you know,
Speaker 3: Trump released more than anyone, but you know, and it's
Speaker 3: but a lot of it is redacted. A lot of
Speaker 3: it is still redacted. And they say that there's still
Speaker 3: some very important documents that can sort of that sort
Speaker 3: of unlock a lot of mysteries that still loom over us.
Speaker 2: What really interests me about Epstein specifically.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I know where you're going with this.
Speaker 2: His interest, Yeah, in theoretical physics, anti gravity, for lack
Speaker 2: of a better term, alternative, alternative propulsions, and his ranch.
Speaker 2: He placed it next to Los Albumos specifically because he
Speaker 2: wanted to target those scientists. Why is a guy like that,
Speaker 2: do you know so intrigued or interested? And for me,
Speaker 2: it's like if if you got a guy that's able,
Speaker 2: if he's the one, can we agree that the president
Speaker 2: is the most influential, powerful, public facing person, public facing, yes, right,
Speaker 2: public facing?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: If this is the guy blackmailing that guy who's he
Speaker 2: worked for, that's the deep state? And who's just why
Speaker 2: are we not making this connection that maybe the same
Speaker 2: people that are blackmailing the president are also suppressing this
Speaker 2: kind of technology to keep the general population because they
Speaker 2: see themselves as above us. Clearly with their actions with children,
Speaker 2: with you know, even adult aged people who you know,
Speaker 2: we don't know what the consensus consensual the nature of
Speaker 2: their interactions, but the way that they viewed the common
Speaker 2: person was absolutely.
Speaker 3: Below the right, right, right, yeah, And I mean, you know,
Speaker 3: a lot of this is you know, still exists only
Speaker 3: in the you know, the the land of speculation, so
Speaker 3: to speak. You know, obviously Epstein had blackmail and a
Speaker 3: lot of people, was Trump one of them? Who knows?
Speaker 3: But I mean he's he's dead now, he obviously can't
Speaker 3: speak for himself. Is he Yeah, well that's I was
Speaker 3: going to say, some people think he's.
Speaker 2: Peak guy.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, yeah right, yeah cameo really similiar.
Speaker 2: People are paying that again, yeah, problem with society, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: people are paying that guy. Yeah cameos. Yeah, overnight he has,
Speaker 2: he grew one hundred thousand followers and I'm like, just
Speaker 2: blew me out of the water with the one day.
Speaker 3: Yeah. It's it's I mean, it's disgusting what you think
Speaker 3: about it, because it's they're obviously paying him to act
Speaker 3: like Epstein, you know, and it's like, you know, you
Speaker 3: see all these and I'm sure you know you get them,
Speaker 3: and I get them, like, you know, these all these
Speaker 3: means with Epstein on on Instagram and TikTok and whatnot,
Speaker 3: and he's kind of getting glorified in some ways, and
Speaker 3: you know, people are sort of you know, pushing this narrative,
Speaker 3: narrative out there that that you know, no one's really
Speaker 3: that upset with what Epstein did because we all kind
Speaker 3: of like wish to, like, you know, have all these
Speaker 3: connections with with you know, rich and famous people, and it's.
Speaker 2: Like I'd be careful there, yeah, because we don't want
Speaker 2: to all be like.
Speaker 3: No, no, no, no, no, I know, but I'm saying
Speaker 3: that there are attempts on social media. Social media is
Speaker 3: being used to push that narrative.
Speaker 2: Dampen. Yeah really, Oh okay, I see what you're saying.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, To be clear, I'm going what I'm saying
Speaker 3: is to your point of they're using this guy whatever
Speaker 3: his name is, Saint Petersburg Pete or whatever, or Tampa
Speaker 3: Pete whatever, Yeah, palm beach feet. There you go. The
Speaker 3: reason he's famous is because he looks like Epstein, and
Speaker 3: the reason he's on Cambio is because people are requesting
Speaker 3: him to basically act like he's Epstein and give them
Speaker 3: a happy Birthday message. Why would you want to do that?
Speaker 2: This guy is a pedophile, the same the same society
Speaker 2: that allows OnlyFans but then looks down on the women
Speaker 2: that exploit the the the game. And of course we're going,
Speaker 2: you know different. Let me tell you a little story, yeah,
Speaker 2: Dlade Maxwell, Yeah, now, character, very very interesting character. Now
Speaker 2: there is this story that, just like Epstein, Galaine also
Speaker 2: had helpers hands, but she only wanted a specific type
Speaker 2: of person Norwegian. Norwegian like blonde haired, blue eyed, and
Speaker 2: a couple of the guys that were working for her
Speaker 2: had noticed that after they'd like take showers, the hair
Speaker 2: would be missing from the dream. What does that sound like?
Speaker 3: Sounds like, Yeah, sounds.
Speaker 2: Exactly like that. And so again, pardon me for trying
Speaker 2: to see the big picture here, but as bad as
Speaker 2: what Epstein did is, I need, I need to know
Speaker 2: what else that guy was doing, you know what I mean?
Speaker 2: I need And you know, I'm not trying to be
Speaker 2: political about it. I'm not trying to to to to
Speaker 2: keep giving limelight to a guy like that. But what
Speaker 2: he is, there is something there, There's a there there.
Speaker 3: He exposed the dark underbelly of some levels of our society.
Speaker 3: That again what I was getting to before we assumed
Speaker 3: was going on. But now like we have the proof
Speaker 3: to like as clear as day, like a lot of
Speaker 3: these conspiracy theories that were once conspiracy theories about child
Speaker 3: sex rings and elites of all levels, whether political, whether Hollywood,
Speaker 3: whether businessmen, were you know, all these people the theory
Speaker 3: the theories. Former theories were that these people were involved
Speaker 3: in child sex rings and like take ticals, cults and
Speaker 3: child sex rings. And before the release of these documents,
Speaker 3: as imperfect as they've been, the release of them has
Speaker 3: now given a definitive proof that these things exist and
Speaker 3: the they're international, yeah, and that there's they're multi layered
Speaker 3: and that like like you brought up with with Glaine
Speaker 3: Maxwell and her you know, her background and her father
Speaker 3: and and all that stuff, and it's like who was
Speaker 3: who was really Batman? And who was really Rob And
Speaker 3: it's a bad analogy because Batman was a good guy,
Speaker 3: but who was really you know, the lead and who
Speaker 3: was the the henchmen in that relationship between Epstein.
