"They'll Erase You" -Super Elites-Invention Of Secrecy Act, & UFOs With Steven Greer
Dr. Steven Greer returns for a second sit-down with Patrick Bet-David, and you won't want to miss it! This episode of the PBD podcast features one of the wildest conversations yet, covering government conspiracies, whistleblowers, aliens, secret patents, teleportation, Nikola Tesla, and more. Tune in for an unforgettable discussion!
TRY BIO MIND BY EDENTIA HERBALS, 25% OFF EXCLUSIVELY FOR TDP LISTENERS-PERFORMANCE MUSHROOM SUPPLEMENT MADE WITH ONLY THE FINEST INGREDIENTS, PEER REVIEWED, AND BACKED UP BY SCIENCE, I USE IT EVERY SINGLE DAY, AND IT HAS CHANGED MY LIFE— WWW.EDENTIAHERBALS.COM & DON’T FORGET TO USE CODE TOTAL DISCLOSURE AT CHECKOUT FOR 25%OFF
TOTAL DISCLOSURE’S HUB The 1—Stop-Shop For all things Total Dsiclosure-> From Our Documentaries, to Youtube Videos, and Podcasts, keep up to date with all things, here on our Website: https://totaldisclosure.onpodium.com/
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
Be A Member On The Audio Feed (Limited Perks: Early Access/Ad Free Content) https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-ufos-coverups-conspiracy--5975113/support
YOUTUBE MEMBER; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
PATREON MEMBER; https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure?
fan_landing=true&view_as=public
Follow Us On Twitter: Www.Twitter.com/DisclosurePod
Follow Us On Instagram: www.Instagram.com/Total.Disclosure
USE OUR CODE AND SIGN UP FOR TUBE-BUDDY TO START UTILIZING THEIR AMAZING TOOLS, LET TUBE BUDDY DO THE WORK FOR YOU: https://www.tubebuddy.com/POP
Sign Up for VIDIQ and Get Tons of Creator Content Tools, SEO Boosts, Keyword Scores, Title Suggestions, & So much MORE! VIDIQ can be integrated seamlessly into your Browser and Youtube Channel, Start utilizing this tool now, Sign up with TDP’s Link-www.VIDIQ.com/TotalDisclosure
Movie Palette allows you to put your favorite scene on Canvas, a great gift for your movie-buff friend/relative, or just an amazing piece that will bring a room together, it also won't make your partner flinch when bringing guests to the house;) Get 15% OFF your order of a new "MOVIE PALETTE" By Using CODE: CultureCorner15 At www.MoviePalette.com
LOOKING TO START YOUR OWN PODCAST?...
Speaker 2: I want to know.
Speaker 1: Do you know what technologies and patterns are in there?
Speaker 1: I do that, okay, can you share some of them
Speaker 1: with the public?
Speaker 2: Can do better than that. This would literally end all
Speaker 2: pollution on Earth, but it would also in poverty on
Speaker 2: the planet within about twenty years. This is a big announcement.
Speaker 2: I hope this goes viral because that's what would mean.
Speaker 2: Their plan is to create a threat from outer space
Speaker 2: to try to unite the world like Independent State of movie,
Speaker 2: and it's sort of a military global finto of humans
Speaker 2: against al back in them the seventies, so they could
Speaker 2: hit a button basically and stage an alien attack.
Speaker 1: What do you think about Elon Musk And would is
Speaker 1: he like a nicol La Tesla?
Speaker 2: Is you a good guy in your rise ip it
Speaker 2: was inclined to research this end of it, He wouldn't
Speaker 2: be making a I call it a fake Tesla. I
Speaker 2: mean a real Tesla car wouldn't have to be plugged
Speaker 2: in that existed in nineteen twenties. Nikola Tesla had one.
Speaker 2: These folks the world is the voice the operator as
Speaker 2: they want.
Speaker 1: Who nominates them?
Speaker 2: Nobody? It's so sensitive. Not going to let the president
Speaker 2: control this anymore, or the Congress, the big corporate media,
Speaker 2: left right center. All of it is corruct You're convinced
Speaker 2: all of it is corrupt, absolutely correct, and the proof
Speaker 2: of it is.
Speaker 1: So. A couple months ago I watched his documentary called
Speaker 1: The Lost Century Blown Away by First I heard about
Speaker 1: Invention Secrecy Act of nineteen fifty one. I told my wife, baby,
Speaker 1: you got to watch it. Then I told my son,
Speaker 1: you gotta watch it. I told everybody you got to
Speaker 1: watch this documentary. Six thousand patents that were protected by
Speaker 1: this senator called John Sparkman. It went into effect the
Speaker 1: nineteen fifty two. Somehow, someway that year, they chose to
Speaker 1: nominate him on the Democratic Party as the vice president.
Speaker 1: November one, we test the biggest nuclear test at the
Speaker 1: time that was seven hundred times more powerful than the
Speaker 1: one we dropped in Hiroshima. November fifth was election, and
Speaker 1: then Stephen gury I said, hey, man, I know we
Speaker 1: did a podcast four years ago. We got a do
Speaker 1: another one because I got a whole different thing I
Speaker 1: want to talk to you about. He came on, we
Speaker 1: had a two and a half hour conversation together. He
Speaker 1: told me about the fact that the government has access
Speaker 1: to technology to teleport, you know teleportation we hear about
Speaker 1: in movies and sci fi and all this stuff. So
Speaker 1: now they've had access to it for a while. Told
Speaker 1: the time about and encountered that George HW. Bush Senior
Speaker 1: had with President Bill Clinton telling him what to stop
Speaker 1: talking about and not even look into a private conversation
Speaker 1: he had with Barry Goldwater, lots of weird things, colleagues
Speaker 1: that were killed for having information. And then today he
Speaker 1: releases this project he's been working on for many, many years.
Speaker 1: While you'll have access to all these information from the
Speaker 1: Inventioned Secrecy Act of nineteen fifty one. Anyways, I don't
Speaker 1: want to take anything away from this. You will be
Speaker 1: fascinated by this conversation, especially if you are a capitalist,
Speaker 1: if you have a family, and you want to find
Speaker 1: a way to preserve this great, you know world we're
Speaker 1: living in right earth, and you want it to be
Speaker 1: around it, and you want to find out who are
Speaker 1: the power players that are controlling all the good things
Speaker 1: that could potentially happen to you and I for the future.
Speaker 1: You're gonna want to watch this thing in its entirety,
Speaker 1: and you'll think me at the end of the podcast
Speaker 1: having said that, here's doctor Stephen Greer.
Speaker 2: Did you ever think.
Speaker 1: You would make you think you want to make film?
Speaker 1: I could say, sweetly, did I know this life may
Speaker 1: have for me? Why would you bet on?
Speaker 2: Juli? Well, we got vet day value, cament give it.
Speaker 1: Values could take this world of entrepreneurs. We can't on
Speaker 1: value that. Hey, it is out of run, homie. Look
Speaker 1: what I've become. So the last time we were together,
Speaker 1: you and I was May of twenty twenty, which is
Speaker 1: a little over four years ago, four years of a month,
Speaker 1: and it was a fascinating conversation. Millions of people watched it.
Speaker 1: It was great. We talked about aliens, We talked about
Speaker 1: your encounters with aliens, experiences, what you've done obviously a doctor, scientist,
Speaker 1: the things you've worked on. I even think your dad
Speaker 1: was he working on the certain responsibilities with the atomic
Speaker 1: for the government.
Speaker 2: What was your dad's My uncle helped design the lunar module,
Speaker 2: the lunar's uncle on the moon the first time Armstrong.
Speaker 1: So this is like, this is in your genes. You've
Speaker 1: been interested in this for a while and then recently
Speaker 1: I was late to this. Two months ago I watched
Speaker 1: the last century right, and how to reclaim it. A
Speaker 1: documentary they did that I think came out in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty three, if I'm not mistaken, it came out last year.
Speaker 1: I watched it and then I was blown away by
Speaker 1: the Invention Secrecy Act, and I went down a rabbit
Speaker 1: hole and I wanted to find out who wrote this
Speaker 1: bill and what happened to the guy that wrote the bill.
Speaker 1: The guy that wrote the bill, you know who he is,
Speaker 1: the John Sparksman, I think his name is or something
Speaker 1: like that. You know, he ends up becoming the vice
Speaker 1: the nominee for the Democratic vice presidential candidate of nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty two, exactly the year they wrote the bill, and
Speaker 1: they're holding go on to six thousand patents. And then
Speaker 1: I had my wife watch it. Then I had my
Speaker 1: son watch it. He's here right now. He just met
Speaker 1: you a few minutes ago, and I think the world
Speaker 1: needs to know about this. And that's when I said,
Speaker 1: I think we need to do a part two. And
Speaker 1: I'm glad you said.
Speaker 2: Yes, happy to be here. Yeah, So you do a
Speaker 2: great show.
Speaker 1: So let's start off with that. I mean, I got
Speaker 1: a lot of things I want to go through with you.
Speaker 1: But I want to start off with that. To the
Speaker 1: average person, when I asked them, have you heard of
Speaker 1: Invention Secrecy Act? When I tell you ninety nine percent
Speaker 1: say I've never heard of it. I'm being friendly because
Speaker 1: one hundred percent people are like, what is the Invention
Speaker 1: Secrecy Act.
Speaker 2: Of nineteen fifty one?
Speaker 1: Can you tell the audience what is the Invention Secrecy
Speaker 1: Act of nineteen fifty one? Who was behind it and why?
Speaker 2: Well, it actually became an offfeot of the projects from
Speaker 2: the forties dealing with energy and technology and propulsion systems that,
Speaker 2: if they were disclosed, would be the immediate replacement of
Speaker 2: oil gas coal surface transportation public UTAIL. Well, in today's dollars,
Speaker 2: you're talking probably over one thousand trillion dollars. So what
Speaker 2: most people don't realize is that around between nineteen forty
Speaker 2: five and nineteen fifty four was the heyday of electromagnetic
Speaker 2: engineering dealing with energy and propulsion. And it was from
Speaker 2: two sources, research that had been done in the late
Speaker 2: eighteen hundreds and early twentieth century, and even things that
Speaker 2: people call anti gravity not the correct scientific term, but
Speaker 2: let's just go with that. It's really gravity control. Those
Speaker 2: experiments started in the late twenties with T. Townshend Brown
Speaker 2: and the Klosky Frosts experiment in Germany and where very
Speaker 2: high voltage systems would cause objects to lift and basically
Speaker 2: have mass cancelation and look like they're defining gravity and levitate.
Speaker 1: This is the g engines you're talking ye about, yep, But.
Speaker 2: That was earlier. I mean that was later. This is twenties,
Speaker 2: but those began to be more and more classified. Tea
Speaker 2: Towns and Browns work became some of the core founding
Speaker 2: for what's called the Rand Corporation in Ventura, California. But
Speaker 2: those got populated with the research from retrieving extraterrestrial vehicles
Speaker 2: in the mid forties and fifties, where they began to
Speaker 2: study them under a very highly classified project. I have
Speaker 2: the documents. We've just released all of them to the
Speaker 2: public last month and our disclosure project Intelligence are but
Speaker 2: it describes in one of the Canadian top secret documents
Speaker 2: that a top secret team was working on this in
Speaker 2: nineteen fifty and the work they were doing surpassed the
Speaker 2: secrecy of the development of the hydrogen bomb, the ultimate
Speaker 2: doomsday weapon. You can imagine now, this is an authenticated
Speaker 2: top secret document. So the punchline on that is there
Speaker 2: was this technological breakthroughs both human and then studying objects
Speaker 2: from outer space. Let's say that came together the two
Speaker 2: mighty rivers that became this torrent, but very classified. So
Speaker 2: they realized that there are too many people stumbling across this,
Speaker 2: and they created this act to give the government the
Speaker 2: power that even if you don't apply for a patent,
Speaker 2: if they learn you have something that they want to seize,
Speaker 2: all they have to do is issue a national security
Speaker 2: order on it. They take it. And this is not
Speaker 2: a conspiracy theory and all that is just a fact.
Speaker 2: You can look up the you know, people can look
Speaker 2: this up. And I am working I've worked over the
Speaker 2: years of many many people who've had that happen to them,
Speaker 2: geniuses that have had their work confiscated. And it would
Speaker 2: be an enormous benefit to humanity. But the super elite,
Speaker 2: global elite don't want that out. They don't want They
Speaker 2: didn't want it out in the fifties, they don't want
Speaker 2: it out now. So that is the core of the
Speaker 2: secrecy besonding what people call UFOs or UAPs. I mean,
Speaker 2: that's really the heart of it. The other thing is
Speaker 2: that when I go into a skiff, a secure compartment
Speaker 2: information facility where top secret information is exchanged, one of
Speaker 2: the first things I do, whether it's with the members
Speaker 2: of Congress or some military people, is to you know,
Speaker 2: tell them, you know, see this video that the Pentagon
Speaker 2: is confirmed is real of this UFO flye off the
Speaker 2: goast California. And they got released few years ago, and
Speaker 2: I said, just look at that and forget all the
Speaker 2: esoteric and alien cachet and baggage. That is an alternative
Speaker 2: energy and propulsion device period. And I said, if you
Speaker 2: look at how it's moving and the sensors that they
Speaker 2: put on that thing, both from space and the ship,
Speaker 2: the big battleship out there, and the jet pilots flying
Speaker 2: those F eighteens, they'd had no heating signature, you know.
Speaker 2: And here's the thing. There's no jets, there's no rockets,
Speaker 2: and if it was a nuclear power plant, it would
Speaker 2: be very hot because you know, fission is dremely hot.
Speaker 2: So how is it doing how is it moving like that? Well,
Speaker 2: it's using this whole new physics. And this is why
Speaker 2: most of our Air Force and other pilots when they
Speaker 2: encounter these they immediately assume all of them are alien
Speaker 2: or extraterrestrial, when in reality, I'd say seventy eighty percent
Speaker 2: of them are hours highly classified, illegally run covert programs
Speaker 2: without the oversight of the Congress and the president, so
Speaker 2: that secrecy has become so embedded. Eisenhower had a pretty
Speaker 2: good clue about it when he left office, and he said,
Speaker 2: but where the military industrial complex? And I remember in
Speaker 2: mind people he's a five star general, right, and a
Speaker 2: conservative Republican modern republican back then, but he was no
Speaker 2: enemy of the military. But he warned the dangers to
Speaker 2: democracy and secrecy because of this. Now he didn't mention
Speaker 2: the UFO issue, but he was very much read in.
Speaker 2: And I can prove that our archive goes through that.
Speaker 2: And he then by nineteen fifty seven to eight was
Speaker 2: being pushed aside out of the programs. And we actually
Speaker 2: have an attorney who at the time was a young
Speaker 2: man the army. His testimony we released in this archive
Speaker 2: where he says he was at the White House Signal
Speaker 2: Corps in nineteen, you know, fifteen nine sixty before Eisenhower left,
Speaker 2: and Eisenhower told him that he was being blocked control
Speaker 2: over these projects. So these covert programs have been let's
Speaker 2: just say, off the leash for most of you know,
Speaker 2: the last sixty So I want to ask you this.
Speaker 1: So I'm going through timeline while you were talking, and
Speaker 1: I'm thinking, you know, it's your you know, So Heroshima
Speaker 1: happened August sixth, nineteen forty five, right, okay. Nagasaki happened
Speaker 1: August ninth, nineteen forty five.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Invention Secrecy Act happened in nineteen fifty one, which ended
Speaker 1: up being a law nineteen fifty two led by Senator
Speaker 1: John Sparksman. Great, and that year he ends up being
Speaker 1: nominated as the vice president for the Democratic you know nominee.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Then the election that year that the day we voted
Speaker 1: on Tuesday was November fourth of nineteen fifty two. Three
Speaker 1: days prior to that, on November one of nineteen fifty two,
Speaker 1: is the big explosion that we had, the thermal nuclear
Speaker 1: explosion that took place, rob If you can pull this up,
Speaker 1: type in hydrogen bomb year. Just type in hydrogen bomb year.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: So if you type in hydrogen can you zoom in that?
Speaker 1: I just want to read that right there. The US
Speaker 1: tested the first full scale thermal nucular device on November
Speaker 1: first of nineteen fifty two. The result was an explosion
Speaker 1: that was equivalent to one of them, one produced by
Speaker 1: more than ten million tons of TNT. This was approximately
Speaker 1: seven hundred times the power of the uranium bomb dropped
Speaker 1: in Hiroshima. Stephen seven hundred. So, so here's what I'm
Speaker 1: trying to find out. The time span from AUGUSTI, Hiroshima,
Speaker 1: August nine, Nagasaki, you know, Investion Secrecy Act of nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty one fifty two becomes in. Then November first, we
Speaker 1: have the hydrogen bomb. November fourth is the election? Is
Speaker 1: the reason why they put the Invention Secrecy Act? A
Speaker 1: noble cause? Or was it the fact that people of
Speaker 1: big industries were afraid that maybe they're about to lose
Speaker 1: some of their control and business that they have, because
Speaker 1: there's a part of it that could be like, No,
Speaker 1: it was noble. We were worried. We wanted to make
Speaker 1: sure that certain things wouldn't be available to other people,
Speaker 1: because if they did, what if out there in the
Speaker 1: free market place, somebody explodes and messages with US uranium
Speaker 1: and then all of a sudden, we you know, we
Speaker 1: lose our country, We lose all this stuff. How much
Speaker 1: do you think was noble? How much of you thinking was, hey,
Speaker 1: you passed this bill, we'll make you the vice president,
Speaker 1: we can do this. What do you think happened there?
Speaker 2: I think it's both. I think for certain, there are
Speaker 2: certain valid national security secrets that are technological that that
Speaker 2: should be kept that way, And you know, I don't
Speaker 2: have agrievance with that. What's terrible is when there are
Speaker 2: corrupting influences from financial and corporate sectors, that then it's
Speaker 2: the tail wagon the dog of the government of we
Speaker 2: the people. Right. And you know, so my great great
Speaker 2: whatever grandfather was the first prisoner in the American Revolution,
Speaker 2: and you know, my family, my dad was hand to
Speaker 2: hand combat World War two in the Pacific. You know,
Speaker 2: we look at this, many of the people I work
Speaker 2: with who are special forces in military, and they look
Speaker 2: at this and they go, well, you know, if you
Speaker 2: have a corrupting influence and you have that kind of
Speaker 2: state power, then you can get into trouble if there
Speaker 2: isn't proper oversight, and there hasn't been. What I'm trying
Speaker 2: to say is that between the fifties and now after
Speaker 2: Eisenhower got shoved aside. The folks who have been working
Speaker 2: and keeping these secrets are not necessarily doing it on
Speaker 2: behalf of the US government or the American people or
Speaker 2: the world. They're doing it on behalf of their own interests,
Speaker 2: which are usually financial and global power related. And that
Speaker 2: is the problem. It's a big problem when no one's
Speaker 2: mining the store. This is why I've been trying to
Speaker 2: get Congress to have a subpoena power through the House
Speaker 2: Oversight Committee and the members of Congress I've been meeting with,
Speaker 2: which we'll get into that that's just been blocked by
Speaker 2: the way, because without that, you know, you really have
Speaker 2: a Frankenstein we created in secrecy that Eisenhower warned us about.
Speaker 2: That that's really gone crazy. So, yes, there are some
Speaker 2: valid national security secrets that we be covered by that.
Speaker 2: But on the other hand, it's like your grandmother's skirt.
Speaker 2: It hides everything right, and they can hoover up totally
Speaker 2: legitimate technologies that for example, you could have an electric
Speaker 2: car but not have nine hundred pounds of lithium ion batteries.
Speaker 2: You'd have a battery about this big, and it would
Speaker 2: start up a electromagnetic generator pulling energy out. We can
Speaker 2: talk about this what's called the quantum vacuum or zero
Speaker 2: point energy field, and you never have to plug the
Speaker 2: thing in, right.
Speaker 1: So that that was in there at that time.