Speaker 2: And who is the agent?
Speaker 3: And maxwel right.
Speaker 2: Exactly, And she's just as much to blame, yeah, her father,
Speaker 2: and then you know the I mean they're the one
Speaker 2: that you know, every textbook has their name on it.
Speaker 2: I've heard of this, Yeah, you know they were. So
Speaker 2: they're putting history into the schools and it's just it's
Speaker 2: bizarre to me when you start looking at all of
Speaker 2: it and you go, wait, what.
Speaker 3: The and these are facts? Like we don't even need
Speaker 3: to have an opinion about these things. They just exist facts, right.
Speaker 2: And you know, again, I apologize, but I.
Speaker 3: Can't absolutely you know, and I have this thing that
Speaker 3: I've started saying because I'm a pretty like outspoken person
Speaker 3: in public, not just in private as well, Like I
Speaker 3: don't really have like a demeanor I switch to when
Speaker 3: I'm like in my job as like a legislator. I
Speaker 3: like say say whatever I want to say, and I
Speaker 3: post whatever I want to post, and I always can
Speaker 3: back up everything I post because I always ask myself
Speaker 3: this question by like, how did we get to the
Speaker 3: point in society that calling out the thing which is
Speaker 3: egregious somehow becomes more egregious than that thing which is egregious, right,
Speaker 3: Like pointing to something and saying Epstein and Gleane Maxwell
Speaker 3: have been abducting children and forcing them to have sex,
Speaker 3: for forcing them to have sex for rich people and
Speaker 3: with rich people, and for their amusement and gratification. And
Speaker 3: oh no, well you can't talk about that's like so
Speaker 3: jarring to even about. Yes, I know it is.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna have to bleep it, yeah, just so it
Speaker 2: doesn't get But that's the problem. I'm don't have to
Speaker 2: bleep this just to get it on YouTube.
Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2: It's crazy. And did you see this? This is kind
Speaker 2: of off topic here, but did you see California's trying
Speaker 2: to pass this? Uh stop? Nick Shirley act they did so,
Speaker 2: and it criminalizes investigative journalism specific It's it's fucking crazy
Speaker 2: to me, yeah, you know, and it makes you want
Speaker 2: what timeline are we on?
Speaker 3: Well and see, And that's the thing I mean. If
Speaker 3: if it looks like a duck, if it quacks like
Speaker 3: a duck, at some point you're gonna have to say, well,
Speaker 3: this is there's probably a strong possibility that this thing
Speaker 3: is a duck. And what I mean by that analogy
Speaker 3: is that like if it smells like corruption, if it
Speaker 3: sounds like corruption, if it looks like a corrupt if
Speaker 3: it looks like corruption, that probably means your government, certain
Speaker 3: you know, elements of your government are acting in a
Speaker 3: corrupt way. Here if you're shutting somebody down like a
Speaker 3: Nick Shurley, who I know very little. I know that
Speaker 3: he was the guy from Minnesota exposing the Somalian daycare
Speaker 3: fraud and stuff, and it's like, Okay, he exposed something
Speaker 3: that was a crime, you know. And it's like if
Speaker 3: he's going around and he's exposing he's trying to expose
Speaker 3: things and he and he falls flat, and it's he's
Speaker 3: going after something where there's no there there, then that
Speaker 3: will also come to the light and people will say,
Speaker 3: well he was wrong there he went after something or
Speaker 3: some people or whatever that were innocent. So you know, he.
Speaker 2: Still protected by a second Amendment. Right, first Amendment firm right, Sorry.
Speaker 3: He may use the second Amendment to protect his first Amendment.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, where's your mind?
Speaker 2: Uh no, So and you know, shout by the way,
Speaker 2: shut out Nick Suarly, keep doing what you're doing, kid, Yeah,
Speaker 2: twenty one.
Speaker 3: He looks than that.
Speaker 2: Twenty one. How are you kidding me? The change that
Speaker 2: could be brought But and you know what, he's exposed again.
Speaker 2: I always had this like full circle when I bring
Speaker 2: something up, because if he's able to find billions in
Speaker 2: waste rodden abuse. Yeah, you don't think that the the
Speaker 2: black programs, Lockey Martin, that they're that they're not also
Speaker 2: charging eight hundred dollars for a nail.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yoh yeah. That stuff was time ago. There was
Speaker 3: actually a famous case. I mean you may vaguely remember
Speaker 3: this because we were around the same age during like
Speaker 3: there was some sort of like audit done during the
Speaker 3: either Afghanistan or Iraq war, and there was like a
Speaker 3: company that was like selling like the Department of Defense,
Speaker 3: like special washers for like one hundred thousand dollars weeks,
Speaker 3: like a washer, right, Like I don't know how special
Speaker 3: a washer can get. Maybe it was made out of
Speaker 3: like element one, I don't know, but for like one
Speaker 3: hundred thousand dollars apiece, and like they were getting away
Speaker 3: with it for really long until they finally got busted.