Speaker 2: That existed in nineteen twenties, Nikola Tesla had one, and
Speaker 2: we've documented this. Now. Remember when Nikola Tesla died in
Speaker 2: nineteen forty three, the FBI went in and sees the
Speaker 2: I think it was forty some trunks or twenty some
Speaker 2: trunks of secret papers, and I have a group that's
Speaker 2: thinking of assuing for those.
Speaker 1: But those still has that the US government has that
Speaker 1: or the militant industrial complexes though we don't.
Speaker 2: This is a good question because where does this stuff
Speaker 2: go once it gets hoovered up under this secrecy Act?
Speaker 2: And this is a big problem because you would think,
Speaker 2: let's make this real for people. Right, So back going
Speaker 2: thirty well, nineteen ninety three is thirty one years. I
Speaker 2: was asked as a young doctor to come up and
Speaker 2: brief the director of the CIA for Bill Clinton or
Speaker 2: James Woolsey, and it's because he and the President had
Speaker 2: started looking into this issue, the whole UFO issue, all
Speaker 2: of it, and they had been denied access and blocked,
Speaker 2: and we're being lied to. You're in the room with
Speaker 2: both of them. I'm in the room with the CI
Speaker 2: director and my POC, my point of contact to him,
Speaker 2: who is the head of a military think tank. So
Speaker 2: I thought, honestly, I mean, he put me under the
Speaker 2: sodium Pentahal. I thought it was a ruse to pick
Speaker 2: my brain because I had these araspace connections in my family.
Speaker 2: I had all this information and it was just counterintelligence
Speaker 2: trying to figure out what I knew. No, it turned
Speaker 2: out the CI director was completely blocked, the president had
Speaker 2: been blocked. And then I found out recently Clinton was threatened,
Speaker 2: and I have a document that also establish just that
Speaker 2: from someone who was with him, where he admitted that
Speaker 2: he was personally threatened if he looked into this much further.
Speaker 2: And so I think this, you know, was my coming
Speaker 2: of age, to be honest with you, I was always
Speaker 2: interested in the UFO and ET issue. I had sightings
Speaker 2: when I was younger, had a family member who designed
Speaker 2: a thing that landed on the moon with an alarmstrong
Speaker 2: and yes, we did go. They just didn't tell us
Speaker 2: everything that happened. But the CI director was shaken and
Speaker 2: he couldn't get access even with the clearance that a
Speaker 2: director of CI would have. So there's a parallel, illegal,
Speaker 2: black government system that I think is mostly corporate. So
Speaker 2: if you're asked me where the center of power on
Speaker 2: this is, you know, everyone in Congress and the National
Speaker 2: Security Council and the President wouldn't add up to anything
Speaker 2: hill of beans compared to what Lackheed' skunk Works and
Speaker 2: my uncle's north of Grumm and he had his whole
Speaker 2: career with Raytheon and some of these other huge behemoths
Speaker 2: that are contractors but who have highly compartment operations dealing
Speaker 2: with this. Now we actually have the information and a
Speaker 2: letter from the director, the head of the Lockheed skunk Works,
Speaker 2: the top secret aerospace engineering, and it's in the archive.
Speaker 2: We release this now, both the letter written to him
Speaker 2: from a friend that his widow gave to us and
Speaker 2: the reply from Ben Rich and it says point blank,
Speaker 2: his friend said, do we have these UFOs? And he
Speaker 2: says yes, some are extraterrestrial, many are hours, and he
Speaker 2: admits they're hours, meaning human made. So people think that
Speaker 2: technology stands still. But if you're at the threshold in
Speaker 2: the twenties thirties, forties discovering this area of science of
Speaker 2: electromagnetic physics post quantum sort of entanglement can get into
Speaker 2: this as we're boring for the general public. But and
Speaker 2: then you know, you have special access projects that are
Speaker 2: top secret. But then decide it's so sensitive, we're not
Speaker 2: going to let the president control this anymore or the
Speaker 2: Congress except for a few devils that they put in
Speaker 2: there that that do control it. So it's a complicated
Speaker 2: architecture of this secrecy. You have to throw your civics
Speaker 2: high school civics book in the trash.
Speaker 1: So let me let me go back to the Still
Speaker 1: I'm stuck on this Inventioned Secrecy Act from purely in
Speaker 1: the capitalistic standpoint, not even the alien side, on all
Speaker 1: this other stuff that's in there, right, So let's go
Speaker 1: back to it. So enough energy to you know, zero
Speaker 1: point energy, which we'll get into. Okay, great, on this
Speaker 1: Nicola Tesla and what happened to him? And they came
Speaker 1: and they took the files god knows how many boxes,
Speaker 1: and they went to Trump's uncle Fred, Trump's brother John.
Speaker 1: They go to him, Hey, is this anything that's a
Speaker 1: threat if it's leaked to the public. No, nothing, to
Speaker 1: worry about. Great, they still end up keeping it anyway,
Speaker 1: is right. But I'm trying to find out. So if
Speaker 1: you were to simplify to the audience, the audience wants
Speaker 1: to know, Hey, Stephen, what are some of those six
Speaker 1: six thousand patterns that we have and what industries would
Speaker 1: they destroy? And how how much would our lives improve?
Speaker 1: For example, you know, one we have access to being
Speaker 1: able to produce cars that can run on water, and
Speaker 1: it puts out of a five trillion It puts a
Speaker 1: five trillion dollar oil industry out of business overnight. You know,
Speaker 1: we have the you know, pharmaceutical side to be able
Speaker 1: to come up and you know, solve cancer tonight. You know,
Speaker 1: we just have because if we do, the amount of
Speaker 1: chemotherapy business is a such and such amount of billion
Speaker 1: dollar industry. We don't want to put that out of
Speaker 1: this we have the ability to do. I want to know,
Speaker 1: do you know what technologies and patterns are in there?
Speaker 1: I do that, Okay, Can you share some of them
Speaker 1: with the public that you know maybe would be reveally.
Speaker 2: I can do better than that. You go to our
Speaker 2: archive and there's a whole file of I believe thousands
Speaker 2: of pages of those that were copied by a man
Speaker 2: I knew who has passed away named John Benini. And
Speaker 2: there was a CIA officer who had approached me, but
Speaker 2: previously had approached him and took him and it's called
Speaker 2: the Saidjack Files. S G E K I said Jaki.
Speaker 2: And he was a CI officer who allowed mister Bedini
Speaker 2: to go into a Badini or Benini Badini b E
Speaker 2: d I N I John Benini. And he's passed away
Speaker 2: but a couple of years ago. But this CIA officer,
Speaker 2: said Jaki, he let him go into a facility where
Speaker 2: they had confiscated these sort of inventions over many decades,
Speaker 2: and they had the patents in file cabinets. And he
Speaker 2: told John Bedini, he said, you know, he was trying
Speaker 2: to recruit him into the agency in a covert program
Speaker 2: dealing with technology. So the guy was a genius with
Speaker 2: electromagnetic engineering, Benini was, and and he let him, for
Speaker 2: twenty four hours copy anything he wanted. And so he
Speaker 2: went in he did, but as a CI officer said Jakie,
Speaker 2: eventually was told no, I'm not going to join your operation.
Speaker 2: But Bedini had kept a copy of those files, which
Speaker 2: members of my team digitized.
Speaker 1: So the CEE. I first, I didn't know he did
Speaker 1: he took those files.
Speaker 2: He didn't know he kept a copy. He thought he
Speaker 2: got them all back, And now we've released them. They
Speaker 2: were in an encrypted uh CD, I believe, and the
Speaker 2: encryption has been removed and people can go in there now.
Speaker 2: Now that was the tip of the iceberg, because I mean,
Speaker 2: this was a huge facility. It's like the end of
Speaker 2: the movie where the you know is Steven Spielberg the
Speaker 2: Raiders of the laws Ark when they're rolling the thing
Speaker 2: is they go into this big warehouse top or was
Speaker 2: this facility? It was in the Upper Midwest, is what
Speaker 2: I've been asked, just to say, in an old school
Speaker 2: house facility that was cordoned off and look like nothing important, so.
Speaker 1: You know where it's at, but just you're not able
Speaker 1: to say, yep, okay, I do know where it got it.
Speaker 1: And would it be a place that the average person
Speaker 1: walks by every day and they have no clue what
Speaker 1: it is?
Speaker 2: They'd have no idea.
Speaker 1: And is there protection, like hardcore secret, you know, protection
Speaker 1: around it that you can't see, or are there are people
Speaker 1: outside of the building that you could tell that something's
Speaker 1: weird about this building, there are sensors. Are sensors?
Speaker 2: Got it?
Speaker 1: And what are some of the things you guys found,
Speaker 1: you know, thousands of pages. What are somethings your team
Speaker 1: and your you and your team found where it's why
Speaker 1: would they hide something like this from Why would they
Speaker 1: keep this away from us?
Speaker 2: Well, they had they had electromagnetic devices that were so
Speaker 2: called free energy. They had the technologies that would take
Speaker 2: water as you mentioned, and do the hydrolysis past the
Speaker 2: Faraday constant where it would be at certain voltages and
Speaker 2: frequency you get a magnetically charged hydrogen and oxygen gas
Speaker 2: you can burn get energy. The only pollution is water vapor.
Speaker 2: You know, all of those sort of technologies. But then
Speaker 2: there are other things that were even stranger, where you
Speaker 2: can cause basically atomic changes in the electron shell so
Speaker 2: as you can move up and down the periodic table
Speaker 2: at certain frequencies, magnetic field frequencies, so that you could
Speaker 2: theoretically take ten and turn it into gold transmutation. It's
Speaker 2: like the alchemist, but it's high tech, and these are
Speaker 2: very old discoveries. And so one of the big problems
Speaker 2: is when you ask this question, why wouldn't we have it?
Speaker 2: The economic power is really about, you know, the money
Speaker 2: about dollars. But when you start talking about trillions and
Speaker 2: dozens or hundreds of trillions of dollars, now you're talking
Speaker 2: about something that is an impact that's way beyond you know,
Speaker 2: inventing a cell phone or even the Internet. This is
Speaker 2: way past that because our entire planet is running on
Speaker 2: an antiquated grid and energy paradigm from the late eighteen hundreds.
Speaker 2: And if you take a nuclear power plants the mid forties,
Speaker 2: And what I remind people is, do you really think
Speaker 2: fundamental energy generation and propulsion technologies haven't gone forward since
Speaker 2: nineteen forty five? This is ridiculous. But those technologies which
Speaker 2: prompted these national security patent acts and seizure laws both
Speaker 2: had applications. It could be sold to Congress because there
Speaker 2: were legitimate state secrets if you didn't want to just
Speaker 2: let someone leak out your design for a nuclear warhead,
Speaker 2: for example. But on the other hand, there are things
Speaker 2: that would technologies that would greatly benefit humanity. And let
Speaker 2: me remind people, this would literally end all pollution on Earth,
Speaker 2: but would also end poverty on the planet within about
Speaker 2: twenty years. Why right now, you have three billion people
Speaker 2: on the planet. The economists came out with an article
Speaker 2: I think two years ago about this that don't even
Speaker 2: have energy to cook their food, so they're like cutting
Speaker 2: down any brush in the desert and the rainforest just
Speaker 2: to be able to have some charcoal to cook food.
Speaker 2: There's three thousand million people. This isn't sustainable. This is
Speaker 2: not a way to have a planet. Right, So these
Speaker 2: technologies would change that, and many, many people in these
Speaker 2: COVID programs agree this should change. But you're stepping on
Speaker 2: some very big toes. I mean, you're talking the kind
Speaker 2: of macroeconomic power globally that is way past anything that
Speaker 2: the president deals with. Okay, And that's the problem because
Speaker 2: on the one hand, it's some people have told me
Speaker 2: who are in this system, it's like the cure is
Speaker 2: worsen the disease, that to release this it'd be too disruptive.
Speaker 2: I say, yes, it should have been released one hundred
Speaker 2: years ago. It would have been transition would have been easy.
Speaker 2: But now look at the mess we're in because of
Speaker 2: this secrecy but also the illegal application of it in
Speaker 2: the last sixty years. Now, that is what Congress right
Speaker 2: now is trying to grapple with but it's a big
Speaker 2: mistake for the public to think because you're the chairman
Speaker 2: of the Senate Intelligence Committee or the co chairman, you're
Speaker 2: a nobody like mister Rubio. Those folks are told either
Speaker 2: nothing or some version of a lie that they want
Speaker 2: to be told. This is what happened to mister Trump,
Speaker 2: by the way, in his first term, and also mister
Speaker 2: Pence because of a friend of mister Pinson's family works
Speaker 2: with me and we found out what happened. But the
Speaker 2: problem with all of this is what has happened to
Speaker 2: democracy and oversight and we the people. But also if
Speaker 2: you know, when you talk about we have a free
Speaker 2: market economy and capitalism, do we I mean if the
Speaker 2: most important discoveries and sciences of the last hundred years
Speaker 2: have been ruthlessly confiscated and kept secret. No, we have
Speaker 2: a faint shadow. We have a managed economy. You know,
Speaker 2: it's not quite as managed to say China's or the
Speaker 2: Soviet unions or Venezuela and control, but it's still controlled
Speaker 2: and managed. It's a mistake to think it's free free market.
Speaker 2: It isn't. The only way it could be free is
Speaker 2: that if the technologies that were not weaponized. And this
Speaker 2: is when you mentioned that, you know, mister Trump's uncle said, no,
Speaker 2: these are fine, they're not going to hurt anything. Well,
Speaker 2: they wouldn't hurt It's not like they're dangerous. It's just
Speaker 2: that it's going to hurt you if you own, you know,
Speaker 2: a three dollars trillion dollar oil field off of Venezuela
Speaker 2: or whatever, and these big interests. So I think this
Speaker 2: is you know, and I'm not saying that everybody in
Speaker 2: the oil industry knows about this. They're not. They're just
Speaker 2: doing their But I'll tell you there's a fortune fifty,
Speaker 2: Fortune five five hundred, Fortune fifty companies chairperson trying to
Speaker 2: come forward.
Speaker 1: And Fortune fifty chairperson that's trying to come forward.
Speaker 2: Yeah, chairman, former chairman. He's getting up there. He's about
Speaker 2: seventy nine or eighty.
Speaker 1: He's still active or former chairman.
Speaker 2: But he has the documents and the information he wants
Speaker 2: to come forward with him. But you know, when he
Speaker 2: reached out to me last year, they threatened him and
Speaker 2: his family and his grandchildren. Is he a money guy?
Speaker 2: Does he?
Speaker 1: Is he financially free?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: Sure? I mean, so how do they threaten them? What
Speaker 1: do they say how do you threaten a person like that?
Speaker 1: What are we going to do with you?
Speaker 2: Kill your whole family?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 2: Who?
Speaker 1: So who calls a person like that.
Speaker 2: Really spooky people? I've had him up here in my
Speaker 2: life and threatened me. I said, buzz off. But you
Speaker 2: know we've had I've had four people on my.
Speaker 1: Team killed, four people in your team killed.
Speaker 2: I have. And you know, when mister Grush was asked
Speaker 2: about this at the House oversight here in last year,
Speaker 2: he said yes. And because when mister Grush was working
Speaker 2: with people that I had been briefing to give information
Speaker 2: so he could begin to drill down on this. But
Speaker 2: he was not a direct whistleblower witness. He was actually
Speaker 2: he's called a whistleblower, but he's not. He didn't directly
Speaker 2: deal with the technology or the programs. He was investigating
Speaker 2: them on behalf of the folks that I was given
Speaker 2: information to just tell them where to go, like I
Speaker 2: told them exactly where to go in the high daysert
Speaker 2: of California to find this stuff or you know, wherever.
Speaker 2: So but you know, someone asked one of the members
Speaker 2: of the committee, I think it was Congressman Burchett, who
Speaker 2: had been working with asked, well, have people been killed?
Speaker 2: And of course a few months earlier, I think it
Speaker 2: was January of last year. There was a peripheral person
Speaker 2: on that team who was killed because he stuck his
Speaker 2: nose in their own place. The people are very naive, frankly,
Speaker 2: if they don't think this kind of corrupt power, you
Speaker 2: think of the worst thing you've ever heard about, the
Speaker 2: mafia or the mob on steroids, hyper charge on steroids.
Speaker 2: But let's say, let's stay on that. That's what you're
Speaker 2: dealing with. Sure, thugs.
Speaker 1: Four people that were killed? Are your team? Their public like?
Speaker 1: How were they killed and how recent was it?
Speaker 2: Oh, this guy's back in the nineties.
Speaker 1: What were you talking about? And that you know, what
Speaker 1: were they talking about or digging? That cost them their lives?
Speaker 2: They were decover sources giving me information, so they were
Speaker 2: they had job before I had good security in place
Speaker 2: and I didn't have what I have in place now,
Speaker 2: which I call.
Speaker 1: Can you say what they did for a living or no?
Speaker 2: Uh? Oh, well they were various. Well, one was a
Speaker 2: military naval intelligence guy, one with CIA H and one
Speaker 2: was an assistant of mine.
Speaker 1: It was at of yours. I'm a good friend. How
Speaker 1: did he get killed. She how did she get killed?
Speaker 2: It was basically a chemical weapon that was induced a
Speaker 2: very aggressive cancer very quickly. And you know, I have
Speaker 2: an FBI lady on my team who is a special
Speaker 2: agent and she alway. I have one hundred and fifty substances.
Speaker 1: Like that, one hundred and fifty substances to inject cancer
Speaker 1: into somebody.
Speaker 2: Or brush up against someone or do something that will
Speaker 2: kill them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, brush up against somebody like there was a movie
Speaker 1: I watch about the brushing up to somebody. That absolutely
Speaker 1: so that's not just a movie. In real life, we
Speaker 1: can do that as Okay, So let let's go back
Speaker 1: to this.
Speaker 2: So this this is but let's go back to the
Speaker 2: point I'm making, and that is people are afraid and
Speaker 2: they should be. Now this is why I mean, going
Speaker 2: back to ninety four, asked the president at the time
Speaker 2: Clinton to do an executive order protecting high value whistleblowers
Speaker 2: and witnesses who whether corporate or government, military, CIA, and
Speaker 2: no one would do it. I have a big announcement.
Speaker 2: I'm saying this on your show now because it starts
Speaker 2: June twentieth. There is a special access project that has
Speaker 2: been stood up that is going to provide this kind
Speaker 2: of security and protection to whistleblowers and high value witnesses
Speaker 2: that are been sitting on the fence coming forward. This
Speaker 2: is a big announcement. I hope this goes viral because
Speaker 2: that's what we need now. I asked the Congress to
Speaker 2: put that in a bill, but they're not quite at
Speaker 2: the point where they realize lethal force has been used.
Speaker 2: There is still a little bit naive. And so since
Speaker 2: lethal force has been authorized. In fact, not long ago,
Speaker 2: there was a meeting and a skiff talking about engaging
Speaker 2: the wetworks. Wetworks is a term for assassinations Houston be
Speaker 2: an old Soviet term and wet from blood. But those
Speaker 2: sort of operations is not some kind of movie. You know,
Speaker 2: it's real. I've dealt with it, and you know this,
Speaker 2: This chairman of this huge former chairman of this big
Speaker 2: fortune fifty corporation, he desperately he regrets what he did,
Speaker 2: you know, and he has stated to us that the
Speaker 2: whole world decades ago, could have had quote unquote free
Speaker 2: energy with these technologies, and look at the state it's in.
Speaker 2: So let me. He really wants to come forward, but
Speaker 2: he's scared. So I'm saying, look, I'm going to try
Speaker 2: to set this up. I see what you're saying. So
Speaker 2: this is a big announcement that there's I can't say
Speaker 2: what agency it's under, but it is an authorized special
Speaker 2: access project that can monitor security and provide security and
Speaker 2: to whistleblowers. Two whistleblowers, yes, and witnesses. People who have
Speaker 2: been in these projects seen things that want to come forward,
Speaker 2: or they may have documents like this General.
Speaker 1: Is this an agency that has a lot of credibility today?
Speaker 2: I don't think any government agency in the United States
Speaker 2: has a lot of credibility today.
Speaker 1: Is this a three letter agency that we're familiar with?
Speaker 2: It would certainly be known by any educated American, But
Speaker 2: I can't comment beyond that. But I will say that
Speaker 2: the people in it are all folks who had been
Speaker 2: in special forces, and they are not in the military
Speaker 2: now because you can't do that. Of course, you know,
Speaker 2: a military cant act domestically. And they're wonderful people. And
Speaker 2: so I've been working with these folks for a while,
Speaker 2: providing them an unredacted version of the archive we just released,
Speaker 2: meaning unredacted. It has all the names, It has seven
Speaker 2: hundred and sixty some whistleblowers in it now. You know,
Speaker 2: if you go to the archive, you'll see I think
Speaker 2: we have one hundred and twenty some whistleblowers and witnesses, name, rank,
Speaker 2: serial number, and their video testimony, not one or two,
Speaker 2: not five. So what's in this archive? If the Congress
Speaker 2: held hearings starting next week from Monday through Friday nine
Speaker 2: to five.
Speaker 1: These are the May thirteen, twenty twenty four.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look at this. Yeah, it seven hundred and some,
Speaker 2: but the first one hundred and some are people we've
Speaker 2: already interviewed. We have their DD two fourteen's discharge forms,
Speaker 2: we have video, most of them on video testimony.
Speaker 1: Are these all public?
Speaker 2: It's all public. Anyone who with a computer on planet
Speaker 2: Earth can see these. Can they see the videos? Or
Speaker 2: that's being released? Both? Is it already released? Yes, sir? Okay?
Speaker 1: And what's the website that they can go to?
Speaker 2: Uh? This, well, we want to put that up. This
Speaker 2: is a DP like Disclosure Project Intelligence are is DP
Speaker 2: I are a DPPIA. Yeah? Archive, Yeah, we'll put that below.
Speaker 2: Wear it right. Yeah, we just released this last week,
Speaker 2: and of course we had about thousands of bots that
Speaker 2: invaded the site try to shut it down, so we
Speaker 2: are asking people to register. It's free. We have a
Speaker 2: crowdfunding program because it's probably going to cost us I
Speaker 2: don't know, tens of thousands of dollars in mone and
Speaker 2: usage fees. But the reason I did this, and I've
Speaker 2: never done this, if you want to hear an interesting
Speaker 2: backstory of how accidents happen weird, you know, like why
Speaker 2: would I do something like this? And this is all
Speaker 2: stuff out of my own archive thirty four years of
Speaker 2: accumulated information. And it also is the Black Site list
Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty some black sites where they are,
Speaker 2: and also links to testimony from witnesses about what's there
Speaker 2: underground and deep underground military bases or skiffs, secure compartment
Speaker 2: information facilities. So some of them people have heard of,
Speaker 2: like Nellis Air Force Base and Edwards some people know.
Speaker 2: Most people have.
Speaker 1: Never heard of black sites, seaie controls, black sites used
Speaker 1: by the US government and it's War on Terror to
Speaker 1: detain people deemed to be enemy combatants.
Speaker 2: Well, not that that's what we have various sites, but
Speaker 2: I'm talking about where retrieved UFOs have been put, where
Speaker 2: reverse engineered objects are located, where the man made ones
Speaker 2: are when we knock one down with an electromagnetic or weapon,
Speaker 2: a directional energy weapon. Where are those taken? Where have
Speaker 2: they been studied? All that's in the archive, So it's
Speaker 2: a massive data.
Speaker 1: Let me go through a couple of things here. So
Speaker 1: one this chairman of a fortune former chairman of a
Speaker 1: fortune fifty company.
Speaker 2: Great guy.
Speaker 1: If any of these, if these six thousand patents were
Speaker 1: to be released, and right now, if I'm not mistaken,
Speaker 1: the punishment is they give you seventy five percent of
Speaker 1: what they think the patent is worth.
Speaker 2: I believe that's what they say.
Speaker 1: And then if you sell it off to somebody else
Speaker 1: and they find out, you're going to jail for the
Speaker 1: rest of your life. If you even talk about it,
Speaker 1: you're going to jail for the rest of your life.
Speaker 1: And if you go on Invention Secrecy Act of nineteen
Speaker 1: fifty one, the way they categorize on what goes in there.
Speaker 1: Right there, if you can read it, folks, the Invention
Speaker 1: Secrecy Act that allows the US government to classify ideas
Speaker 1: and patents under secrecy orders, which definitely restrict public knowledge
Speaker 1: of them. And at the top, if you read it,
Speaker 1: the United States federal law designed to prevent disclosure of
Speaker 1: noon investigations, the opinion and technologies that in the opinion
Speaker 1: of selected federal agencies. So it's purely opinion based of
Speaker 1: selected federal agencies, present an alleged threat. It's alleged threat
Speaker 1: to the economic stability in national security United States. Okay,
Speaker 1: so energy oil. Let's just go through ex On Mobile
Speaker 1: right now. Market cap June twenty twenty four. It's four
Speaker 1: hundred andninety seven billion dollars half a trillion out of
Speaker 1: company chevron Is two eighty four, Petro China two forty four.
Speaker 1: But that's China, India UK. Set them aside. You got
Speaker 1: a few other companies. You got BP one hundred billion
Speaker 1: out of companies. These are not small companies. We're talking
Speaker 1: about Shell to eighteen. Right, I can go through a
Speaker 1: bunch of these that we know about. If these things
Speaker 1: were released, how long before these industries were one wiped out?
Speaker 2: Or? Would it be nasty?
Speaker 1: Would it be ugly? Would it be a danger to society?
Speaker 1: Would people be doing would protesting riots?
Speaker 2: Ugliness?
Speaker 1: Power players coming and saying you're touching my wealth?
Speaker 2: What are you doing?
Speaker 1: What would happen if this actually was to be released?
Speaker 2: Well, see, this is the tragedy of corrupt interests keeping
Speaker 2: good science away from the public for over one hundred years. Yes,
Speaker 2: it's going to be very difficult. It's like an addiction
Speaker 2: the current energy paradigm. The whole planet is now addicted
Speaker 2: to substances that are not only cancer causing and bad
Speaker 2: for the environment, but costly. And that leaves, as I mentioned,
Speaker 2: three billion people with no means even to cook their food.
Speaker 2: So that paradigm should have been retired, but we can't
Speaker 2: help that. We have to take the fact this is
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four, and so what I have always said
Speaker 2: is that it has to be released and then transition.
Speaker 2: But keep in mind, let's take one example, since you're
Speaker 2: getting into the macroeconomics of this. We make on the
Speaker 2: planet about one hundred million motor vehicles a year, but
Speaker 2: there are one and a half billion motor vehicles on
Speaker 2: the road, cars and trucks. So even if you retooled
Speaker 2: and twinkled your nose like bewitched or something, and retrofitted
Speaker 2: all vehicle manufacturing to these systems, it would take about
Speaker 2: fifteen years, and to tool up it'll be five. So
Speaker 2: you're talking twenty years now. I'll probably be dead because
Speaker 2: I turned sixty nine this week the next week, and
Speaker 2: you know your children will be in college. And so
Speaker 2: even if we did it immediately, because there's a lag time,
Speaker 2: because we're not talking about, you know, downloading an app.
Speaker 2: We're talking about heavy industry here, we're talking about public utilities.
Speaker 2: We're talking about manufacturing a box that would be at
Speaker 2: your house that would generate all the energy you need
Speaker 2: for your home, no bill, no power bill, and no pollution.
Speaker 2: But to retrofit three billion households on the planet two
Speaker 2: and a half billion, this is a massive I mean,
Speaker 2: this makes the Marshall Plan after World War Two look
Speaker 2: like nothing. So yes, this is what I've been saying
Speaker 2: the policy makers. This needs to happen. It will happen.
Speaker 2: But the longer this is like a leak in your roof, right,
Speaker 2: the longer you put that off, the harder and the
Speaker 2: mess is going to be to clean up, and the
Speaker 2: more damage. So this is the tragedy of it is
Speaker 2: that this was allowed to go on. And one of
Speaker 2: the things I've observed people in periods of enormous power
Speaker 2: and responsibility when they realize when I go into a facility,
Speaker 2: I say, see that thing that's an alternative energy and
Speaker 2: propulsion device, what people call a UFO. Well, once they
Speaker 2: realize what these implications are, then they get scared. They
Speaker 2: get to the edge of the table or the edge
Speaker 2: of the cliff and back off. So here we are now.
Speaker 2: I've spent thirty four years trying to resolve this problem,
Speaker 2: literally fifty percent of my biological life. And it's a
Speaker 2: very heavy lift and a very dangerous lift. But you know,
Speaker 2: what are we going to leave to our children, your children,
Speaker 2: my grab twelve grandchildren. What are we leaving you know,
Speaker 2: on this planet to them? And I think beyond that,
Speaker 2: there's even a bigger issue not being addressed. Some of
Speaker 2: these UFOs or UAPs are from extraterrestrial origin. None of
Speaker 2: them are hostile, but we have been targeting them with
Speaker 2: electromagnetic directional energy weapons since the forties, and those technologies
Speaker 2: have become more and more sophisticated. And you know, they
Speaker 2: have not struck back. If they did, the whole planet
Speaker 2: would come to a standstill. Because I think they're fundamentally
Speaker 2: peaceful and very highly developed socially and spiritually. However, how
Speaker 2: do we know that, Well, because there have been a
Speaker 2: lot of people who have had contact and there's no
Speaker 2: evidence otherwise. Now, there are some scary stories what we
Speaker 2: call the stagecraft of you, so called abductions and mutilations
Speaker 2: and things like that, but those are all done by
Speaker 2: covert human programs. Those are lookalikes. We can get into that.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's a whole Actually, there's a whole section
Speaker 2: of the archive on that, and we actually document this.
Speaker 2: I have top secret guys who come forward on the
Speaker 2: record stating point blank that they had been part of
Speaker 2: operations abducting people. And in fact, the very famous astrophysicist
Speaker 2: doctor Jacques Ballet, who some of his work ended up
Speaker 2: in Steven Spielberg's movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind,
Speaker 2: and he's up in his eighties now, and in nineteen
Speaker 2: ninety two he wrote, he wrote a book, and he
Speaker 2: had a log entry where he had received a nineteen
Speaker 2: eighty five CIA document that outlined for psychological warfare purposes
Speaker 2: them using these advanced technologies that look like an alien
Speaker 2: craft and other technologies to quote abduct peasants in Argentina
Speaker 2: and Brazil for their psychological warfare value. Now that's in
Speaker 2: black and white, and so people go, this sounds crazier
Speaker 2: than the myth you've been told, and it is, but
Speaker 2: why would they do that. Vernavon Brown, in his deathbed
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy four, told a member of my team,
Speaker 2: Carol Rosen, that their plan is to create, eventually and
Speaker 2: hoax a threat from outer space to try to unite
Speaker 2: the world like independence stay of the movie, and it's
Speaker 2: sort of a military global junta of humans against aliens.
Speaker 2: It's all nonsense. It's bs, but it sells well, sells movies,
Speaker 2: it sells tickets, it sells books. This is the Bluebeam project.
Speaker 2: Blue Beam, Yeah, that related to that, and I've met
Speaker 2: with many men who've been on operationally, like literally have
Speaker 2: been operational on those programs. Now, it went from really
Speaker 2: clunky stuff like the Betty and Barney Hill abduction. People
Speaker 2: think that was alien It wasn't US late fifties, early sixties,
Speaker 2: and I think President Obama's actually working on a documentary
Speaker 2: about that. And it was an interracial couple and very
Speaker 2: interesting story. But most people have no idea what really
Speaker 2: happened with that. And this is one of the really
Speaker 2: disturbing parts of this archive is what are the technologies
Speaker 2: that are in the hands of these sort of monsters
Speaker 2: and how have they used it to deceive the public
Speaker 2: but also deceive policymakers and presidents. You know, I talked
Speaker 2: to a man named Colonel Holman, Joe L. M An.
Speaker 2: He's passed away, and this was maybe five years ago,
Speaker 2: and he was on a committee trying to sell first Carter,
Speaker 2: who wouldn't bite, and then President Reagan on SDI Star
Speaker 2: Wars Strategic Defense Initiative, and they weren't biting. And then
Speaker 2: he said, what we did. We eventually played the alien
Speaker 2: threat card and that's when Reagan signed on to it. Now,
Speaker 2: he was prepared to do so because I'm working with
Speaker 2: an older CI officer with a PhD. That some of
Speaker 2: his information is in the archive, but his name's protected
Speaker 2: because we still work together. And he actually was a postdoc,
Speaker 2: had a PhD and briefed candidate Ronald Reagan in nineteen
Speaker 2: seventy nine when he was thinking of running for president
Speaker 2: on the UFO issue. Because Reagan had had a couple
Speaker 2: of sightings, including one on the governor's plane that you
Speaker 2: may have heard about. It is well documented, and so
Speaker 2: you know, President Reagan not here's one of the problems
Speaker 2: of the president. You get into a position and say
Speaker 2: you're a governor, you're a real estate developer like mister Trump,
Speaker 2: whatever you are, or you know, mister Carter was said
Speaker 2: he was a peanut farmer exactly, a nuclear engineer and
Speaker 2: the top of his class, and an apple is very smart,
Speaker 2: probably our highest ich president politically not very good, but
Speaker 2: he was very very smart. But and you're going to
Speaker 2: come in there and the people who are going to
Speaker 2: come in and brief you on this. If you ask,
Speaker 2: you're either gonna be told nothing. And I know this,
Speaker 2: so I've dealt with it pretty much every bit of
Speaker 2: presidential involvement since nineteen since Clinton. You're either gonna be
Speaker 2: told nothing or you're gonna be told a version of
Speaker 2: the truth that manipulates you into decisions they want to make,
Speaker 2: they want you to make. And that's what happened to
Speaker 2: mister Trump and mister Pens and also to Ronald Reagan.
Speaker 2: So it's dangerous that kind of secrecy. Let me tell
Speaker 2: you why it's so dangerous. It's the Foxes, and there's
Speaker 2: manning the Henhouse. You know who's overseeing this, right, who's
Speaker 2: looking into the and who is in charge? Well, it
Speaker 2: certainly isn't the president. They come and go every four
Speaker 2: to eight years. Members of Congress come and go all
Speaker 2: the time. So there's sort of this permanent committee a
Speaker 2: few hundred people. And they've arrogated this because it's so secret,
Speaker 2: the right to do this. But they cannot be trusted.
Speaker 2: Who do they report to themselves? I mean, this is
Speaker 2: a global operation. And by the way, what i'm global operations?
Speaker 2: So from this one hundred percent, no it take the
Speaker 2: map of the world and erase all the geopolitical lines.
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. And that's actually when the Senate Intelligence
Speaker 2: people wanted me to come in. There was a map
Speaker 2: of the world in the conference room in the skiff,
Speaker 2: and I said, see that map, erased all the lines
Speaker 2: on it. This is these folks. The world is a royster.
Speaker 2: They operate as they want. Who nominates them, nobody. They
Speaker 2: move up through the chain of command or through corporations.
Speaker 2: How do you move up? You're moved up by giving
Speaker 2: a little information. See what you do with it and
Speaker 2: if you can keep the secrecy. But more importantly, once
Speaker 2: you reach a certain level of clearance, when you realize
Speaker 2: how monstrous and criminal the operations are, will you stay
Speaker 2: with that. I'm dealing with a team right now that
Speaker 2: I can't see. I won't even say what state they're in,
Speaker 2: but let's just say. In September I was on a
Speaker 2: classified helicopter over two black sites and was shown where
Speaker 2: the underground openings are out in the desert, where the
Speaker 2: man made ones come up and are tested. But there
Speaker 2: are also electromagnetic pulse weapons that are illegal by the
Speaker 2: Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty that are and I have video
Speaker 2: and photos of this. One of the photos is in
Speaker 2: the archive. I'll just tell you that. And there looks
Speaker 2: like there's a landing strip. It's not. It's an area
Speaker 2: with diamonds on it, and that's where the man made
Speaker 2: some people call them Arab alien reproduction vehicles come up
Speaker 2: from underground, and I have the photos and video underground opening.
Speaker 2: We went right around it because this guy was cleared.
Speaker 2: He's one of the top people in the system, but
Speaker 2: he's wanting to defect, and.
Speaker 1: It's one of these one hundred people in one of
Speaker 1: these couple hundred people.
Speaker 2: He's very high up. I wouldn't say he's on that
Speaker 2: policy level, but operationally he's read in. He's been read
Speaker 2: in for many, many, many years, and he's very high up.
Speaker 1: What's his reason. And so what did you went there
Speaker 1: and you actually saw it?
Speaker 2: Yeah, videotape. I have all of it, and it's public,
Speaker 2: some of it off the air. I'll show you the video, okay.
Speaker 2: And so that in September, and then of course I
Speaker 2: was almost killed in October.
Speaker 1: I think I mentioned how'd you get almost killed? In October?
Speaker 2: Oh? Someone tampered with my mountain bike seat and it
Speaker 2: snapped off and I was going fast and my left
Speaker 2: foot came off and two bones were in the air,
Speaker 2: and my left shoulder came off, and my admirin and
Speaker 2: got I had four surgeries in three months. Got to
Speaker 2: be kidding me. I'm up doing everything now. But it
Speaker 2: was hell on Earth.
Speaker 1: But you know it's not the first And how do
Speaker 1: you know what was tampered? Would how do you know somebody?
Speaker 2: Well, I mean it wasn't the bike that it was
Speaker 2: like the whole thing that was kind of a salted
Speaker 2: and snapped off. We can't prove anything. I'm in who cares?
Speaker 2: I mean, you know I as an emergency doctor. You
Speaker 2: know I'm a trauma doctor. Anyway, Ironically, I'm laying there
Speaker 2: going It's like an out of body experience, seeing me
Speaker 2: there with my foot off and the bones in the air.
Speaker 2: But I go, you know, the only thing I said,
Speaker 2: I'm f't you know it was That's the only thing
Speaker 2: I said. But you know it was a full time
Speaker 2: How much do you because you're in this world, who
Speaker 2: do you trust?
Speaker 1: Like? What? What? How do you process? Who you can
Speaker 1: trust and who you can't trust? Oh, it's like the
Speaker 1: things it is in the Bible. You shalln't know them
Speaker 1: by their deeds.
Speaker 2: So well, my wife, my close circle of friends I've
Speaker 2: had for fifty sixty years, my assistant who's been with
Speaker 2: me for a quarter of a century, and other people,
Speaker 2: and you know, now they're this whole team of you know,
Speaker 2: special Forces folks and people who are defecting that I
Speaker 2: were very close and who are enormously courageous men who
Speaker 2: want to do the right thing for the world and
Speaker 2: for the country. You know, Green Berets and Navy seals
Speaker 2: some of them, but these are some of them are
Speaker 2: still very active. Some have separated from the military and
Speaker 2: are working in private. But they're all gathering to do
Speaker 2: this disclosure of the subject. And then what I just mentioned,
Speaker 2: the gentleman who had me on the chop or over
Speaker 2: these black sites in September. There's a whole team that
Speaker 2: he is involved with at these sensitive facilities that are
Speaker 2: so the word used when he first reached out to
Speaker 2: me was fed up. They are fed up with what's
Speaker 2: happening to the planet. They're fed up with the illegal secrecy,
Speaker 2: and they're fed up with some of the atrocities that
Speaker 2: are happening that they've been part of. And you know,
Speaker 2: it's very emotional for these men.
Speaker 1: This chairman of the former you know, former chairman of
Speaker 1: the Fortune fifty company. If he comes out, what would
Speaker 1: he be leaking as a whistleblower to the to the country,
Speaker 1: to the world.