Speaker 3: And it's like, I'm sure there's of those types of stories,
Speaker 3: and you know, and that's not the sort of like
Speaker 3: fraud that Nick Sureley's going after per se. But like,
Speaker 3: you know, I'll even give you an example with Connecticut,
Speaker 3: and this isn't technically fraud, but like in the budget
Speaker 3: there's you know, we're all familiar with the term pork
Speaker 3: spending or pork barrels spending where you know exactly we'll
Speaker 3: throw off sorts of you know, stuff for their districts
Speaker 3: in a budget. In Connecticut, we call those rats you
Speaker 3: know whatever I more fitting term, actually I think it
Speaker 3: sure is. And you know, you'll look at all these
Speaker 3: things and individually they're anywhere between two hundred thousand to
Speaker 3: a million dollars, but when you have hundreds of them,
Speaker 3: they add up, especially in a small state like Connecticut,
Speaker 3: and we we have a lot of money. We're a
Speaker 3: rich state parts of the state.
Speaker 2: But you're now fighting that because you're like, oh, wait,
Speaker 2: where is all the money?
Speaker 3: Yeah, but here, and let me give you some examples.
Speaker 3: So look, this is how ridiculous it is, and you're
Speaker 3: it's gonna be really hard to believe. But if you
Speaker 3: look at our last budget that we passed in there
Speaker 3: there is money for a club known as Jeep Owners
Speaker 3: of America, like literally a recreational club, like a club
Speaker 3: of Jeep enthusiasts are getting state or getting taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 3: There's ethnic based organizations Indian Americans, Indian Americans, Bengali Americans. Uh,
Speaker 3: you know, all sorts of things, wonderful people. I love
Speaker 3: the I love the Indians, I love the Bengalis. But
Speaker 3: you shouldn't be getting taxpayer dollars to throw your festivals.
Speaker 3: You raise the money, raise the money, and throw your
Speaker 3: festivals like everybody else does. Literally, but these are but
Speaker 3: you could track it. You could you could see who
Speaker 3: is advocating for certain groups, all sorts of LGBT groups
Speaker 3: that are getting money, all sorts of ed It's listen,
Speaker 3: all these things can exist, but why are you getting
Speaker 3: taxpayer dollars, and then when you add them all up, Tyler,
Speaker 3: it's all like it's it's like millions of dollars, millions
Speaker 3: and millions of dollars. And that's just the low hanging fruit.
Speaker 3: The stuff that's like ingrained or like webbed in uh,
Speaker 3: you know, other departments and under other builds and things
Speaker 3: like that. That's where the real like juicy end of
Speaker 3: the wasteful spending is. Even if it's not to the
Speaker 3: level of something that would be classified as corruption, it's
Speaker 3: still wasteful spending. And you know this isn't you know,
Speaker 3: the type of place to talk about that. But you know,
Speaker 3: the point is this that we have created this this huge,
Speaker 3: like Eisenhower said, military industrial state at the federal Yeah,
Speaker 3: and that it's and it's only gotten bigger and bigger
Speaker 3: and bigger. And here's the thing, and this is the
Speaker 3: thing that I've I've always been been afraid of, but
Speaker 3: I think it's it's happened, you know, even before I've
Speaker 3: i was born. Is that that military industrial state, I
Speaker 3: think has gotten into the private economy, has has gotten
Speaker 3: it's it's nailed into the private economy into national economy.
Speaker 3: Here so far deep that, like, you can't just cut
Speaker 3: it out now, because if you do, then if you
Speaker 3: don't know, like you know, you work you let's say
Speaker 3: you work a factory job and you're just you know,
Speaker 3: a simple you know, assembly line worker. Let's say whatever
Speaker 3: you're making a part that goes into something, well that's
Speaker 3: something maybe bought by another company who then sells it
Speaker 3: to the government, and every it's all interconnected. And if
Speaker 3: you cut the head off of all this money that
Speaker 3: is going into the private sector from the federal government
Speaker 3: for defense spending, you're killing thousands and millions of jobs potentially,
Speaker 3: and then you're the bad guy. And then you're the
Speaker 3: bad guy because you've just caused a massive recession and
Speaker 3: depression maybe you know, and people are losing their jobs
Speaker 3: in the It's almost lost, like there's no way to
Speaker 3: win that that battle. Yet the military industrial complex has
Speaker 3: already won because now, like you said, you're the bad
Speaker 3: guy if you try to do something about it, because
Speaker 3: it will have negative rambifications.
Speaker 2: Right, I gotta ask, Yeah, do you believe Bob Bluzar Uh?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I believe him personally, I believe him. I look
Speaker 3: at him and I've never once seen him. I've never
Speaker 3: really like I'm not gonna pretend to be like an
Speaker 3: expert like body language reader or anything like that, but
Speaker 3: just my gut feeling when I look at somebody's face
Speaker 3: and the way they express themselves. I've never once like
Speaker 3: read any insincerity in his face or in what he's
Speaker 3: saying in a story. Is estates so consistent at least
Speaker 3: that I know of. Maybe somebody has picked up a
Speaker 3: discrepancy here and there. I mean, listen, if you ask
Speaker 3: me to retell my whole how I got into the
Speaker 3: UFO you know field story. There's gonna be some discrepancies obviously,
Speaker 3: but so but he just comes off as a sincere individual.
Speaker 3: And and the fact that if you look at if
Speaker 3: you look at the new UFOD I'm sorry, the new
Speaker 3: S four documentary, it's called S four US as for the.
Speaker 2: Bob Bazar story exactly, Luigi, He's coming on the show.
Speaker 2: So cool, Yeah, he Rogia Gravitz are very very very talented.
Speaker 2: Like so I saw the you know the thing they
Speaker 2: keep referencing in that documentary, like the the VR headset.
Speaker 3: Yes, I put that.
Speaker 2: On and you're in the hangar really wild, and that's
Speaker 2: how this it started. That's all it was going to be.
Speaker 2: And then they were like, oh, no, we need to
Speaker 2: we need to show people because like we we can't
Speaker 2: just like expect everyone to have reality goggles. It was cool,
Speaker 2: but they were like, we need to be able to
Speaker 2: show this to people. This is something next level.
Speaker 3: So yeah, but yeah, get so getting back to that,
Speaker 3: the reason why I believe him. Part of the reason
Speaker 3: why I believe him is in that documentary S four
Speaker 3: they talk about I think it was George Knapp were
Speaker 3: we were just talking about him that he he called.
Speaker 3: He tried to either get los I mean, does lost
Speaker 3: animals even exist anymore? Yeah, yeah, it does. So he
Speaker 3: tried to call like a few different places to see
Speaker 3: if they could give them confirmation that Bob worked there.
Speaker 3: And I think the only place that gave him some
Speaker 3: sort of confirmation was like this like staffing agency who
Speaker 3: said that like gave him some hunters head hunters. Yeah,
Speaker 3: they gave him some sort of confirmation that yes, there
Speaker 3: was a Bob Lazar here and we like referred him
Speaker 3: over to S four or not g g there you go, yes, yes,
Speaker 3: And as far as military, they wouldn't refer him over
Speaker 3: to that, and which is a part of area fifty one,
Speaker 3: right four, So.
Speaker 2: As four as a sector of area fifty one Groom Lake. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but it's up by pat Boost Lake is where S
Speaker 2: four is. Yes, so that's where allegedly he worked, right,
Speaker 2: And I mean, like you said, consistent, consistent really hasn't
Speaker 2: made money off of the UFO topic. You know, people
Speaker 2: will fly him to do the podcast. I don't consider
Speaker 2: that making money. It's like, you know what I mean,
Speaker 2: but this community labels anytime money gets involved, you're a grifter.
Speaker 2: You're a grifter. And it's like, guys, you were throwing
Speaker 2: that word around, just like we throw a whistleblower around, right,
Speaker 2: We like these buzzwords in this community. Right, you can't
Speaker 2: just be a witness, you have to be a whistleblower,
Speaker 2: right right. You can't just be a researcher, you have
Speaker 2: to be the foremost expert.
Speaker 3: Right right, right, exactly, so exactly.
Speaker 2: We love that kind of stuff. But Bob, I get
Speaker 2: that same feeling.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, And you know, there's been a few documentaries
Speaker 3: that have been made about him, and I've seen all
Speaker 3: of them, and like we were saying, the story stays
Speaker 3: stays pretty consistent, and uh, with this latest one, and
Speaker 3: I found this to be really interesting, and I suppose
Speaker 3: it's something that you know, can be explained or you know,
Speaker 3: if anybody wanted to to sort of doctor this this
Speaker 3: type thing, they could. But at the end of it,
Speaker 3: and you've seen the documentary, they show like where the
Speaker 3: hangars were supposedly, and they did something with the lighting
Speaker 3: and once they like dimmed it down enough, can.
Speaker 2: You bring that up? Look up? Look up S four
Speaker 2: bob Blazar. Uh damn what we look up? It was
Speaker 2: Bob Blazar S four Bob Blazar aerial photos.
Speaker 3: Yes, the hangars and the mountains.
Speaker 2: So what And I'll tell the story. So during COVID,
Speaker 2: someone got no, these aren't no. Yeah, well, well while
Speaker 2: they're pulling that up, you'll see it. It looks like
Speaker 2: a brown grid.
Speaker 3: Yeah. And then when when he did he did something
Speaker 3: with a contrast on the photo and it exposed the
Speaker 3: brown grids the four hangars. Yeah. Keep look, these are
Speaker 3: like maps.
Speaker 2: We're getting there. We're getting there, all right. I don't
Speaker 2: want to waste too much time. I'll overlay it. But
Speaker 2: there's these these pictures that show and when they so
Speaker 2: during COVID, a private pilot got clearance to fly over
Speaker 2: the base, and he had a powerful nikon with him.
Speaker 2: He knew exactly what he was doing, right, and they
Speaker 2: granted him access to fly over the base, and he
Speaker 2: just just picture after picture after picture after picture, and
Speaker 2: you put them all out and then no one ever
Speaker 2: saw anything, right, because it just it's meant to blend
Speaker 2: into the side of my mouth. It's meant to be hidden.
Speaker 2: And they discover all of a sudden that, you know,
Speaker 2: if you adjust the contrast, all of a sudden you
Speaker 2: make out this. You know, six hangars are in the
Speaker 2: first one's bigger, just like Lazar described because that was
Speaker 2: where the sport model was. So it was interesting. And
Speaker 2: then there's all these tracks in Papoos Lake.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I did right too, And they say.
Speaker 2: There's nothing out there, So why are all these tracks
Speaker 2: out there? Why is there one road out to Pappoos
Speaker 2: Lake at dry Lake bed if there's nothing out there,
Speaker 2: you know, So all these questions are raised. Yes, I
Speaker 2: will say, yeah, So you believe Babazar.
Speaker 3: I do. I think I believe him. He comes off
Speaker 3: very sincere. Uh this I think even says at the
Speaker 3: end of the documentary that if he could go back
Speaker 3: and never talk about this, that he would do that,
Speaker 3: and that this has caused nothing but grief to him
Speaker 3: and his wife and his personal life and the and
Speaker 3: the you know. And it's funny like when when you
Speaker 3: look at the things that they like try to like
Speaker 3: smear him on, it's like, you know, no record of
Speaker 3: him here, no record of him there. Listen if you know,
Speaker 3: and I've spoken to government officials at that level, if
Speaker 3: the government wants you erased. We saw what stopp Ellen
Speaker 3: did in the Soviet Union. Why wouldn't the United States
Speaker 3: government have the ability to like remove you from like
Speaker 3: records and schools and things like that, especially pre digital
Speaker 3: age right where it's just only on paper. And paper
Speaker 3: could be our friend and could also be our foe
Speaker 3: fall in the sense that it makes it easier for
Speaker 3: those interested in erasing you, makes it that much easier,
Speaker 3: but also friend because a physical copy of something could
Speaker 3: have been in the possession of anyone, whereas something that
Speaker 3: only exists on the Internet can be deleted, and once
Speaker 3: it's deleted, it's deleted for everyone, unless you've like downloaded
Speaker 3: an image or something like that. But like, and that's
Speaker 3: where like, you know, like he had like a newspaper
Speaker 3: that mentioned him in in you know, the sort of
Speaker 3: like the.