Speaker 2: Well, he'd be leaking that one of the largest corporations
Speaker 2: in the world and certainly in America had worked on
Speaker 2: these programs and he has with them in his possession
Speaker 2: the schematics and plans for these technologies and devices. And
Speaker 2: he wants to hand him over before he passes away,
Speaker 2: but he doesn't want to see any collateral damage with
Speaker 2: his family. So that's why I mentioned, you know, I've
Speaker 2: been trying to get this sort of protection, and even
Speaker 2: with that, I'm not sure who wants. You know, people
Speaker 2: get very cold feet. I mean, I'll tell you a
Speaker 2: weird story that happened in the past year. There was
Speaker 2: a man who had worked out of the Northern Nevada
Speaker 2: Test Range. His testimony and information and the drawings of
Speaker 2: this event are in the archive, and we took his
Speaker 2: name out because he doesn't want to be known publicly yet.
Speaker 2: But he reached out to me about this and he
Speaker 2: was on a retrieval team. So it was at a
Speaker 2: If you go from Nellis Air Force Base way north
Speaker 2: where the atomic the nuclear test range was where we
Speaker 2: did open air testing, there's a huge area and there's
Speaker 2: an underground base there and facility, and there's a team
Speaker 2: and a helicopter pad team with Delta Force guys and
Speaker 2: then this guy had been part of the retrieval operation
Speaker 2: and hasmat suits. He was first put in there to
Speaker 2: retrieve man made the triangular UFOs that are coming out
Speaker 2: of north of Grumman and raytheon that would malfunction and crash,
Speaker 2: and we have great artists rendition of exactly what these
Speaker 2: look like. Then he was moved into an operation where
Speaker 2: they would target someone was targeting not him, the extra
Speaker 2: trestor ones and stunned them and they would go in
Speaker 2: theo retree them. And when he realized what we were doing,
Speaker 2: and he had an encounter with two of these events
Speaker 2: extraterrestrial biological entities, so was what they're called, or aliens.
Speaker 2: I don't use the word aliens, people think of someone
Speaker 2: from Peru. But what happened is he was so second
Speaker 2: by what they were doing. He tried to separate from
Speaker 2: the operation, which you generally can't do. But he had
Speaker 2: an uncle and we know who he is, very high
Speaker 2: up in this cleandestine program, who helped get him out.
Speaker 2: But then he subsequently went through a whole series of events,
Speaker 2: including an attempted alien abduction with these fake looking gray aliens,
Speaker 2: and he actually knocked one down. We have a great
Speaker 2: artistic our artists rendering and how it split open what
Speaker 2: looked like the skin, and they were all fiber optics
Speaker 2: and integrated circuits and stuff. This stuff is very sophisticated technology,
Speaker 2: way beyond what people can imagine we might have. So
Speaker 2: when he reached out to me, he was going to
Speaker 2: come actually to the National Press Club and the congressional
Speaker 2: things we did last summer in June a year ago.
Speaker 2: And a van pulls up, an suv pulls up. Guys
Speaker 2: come out and they say you've stepped one step further.
Speaker 2: Look at your phone, and they had put child pornography
Speaker 2: all over his phone, all over his computers, and says,
Speaker 2: you won't see your two little children again because he
Speaker 2: was recently in these programs. You'll spend the rest of
Speaker 2: your life in prison. And he called me up. Now,
Speaker 2: if some nonsense like that happens to one of my guys,
Speaker 2: now it'll be monitored. If they come forward, to hand
Speaker 2: them off to this Special Access Projects team that have
Speaker 2: this monitoring capability, they will open a criminal file and
Speaker 2: arrest and open a criminal prosecution whoever threatens these witnesses.
Speaker 2: That's what we're setting up because I'm fed up. I mean,
Speaker 2: I've been carrying this ball and chain for a long time.
Speaker 2: So that's the kind of stuff that happens routinely. I
Speaker 2: deal with this every week. Every month we have a
Speaker 2: new whistle blower comes forward and these sort of dirty
Speaker 2: tricks and nasty nonsense. I've been powered. I'm a civilian.
Speaker 2: I mean all this stuff you hear me I'm talking
Speaker 2: about doing. I've done probono without charge and the interests
Speaker 2: of the public. But you know I I there are
Speaker 2: there's a there's a critical mass that's happened. I call
Speaker 2: it of very capable military and intelligence and civilian folks
Speaker 2: who know that it's time for this to come out,
Speaker 2: and now they have finally put together a way to
Speaker 2: protect these wonderful And I have to say, the names
Speaker 2: you see on that list are incredibly courageous people who've
Speaker 2: come forward. But sometimes they start to come forward and
Speaker 2: they get such a threat they back off. Let me,
Speaker 2: let me ask a couple of questions. And that frustrates
Speaker 2: me because some of the best one, some of the
Speaker 2: very best people I'd like to pay out in front
Speaker 2: the Congress and the public. The best ones, I would say,
Speaker 2: are the ones that they throw the worst dirt at.
Speaker 1: And the tactic is always the same, right, it's public humiliation,
Speaker 1: embarrassment in front of your family and kids, ruin your legacy,
Speaker 1: and whether you have done anything for us to blame
Speaker 1: you or not, we can fabricate it anyways and destroy
Speaker 1: your entire life.
Speaker 2: Right, And that's the strategy. Go in and clean out
Speaker 2: your bank account. Yep.
Speaker 1: You know what would be a great insurance business is
Speaker 1: to find a way to protect you that if anybody
Speaker 1: ever tries to do that, you'll protect it from it.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the method would be to do that,
Speaker 1: but that would definitely be a big insurance industry. If
Speaker 1: somebody could protect you from those types of things.
Speaker 2: Well, you know what I did instead. I did what
Speaker 2: it's called my dead man trigger. And I have files
Speaker 2: that no one's ever seen that something happens to me.
Speaker 2: And I put this in place in the late nineties
Speaker 2: after I was almost kid, and I said, yeah, if
Speaker 2: I just flat out get killed, the thing, the stuff
Speaker 2: that will hit blockchain and internet and sites that will
Speaker 2: curl your toes. I mean, the archive is mind blowing,
Speaker 2: but the stuff I've redacted and these private files would
Speaker 2: be more explosive. And I did it because, you know,
Speaker 2: the first three people who were killed was back in
Speaker 2: that era. One of them was a former CI director
Speaker 2: helping us. I don't know if you remember. Back in
Speaker 2: the Ford and Nixon and Ford era, there was a
Speaker 2: CI director named William Colby, Bill Colby. And Bill Colby
Speaker 2: was read in or briefing on this was very much involved,
Speaker 2: and he was maybe pushing eighty and very fed up
Speaker 2: and bless you, and he was he was like he
Speaker 2: was over it. So what he was going to do.
Speaker 2: He was going to hand off to us one of
Speaker 2: these zero point quantum energy generation devices free energy, and
Speaker 2: initially about fifty million dollars in seed money just to
Speaker 2: get that going and hand it off. But he wanted
Speaker 2: to do it Clint destinely, which I thought was very dangerous.
Speaker 2: He should have done it on CNN or news or
Speaker 2: the press conference, but he didn't want to do it
Speaker 2: that way. So there was a colonel who was on
Speaker 2: my team, who was his best friend, and the week
Speaker 2: he was going to meet with a member of my board,
Speaker 2: Bill Colby, the Pharmacy I director, was found floating south
Speaker 2: of d C. And the river made to look like
Speaker 2: a canoeing accent. Even his wife went on CNN said
Speaker 2: he would not have been out there canoeing in a
Speaker 2: rain swollen river at dusk and he was killed. And
Speaker 2: his friend, who was a colonel, said, oh, absolutely, yep.
Speaker 2: So that was a shot across the bow. That was
Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety five during the Clinton era, and what
Speaker 2: people don't a lot of people don't think that kind
Speaker 2: of thing happens, And of course the media said it
Speaker 2: was an accident. His son, unfortunately thinks he committed suicide.
Speaker 2: Which he didn't. And that's a terrible thing that I
Speaker 2: think your father committed suicide. He did not commit suicide.
Speaker 1: What's the story of what happened when Nikola Tesla when
Speaker 1: he got out in a cab and you know that
Speaker 1: whole story.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, you know he knew too much too. You know,
Speaker 2: when Albert Einstein was asked by a reporter, what's it
Speaker 2: like being a genius? You know what he said, I
Speaker 2: wouldn't know as Nikla Tesla. Nikola Tesla was probably the
Speaker 2: great genius for the twentieth century, and he died a
Speaker 2: poor man, a bitter man. Most of his huge breakthroughs
Speaker 2: never saw the light of day. You know, he had
Speaker 2: one of these sort of electromagnetic generators that was free energy.
Speaker 2: JP Morgan famously told him, if we can't put a
Speaker 2: meter on it in charge, the utilities is not coming out.
Speaker 2: I mean we're talking twenties here, one hundred years ago.
Speaker 2: So you know, it didn't help that he was a
Speaker 2: genius and had these breakthroughs. And that's why it was.
Speaker 2: It's like twenty four trunks of secret papers and the
Speaker 2: day he died. We can prove this in this archive
Speaker 2: is a Department of Defense memo to the FBI demanding
Speaker 2: that the FBI turned those over, and I don't know
Speaker 2: if they ever did. I mean that happened in forty three.
Speaker 2: The document is not contested, it's authenticated. Document was from
Speaker 2: the nineteen eighties. So eventually someone at the Pentagon realized
Speaker 2: what the FBI was sitting on in a compartment at
Speaker 2: Black Project, and they wanted it. So, you know, the
Speaker 2: untangling the history of this, you know, of course we'd
Speaker 2: be here for a week. But it's all in the archive.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's it's laborious to go through. It'd probably
Speaker 2: take people two years just to partially read it and
Speaker 2: see it. But you know, I just want to say
Speaker 2: one thing that's missing the archive is that I've done.
Speaker 2: I think it's about twenty intelligence briefings that are being
Speaker 2: re and with links that aren't in the archive yet.
Speaker 2: That'll be the first category there. Right now they're thirteen,
Speaker 2: so it will be fourteen with this one, and it
Speaker 2: will relate to each of the categories crash retrievals, military whistleblowers, technology,
Speaker 2: you know, the black budget of the United.
Speaker 1: We'll put the linklow to go so go back to
Speaker 1: technicol though, So what happened that the New Yorker. He's
Speaker 1: getting out the hotel. You know, I'm trying to see
Speaker 1: how I read the story. Cap hits him and you're
Speaker 1: thinking maybe there was an inside job that you know,
Speaker 1: broke his ribs.
Speaker 2: Or who knows. I mean, one of the things that
Speaker 2: Gordon Crichton said, he was a six guy in England.
Speaker 2: He's his testimony is in our he's British intelligence guys.
Speaker 2: In our archive. He says, if you become too troublesome,
Speaker 2: they just erase you, they get rid of you. And
Speaker 2: you know I heard that term first in the ninety
Speaker 2: he's a racer. There is a ratio, and I think that,
Speaker 2: you know, like I said, my coming of age of this,
Speaker 2: I was fortunate that when I first started out on
Speaker 2: this in the early nineties, there was a naval intelligence
Speaker 2: guy who I thought was an infiltrator, but he was
Speaker 2: actually a very sincere. I didn't know what an unacknowledged
Speaker 2: special access project was. You know, I'm a doctor, you know,
Speaker 2: I'm an emergency doctor and before kids and a golden
Speaker 2: retriever in the suburbs, right, so I had no idea,
Speaker 2: but you know, he took me under his wing and
Speaker 2: mentored me, and I learned a lot, and it was
Speaker 2: a very steep learning curve. Uh. And and that was
Speaker 2: before I briefed the CI director. So by the time
Speaker 2: I break the CI director, I knew all this uh structure,
Speaker 2: let's call the structure of the secrecy. And I think
Speaker 2: that's the hardest thing for senators and congressmen to understand
Speaker 2: or the general public. How was this structured that a
Speaker 2: president will be told, we're not going to tell you, right,
Speaker 2: and a few president's equipped. I know that President Carter
Speaker 2: was was at an event in Spain. I have a
Speaker 2: friend who was there, and he was asked, what was
Speaker 2: it like being the most powerful man in the world,
Speaker 2: And mister Carter said, I don't think I was that person,
Speaker 2: and they said why. He said, there are things that
Speaker 2: as president I wasn't allowed to know about. And someone
Speaker 2: kind of giggling, joking, kind of making fun of it, Oh,
Speaker 2: you mean UFOs and he said, yes, that and more.
Speaker 2: Carter said this. Carter said that President Carter in an interview,
Speaker 2: no and a dinner after an event in Spain. But
Speaker 2: I have a man on my team who was there.
Speaker 2: So this is a real issue. This is a huge
Speaker 2: governance because you're talking unconstitutional. So let's cut to the
Speaker 2: chase here. These operations are illegal black projects, not legal,
Speaker 2: and there are legal black projects at the President and
Speaker 2: the Gang of Eight in Congress oversea, but these are illegal,
Speaker 2: meaning there's no oversight and they're being run as a
Speaker 2: criminal operation. And I'll just call it out. They are
Speaker 2: not only criminal, but they're treasonous because they absolutely will
Speaker 2: defy the chain of command. So here's a really good example.
Speaker 2: On this letter. This correspondence is in the archive. There's
Speaker 2: a man who had been the head of the what's
Speaker 2: called J two, head of intelligence for the Joint Chiefs
Speaker 2: of Staff J two and Admiral Wilson. And this memo
Speaker 2: leaked out a few years ago, not my doing. It
Speaker 2: was after astronaut Edgar Mitchell, the sixth man to walk
Speaker 2: from the Moon, after he died, someone leaked this out
Speaker 2: of his archive because I had brought doctor Mitchell, astronaut
Speaker 2: Mitchell to a briefing at the Pentagon that I was
Speaker 2: doing a stand up briefing for Admiral Wilson, and Admiral
Speaker 2: Wilson was very sincerely wanting to find out about what
Speaker 2: was going on with his issue. Before the meeting, I
Speaker 2: sent him a secret document it has not been declassified,
Speaker 2: which is in the archive. By the way, this is
Speaker 2: different from the trouble the President's in with classified material.
Speaker 2: We declared all these projects unconstitutional and illegal in the nineties,
Speaker 2: documented it, and therefore I have in this archive classified
Speaker 2: top secret and secret documents for the public to see,
Speaker 2: and they have not been declassified. I'll just put that
Speaker 2: on the table. So this document said, you know it
Speaker 2: was an NRO National Reconnaissance Office, which runs all the
Speaker 2: super secret spy satellites, right, and it was from Area
Speaker 2: fifty one LS Air Force Base in nineteen ninety one,
Speaker 2: and they were warning of some civilians trying to spy
Speaker 2: on what was going on at that secret facility from
Speaker 2: some mountaintops overlooking the facility. So they'd had what was
Speaker 2: called a security alert. But in that document which I acquired,
Speaker 2: I won't say how it lists did the project code
Speaker 2: names and numbers, And that's in the archive. Anyone on
Speaker 2: earth can see it now as of the nineties. So
Speaker 2: I sent this to Admiral Wilson along with some other
Speaker 2: briefing material, and he made an inquiry. And remember this
Speaker 2: is the head of Intelligence for the Joint Chuess of Staff,
Speaker 2: United States. And by the time I got to this meeting,
Speaker 2: he was scared to death and furious because he made
Speaker 2: inquiries suit channels based on the information we had provided,
Speaker 2: and he discovered the offices and the compartment at operations
Speaker 2: dealing with the UFO matter. And he was flat out told,
Speaker 2: you don't have a need to know. And he said,
Speaker 2: I'm the head of intelligence for the Joint Chess of Staff,
Speaker 2: how do I not have a need to know? For
Speaker 2: God's sake, they said, we will not discuss this with you.
Speaker 2: When he pushed on it further, they threatened him and
Speaker 2: they also threat with taking a star off his lapel,
Speaker 2: a demotion to retiring where he would lose a big
Speaker 2: pay cut in retirement. So that is a fact. Now,
Speaker 2: the same thing happened to the head of the Defense
Speaker 2: Intelligence Agency. Google it. The Defense Intelligence Agency is like
Speaker 2: the CIA but for the military. ATGENS, the Director General
Speaker 2: Patrick Hughes, I spent hours briefing at the Pentagon he
Speaker 2: had a similar thing happened, and he made inquiries through
Speaker 2: channels and was flat out told nothing. Now, there have
Speaker 2: been people who have been read in in those positions
Speaker 2: others haven't. Why do some CI directors or J two
Speaker 2: or whoever know and others don't. While we talked about
Speaker 2: a moment ago, they're tapped early, they come up through
Speaker 2: the system, and they're carrying water for this criminal operation.
Speaker 1: I had Wolsey on the podcast a few years ago. Oh,
Speaker 1: he denies all this. When I spoke to him, I said, so,
Speaker 1: you know, what was your experience like as the director
Speaker 1: of CIA? He says, you realized I never met Bill Clinton?
Speaker 1: So what do you mean I never met the president.
Speaker 1: We never had a meeting, never communicated with me, says
Speaker 1: I think at one encounter was just like when I
Speaker 1: got appointed, or do you want the job or not?
Speaker 1: And that was it. But there was no communication. And
Speaker 1: I think he was only the director of CIA for
Speaker 1: two years if I'm not mistake. Yeah, maybe even less
Speaker 1: than two years. About can you look up the time, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's less than two years when he was a director
Speaker 1: of CIA. So to me, based on what you're saying,
Speaker 1: was he one that knew or is he one that
Speaker 1: doesn't know anything. He's not at the levels of knowing
Speaker 1: what's really taking place.
Speaker 2: At the time we met. He didn't know. I think
Speaker 2: later he as when he left the CIA, he was
Speaker 2: pulled into some operations where he knew which is why
Speaker 2: he's he says very equivocal things about the issue. The
Speaker 2: same thing is true of Admiral Bobby ray Enman, who
Speaker 2: is probably at the top of the pyramid of this
Speaker 2: covert group keeping the secret. You know, I'll tell you
Speaker 2: some most comical stories alive. He was as of last
Speaker 2: a few months ago, so he's at the time top
Speaker 2: of the permier. He's very senior. Mister Cheney, him and
Speaker 2: a few other people. Have you spoken to him, Have
Speaker 2: you had meetings with them? I had. Have you ever
Speaker 2: heard of Senator Barry Goldwater, of course, Well, he was
Speaker 2: hugely interested in what we were doing. He was Goldwater Goldwater,
Speaker 2: and I went out to his place in Scottsdale, and
Speaker 2: what year was that, in the nineties, and he was
Speaker 2: friends with Admiral Edmund and so the Senator Goldwater was
Speaker 2: always trying to find out about this, even when he
Speaker 2: was running for president, and he was, you know, chairman
Speaker 2: of various committees in the Senate, and you know, John
Speaker 2: McCain took his seat. So I'm sitting at his house
Speaker 2: and Senator A gold Order you know, started saying, well,
Speaker 2: you know, I'm giving him all the information I have,
Speaker 2: and he tells me two very interesting things. He said,
Speaker 2: I was never briefed on this, even as the nominee
Speaker 2: for president or as the key members of the Senate
Speaker 2: Armed Services or intil never, he says, but I knew
Speaker 2: it was real because he had been in the He
Speaker 2: was in World War Two. Then he became a general
Speaker 2: reserve in the Air Force Reserve. When he was a
Speaker 2: general in the Air Force Reserve, he asked at a
Speaker 2: General Curtis le May, they used to call him bomb
Speaker 2: them back to the Stone Age Lay because he was
Speaker 2: advocating using nuclear weapons in Vietnam, which is what actually
Speaker 2: cost Center Goldwater the election in sixty four. But this,
Speaker 2: of course in the nineties, many years later, and Senator
Speaker 2: Goldwater says, look, I asked. He had heard that at
Speaker 2: Wright Patterson Air Force Base there was a name, he
Speaker 2: called it the Blue Room there and he wanted to
Speaker 2: go there. And so he approached General LeMay, who I
Speaker 2: think at the time was Chief of Staff of the
Speaker 2: Air Force, and he says, I want to go there,
Speaker 2: And General Lea May turned to Center Goldwater and we're talking, Yeah,
Speaker 2: and Center Goldwater was told point blank by General the
Speaker 2: May that if he ever brought this issue up again,
Speaker 2: he would have been court martialed out of the Air
Speaker 2: Force reserves, and that he General LeMay could not even
Speaker 2: get into that area anymore. Now, so I said, here's
Speaker 2: a measure of the level of corruption and secrecy someone
Speaker 2: at that level of government, Center Goldwater, conservative, Republican, pro
Speaker 2: military in the war being denied access to this information.