Speaker 2: Employee referred to him as a physicist at Los Alamos
Speaker 2: National Laboratory, and that was the article that Ed Teller
Speaker 2: was reading when he when he ed Teller dies, I'm
Speaker 2: right here, right. Ed Teller was given a speech and
Speaker 2: that's who referred That's who ended up preferring him.
Speaker 3: Oh okay, yeah, yeah, was am I right? Okay?
Speaker 2: Because I'm like, am I crazy?
Speaker 1: It was?
Speaker 2: I'd tell it. I was given the speech, right. But
Speaker 2: that's interesting. Do you have a favorite like UFO.
Speaker 3: Case, favorite UFO case.
Speaker 2: Like one that when you hear you're like, that's it,
Speaker 2: that one happened.
Speaker 3: I don't know if it's my favorite, but it's the
Speaker 3: one that I reference a lot because I always try
Speaker 3: when when I talk about this subject to uh a
Speaker 3: normy right like me? And you were not normy? Yes,
Speaker 3: there are plenty of normies out there. The one that
Speaker 3: I try to use the most, and I've used this
Speaker 3: with with journalists that have called me from the AP,
Speaker 3: journalists that have called me from local publications and things
Speaker 3: like that. I'm like, just look at this one case.
Speaker 3: If you don't believe anything else, but look at this
Speaker 3: one case. Arizona. The Light's Over Phoenix nineteen ninety seven.
Speaker 3: Oh man, look at this one case. You had thousands
Speaker 3: of probably the most widely seen UFO sighting, a single
Speaker 3: UFO sighting ever, twenty seven thousand and thirty thousand people
Speaker 3: witness this, and there's recordings of people like giving their
Speaker 3: you know, eyewitness testimony from all walks of life. And
Speaker 3: then the very next day, the governor of Arizona, Fife Simington,
Speaker 3: gets on stage and has one of his staffers dressed
Speaker 3: up like in an alien costume and try again, trying
Speaker 3: to make a light situation as is common. And then
Speaker 3: ten fifteen years later, guess what he goes. He goes
Speaker 3: on camera and he with James Fox, with James Fox,
Speaker 3: is that who it was? Yep? And he fes that
Speaker 3: fesses up.
Speaker 2: That he saw it.
Speaker 3: He not only did he see it, but the reason
Speaker 3: why he chose to cover it the way he did
Speaker 3: was because he was so stunned at what he saw
Speaker 3: that like his almost like his fight or flight kicked
Speaker 3: in and he was like but not fight or flight,
Speaker 3: like make light of it, or give it, give it,
Speaker 3: you know, life, giving it life would be talk about
Speaker 3: it in a serious way and really tell people how
Speaker 3: you felt, which was that he was astounded the same
Speaker 3: way everybody else was that witnessed this, But he chose
Speaker 3: he's a pilot. He's a pilot, and he was the
Speaker 3: governor of Arizona.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so he was like trained in yah, knowing flight,
Speaker 2: what flew and what didn't.
Speaker 3: He a smart guy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he's like that was a spaceship and people, you know,
Speaker 2: I find that to be that one of the most
Speaker 2: incredible cases.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, And I just tell people that this is like,
Speaker 3: imagine our governor in Connecticut, Governor Lamont. Yeah that's his name.
Speaker 3: You got. I forgot who you guys have up here,
Speaker 3: but you got Charlie Baker. And imagine him like Michelle,
Speaker 3: it's someone else else, Yeah, forget, but just imagine like
Speaker 3: a like a normal like politician like on the state level,
Speaker 3: doesn't even need to be federal, but somebody important on
Speaker 3: the state level. Like can you actually imagine this? Like
Speaker 3: Trump has an experience, right, and you know he's been
Speaker 3: beating around the bush on this issue. I know we
Speaker 3: have some stuff we're gonna release in this whatever, but
Speaker 3: imagine he one day has a press conference. Yeah, and
Speaker 3: he goes I saw a spaceship or I saw lights,
Speaker 3: I saw a V shaped formation. Nowadays, we've become so desensitized,
Speaker 3: not just because of him, but because of just social
Speaker 3: media and like what we were talking about before, all
Speaker 3: the all the content that exists out there that we like,
Speaker 3: we may see something like that and and may go,
Speaker 3: this is like, uh, shock content, or this is like,
Speaker 3: you know, supposed to be something funny. Like, not everybody
Speaker 3: will have that's that same uh synchronous reaction where uh
Speaker 3: they're all like, what did this guy just say? Like,
Speaker 3: not everybody may have the same reaction.
Speaker 2: Right, visceral guttural exactly.
Speaker 3: Exactly because because because of the the nature of the
Speaker 3: times that we live in that like some people may
Speaker 3: see that it go, oh, he's just trying to be
Speaker 3: funny again, or oh, this is just you know, a joke. Right,
Speaker 3: But back then there was that that didn't really exist.
Speaker 3: There was no there was the real world, There was
Speaker 3: no social media world, right, and you have the governor
Speaker 3: of the state getting on camera and making a joke
Speaker 3: about this. Everybody that didn't see it themselves thought it
Speaker 3: was a joke.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 3: Then now I forgot when the video came out, I
Speaker 3: think seven years ago or something like that, twenty nineteen,
Speaker 3: twenty eighteen. Maybe he comes out and he says, I
Speaker 3: felt the same way everybody else felt. I was in
Speaker 3: utter shock at what I was witnessing, you know, and
Speaker 3: I'm paraphrasing whatever.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 3: I don't know exactly the words he used. You could
Speaker 3: look it up, but he basically admits to just having
Speaker 3: having felt the same thing everybody else felt when they
Speaker 3: when they saw that. And but that's not what he
Speaker 3: portrayed to the world. And that's that's the part that
Speaker 3: like I think, you know, is is the most uh
Speaker 3: is the most interesting, And even for somebody that's a
Speaker 3: quote unquote ormy, you know, we use that term. You know,
Speaker 3: it's it's sort of lightheartedly. But you show that to somebody,
Speaker 3: and if they're willing to try to digest the point
Speaker 3: you're making, it should it should make them, It should resonate,
Speaker 3: it should make them go holy shit, like yeah, I
Speaker 3: see what you're saying. Like this guy was the governor
Speaker 3: of Arizona, made light of it, and then fest up
Speaker 3: fifteen years later and said that like he actually believed
Speaker 3: it to be what everybody else believed it to be.
Speaker 3: An actual UFO siding.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and not only just he didn't even say UFO.
Speaker 2: He said it's a reship.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's not of.
Speaker 2: This world, like it's a pretty like you know, stern descriptor.
Speaker 3: Yeah, right, yep.
Speaker 2: Uh so yeah that case, that case, I'm in contact
Speaker 2: with doctor Linkatai. She got like the famous footage and pictures.
Speaker 3: Of it, oh in the light.
Speaker 2: Yeah, she made she funded the documentary about it. Yeah.
Speaker 2: So she's a wonderful person. You hope to have her
Speaker 2: on soon. But moving moving forward, you talked earlier about
Speaker 2: Ancient Alien Yeah, now, I know everyone laughs when I
Speaker 2: you know, it's it's almost like comical. I agree to
Speaker 2: like that because we all think of the show, right yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: and the show has gone seventeen goddamn seasons, like eighteen
Speaker 2: goddamn you know.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, so of.
Speaker 2: Course that they've had to stretch, right yeah. Component And
Speaker 2: but do you think it's crazy to think that that
Speaker 2: we've always been in contact with something?
Speaker 3: No, I don't. I don't think it's crazy to think that.
Speaker 3: I and I consider Ancient Aliens the show a very
Speaker 3: credible source of information, because again, it's a show that's
Speaker 3: presenting established findings it has professionals speaking, uh to you know,
Speaker 3: it has professionals speaking on the show about certain things, scientists,
Speaker 3: they're using historical facts and documents. They're just packaging it
Speaker 3: into this thing called Ancient Aliens with some vibrant characters
Speaker 3: that are the hosts. But again, the stuff that they're
Speaker 3: talking about, it's like we were talking about before, just
Speaker 3: because something comes from the Internet, you don't automatically disqualify
Speaker 3: it as oh, that's garbage because the of the Internet,
Speaker 3: because there's everything is on the Internet, the good, the bad,
Speaker 3: or the ugly. Right, So it's like Ancient Aliens is
Speaker 3: absolutely a valid show to get good information on the
Speaker 3: UFO topic because all they're doing is aggregating all these
Speaker 3: you know, cases and documents.
Speaker 2: Even take the show, Take the show and put it aside. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the actual like base theory.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh right, right, the.
Speaker 2: Actual base theory. Because the problem I have with the
Speaker 2: Engine Aliens that I think they go a little too
Speaker 2: far in saying that like everything's alien, but like things
Speaker 2: like the pyramids, right, the precision, the astronomical, the mathematical,
Speaker 2: like this this idea that that in almost every culture,
Speaker 2: every civilization, they talk about beings that descended from the
Speaker 2: sky and taught them civil civilization essentially agriculture, you know, mathematics, astronomy.
Speaker 2: It seems that we all across the globe we're seeing
Speaker 2: the same thing almost as early as time itself.
Speaker 3: Yeah, no, exactly. For me, the biggest thing, the biggest
Speaker 3: piece of evidence in my opinion is forget it. When
Speaker 3: I say evidence that it is not like actual footage
Speaker 3: or eyewitness testimony. I'm talking about historical evidence before the
Speaker 3: time of cameras and photographs. The biggest piece of evidence
Speaker 3: for me is the the cave paintings. Yeah, and we're
Speaker 3: talking about paintings that are pre date civilization, like caveman times,
Speaker 3: like when we didn't have like real civilization, and there's
Speaker 3: depictions of flying objects, of people in space suits. And
Speaker 3: then fast forward, you know, thousands of years later, medieval
Speaker 3: paintings of of Christian figures, Jesus himself and.
Speaker 2: Crafts Christ a ufo right off the top of it, exactly.
Speaker 2: And then there's that, I mean a lot of the
Speaker 2: like you said that that that period, the medieval period,
Speaker 2: it was almost like because again the Church at the
Speaker 2: time they're judged jury and execution. Oh yeah, right, So
Speaker 2: art that's the way you can hide what you were
Speaker 2: seeing but also document it right right, Well, yeah it's
Speaker 2: the sun right.
Speaker 3: Right, a star or an angel, but it's like.
Speaker 2: Got this light that's descending on to Jesus as he's
Speaker 2: being baptized.
Speaker 3: And then there's like those drawings where like there's humans
Speaker 3: in like these crafts, these like intricate crafts. Yeah, it's
Speaker 3: not like it's a human and a cloud. You know,
Speaker 3: it's a human in a craft like it's got like
Speaker 3: a steering wheel and it's got like things around it.
Speaker 3: And all these people that try to like you know,
Speaker 3: cope and say that it's clouds or it's something that
Speaker 3: they could you know, wedge into their all pre existing paradigm.
Speaker 3: It's not. It is what it is. And there are
Speaker 3: some pictures where there are clouds and you could say, okay,
Speaker 3: those could be clouds there, but there's ones where they're
Speaker 3: clearly not. And that's the point. Why were people you know,
Speaker 3: thinking to draw these things before anything flu anything flu.