Speaker 2: So you know how many data points like that do
Speaker 2: you need? This is why I tell people, can't I
Speaker 2: prove that these programs are unconstitutional? Illegal? Absolutely, we can
Speaker 2: prove it. And so at that point, here's what really
Speaker 2: ought to happen. The Criminal Investigative Division of the Pentagon
Speaker 2: and the FBI should launch immediate criminal investigations into this.
Speaker 2: There's enough information. Who needs to well, for domestic could
Speaker 2: be FBI f guys is not going to do that. Well,
Speaker 2: not to cry, I never say never. And the other
Speaker 2: would be the Criminal Investigative Division of the of the
Speaker 2: of the Pentagon, because you know, there is enough proof
Speaker 2: of criminal activity and unconstitutional in treasonous activity to launch
Speaker 2: those Now, this is what I've been saying to the
Speaker 2: members of Congress in the last few years since they've
Speaker 2: started looking into this. I said, you guys, are you
Speaker 2: know here rearranging the chairs on the Titanic as it
Speaker 2: goes down. You really need to understand and learn quickly that,
Speaker 2: you know, you can make a request through the chain
Speaker 2: of command and you're going to be told nothing like Wolsey,
Speaker 2: nothing like General Hughes, THEE Director, nothing like Admiral Wilson,
Speaker 2: and all the dozens of other people like that. And
Speaker 2: by the way, this pattern you can replicate in the
Speaker 2: United Kingdom Australia, because I have had meetings with the
Speaker 2: men serve defense directors for Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom.
Speaker 2: None of them were given access and they all have
Speaker 2: told me, you know, this never came. They were never
Speaker 2: were told. And then subsequently they would have learned that, oh,
Speaker 2: there are operations right under their nose that were deep black,
Speaker 2: illegal operations. So this pattern is a dangerous pattern in
Speaker 2: terms of governance, but also for world security, national security,
Speaker 2: and the future of the planet and humanity. There's nothing
Speaker 2: good that comes from that kind of corruption. And so
Speaker 2: at some point some people with real courage are going
Speaker 2: to have to step up to the plate or you know, frankly,
Speaker 2: we're going to hell in a handbasket very quickly on
Speaker 2: this planet. Excuse my language, but it's just we're not
Speaker 2: in a place where we can keep kicking this ball
Speaker 2: down the road. But that is typically what politicians want
Speaker 2: to do. They just want to kick the ball down
Speaker 2: the road. Like when Admiral said, Admiral he says, I
Speaker 2: just I just want to retire from this command and
Speaker 2: retire at my place in Montana, go fishing. This is
Speaker 2: too much to take on. And this was a man
Speaker 2: who was the head of in charge of KUNIS Continental
Speaker 2: United States Security. So I hear that. I've heard all
Speaker 2: this for so many years, you know, And this is
Speaker 2: why I'm very encouraged actually that this special Access Project
Speaker 2: has been stood up to protect whistleblowers and that there
Speaker 2: are people defecting at a very high level from operational
Speaker 2: programs that are running these you know, systems out in
Speaker 2: the western desert. And separate from that, there's an entire
Speaker 2: group of Special Forces guys that I've been meeting with
Speaker 2: who are asking to eventually get authorized to strike these
Speaker 2: facilities out of.
Speaker 1: These people that are the powerful people that even Barry
Speaker 1: Goldwater couldn't get up to and President Carter couldn't get
Speaker 1: up to. President Trump has asked the other day by
Speaker 1: Logan Paula by UFOs. His answer was very generic. This
Speaker 1: one man told me that there are things up there,
Speaker 1: but you know he wasn't really given the answer.
Speaker 2: Well, no, I mean because you know, as one what
Speaker 2: President said, I'm only the president, and that's true. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's like the comedy, you know, but that needs to change. Now.
Speaker 2: There are people I know who are very good friends
Speaker 2: with mister Trump. And you know, I actually meet met
Speaker 2: with mister Biden when he was chairman of Foreign Relations
Speaker 2: Committee back long time ago. But he wouldn't touch this
Speaker 2: with a ten foot poll. And who is the most
Speaker 2: powerful person in America? Oh, I don't think anybody would
Speaker 2: probably know their name. Yeah, they're sort of behind scenes,
Speaker 2: but certainly people on this committee like Admiral Wilson, now
Speaker 2: you know he you know, here's the lineage he was.
Speaker 2: He was deputy director of CIA, then he was the
Speaker 2: Director of the National Security Agency. Then he moved on
Speaker 2: to the board of wait for it, Science Applications International
Speaker 2: Corporate Admiral Bobby Rayanman. So if you look at that.
Speaker 2: Often there's a trajectory where they're brought in and brought up,
Speaker 2: but where they end up the revolving door out of
Speaker 2: government and senior military intelligence. You keep seeing this pattern
Speaker 2: that the center of gravity are in these big contracting
Speaker 2: entities like SAI C and Raytheon and Northrope and Lockheed
Speaker 2: and so forth. So that's where the action is. I
Speaker 2: think the center of gravity isn't in the government at all.
Speaker 1: Was mister Bush Senior ever one of these high ranking
Speaker 1: people that was on the inside or no?
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, George H. W. Boo, yes, W No. But
Speaker 2: George W. Bush, he was the one who threatened Bill Clinton.
Speaker 2: But stay quiet, there's none of your business. I have
Speaker 2: a witness to mister Clinton sharing that. George H. W.
Speaker 2: Bush Senior, Yes, it's this none of your business, but
Speaker 2: out because mister Clinton had stood up what's called Red Team.
Speaker 2: Red Team was a military special operation to the Blue
Speaker 2: Team was conventional military Black team. Were these illegal operations
Speaker 2: Clinton had authorized. I have a whole document on this.
Speaker 2: It's not in the archive, but it's definitely in my
Speaker 2: dead Man trigger. That was called Red Team, and these
Speaker 2: were people trying to infiltrate these illegal black projects, but
Speaker 2: most of them either got absorbed or killed, and eventually
Speaker 2: George H. W. Bush said, back off, this is none
Speaker 2: of your business. Did he? Oh? Yeah, absolutely he did.
Speaker 2: That's why they became fast friends and towards they remember
Speaker 2: did he did he?
Speaker 1: I do?
Speaker 2: Did he ever make it?
Speaker 1: Was Bush ever in a top five most powerful men
Speaker 1: in America? Or no? Was he?
Speaker 2: Still?
Speaker 1: There's people above him that he's reporting too.
Speaker 2: He would have been on the mid to upper level
Speaker 2: of that committee to three hundred people. But George H. W.
Speaker 2: Bush was definitely involved, I would say, ironically Chaney more so,
Speaker 2: mister changing.
Speaker 1: Cheney more so?
Speaker 2: Why is that? Because of who he is?
Speaker 1: And on the military industrial complex all the way.
Speaker 2: All the way back to the what was he Ford
Speaker 2: Defense secret? I mean all the way back to seventies eighties? Yeah? Absolutely?
Speaker 2: How powerful was a Kissinger? Was he anybody? Oh? Yes,
Speaker 2: above a Cheney? Sure? Absolutely so. He was one of
Speaker 2: the two hundred. Sure, yes, mister Kissinger. Yes, what's your
Speaker 2: opinion on him? It's unfortunate. I mean, you know, I
Speaker 2: think he's a very brilliant man, but you know, I
Speaker 2: think he moved us in a lot of corrupt directions.
Speaker 2: And harmful directions such as this issue. For one, because
Speaker 2: and I don't want to go to Mimy he's passed away.
Speaker 2: It's irrelevant. I speak too badly of him, but I
Speaker 2: think he would have been very way high in that
Speaker 2: pecking order, but was very interested in, I hate to
Speaker 2: say this, subverting American power for global power. So this
Speaker 2: is a pattern you see. And it's not that I'm
Speaker 2: against you know, international relations or all that, but there
Speaker 2: is a concerted effort, in my opinion, to subvert and
Speaker 2: make subordinate American power and interest to some of these
Speaker 2: global schemes and agendas. And the Kissinger was really one
Speaker 2: of the original architects of that. But because you you
Speaker 2: can't take this uap UFO secrecy issue out of context
Speaker 2: with all of these other concerns, you know, national security,
Speaker 2: world security, energy, financial, I mean, for Havn's sake, is
Speaker 2: the petro dollar right from Bretton Woods after World War Two.
Speaker 2: You know, the reserve currency of the world is the dollar.
Speaker 2: But it's mainly because it's the petro dollars. It is
Speaker 2: the currency of exchange and trading in oil and commodities
Speaker 2: and everything else. So this is all extremely complicated you
Speaker 2: release this information that we're not only are we not
Speaker 2: alone in the universe, but we've already figured out how
Speaker 2: they operate. And I will tell you right now, the
Speaker 2: extraterrestrial issue part of this is nowhere near sensitive a
Speaker 2: secret as the part that deals with the technologies that
Speaker 2: we have humans have in the hands of people who
Speaker 2: are misusing them and are withholding the beneficial ones from
Speaker 2: humanity and from the That is a much bigger secret
Speaker 2: so far.
Speaker 1: When I asked you, you know Barry Goldwater, you know
Speaker 1: he's there, but he's not has Bobby Raynman? Okay, So
Speaker 1: Bobby Raynman has more influence than he does. Then I
Speaker 1: went to President Clinton and you said, no, George H. W.
Speaker 1: Bush Senior has more influence than he does. He's passed away.
Speaker 1: He's that he's passed away. Then I asked you about Kissinger.
Speaker 1: Then you said Dick Cheney was more powerful than Senior.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Then I asked you Kissinger. You said, no, Kissinger was
Speaker 1: more in that community of that influence and very gluble
Speaker 1: with it for sure. I mean, yeah, And he had
Speaker 1: a very interesting reputation, fascinating guy to study, by the way,
Speaker 1: some of the things he said, he said, uh, the
Speaker 1: the illegal we.
Speaker 2: Can do fast.
Speaker 1: The unconstitutional takes a while, said something like that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's actually an our archive that quote. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 2: he said, yeah, the illegal we can do immediately and
Speaker 2: takes a little longer.
Speaker 1: Interesting guy, very interesting guy, woman eyes er, playboy liked
Speaker 1: at one point sexiest man I think in nineteen seventy two,
Speaker 1: all the stuff that you read about him. Interesting guy. Okay,
Speaker 1: so then go up above that. Who do you know
Speaker 1: that you will put even above Kissinger from the last
Speaker 1: seventy years that we would.
Speaker 2: Know about the name, you know, right off the top
Speaker 2: of my head, I can't think of one, certainly. You know,
Speaker 2: some of the corporate folks that nobody would think of.
Speaker 2: Tillerson would would be very powerful, you know, Jack Welsh
Speaker 2: in general Electric Jack Welcher would put ahead of very
Speaker 2: high up now at a certain point, you know, it's
Speaker 2: not a pecking order. They collaborate, I think. But what
Speaker 2: I understand that committee collaborate and it sort of squabbles.
Speaker 2: But you know, when I was first told about it,
Speaker 2: you know, back in the early days, used to talk
Speaker 2: about there are these documents that got released called the
Speaker 2: Majestic twelve MJ twelve, and nobody knows that they're authentic
Speaker 2: or not. I think they are largely authentic. But what's
Speaker 2: not in dispute is this NRO document from the nineties
Speaker 2: and one of the compartment operations is MJI MAGI or
Speaker 2: or sometimes you'll see m AJICE, and it stands for
Speaker 2: the Majority Joint Intelligence Committee, and that is the group
Speaker 2: that is a joint entity on the US end of
Speaker 2: this that deals with this subject, and that is in
Speaker 2: the document. You can pull it up. It's the National
Speaker 2: Reconnaissance Office document Nellis Air Force Space in nineteen ninety one.
Speaker 1: So we pull up Majestic twelve, Rob, I just want
Speaker 1: to is this Majestic twelve, also known as Magic twelve,
Speaker 1: is a Purport organizational presenting UF conspiracy theories. The organizations
Speaker 1: claim to be the code name of an alleged secret
Speaker 1: committee of scientists, military leaders, and government officials formed in
Speaker 1: nineteen forty seven by an executive order by President Harry
Speaker 1: Truman to facilitate recovery investigation of alien spaceships spacecrafts. The
Speaker 1: concept originated in the series is supposedly leak secret government documents,
Speaker 1: first circulated by ufologists in nineteen eighty four. Upon examination,
Speaker 1: the Federal Beeer FBI declared the documents to be complete bogists,
Speaker 1: and many euthologists consider them to be elaborate hoax. Majestic
Speaker 1: twelve remains popular amongst some UFO conspiracy theories, and the
Speaker 1: concept has appeared in popular culture, including television, film, and literature.
Speaker 2: Here's what I think actually happen. If you want to
Speaker 2: hide something, you hide it in plain sight. So a
Speaker 2: great deal of information and those documents is true, but
Speaker 2: the way they came about was a hoax. So if
Speaker 2: you're involved with counterintelligence and information's coming out, you want
Speaker 2: to tot people to something that's the provenance is going
Speaker 2: to be a problem, and that way it takes them down.
Speaker 2: A National Security Agency guy described it to me this way.
Speaker 2: He was the right hand to General Odum back in
Speaker 2: the day, who is the director of the NSA, And
Speaker 2: he said, we call this a DDT operation. You set
Speaker 2: up a decoy, you distract people, and then you trash them.
Speaker 2: And so by releasing things that are questionable provenance, then
Speaker 2: it can you sort of put it out there. And
Speaker 2: much of the information may be correct, but because the
Speaker 2: provenance is bogus, it takes the information down with it.
Speaker 2: So one of the things that's very complicated is understanding
Speaker 2: how counterintelligence and disinformation works on this It's byzantine, it's complicated.
Speaker 2: It takes a lot to unravel it. And that's why
Speaker 2: I tend to be very careful with both witnesses and
Speaker 2: documents if I don't have a good provenance for it. So,
Speaker 2: I mean, that is something that's hard to do when
Speaker 2: you're you're trying to run an operation like we do
Speaker 2: without any uh, you know, real clearance. I mean we
Speaker 2: you have to rely on people and their credibility and
Speaker 2: what documentation they can prove. And I think what's most important.
Speaker 2: The reason I'm releasing this, this archive is that if
Speaker 2: you go through it carefully, you see where the dots
Speaker 2: all connect. But these intelligence briefings we're working on the modules,
Speaker 2: we call these intelligence modules. When those get put in,
Speaker 2: it's going to connect all these dots. And that's a
Speaker 2: big undertaking that we're working on right now.
Speaker 1: Jamie Diamond, what do you put them? Is Jamie Dimond
Speaker 1: a person all the way at the top or not?
Speaker 2: Really?
Speaker 1: I wouldn't. I don't know anything about him. You don't
Speaker 1: know anything, no information. What do you, what do you
Speaker 1: think about Elon Musk and would is he like a
Speaker 1: Nicola Tesla? Is you a good guy in your rights?
Speaker 1: Is he somebody that you know, do you establishment can't stand?
Speaker 1: Is he someone that can't control?
Speaker 2: Well? I think that certainly if he was in cline
Speaker 2: Lining to research this end of it, he wouldn't be
Speaker 2: making up I call it a fake Tesla. I mean
Speaker 2: a real Tesla car wouldn't have to be plugged in.
Speaker 2: It most certainly wouldn't have nine hundred and some pounds
Speaker 2: of lithium ion batteries. It would be an electromagnetic genre.
Speaker 2: You know. If you look at this archive we have
Speaker 2: with this whole account of this inventor named Floyd Sweet,
Speaker 2: he had something that size a little bit bigger than
Speaker 2: a cigarette pack. And then this was back in the
Speaker 2: eighties and we have all the documentation on this, huge
Speaker 2: files on it, and it was running a three hundred
Speaker 2: horsepower motor that could run your car. And it never
Speaker 2: had to be plugged in. I think the battery start
Speaker 2: up with some very tiny battery, you know, and once
Speaker 2: that circuit started, it was pulling energy out of what's
Speaker 2: called the quantum vacuum some people called the zero point
Speaker 2: energy field. But let's describe about that. As you see
Speaker 2: your teiclat there that mug, the amount of potential energy
Speaker 2: and the space in that mug is enough energy to
Speaker 2: boil off all the oceans of the Earth. It has
Speaker 2: been quantified, and that's called the zero point energy field.
Speaker 2: So if you understand the physics of these very high
Speaker 2: voltage VHV we call them very high voltage systems where
Speaker 2: at certain it may be millions of volts, but at
Speaker 2: very low power, but at certain cycles per second, certain
Speaker 2: frequencies you can tap into. That depends on what material
Speaker 2: you're using to explain to zero point energy to the
Speaker 2: average person. Well, so visualize just the space around you
Speaker 2: and everything around you if you get down to by
Speaker 2: classic definition, it's the energy left after even all sub
Speaker 2: atomic particles have been brought down to minus two hundred
Speaker 2: and seventy some degrees kelvin. But there's still this energy field.
Speaker 2: That's the baseline energy field that all of matter space time,
Speaker 2: some atomic particles are fluxing in and out of. And interestingly,
Speaker 2: the early Lockheed Man made UFOs were called flux liners
Speaker 2: because they were tapping into that energy field. The quantum flux.
Speaker 2: So that's basically it, and it's huge. I mean, I
Speaker 2: think Nikola Tesla called it the infinite energy field, and
Speaker 2: Professor Diraq and modestly called it the direct see. But
Speaker 2: a scientist named doctor Casimir CSI M. E. R. Back
Speaker 2: in the thirties spot postulated this but then proved its
Speaker 2: existence in the fifties another important date, and that's called
Speaker 2: the Casimir effect. The scientific information on that is also
Speaker 2: in this intelligence archive. So you know, I wasn't even
Speaker 2: born when Professor Casimir proved the existence. Now what's debated
Speaker 2: amongst scienceists currently is that you can tap into it
Speaker 2: from a practical point of view. But you can, and
Speaker 2: the proof is. You know what the proof is. Look
Speaker 2: at one of those UFOs moving, no jets, no rockets,
Speaker 2: no internal combustion engines, no nuclear no heat signature. In fact,
Speaker 2: when you get those things, operational temperature actually goes down.
Speaker 2: If you're in a hangar with two or three of
Speaker 2: these things hovering, like we have the pictures in our
Speaker 2: archive of what's called the ARB there at the Norton
Speaker 2: Air Force Pace in nineteen eighty eight, it actually is
Speaker 2: like an air conditioning. It cooled down so not only
Speaker 2: do you not have heat coming off of it, it
Speaker 2: actually pulls temperature down somewhat. And so there's so many
Speaker 2: applications of these sciences. I mean, think about it. You'd
Speaker 2: be free energy, refrigeration, cooling, server forms, farms if you're
Speaker 2: concerned about climate change for whatever reason. But even people
Speaker 2: who don't think there's climate change due to pollution, there's
Speaker 2: five plus million people a year die from particles from
Speaker 2: emissions coal and gas and oil, and not to mention
Speaker 2: radiation causing cancer from nuclear and all of that would
Speaker 2: be replaced. See, I mean, all that's gone. Now, that's
Speaker 2: the good news. The bad news is you're stepping on
Speaker 2: the toes of hundreds of trillions of dollars in assets,
Speaker 2: not just the market cap of these big corporations, but
Speaker 2: the commodities. Think of what's traded on the Chicago Board
Speaker 2: of Trade, you know, just in futures, in commodity training,
Speaker 2: it's trillions. So all of that, you know, you're not
Speaker 2: trading commodities anymore. Surprise you don't.