Speaker 2: And like I mean stripped down like a dragon, right,
Speaker 2: strip down a dragon and bring it to the base. Right,
Speaker 2: If you didn't have if we didn't have a word, right,
Speaker 2: if the closest thing we had to flying object was dragon, right,
Speaker 2: That's how they're going to describe them, and a fire
Speaker 2: breathing dragon. What does that sound like to you? Sounds
Speaker 2: like are you a modern day rocket blowing fire out
Speaker 2: the back the dragon? Right? So I think the language
Speaker 2: is particular, and again I think with improper translation, a
Speaker 2: lot can get lost. So that's why I do think
Speaker 2: like some of these tribes that are uncontacted or like
Speaker 2: the Dogons, you know, where they we'll have to have
Speaker 2: another another. Yeah, because I see we're coming up on
Speaker 2: time here. Is there anything I didn't ask you that
Speaker 2: I should have?
Speaker 3: I think we we covered? Uh, we covered.
Speaker 2: What's next?
Speaker 3: Yeah for you?
Speaker 2: And what what do you want to see happen as
Speaker 2: far as disclosure?
Speaker 3: So yeah, that's a good question and one that I
Speaker 3: don't know the answer to. Honestly, I don't know if
Speaker 3: we're ready for disclosure as as a society, as a
Speaker 3: as a racer, you.
Speaker 2: Know, not everyone says that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't think we are. I mean because I
Speaker 3: have these conversations lightheartedly, not as intense as we've gone
Speaker 3: here obviously with with a lot of people, you know,
Speaker 3: and especially now like people actually come to me, and
Speaker 3: think they come to me from every sort of level
Speaker 3: of this subject, from some pretty intense, you know, perspectives
Speaker 3: like what we've discussed here, to some pretty casual, like
Speaker 3: we said, normy sort of like views on this like
Speaker 3: a little green men, you know. And I just get
Speaker 3: the sense that like very few people can really have
Speaker 3: really grasped the seriousness of the implications of what it
Speaker 3: would mean if we really had disclose to us that
Speaker 3: we are truly not alone, and that the things that
Speaker 3: we've been seeing have actually been other life forms, other
Speaker 3: intelligent life I just I don't feel confident enough that
Speaker 3: we can grasp that, like we literally could have like
Speaker 3: a full on, like panic dystopian level collapse of society.
Speaker 3: I think you think, oh yeah, I don't think that
Speaker 3: we're as humans. I mean, look, look, look how like
Speaker 3: weak we are like in so many respects, Like you know,
Speaker 3: we still fight these wars, and you know, the smallest differences,
Speaker 3: you know, result in conflict. Like really, like to be honest,
Speaker 3: I don't think we're ready. We're not ready if this
Speaker 3: is real, We're not ready as a whole to to
Speaker 3: digest to digest this.
Speaker 2: Honestly, I respect the fact that you're willing to say
Speaker 2: that yeah, and still.
Speaker 3: Willing to pass like you did to pursue it.
Speaker 2: Because most people sit in that chair and they go,
Speaker 2: we're ready because they want us to be ready. It's
Speaker 2: not that we are.
Speaker 3: I want us to be ready to but I don't
Speaker 3: know that we are. But if I could do my
Speaker 3: little part in at least offering a scientific way of
Speaker 3: analyzing whatever we see, and you know, maybe putting some
Speaker 3: people at ease as far as experiences that they may
Speaker 3: have had in Connecticut that can be explained by a
Speaker 3: study of this nature. And if nothing else, like I said,
Speaker 3: just bring more awareness to the topic and show people
Speaker 3: it's being taken seriously by the by the by the government.
Speaker 2: Isn't it funny I mentioned this on the phone to you.
Speaker 2: The enemy of the UFO. Yeah, conspiracy world has always
Speaker 2: been the government. Yeah, but the only way confirmation comes
Speaker 2: is from the government.
Speaker 3: Government.
Speaker 2: It just seems inherently conundrumic got made up a word again.
Speaker 3: Connut canun like like a quagmire.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's it's inherently yeah, I because I don't need disclosure.
Speaker 2: I've seen things.
Speaker 3: Yes, you were gonna tell me, I was, Yeah, we'll.
Speaker 2: End it here. So I was young outside throwing a ball,
Speaker 2: waiting for the other kids to get home from school.
Speaker 2: My audience gonna be like, dude, I don't want to
Speaker 2: hear this story again. I look up gun metal, gray craft,
Speaker 2: oscillating moving forward, tree top level, no mistaking what it is.
Speaker 2: I didn't have a write frame of reference for that
Speaker 2: type of craft. I lived to Hanscom Air Force Base
Speaker 2: and I grew up next. You know, during nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: I knew what flew? What did this thing should not.
Speaker 3: Have flown here in Massachusetts?
Speaker 2: Yep, dead silent bill ricka mass right to Hanscom and
Speaker 2: at the time, a raytheon raytheons in that area. So
Speaker 2: I see the craft, I run in. I tell my mom.
Speaker 2: She's like you saw UFO. Brings me to the library
Speaker 2: the next day, YadA, YadA, Yeah, move on life. I
Speaker 2: end up going a different direction, right, I'm not happy
Speaker 2: with that direction. Something's off, you know. Then I get sober,
Speaker 2: things start to clear up a little bit. If she
Speaker 2: would drinking, and you know, my mom passed, but she
Speaker 2: got to see me sober for a couple of years,
Speaker 2: which is you know, for me, that's everything that was that.
Speaker 2: That's the most proud of myself that I've ever been
Speaker 2: is that she got to see it all the way
Speaker 2: through because she was there to during the bad right.
Speaker 2: She was always there and she always remains there. It's weird,
Speaker 2: but I'm in the room with her. I come back
Speaker 2: and I'm not happy with like things. I'm in the
Speaker 2: right place. She's like she knows podcastings like, She's like,
Speaker 2: you found it. What makes you happy? She saw it
Speaker 2: lit me up. But she's like, you'll find the top
Speaker 2: because she knew I wasn't happy with what I was
Speaker 2: talking about right inherently she knew what path I was
Speaker 2: supposed to be honest this one. And so I'm in
Speaker 2: the room when she passes of breast cancer, and man,
Speaker 2: I can't I can't explain it. But just a little
Speaker 2: ball of like you ever looked down a highway on
Speaker 2: a hot day like that discussion fact, so like a
Speaker 2: soft like a ball. But that'side. It's hilarious. The eight
Speaker 2: ball size of that just crosses my field of vision
Speaker 2: and hooks an l. So I saw it. It wasn't
Speaker 2: like something like in my eye that you know you
Speaker 2: have the slowdies. It wasn't one of those because this
Speaker 2: thing turned and then I saw the depth field, like
Speaker 2: you know when something makes it elwick. You can now
Speaker 2: you're seeing it move away, so it's cross and then
Speaker 2: it's moving away and it goes out the window boom up.
Speaker 2: Or at least I lost it outside the window because
Speaker 2: I'm colorblind, and it didn't I don't know, I don't know.
Speaker 2: It didn't admit a color. I'm color blind to a degree,
Speaker 2: so it I just saw it as it looked like
Speaker 2: light bent around it. But my mom was there. She
Speaker 2: was there like just like, you're there. I can see
Speaker 2: that you have a conscious spirit right now, you're in there.
Speaker 2: I watched this thing going by. I look back and
Speaker 2: then my Mom's gone and I close her eyes. I
Speaker 2: never put meaning to it. I didn't talk about it
Speaker 2: for like a year because I thought I was crazy.
Speaker 2: But that day total disclosure was born.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Wow.
Speaker 2: I held her hand and I was like, I will
Speaker 2: find out. I feel like it was her last one
Speaker 2: get on the right track, you know. So she was
Speaker 2: the common denominator in both of my experiences. So it's weird.
Speaker 2: It's like the dichotomy of like what you went through
Speaker 2: that right, not saying your mom just brushed it off.
Speaker 2: My mom almost embraced.
Speaker 3: It, definitely right.
Speaker 2: She handed me Whitley Sreevers communion. She was that girl right.
Speaker 2: Took us to church one time, brought us out. She goes,
Speaker 2: you guys want to go back? We said no, and
Speaker 2: we never went back. She let us go journey. So
Speaker 2: wherever she is, she's the highest picture in the studio
Speaker 2: because she's always always there. Her ashes are up there
Speaker 2: as well, and she's always ready. I've brought her into
Speaker 2: Congress Halls of Congress to watch Ufo pi Wi testify.
Speaker 2: We've done some amazing things together post mortem. And she's
Speaker 2: a She's the life that that guides my She's my
Speaker 2: north star. Where can people find you? Where can people
Speaker 2: keep up with what you doing?
Speaker 3: Oh? Yeah, I mean so you can find me on
Speaker 3: like Facebook, Just just Joe Hawks on Facebook.
Speaker 2: I'll put the links in the description.
Speaker 3: You can email me. I would love to get actually
Speaker 3: emails on my legislative look through my legislative email that way,
Speaker 3: you know, it's like an official Your got to me
Speaker 3: to my official capacity, and I.
Speaker 2: Can use that as and we can put that email out.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, okay, information, It's Joe dot Hawks at c G, A,
Speaker 3: dot c T, dot gov. So for those international listeners,
Speaker 3: the dot gov makes it like totally legit. Yep. So
Speaker 3: if you know, that's how you know, like I'm actually
Speaker 3: working with in the in the government, in government.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'll put I will put that link.
Speaker 3: In the description. Please send emails.
Speaker 2: Anything coming up that anyone should be aware of.
Speaker 3: So the bill will pass because and I don't want
Speaker 3: to drinx it, but because like I said, it's an
Speaker 3: appropriations bill, it's basically going to get baked into the budget,
Speaker 3: and the budget's going to pass because it's the budget.
Speaker 3: It's how we find fund the government, and so we
Speaker 3: will have this money, we will spend it. So we
Speaker 3: may create a website that will probably definitely create Like
Speaker 3: I'm working with a group called the Disclosure Foundation.
Speaker 2: I am very familiar.
Speaker 3: Oh okay, good, they're out of Connecticut. A couple of
Speaker 3: guys you know, reached out to me and yeah, I
Speaker 3: see that's ironical to mention that. Yeah, so they're gonna
Speaker 3: be taking up a piece of this endeavor, so to speak. Uh,
Speaker 3: So we'll be on social media and everything, you know.
Speaker 3: I'm sure we'll have like a page a website or
Speaker 3: to report anything and to interact with the public. So
Speaker 3: you're you're gonna hear more and I'll send you whatever
Speaker 3: you need to get it out there.
Speaker 2: Well, we'd love, we'd love to have you back. I'd
Speaker 2: love to continue doing this and maybe next time we
Speaker 2: could bring another person, do whatever. But you have an
Speaker 2: open invite, my friend, and thank you. Thank you and
Speaker 2: everyone out there listening or watching. Thank you. We couldn't
Speaker 2: do it without you, and I don't know if I
Speaker 2: would want to. I definitely would actually, but without you guys,
Speaker 2: this wouldn't be possible. Please, if you can like, share, subscribe,
Speaker 2: you already have your phone in your hand, don't be lazy.
Speaker 2: It takes twenty seconds, rate and review on your favorite
Speaker 2: podcast platform. And if you can take a step further
Speaker 2: and join our membership for early and ad free access.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much to producer Jane, to just on
Speaker 2: the keys, and to Lissa doing the background notes. The
Speaker 2: team has been doing doing a great job, and I
Speaker 2: just want to say thank you guys from the bottom
Speaker 2: of my heart. Truly, it's been a it's been a
Speaker 2: process giving up control. I was a one man show
Speaker 2: for years, many years. I have a tough time letting
Speaker 2: go of rains. But yeah, so we've been doing this
Speaker 2: is this is right, but we need to be so thank you.
Speaker 2: We're out, see you guys on the other side.
Podbean