Speaker 1: You're not studying much of Jamie Diamond or Larry Fink
Speaker 1: or Blackrock or some of these guys, because who is
Speaker 1: funding all these programs. Where are they getting the money from?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, well, Goman, Sacks and Blackrock definitely have involvement
Speaker 2: with these operations. And you know, the more current people
Speaker 2: who are involved, the more it's shadowy. But when people
Speaker 2: get older or pass away, then they start. Let me
Speaker 2: give you a great example. After World War Two, at
Speaker 2: the end of the war, there was a man named
Speaker 2: Paul Mellon who was you know, the Melon Carnegie. The
Speaker 2: Mellon family one of the few billionaires in the world
Speaker 2: into World War two. His grandson has worked with me,
Speaker 2: who was also a Senator John Warner's son and Senator
Speaker 2: John Warder was like a lower level operative on this majority. Yes,
Speaker 2: and so Paul Mellon he went over and at the
Speaker 2: end of World War two with General Patten and Alan
Speaker 2: Dulles and they confiscated this disc.
Speaker 1: That was.
Speaker 2: An early attempt to make an electromagnetic anti gravity thing.
Speaker 2: It wasn't fully operational, but they brought it back to
Speaker 2: the United States. And how do we know this because
Speaker 2: towards the end of his life, Paul Mellon, who was
Speaker 2: very instant mental with Alan Dallas and forming the CIA
Speaker 2: and all that stuff. Remember, the OSS became the CIA
Speaker 2: osister and World War two, and when he was getting older,
Speaker 2: he had had a couple of Martinez and told his
Speaker 2: grandson John Warnered the fourth that in fact he had
Speaker 2: gone over there and brought this thing back, and that
Speaker 2: it was not when the jet rocket thrusters, it was
Speaker 2: electromagnetic anti gravity. And so I mean that we're talking
Speaker 2: all night at the end of World War two in
Speaker 2: Germany in nineteen forty five. So that is something. What
Speaker 2: you find is that as some of these folks get older,
Speaker 2: before they meet their maker, as it were, they start
Speaker 2: telling things to me or to other family members who
Speaker 2: didn't share it. So that's you know, a pattern that
Speaker 2: in terms of you know, I have debriefed. You know,
Speaker 2: if you look at this list, there's seven hundred and
Speaker 2: sixty whistleblowers and witnesses, but I've met with more, some
Speaker 2: of them I never quite get their name, probably over
Speaker 2: a thousand, but all the people on that list I've debriefed,
Speaker 2: I mean over thirty four years. So I carry that
Speaker 2: in my head. Is why I'm trying to put some
Speaker 2: of this down. You know, in case something happens.
Speaker 1: To me, which president have you had direct contact with
Speaker 1: you spoke to that is interested in this.
Speaker 2: I've never spoken directly with any of the presidents. There's
Speaker 2: the only people who've been on their cabinet or people
Speaker 2: who have been like the SAI director or people work
Speaker 2: with them. Now, I've never got it. I've never met
Speaker 2: with any of them directly. All of them been asked
Speaker 2: to any of the recent one.
Speaker 1: Who's the most recent, most powerful people you've spoken to,
Speaker 1: that's that's reached out to you.
Speaker 2: Oh, I think by far, this former chairman of this
Speaker 2: fortune fifty company. I mean he's sit holding all the car.
Speaker 1: Is he Is he respected by a lot of people?
Speaker 1: Is he somebody that has a reputa? Oh?
Speaker 2: Yes, he would be. Yeah, he very much, he would be.
Speaker 1: So Okay, as a president, you get to campaign.
Speaker 2: You're done.
Speaker 1: I'm going to run for president twenty twenty four. I'm
Speaker 1: campaigning for human rights, to fix the border. You know,
Speaker 1: we're going to go climate change is a number one
Speaker 1: issue in the economy, stupid, And then we're going to
Speaker 1: focus on all this stuff, right, all these things that
Speaker 1: they say their campaigning on. Okay, great, what's the riskiest
Speaker 1: thing to campaign on. Let me kind of give you
Speaker 1: a couple of them, and you tell me Okay, one,
Speaker 1: here's what my campaign is going to be. Why is
Speaker 1: it that only two countries in the world allow Big
Speaker 1: Pharma to advertise on TV, US and New Zealand. Why
Speaker 1: are all the other countries not allowed that to happen.
Speaker 1: If you help me become president, day one executive order,
Speaker 1: Big Pharma will not be able to advertise on TV,
Speaker 1: just like cigarette and tobacco companies cannot.
Speaker 2: Okay, there's a lot of risk with that.
Speaker 1: Okay, You're going after a lot of strong people.
Speaker 2: Right number two? Number two?
Speaker 1: You you you know as your president. I think one
Speaker 1: of the things that you, as a taxpayer, are owed
Speaker 1: the truth. And I think this government in the recent years,
Speaker 1: we used to be an open source type of a
Speaker 1: country when Washington and all guys ran it. Today we
Speaker 1: are no longer open source. If you help me become president,
Speaker 1: I'm going to release all the six thousand patents in
Speaker 1: the Invention Secrecy Act of nineteen fifty one, and I'm
Speaker 1: going to make sure you know all about it.
Speaker 2: And it's going to help a lot of you guys.
Speaker 1: You're gonna save money on electricity, you're gonna save money
Speaker 1: on oil, and cars are going to be able to
Speaker 1: run on this because it's going to help us with this,
Speaker 1: and it's going to help us with pollution, and we're
Speaker 1: no longer going to deal with poverty worldwide. It is
Speaker 1: never you help me. I'm going to make sure all
Speaker 1: that becomes public. Okay, you helped me become president. I'm
Speaker 1: going to give the truth of what happened with CI
Speaker 1: and I'm going to release the last fifteen percent of
Speaker 1: the information to know who assassinated John F.
Speaker 2: Kennedy.
Speaker 1: You helped me become president. All of these things that
Speaker 1: I'm going through, What is the riskiest one for your life?
Speaker 1: That if you say you're going to do that, ain't
Speaker 1: nobody going to help you and your your It's the
Speaker 1: riskiest position to take.
Speaker 2: Well, I think in terms of your own personal security,
Speaker 2: it probably be this issue, the UFO and UAP issue.
Speaker 2: Why would that be because behind it is the whole
Speaker 2: center of power that was running the planet, the technology.
Speaker 2: Because if that comes out, all of it's coming out. Look,
Speaker 2: anybody with a grain of sense, if and this is
Speaker 2: where we're getting really close, Like when the Pentagon confirmed
Speaker 2: that that UAP that we chased off the coast California
Speaker 2: was real in three dimensional and not an artifact or
Speaker 2: a misperception broad daylight. What they admitted to without saying
Speaker 2: it is that there's there's something that's there that's three
Speaker 2: dimensional and real, that is absolutely defined the aerodynamics and
Speaker 2: energy of anything known thought by the public, now not
Speaker 2: known to man and certainly not known to these clandestine programs.
Speaker 2: But so going into that, then you're you're you're also
Speaker 2: here's the other big risk. The only reason this could
Speaker 2: have been kept secret is that the big corporate media,
Speaker 2: left right center. All of it is corrupt. I have
Speaker 2: dot there's a whole section in here about it. You'll
Speaker 2: convince all of it is corrupt, absolutely corrupt. And the
Speaker 2: proof of it is, why would they given what we've
Speaker 2: already put on the street and had press conferences around
Speaker 2: and right here, one hundred and twenty two named whistleblowers,
Speaker 2: Why isn't that being covered by Fox, CNN, MSNBC, New
Speaker 2: York Times, Washington Post. So if you go in here,
Speaker 2: you'll see that on certain issues, the media is actually
Speaker 2: the most culpable for the secrecy because the fourth estate,
Speaker 2: which is what the media is called, and you know,
Speaker 2: is supposed to be a watchdog against these s excesses,
Speaker 2: of the government and abuses of power. And we're talking
Speaker 2: the biggest abuse of power in my life, in certainly
Speaker 2: in the last seventy to eighty years, And why wouldn't
Speaker 2: there be investigations on that? So let me tell you
Speaker 2: a little story hypocryphal, but Mike Wallace was a famous
Speaker 2: reporter for sixty minutes CBS. A good friend to his
Speaker 2: name of Bob Schwartz was on the board of Time
Speaker 2: Life and knew him very well. And I was at
Speaker 2: a meeting in New York back in the nineties and
Speaker 2: mister Schwartz told me about how Mike Wallace had gotten
Speaker 2: some government documents from a source about the UFO issue,
Speaker 2: and he said, this is the biggest story in history.
Speaker 2: This is the biggest secret in US history, and he
Speaker 2: was going to do a sixty minute special on it.
Speaker 2: At the time, Westinghouse, a defense contractor, owned CBS. And
Speaker 2: basically from the top Mike Wallace was told, you'll do
Speaker 2: no such thing, and he went into a very deep depression.
Speaker 2: In fact, he went on Larry Kingon admitted he becomes
Speaker 2: suicidal because he realized he was a fraud. He used
Speaker 2: that word. Now, he didn't tell this part of the story.
Speaker 2: His friend Bob Schwartz told me at a salon in
Speaker 2: New York.
Speaker 1: I think he told Larry Kinky thinks he's a fraud.
Speaker 2: Mike Wallace, did you can go find that? Say? He says, I,
Speaker 2: you know, why are you as well? I just thought
Speaker 2: I was a fraud. And so somewhere in there now
Speaker 2: I saw that episode and what Bob Schwartz said. Robert
Speaker 2: Schwartz said, Look, he was so devastated because he thought, here,
Speaker 2: we are the premiere investigative journalist. We take on anything.
Speaker 2: He had never been told he couldn't do a story.
Speaker 2: He was not allowed to do this story. He was
Speaker 2: flat out stood down, sat down hard, and said, no,
Speaker 2: you will not. Now I have dealt with many media people,
Speaker 2: very high up, and they've had the same thing happen
Speaker 2: to them. There was a guy named Ira Rosen who
Speaker 2: was the executive producer of twenty twenty in Primetime Live,
Speaker 2: and after the first National Press Club event that we
Speaker 2: did in two thousand and one May twenty three years ago,
Speaker 2: he approached me and he wanted to have this first
Speaker 2: sort of tranch of whistleblowers and witnesses come forward, and
Speaker 2: so he came out to my home, my farm in
Speaker 2: Virginia near the University of Virginia, and I gave him
Speaker 2: thirty five digital hours of summaries of these testimony and
Speaker 2: hundreds of pages of government documents. He says, if this
Speaker 2: is true, this is the biggest story ever in US history.
Speaker 2: I say, yeah, it is so, I said, but I
Speaker 2: don't think they're going to let you do it. He says, oh,
Speaker 2: I'm the executive producer of this, and that he had
Speaker 2: been with by the way, sixty minutes, and I think
Speaker 2: he's back there now. I'm not sure. Anyway, this is
Speaker 2: a long time ago, twenty some years ago. And I said, Ira,
Speaker 2: I don't think they're going to let you. A couple
Speaker 2: weeks later, he calls me up. He says, well, doctor Garr,
Speaker 2: you're right. They won't let me do this story. I said, Ira,
Speaker 2: who are they? And he says, doctor Gear, you know
Speaker 2: who they are. And so we stayed in touch for
Speaker 2: a few years. Now. I can tell you account after
Speaker 2: account after account like that. So when you get really
Speaker 2: close to truth, now, if you cover nonsense or something
Speaker 2: that's disinformation, or you know, I was attacked by an
Speaker 2: alien and raped and have babies floating around alpha Centauri.
Speaker 2: They'll cover that. I mean, the media will be happy
Speaker 2: to cover nonsense, but when you have hard evidence interesting,
Speaker 2: they're not going to cover it. And I don't care
Speaker 2: how high you are you think you are in that
Speaker 2: food chain in the media, I challenge anyone listening to
Speaker 2: do that. Now, look what happened to Tucker Carlson. I
Speaker 2: don't know if you know who Tucker Carlson. He was
Speaker 2: on Fox. I was on a show a month ago.
Speaker 2: Oh okay, yeah, I would like to be on it.
Speaker 2: But see, he got gas lit. He had a whole
Speaker 2: bunch of disinformation. People come to him and provided him
Speaker 2: with enormous amount of false information. And so one of
Speaker 2: the problems is, you know, a little knowledge is a
Speaker 2: very dangerous thing on this issue, and it's very very
Speaker 2: easy for someone with a limited amount of access and
Speaker 2: information to have people come in and steer them in
Speaker 2: the direction of the aliens are eating us for a
Speaker 2: launch and taking our babies. Right. That whole rubbish, But
Speaker 2: that is really the stock in trade. So if you
Speaker 2: move in that direction, doors will open. If you actually
Speaker 2: start putting out the truth, every door will close. Same
Speaker 2: thing with Hollywood. You know, I had Arnold Coopelson, who
Speaker 2: was a huge billion dollar producer back in the nineties.
Speaker 2: You'll see in the archive nineteen ninety seven I did
Speaker 2: a congressional briefing off site with the first Early Gathering
Speaker 2: or the second Early Gathering or whistleblowers. The first gathering
Speaker 2: was nineteen ninety five at a silamar in California. This
Speaker 2: was ninety seven in DC, but at the Georgetown Weston
Speaker 2: and so members of Congress came, and Dan Burton, who
Speaker 2: was Chairman of Oversight, came, and you know, this was
Speaker 2: all you know, there were really people really were very
Speaker 2: interested in hearing this. This was not public, it was
Speaker 2: in in the news. And what I found was one
Speaker 2: of the men who came he was going to tell
Speaker 2: the members of Congress. That next day we had a
Speaker 2: day first where we met about having been on an
Speaker 2: inter agency committee back in the seventies where they could
Speaker 2: hit a button basically and stage an alien attack on
Speaker 2: the planet, and all that, and that all that had
Speaker 2: been in place before he got there. And I think
Speaker 2: it was seventy three or four. That night, some guys
Speaker 2: that he had worked with came to the hotel took
Speaker 2: him from his hotel room to a secure site out
Speaker 2: in Virginia until those briefings from members of Congress was over. Now,
Speaker 2: some of the raw footage of that meeting is in
Speaker 2: this archive now, I mean it was old high eight
Speaker 2: or VHS tape, but it's not cinematic, it's not a production.
Speaker 2: But it's interesting, very interesting. Ever since you released this,
Speaker 2: is anybody weird reached out to you. Well, people weird
Speaker 2: reach out to me all the time. But I'm talking threats.
Speaker 2: I'm talking we're going to release this thing you did
Speaker 2: twenty two years ago. Oh sure, happened all the time.
Speaker 2: You know, I just ignore it and I have what's
Speaker 2: good with the folks who are around me now, they
Speaker 2: monitor what's going on around me. One of your friends
Speaker 2: before we came in here asked me this, and I said,
Speaker 2: nothing like that's going to happen and not be known.
Speaker 2: And so now that there's a SAP stood up to
Speaker 2: literally arrest and create a criminal case against someone who
Speaker 2: pulls as kind of illegal operating, you know you can't threaten.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you threaten someone that is in a
Speaker 2: self crime, right, yeah, But I mean they do it
Speaker 2: all the time, but they do it all the time
Speaker 2: Tuesday for them, Yeah, but now this will be trapped.
Speaker 2: Oh with this thing that you have that's just June twentieth.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm really curious to know what the level
Speaker 1: of credibility and protection will be.
Speaker 2: Well, we'll see, I mean, yeah, exactly. I trust the
Speaker 2: director of the team that's lays on this three letter organization,
Speaker 2: the group. Yeah, and we've spent a lot of time.
Speaker 2: Are the three letter or no? Whatever? I mean, there
Speaker 2: are only so many three letter agencies that are not
Speaker 2: going to so we know that it has domestic authority.
Speaker 2: So are they Are they powerful? Are they powerful enough
Speaker 2: where they carry you know, weight? Well, here's the Achilles
Speaker 2: Hill with that. It's a SAP, a special Access project,
Speaker 2: and by definition is top secret. It's compartmented, so it's
Speaker 2: operating under the authority of this immediate supervisor. But it
Speaker 2: wouldn't go up to the director of that agency.
Speaker 1: Who do they report to? Independent because it's a SAP.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, it's closed, so they they hold their
Speaker 2: own clearance and but they've been authorized, their group has
Speaker 2: been authorized to take these people, put protection and monitor.
Speaker 1: Ask is it kind of like an independent PMC, except
Speaker 1: that's an independent CIA version of what a PMC is no.
Speaker 2: I mean, it can't be independent totally. But the way
Speaker 2: compartmented operations are it's on a need to know basis so.
Speaker 1: But they have access to governmental information or no oh yeah,
Speaker 1: and also monitoring who gives them permission to do them?
Speaker 1: Who are the people who've authorized and for him the SAP?
Speaker 1: And you know where it goes beyond that, I don't know,
Speaker 1: because these remember the idea that let's say you're the
Speaker 1: director of the CIA, you're not signing off on all
Speaker 1: the thousands of compartmented SAPs and operations. In fact, they've
Speaker 1: told me, Wolsey told me it barely knows what's going
Speaker 1: on here. I know. Wolsey said, you know nothing. It's
Speaker 1: like they kept things away from him. That's what he
Speaker 1: told me.
Speaker 2: That's what the That's what they all say because it said,
Speaker 2: you know, call me, you know, call me, or they're
Speaker 2: not lying about that. Because this thing is so huge.
Speaker 2: Here's one of the problems at Eisenhower warned about that
Speaker 2: he's right, is that this is like a multi headed
Speaker 2: monster that's gotten created, and it's so big and it's
Speaker 2: so out of control. And if you think members of
Speaker 2: Congress are overseeing these things or the president, not just
Speaker 2: this any president, I'm very non part doesn't have to
Speaker 2: be or the National Security Council, You're mistaken. And they're
Speaker 2: dealing with so many conventional issues that this issue because
Speaker 2: they don't know about it. Day's like, wow, well it's
Speaker 2: the X files. It's a joke, it's nonsense. Now there
Speaker 2: are good people in Congress now, I would say Mark
Speaker 2: Warner and Rubio and jillib Brand and the co Chair
Speaker 2: of Armed Services and Burchett, Luna Moscowitz, who's here. I
Speaker 2: mean Moscowitz is very interested. I've spoken with him. He's
Speaker 2: your representative Fort Lauderdale, part of this area, and you
Speaker 2: know they're sincerely wanting to get to the bottom. The
Speaker 2: problem is they have no dedicated staff or funding. And
Speaker 2: one of the bad news things that I want to
Speaker 2: report today is a few weeks ago I met with
Speaker 2: members of House Oversight and they were aiming to get
Speaker 2: subpoena power and a select committee that was funded. Because
Speaker 2: you need a staff of a couple dozen people just
Speaker 2: unpacked ten percent of this archive I have and really
Speaker 2: then start an investigation properly. They don't have that. So
Speaker 2: when I meet with their staffers, you know, like one
Speaker 2: of them who is the most senior guy for Senate intelligence.
Speaker 2: He says, I've been told I can spend ten percent
Speaker 2: of my time on this. He ended up spending fifty percent.
Speaker 2: There was a huge burden, and he's the one who said, look,
Speaker 2: can you give me what you have? I said yes.
Speaker 2: And the genesis of the archive, by the way, ironically,
Speaker 2: was that they were supposed to put funding in place,
Speaker 2: so there'd be a couple dozen people going through my
Speaker 2: files and archives and information, digitizing them which they were
Speaker 2: all in paper and foul cabinets, and then going through
Speaker 2: intelligence analysis and unpack it. That never got funded. So
Speaker 2: over the last couple of years, I've spent about half
Speaker 2: a million dollars personally to get that done with some
Speaker 2: help and some donors, with a skeleton crew of you know,
Speaker 2: a couple of people and some volunteers. So that's why
Speaker 2: the archive is still not fully organized yet. I'll admit
Speaker 2: it needs a lot of work, but I wanted to
Speaker 2: get it out there for.
Speaker 1: The public as sort of a let let me let
Speaker 1: me ask this question on the nuclear side, right, you know,
Speaker 1: you hear stories about you know a lot of times
Speaker 1: when the aliens show up, is when we're in war
Speaker 1: or nuclear you know, absolute fears and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: And then you hear about the time where Eisenhower is
Speaker 1: on vacation and he steps away for a few days
Speaker 1: apparently allegedly he met with aliens because aliens said, you
Speaker 1: give us the nuclear stuff, we're going to give you
Speaker 1: some powerful technology. The world was so worried about it
Speaker 1: that even associated US reported that Eisenhower's dead. He died
Speaker 1: from you know, cancer, a heart attack. They just made
Speaker 1: up some kind of a story and he was alive
Speaker 1: all alone. Now, you know, some say that's a myth,
Speaker 1: some say that's true.
Speaker 2: No, I have a document from the Ministry of the
Speaker 2: Fact I want to hear it's so well, that's in
Speaker 2: here too. And there was a man who reported out
Speaker 2: about that meeting, and it was at Muroc in u
Speaker 2: RFC is where it's sort of near where Edwards Air
Speaker 2: Force Base is now. It didn't exist at the time
Speaker 2: in nineteen fifty six or seven when it happened, but yeah,
Speaker 2: that did happen. And you're spot on and bringing up
Speaker 2: this point that when we started detonating atomic and then
Speaker 2: thermonuclear weapons, what people everyone knows what an electromagnetic pulse
Speaker 2: says what they don't know is that embedded in that
Speaker 2: is what's called a scaler pulse. And Nikola Tesla was
Speaker 2: one of the original researchers of scaler electromagnetic And to
Speaker 2: make it simple, the light we're seeing or electromagnetic is
Speaker 2: a wave like this, like a sin wave, and it
Speaker 2: propagates at one hundred and eighty six thousand miles per second. Scaler,
Speaker 2: it's also called longitudinal, is a point and a line
Speaker 2: that goes out boom at multiples of the speed of light.
Speaker 2: But when it's done in an uncontrolled way, it rips
Speaker 2: the fabric of inter or transdimensional space time, which disrupts
Speaker 2: extraterrestrial communications and transport systems. So when we detonated the
Speaker 2: first atomic bomb boom, all of a sudden, there are
Speaker 2: et vehicles investigating everything we were doing on this planet.
Speaker 2: Because it wasn't just that we were on a path
Speaker 2: where we could kill ourselves. We were disrupting other operations
Speaker 2: that are extraterrestrial. And very few people understand this. Now
Speaker 2: there is an FBI document in the archive I understand.
Speaker 2: Once we released that, it became the most viewed document
Speaker 2: on the FBI website which one, And it was a
Speaker 2: memo from Guy Hotel h o Ttel to jag Or
Speaker 2: Hoover from nineteen forty seven from Roswell where you know
Speaker 2: we had those. It turned out three ET vehicles that
Speaker 2: went down. One wasn't found till fifty nineteen fifty or
Speaker 2: fifty one. And it's a memo where he said that apparently, yes,
Speaker 2: apparently the we've retyped it because it's so old and
Speaker 2: hard to read. In the forties that when they had
Speaker 2: a new quote radar system that when they switched it on,
Speaker 2: messed up the guidance systems of these ET vehicles, these
Speaker 2: discs that crashed. Well, remember radar is a euphemism for
Speaker 2: both a what you think of radar where you kind
Speaker 2: of paint the fuselage and it's you know, the beams
Speaker 2: that go out and bounce off an aircraft metallic come
Speaker 2: back and you track it. But they're also radar is
Speaker 2: used to track but then embedded and it can be
Speaker 2: an active system. And so what they had done they
Speaker 2: had put a classified By forty seven, they knew these
Speaker 2: ET craft were all around our nuclear facilities. Roswell was
Speaker 2: the only nuclear bomb squadron in the world or atomic
Speaker 2: bomb Squadron. Technically it wasn't nuclear yet and with Thermo
Speaker 2: nuclear it was atomic like Hiroshima and Nakasaki. But that
Speaker 2: was the only place on the Earth was the Roswell
Speaker 2: Army Air Base, and so they were trying to track
Speaker 2: and knock these things down. So that new radar that's
Speaker 2: mentioned here hit and it calls it they embedded the
Speaker 2: scaler signal, and it really these are all electromagnetic craft
Speaker 2: their guidance systems or propulsion, so it's not like you're
Speaker 2: hitting them with a missile or a laser. It's these
Speaker 2: weird directional energy weapons that are a crossover into this
Speaker 2: scalar area. And to this day. You know, when I
Speaker 2: went over the Black Site in September, about a month
Speaker 2: before I got injured, there was these massive electromagnetic pulst generators,
Speaker 2: but they also have embedded in them so you can
Speaker 2: target an object with that hit it. But he also
Speaker 2: had the scaler and that can cause these et craft
Speaker 2: to get stunned or lose controlling crash. So some of
Speaker 2: the people I'm working with currently have been on those
Speaker 2: retrieval teams that are actively still doing that. In fact,
Speaker 2: one of the sites I went over. I'll show you
Speaker 2: this video that one or two et craft per year
Speaker 2: are knock down there and it's very worrisome. The worse
Speaker 2: is that if a civilian aircraft goes in over that
Speaker 2: temporary flight restriction area, they knock it down.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this when we're talking murder, Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I mean listen, this is this is this is weird stuff.
Speaker 2: And that's still going on right That is still happening
Speaker 2: today right now as we speak.
Speaker 1: The level of technology, okay, some of the stuff that
Speaker 1: we got zero point of juteleporting, like the concept of
Speaker 1: tele is that something that's out of the ordinary. Is
Speaker 1: that currently do we have access to it? How long
Speaker 1: cap we had it? Who invented it? Is it being used?
Speaker 1: What's the worry with that? Why are you not releasing it?
Speaker 1: If they have actions, there's a lot of questions with it, obviously.
Speaker 2: Well all of it. I mean, they don't release it,
Speaker 2: there won't any one to know about it. But if
Speaker 2: you look at the testimony of one of our witnesses,
Speaker 2: Fred Threadfeld nineteen fifty three, he was at a Canadian
Speaker 2: Air Force base and they were experimenting with that so
Speaker 2: called teleportation and he said, it's so funny. They were
Speaker 2: using everyone smoke back then, these big ashtrays and it
Speaker 2: would be, you know, an electromagnetic system here and the
Speaker 2: other inner base another one, and this ashtray would go boom. Teleport.
Speaker 2: Now you know Einstein when he said the same particle
Speaker 2: could be in two places at once, he called it
Speaker 2: the spooky effect. But really what it is is what's
Speaker 2: called quantum entanglement, where every point in space and time
Speaker 2: is connected to the other. And if you look up
Speaker 2: quantum and haanglement, that's what this is. But imagine doing
Speaker 2: that not just for the particle, but the whole object
Speaker 2: or spacecraft. So those experiments were going on also thirties, forties, fifties,
Speaker 2: but when they began to unpack and really have some
Speaker 2: of the most brilliant minds I mean, I will tell
Speaker 2: you the smartest people I've ever met with, certainly IQ's
Speaker 2: north of mind, have been working on these projects in underground.
Speaker 1: So you couldn't mins teleportation is a real thing.
Speaker 2: Oh, it certainly can be done.
Speaker 1: When you're reading it, it says teleportation as the theoretical
Speaker 1: transfer of matter or energy from one point to another
Speaker 1: without traversing the physical space between them. It is a
Speaker 1: common subject in science fiction, fantasy, literature, film, video games,
Speaker 1: in television. In some situations, teleporting is presented as time
Speaker 1: traveling across space, to use of matter transmitters and science
Speaker 1: fiction originator at least as early as nineteenth century. An
Speaker 1: example an early example of scientific teleportation is found in
Speaker 1: an eighteen ninety seven novel To Venus in five Seconds
Speaker 1: by Fred Jane. Chain's protagonist is transported from a strange
Speaker 1: machinery containing gazebo on Earth to planet of Venus. A
Speaker 1: common fictional device for teleportation is a warm hole. In
Speaker 1: video games, the instant teleportation of a player character may
Speaker 1: be referred to as a warp.
Speaker 2: So if that exists, well it does. I mean, how
Speaker 2: are you going to go from one star system to another?
Speaker 2: Just just bear me with me a minute. If you're
Speaker 2: in a one percent of the way through our galaxy,
Speaker 2: the way is a thousand light years, which at the
Speaker 2: speed of light, which you can't go because as you
Speaker 2: accelerate the speed of light you become infinitely massive. So
Speaker 2: we'd be a thousand years one way, a thousand years another.
Speaker 2: So in order to traverse interstellar space, and this was
Speaker 2: concluded early on by the fact they were here and
Speaker 2: we down some of them. You have to do basically
Speaker 2: your ending space time. So visualize this like a piece
Speaker 2: of paper. I don't have one, but you know you
Speaker 2: have a star system here and we're here. Instead of
Speaker 2: going in a straight line, even at enormous velocities like
Speaker 2: or space shuttle or whatever, you through these very high
Speaker 2: voltage electromagnetic systems that also create gravitational waves, you can
Speaker 2: bend space time. So the piece of paper does this,
Speaker 2: so the two points come right here, so you're actually
Speaker 2: that's where you get into this whole non locality and
Speaker 2: physics and quantum entanglement in an applied setting. So the
Speaker 2: fact that you know it's relegated to science fiction is fine.
Speaker 2: It doesn't mean that it isn't being done, because it
Speaker 2: has to be. You're not going to be able to
Speaker 2: travel through interstellar distances in any way during any species
Speaker 2: life span without obliterating, as it were, linear space time.
Speaker 2: And it doesn't mean you're not traversing, but you're moving
Speaker 2: trans dimensionally. So let's look at it from the point
Speaker 2: of view of it's like a quantum hologram, you know,
Speaker 2: a hologram where like if you had a hologram of
Speaker 2: Marilyn Monroe with her skirt, if you zoomed in on
Speaker 2: one little part of it, it would have the entirety
Speaker 2: of her image in it, and then zoom in again
Speaker 2: and zoom. So when you're talking about a quantum sort
Speaker 2: of holographic view of the universe, which is a correct one,
Speaker 2: then you're not traveling in a straight line, and you're using, however,
Speaker 2: a whole new area of physics. And this is not
Speaker 2: going to be in your physics textbook or an MIT.
Speaker 2: It's in these classified areas. And that's why I tell people,
Speaker 2: I'd say, some of the very smartest physicists and electromagnetic
Speaker 2: engineers I've ever met work in these projects, and they're
Speaker 2: in usually most of the time they're in a deep
Speaker 2: underground military I want to read this.
Speaker 1: In nineteen ninety three, Bennett proposed that a quantum state
Speaker 1: of particle could be trans transferred to another distant particle
Speaker 1: without moving two particles at all. This is called quantum
Speaker 1: state teleportation. There are many following theoretical and experimental papers published.
Speaker 1: Researchers believe that quantum teleportation is the foundation of quantum
Speaker 1: calculation and quantum communication. In two thousand and eight, m
Speaker 1: Hoda proposed that it may be possible to teleport energy
Speaker 1: by exploiting quantum energy fluctuations of an entangled you set
Speaker 1: entangled vacuum state of a quantum field. In twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: zero temperature quantum energy transportation was observed and recorded by
Speaker 1: Kazuki Akida for the first time across microscopic distances using
Speaker 1: IBM superconducting computers that are used by quantum computing. What so,
Speaker 1: it's already been done as being tested, well, it has.
Speaker 2: Been on this small level. I'm just saying that when
Speaker 2: you cross in these let's call them these forbidden sciences
Speaker 2: right that are are been highly classified, I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: and they were standing on the shoulders of great people. Uh.
Speaker 2: Nikola Tesla discovered many of these this phenomenon the or others.
Speaker 2: I mentioned the b Phil Brown effect with electrogravitic So
Speaker 2: what's called electromagnetic gravitic where certain voltages cause objects to
Speaker 2: float and shrink, change their structure. And I think it
Speaker 2: has more to do with the magnetic spin. I'm not
Speaker 2: a physicist, but from what I've studied and learned from
Speaker 2: people worked on it, that that is what it's really doing,
Speaker 2: and it causes a magnetic field flux that alters the mass,
Speaker 2: the actual not weight, but mass of an object, and
Speaker 2: then it can float and go up, you know, put
Speaker 2: against gravity. And that's how also how you control. If
Speaker 2: you look at how these objects move, often they've been
Speaker 2: like we had one case when I was in France,
Speaker 2: uh and we were doing a what we call CE
Speaker 2: five contact, which is when we when we attempt to
Speaker 2: make contact with these objects and these civilizations, and the
Speaker 2: object was moving over us at a two hundred thousand
Speaker 2: kilometers per hour. It was tracked by the French Ministry
Speaker 2: of Defense and an admiral was there. We were doing
Speaker 2: a demonstration for them, and it could make a right
Speaker 2: hand turn or stop. Now, if you were in a
Speaker 2: normal vehicle, if you were a pilot in a normal object,
Speaker 2: your brains would come out of your nose. The G
Speaker 2: forces would kill you immediately. So we know that they're
Speaker 2: able to do that and also control for one G
Speaker 2: in other words, so you're really in an electromagnetic space
Speaker 2: time bubble when you're moving like that. And that technology,
Speaker 2: as I mentioned, began to be experimented with in the
Speaker 2: twenties and thirties. But by the time the forties came
Speaker 2: along and they started in earnest studying the extraterrestrial vehicles,
Speaker 2: it took a while. And also it's not just energy
Speaker 2: and propulsion, it's specialized materials. I have the CEO of
Speaker 2: a corporation that took was working on the skin of
Speaker 2: one of these part of the craft, and it was
Speaker 2: such an unusual crystalline metallic material and they spent many
Speaker 2: years and figured out how to fabricate it. So some
Speaker 2: of the really specialized materials we have that we use
Speaker 2: have been sort of two or three steps removed, spun
Speaker 2: off from reverse engineering studying extraterrestrial not just energy and propulsion,
Speaker 2: but material science. So the material science is really interesting.
Speaker 2: And then the final one, that's the big one, is
Speaker 2: communication because the communication is well the Elon Musk would
Speaker 2: love this with neuralink, but it's non local. So their
Speaker 2: communications systems involve the ability to interface with very well
Speaker 2: designed electromagnetic systems that interface with the consciousness field and thought.
Speaker 2: So in other words, you want to do something to
Speaker 2: your computer, you just think to it without a wire,
Speaker 2: without an implant, like let's see that, but think of it.
Speaker 2: I mean a thought. What is thought? You know, we
Speaker 2: have these thoughts and it's like, hey, what dreams may come?
Speaker 2: But you know, you many people have had of these
Speaker 2: sort of experiences where they've had an out of body
Speaker 2: or near death. In my case, I met my wife
Speaker 2: in a series of lucid dreams. I think it's because
Speaker 2: I'm part Cherokee. Shame here, yep, I met her that way.
Speaker 2: I met her to at eighteen years old. Yeah. Well
Speaker 2: we're going to have our forty fifth anniversary in couple months.
Speaker 2: So what's interesting is that think about as civilization so
Speaker 2: advanced that that aspect of thought and consciousness without wiring,
Speaker 2: without something at the speed of electromagnetic can interface with
Speaker 2: a device. So in nineteen ninety one I wrote a
Speaker 2: paper and it was about this, and it was called
Speaker 2: consciousness assisted technologies. But it goes the other way, where
Speaker 2: a technology can assist your own consciousness. So you hear
Speaker 2: about the CIA remote viewing programs like Ingo Swan, who
Speaker 2: was a friend of mine, I knew where they were
Speaker 2: able to use consciousness to spy on the Soviet Union
Speaker 2: or what have you. It's so called psychic abilities. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's sort of a loaded term because it's so usually wacky,
Speaker 2: but that is real. And imagine a civilization so advanced
Speaker 2: that that innate ability is augmented, assisted with technological systems,
Speaker 2: and the reverse that there technological systems can interface directly.
Speaker 2: So when you hear many accounts of these ets, you'll
Speaker 2: see that they'll touch a console and think to it,
Speaker 2: and the craft moves and goes. So this is not
Speaker 2: I'm Alexander Graham Bell using the speed of light electromagnet I.
Speaker 1: Think sometimes you know, you're like you're thinking about somebody
Speaker 1: in a boom. Three seconds later you get that phone call. Sure,
Speaker 1: and that's happened. I don't know how many times? Sure,
Speaker 1: where it happens? How did this happen?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 1: What gave you the signal that that was coming? What
Speaker 1: gave you a signal that that was taking place? You know,
Speaker 1: I couldn't pinpoint on what that is?
Speaker 2: Oh I do? But what is that? What it is? Yeah? Okay,
Speaker 2: this is why this is beautiful. This gets back into
Speaker 2: conscious quantum entanglement. So the ultimate non local entangled field
Speaker 2: is the conscious mind itself. You know Ern Schrodinger, who
Speaker 2: is one of the fathers of quantum mechanics and particle
Speaker 2: wave theory nineteen oh eight. He said, the total number
Speaker 2: of minds in the universe is one, and that is
Speaker 2: a singularity. So the real singularity they're looking for is
Speaker 2: actually the consciousness field. So you know, you and I
Speaker 2: are speaking right now, and you have your individual self
Speaker 2: and ego and personality and I have mine, but we're
Speaker 2: both awake, and that awake field is a singularity, but
Speaker 2: we end up closing it off. So if you open it,
Speaker 2: this is what meditation does. Meditation enables you to connect
Speaker 2: to that deep or transcendent aspect of consciousness that's actually
Speaker 2: omnipresence everywhere. It's not limited by space and time, which
Speaker 2: is why people can have experiences of a lucid dream
Speaker 2: and see something in the future or an intuition. And
Speaker 2: I as a medical doctor, I mean I'm not practicing now,
Speaker 2: and the nurses knew. I used to be able to
Speaker 2: do this. I would sense if someone had an occult
Speaker 2: or hidden cancer and I would just inematically order a
Speaker 2: cat scan when it didn't seem to be indicated. It
Speaker 2: would be in there because I could sense it see it.
Speaker 2: So that's something we ought to teach all doctors, by
Speaker 2: the way, but someday we will, but this is an
Speaker 2: area that gets into really controversy. Sal part of the
Speaker 2: work we do and that is going beyond, is just
Speaker 2: sort of the material entanglement to you know, how are
Speaker 2: these civilizations communicating? Well, it can't be like our cell phone.
Speaker 2: It's speed a light and it's got to be something
Speaker 2: that is instantaneous. What turns out through the consciousness field
Speaker 2: and thought you actually can connect bang instantly across a
Speaker 2: million light years of space, which is really amazing think
Speaker 2: about it. It's a way.
Speaker 1: Mind thoughts. Teleport, I don't know if you want to
Speaker 1: use that word. Could physical things teleport?
Speaker 2: Could you?
Speaker 1: You know? You know, at one point one would say,
Speaker 1: how am I going to be able to email you
Speaker 1: to go from here to Australia within half a second?
Speaker 2: How does that happen? Right? What causes that to happen? Right?
Speaker 1: You know, some of the stuff is way too advanced
Speaker 1: fort the average person to be thinking about. This is
Speaker 1: why you know, specific topics like this Swabinist conversation with you.
Speaker 1: But let me go to the next topic here.
Speaker 2: So esg right.
Speaker 1: Environmental social governance so important that even this net zero
Speaker 1: you know, asset managers Initiative. I don't know if you're
Speaker 1: familiar with it or not. They're talking about more than
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifteen signatories with the US dollars fifty
Speaker 1: seven trillion dollars in assets under management.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: The Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative is an international group
Speaker 1: of asset managers committed, consistent with their fiduciary duty to
Speaker 1: their clients and beneficiaries, to supporting the goal of net
Speaker 1: zero greenhouse gas emissions by twenty fifty or soon, or
Speaker 1: in line with the global efforts to limit warning to
Speaker 1: one and a half degrees celsiuse, and to supporting investing
Speaker 1: aligned with net zero mission by twenty fifty or sooner.
Speaker 1: Are these guys noble people or they full of shit?
Speaker 2: Well, to be honest with you, I think many of
Speaker 2: them are well meaning but uninformed. In other words, you're
Speaker 2: not going to I own the I have the largest
Speaker 2: legal allowable solar farm in Virginia at my farm because
Speaker 2: the state caps how big it can be. And when
Speaker 2: our power went out in a snowstorm, we had no heat,
Speaker 2: we had nothing, it barely. I mean, this is a joke.
Speaker 2: You're not going to run a planet with eight billion
Speaker 2: people with solar and wind. Now with these zero point
Speaker 2: quantum vacuum these sort of technologies that have been confiscated,
Speaker 2: patents have been confiscated what we've been talking about that
Speaker 2: would get us there very quickly. But so I think
Speaker 2: their aspirations may be in fact noble, but their methodology
Speaker 2: is fatally flawed because they're not going to get there
Speaker 2: with any of the schemes that they're planning now. And
Speaker 2: that's the frustration here now. Ironically, I was at a
Speaker 2: meeting in twenty thirteen off the coast of Australia. It
Speaker 2: was a group of world muckety MUCKs. It was I
Speaker 2: was asked to give a keynote at this thing. I
Speaker 2: think it was one hundred and twenty people flown in
Speaker 2: on this island, and one of the people there was
Speaker 2: the head of an international I think it was international
Speaker 2: Green Peace director. He was so hostile to what I
Speaker 2: was saying because I pointed out that the only way
Speaker 2: we're going to get to these solutions to clean up
Speaker 2: the oceans, in the air and all this and it
Speaker 2: is to bring out these technologies. And he wouldn't hear
Speaker 2: of anything except the orthodoxy of wind and solar and
Speaker 2: I said, but you know, have you actually run the
Speaker 2: numbers on that. You can't get there from here with
Speaker 2: eight billion people. You know, there's not enough energy density
Speaker 2: or reliability and wind and solar plus wind doesn't blow
Speaker 2: all the time, and the sun isn't up all the time,
Speaker 2: and the battery storage needs are ludicrously huge. We have
Speaker 2: no ability to do that. So the solutions are going
Speaker 2: to have to come from the high tech classified sector.
Speaker 2: Good news to all your children in mine is that
Speaker 2: we have the solution. The bad news is a bunch
Speaker 2: of Nazis, I use that word like Petro Nazi, true fascist,
Speaker 2: ruthless people are keeping it secret. And I'll just put
Speaker 2: it on the table. And you're not going to get
Speaker 2: there by wishful thinking and holding hands and singing Kumbaya.
Speaker 2: You're going to have to do the heavy lift of
Speaker 2: getting these declassified. Now here's another solution. I've made an
Speaker 2: appeal if there are people of high net worth to
Speaker 2: put together a venture capital fund that would be an
Speaker 2: angel fund to create an open source R and D
Speaker 2: lab on this kind of electromagnetic and physics. And I
Speaker 2: think with the information that we have that probably in
Speaker 2: a couple of years we would come out without the
Speaker 2: government declassifying anything. Since most of the gun doesn't have
Speaker 2: access or these big corporations releasing it, we could bring
Speaker 2: it out and if you open sourced it in a
Speaker 2: multi centered way, streamed it on the internet, the whole
Speaker 2: lab streamed the instant you got your Eureka moment. Everyone
Speaker 2: who's an engineer or physicist would have the solution. There'd
Speaker 2: be no patent, there'd be no intellectual property restriction. That's
Speaker 2: what I've been proposing that we do. And honestly, if
Speaker 2: you're actually wanting to spend a fraction, you know, a
Speaker 2: millionth of a percent of what they're going to spend
Speaker 2: on this game, you'd get to this solution probably in
Speaker 2: a couple of years.
Speaker 1: A question for you, what do you think about Terrence Howard?
Speaker 1: Did you watch the podcast with him and Joe Rogan?
Speaker 2: I did not.
Speaker 1: You did not, so you don't see what things he
Speaker 1: was talking about.
Speaker 2: No, I didn't.
Speaker 1: There's a very viral interview. Are you familiar with Billy Carson? Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know him. What are your thoughts on Billy Carson?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think he's doing some good work. He's here locally,
Speaker 2: and you know, I last year I got the Disclosure
Speaker 2: for Humanity Award from his organization.
Speaker 1: Right, we had him on two days ago. I thought
Speaker 1: he was very interesting listen to him, very interesting. Would
Speaker 1: you guys, would you say you guys are very similar
Speaker 1: on some of the ideas and beliefs or what do
Speaker 1: you Well, I.
Speaker 2: Don't know, Okay, I didn't see that interview, and honestly
Speaker 2: it sounds terrible. I don't have time. I don't look
Speaker 2: at other things much, and it's it's in the I
Speaker 2: just am overwhelmed. I mean, you know, you take a
Speaker 2: like unpack a little bit of what I tell you
Speaker 2: we're doing. I'm, you know, with this huge family and
Speaker 2: flying all over the world and working with all these
Speaker 2: COVID things. I'm not sitting and looking at these things.
Speaker 2: I wish I could tell you not. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2: I plead my ignorance. And it's not to dismiss anyone.
Speaker 2: It's just like I don't have to I want to
Speaker 2: wrap up on this.
Speaker 1: I think one of the things you said when I
Speaker 1: was watching you know, the Lost Century, right, and at
Speaker 1: the end you said you wanted to build a facility
Speaker 1: that's going to be open source twenty four to seven,
Speaker 1: you're working on stuff and there's cameras for other people
Speaker 1: to see on whatever you're building. Right, This whole concept
Speaker 1: of open source, right, probably became more mainstream when Elon
Speaker 1: started talking about all.
Speaker 2: Our stuff is open source.
Speaker 1: Open open sources is a phrase that's been on for
Speaker 1: a long time, but he just kind of took it
Speaker 1: to all different level with you know, a few hundred
Speaker 1: million followers and like, oh, what is open source? Let
Speaker 1: me look into this to walk me through why you know,
Speaker 1: your idea of open source and how that would protect
Speaker 1: both everyone.
Speaker 2: Why that's a good idea? You know?
Speaker 1: Is it going to get others to look and see, well,
Speaker 1: what what if we can do it better? And what
Speaker 1: if we can do it better? What are your thoughts
Speaker 1: on that?
Speaker 2: Well, see, that's the beauty of like crowd sourcing information.
Speaker 2: So let's say you're working on a system and you
Speaker 2: get stuck because you're having a problem rectifying the electromagnetic
Speaker 2: frequency or whatever. If it's open source and it's streamed,
Speaker 2: you have scientists hell over the world. There would be
Speaker 2: a specialist in there that could pipe in and say, well,
Speaker 2: try this right, so you collapse timeframes. Secondly, and this
Speaker 2: is more important if you do it secretively. The minute
Speaker 2: you get that eureka moment, the door is going to
Speaker 2: get kicked in, the device is going to get confiscated,
Speaker 2: and you're going to get a national security order on it,
Speaker 2: or you may get killed. Whereas if it's being streamed
Speaker 2: and the old saying the whole world's watching, that can't happen.
Speaker 2: And the other is that it can't be black shelld
Speaker 2: if a corporation does it. I know people who become
Speaker 2: very wealthy by having an invention like that and they say, well, hey,
Speaker 2: you know what's your price. There's fifty million dollars. Go
Speaker 2: buy a Lamborghini and you know they've sold the and
Speaker 2: they sold, and that corporation puts an all black shelf
Speaker 2: right and never seen or the patent office.
Speaker 1: In our archive, you'll see an MHL that I shilled
Speaker 1: by one of the guys for twenty five million dollars.
Speaker 1: If I'm not mistake. Oh absolutely yes. It happens all
Speaker 1: the time.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, since nineteen ninety one, I've been
Speaker 2: dealing with inventors that keep having that happen. The other
Speaker 2: is that if you go to the patent route, there
Speaker 2: is a provision in the patent laws related to this
Speaker 2: secrecy act you talked about. And if you look at
Speaker 2: the interview we had with doctor Paul Vallone, who is
Speaker 2: a physicist who was in the patent office, he blew
Speaker 2: the whistle that they were doing this and that we
Speaker 2: have that we have that interview with him. He ended
Speaker 2: up suing the Patent office because he was terminated and
Speaker 2: fired and and and won a settlement. So he won't
Speaker 2: talk about it now.
Speaker 1: I shaid Volone, how do he spelled va l l
Speaker 1: O N E?
Speaker 2: Got a doctor Paul, he's a PhD. Physicist, So yeah,
Speaker 2: we have all that information. So what I've tried to
Speaker 2: do is say, over the last hundred years, how has
Speaker 2: this gone sideways when people have got these discoveries And
Speaker 2: so the idea of doing this on live on the internet, streamed,
Speaker 2: backed up, multi centered, but also where there's no intellectual
Speaker 2: property or patent attached to it, it's you.
Speaker 1: You.
Speaker 2: Basically you're squeezing the toothpaste out of the tube so
Speaker 2: fast no one can put it back in. And that
Speaker 2: I don't think would be so easily for straight to say,
Speaker 2: someone doing a stand up you know, a startup company
Speaker 2: and they're doing it secretively, and it's like the next iPhone,
Speaker 2: We're going to keep it under wraps.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: That's how you end up dead or getting confiscated. And
Speaker 2: one of the things that I've found is people don't
Speaker 2: learn from history. But if you study this history of
Speaker 2: these sort of incredible technologies and inventions, you'll see a
Speaker 2: certain number of patterns. And one of them is this
Speaker 2: that people who try to do it, even with the
Speaker 2: best intentions, but are trying to you know, monetize it
Speaker 2: at the front end and keep it a secret or
Speaker 2: a patent or a special sauce. It never gets out
Speaker 2: to the public and they never end up getting anything
Speaker 2: for it unless they take a bribe.
Speaker 1: Who was the guy you spoke to the fellow where
Speaker 1: you said, look, I'm telling you make it open source,
Speaker 1: leak it to everybody. No, no, no, I'm not going
Speaker 1: to do it. I'm pretending then boom, he was killed.
Speaker 1: Who was a guy you talked about somebody on The
Speaker 1: Lost Century?
Speaker 2: Well, I'm not sure in that film, several people I've
Speaker 2: had that happen and yeah, it's a tragedy. Was it
Speaker 2: Thomas Mulray or no? Not?
Speaker 1: Murray was one of the ones you had a conversation
Speaker 1: with to look at the Yeah. There.
Speaker 2: You know, I've dealt with hundreds of these inventors over
Speaker 2: the years.
Speaker 1: Who don't want to give it up, who don't want
Speaker 1: to make they make.
Speaker 2: The same mistake over and over and over and over. Well,
Speaker 2: actually one of the groups was you know, the guys
Speaker 2: who bought all the stan Meyer. You know, he had
Speaker 2: a car that was running on uh water and that
Speaker 2: was real back in the nineties, I believe. But he
Speaker 2: also everyone didn't know he had a toroidal, a donut
Speaker 2: shaped electromagnetic device yep. And you'll see a picture of
Speaker 2: this thing because we were going to try to get
Speaker 2: that collection because he had died. Everyone thinks he was poisoned.
Speaker 2: We don't know, but he dropped it suddenly. And but
Speaker 2: there was a group that had a lot of funding
Speaker 2: from an all shore source who I know now, but
Speaker 2: we didn't know who they were, and they got all
Speaker 2: that material and they were studying it basically reverse engineering
Speaker 2: stan Meyer's inventions, including this electromagnetic It was like a
Speaker 2: doughnut shaped object that was free energy and it had
Speaker 2: a National security order on it from way back then,
Speaker 2: I think, from the eighties, and when they got it operational,
Speaker 2: they were sabotaged. They were a death threats. So I
Speaker 2: got a call from their big funder lord, so and
Speaker 2: so I'm not going to say it on the air
Speaker 2: because Peptist Confidential, who was providing all the money. And
Speaker 2: I said, well, I told them, if you do this secretly,
Speaker 2: when you hit that eureka moment it works, you're going
Speaker 2: to run into the mother vau buzzsaws. And they did.
Speaker 2: And so he says, well, what should I do? I said,
Speaker 2: you need to have them open source this dumping on
Speaker 2: the internet immediately into me and I'll see that it
Speaker 2: gets to millions of people. They wouldn't do it. They
Speaker 2: still thought they could keep it secret. They were going
Speaker 2: to go to another country. I said, dude, you're gonna
Speaker 2: have to go to another damn planet right to protect yourself.
Speaker 2: So the next thing I heard, I think it was
Speaker 2: more than a dozen of them were killed and all
Speaker 2: that everything vanished. And that wasn't that long ago. That
Speaker 2: was just a few years ago. And you know, I've
Speaker 2: seen this happen too often. So everyone who gets dollar
Speaker 2: signs in their eyes, I'm going to be the next
Speaker 2: Rockefeller of energy. Yeah, well, here's what's going to happen.
Speaker 2: Before that occurs. The Murder Incorporated is going to kick
Speaker 2: your door in and kick your ass or you know,
Speaker 2: they'll offer to buy you out, but you're not going
Speaker 2: to benefit humanity or the Earth. I think it's sort
Speaker 2: of like when the DARPA, the Defensive Vance Research Project Administration,
Speaker 2: started the Internet. It was them, not al Gore, and
Speaker 2: al Gore claimed he invent know but the truth is
Speaker 2: DARPA it it's open source, and it's spun off thousands
Speaker 2: of companies, including some that are trillion dollar companies. I
Speaker 2: think that if a group did this as Angel funders,
Speaker 2: they would be able to get it out there and
Speaker 2: it would spawn a whole new economy. Imagine what could
Speaker 2: happen in Africa and South America and Indian poverished areas.
Speaker 2: You would have such a huge uplift in humanity and
Speaker 2: the economy. Now, as that goes up, there are going
Speaker 2: to be some people who will go the other way.
Speaker 2: Just like royal typewriters didn't adapt to the Internet age
Speaker 2: and computers, and so they went the way of all flesh.
Speaker 2: If you made horse carriages and you didn't adapt to
Speaker 2: the automobile, you went bankrupt, So you know, at a
Speaker 2: certain point, that's just the way technology has to evolve.
Speaker 2: So the secrecy around all this it's time for and
Speaker 2: that's how it's going to happen.
Speaker 1: It isn't going to have open source model, so you
Speaker 1: have to you have to be willing to do it
Speaker 1: for civilization and your kids and family and others instead
Speaker 1: of your pocketbook.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but on the second order, now, let's remember, if
Speaker 2: you did it open source, it doesn't mean you can't
Speaker 2: then productize it, create products. Secondarily. Now there'll be a
Speaker 2: lot of people doing that, but it's like the first
Speaker 2: Xerox machine was still the first xerx machine, even if
Speaker 2: it eventually got copied and imitated. And let's not forget
Speaker 2: in this climate globally, I don't care if you patent
Speaker 2: it or keep it secret. The first thing is going
Speaker 2: to happen is in China and other countries, they're going
Speaker 2: to study it, reverse engineer. I'm out with generation too,
Speaker 2: and they're not going to care about your patent or
Speaker 2: your intellectual product.
Speaker 1: Even in America that we just saw, even in an
Speaker 1: FTC noncompete laws, they just change right now, that's getting
Speaker 1: effect in August that they're doing that.
Speaker 2: That's just a given. Yeah, So I tell people about this,
Speaker 2: you need to be smart about it because if you
Speaker 2: don't learn from history, you're going to repeat it and
Speaker 2: repeat it and repeat it. And that's, as I say,
Speaker 2: you know, the definition of insanity doing the same thing
Speaker 2: over and over expecting a different result. So I think
Speaker 2: this is a fresh approach. It's controversial because most people
Speaker 2: I've met of high net worth they want to keep
Speaker 2: it secret. They want to monetize it. You know, it's like, dude,
Speaker 2: you've already got a billion, do you care? I mean,
Speaker 2: you know at a certain point. I mean, I'm a
Speaker 2: retired doctor. I'm comfortable, but you know, I can't fund
Speaker 2: something like that. But I'm always astonished at how myopic
Speaker 2: a lot of folks are about this.
Speaker 1: Have you ever had a meeting with elam muscor now,
Speaker 1: you guys, have ever had a conversation?
Speaker 2: No? I haven't. Yeah, I don't know him personally. Interesting.
Speaker 1: I have a friend who who does. But you've never
Speaker 1: been on Tucker. You guys have never had any conversation. No.
Speaker 2: I think he reached it just hasn't happened. I would
Speaker 2: love to. Yeah, you know, yeah, we hook us up.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think he's he's been on the right
Speaker 2: path on some things on this issue, and then I
Speaker 2: I think he got gas lit and diverted. I mean,
Speaker 2: I'm being honest with you.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think he's He's His level of curiosity and
Speaker 1: willingness to seek the truth and challenge the statistical and
Speaker 1: have the I don't give a you know attitude is
Speaker 1: going to both get him in trouble as.
Speaker 2: Well as get us closer to the truth.
Speaker 1: Yes, and I think that's a very honorable position to
Speaker 1: be in, risky because you risk not being liked and
Speaker 1: hated and you know, defame and defamation all this other
Speaker 1: stuff that comes with it.
Speaker 2: But hey, I've had it. But the other thing is,
Speaker 2: I said this earlier, little knowledge is a dangerous thing
Speaker 2: with this issue because I think out in the public
Speaker 2: there's nine parts disinformation and fake stuff and one may
Speaker 2: be one part real. And so I mean the reason
Speaker 2: that the chief folks for Intelligence Committee have asked me
Speaker 2: to come in is because they know that I actually
Speaker 2: have information. And so I think journalists like mister Carlson
Speaker 2: or others, if they're really going to look into this,
Speaker 2: need to look into it properly and uvail themselves of experts,
Speaker 2: And I always tell people, not me so much as
Speaker 2: what we've collected, but I can articulate that. But I
Speaker 2: just think it's very important for people to understand this
Speaker 2: is not like anything else. If you take, for the
Speaker 2: top secret document from Canada for nineteen fifty one of
Speaker 2: the things that said black and white, this issue is
Speaker 2: the most secret subject in the entire US government, exceeding
Speaker 2: the secrecy of the detonation of the first hydrogen bomb
Speaker 2: when they were working on the hydrogen bomb that was
Speaker 2: nineteen fifty fifty two, we detonated it. Imagine anything more
Speaker 2: secret than the ultimate dooms they weapon and what kind
Speaker 2: of counterintelligence and disinformation has been pushed out to the
Speaker 2: public to gaslight people and divert them. So I think
Speaker 2: people have to take that document seriously and say, well,
Speaker 2: what has been done? Yeah, And that's been my huge
Speaker 2: challenge is to you know, sift the truth from the
Speaker 2: fiction to the best I can.
Speaker 1: Rob, let's put the link below on chat when it
Speaker 1: goes live on Spotify on Apple, can you say the domain?
Speaker 1: So even some of the people that just listened to
Speaker 1: the audio, they know how to go find it if
Speaker 1: you can give the domain.
Speaker 2: If you really, if you want to find it, go
Speaker 2: to doctor Stephen Greer dot com. From there you can
Speaker 2: go do okay fantastic. So that's the easy way to
Speaker 2: go to and also just a little appeal two things.
Speaker 2: Next in July, we're going to have a gathering in
Speaker 2: California and Temecula that if people want a weapbinar. With that,
Speaker 2: they're going to learn a whole lot more about all this,
Speaker 2: including the CE five contact. There's an app for CE
Speaker 2: five contact you can get. We're also crowded funding the
Speaker 2: archive because it's going to cost us six digits a year,
Speaker 2: and the only way we're going to keep it free.
Speaker 2: We don't have a paywall up. We're keeping it free.
Speaker 2: But the only way to keep it free is that
Speaker 2: people contribute. So we're asking for people or.
Speaker 1: Did they do on your website or on okay? It
Speaker 1: says donate right there at the top. I see it fantastic.
Speaker 1: Last time we did it was four years ago. I'm
Speaker 1: hoping the next time we do it it's not four
Speaker 1: years from now. Yeah, it's a really I really enjoyed it.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you, appreciate your work. I'd never heard about
Speaker 1: Enveissioned Secrecy Act until I watch your documentary, and I'm
Speaker 1: so curious about it.
Speaker 2: I want to know what's behind it.
Speaker 1: There's a high level of curiosity, and I highly recommend everybody,
Speaker 1: if you don't go to his website, go watch the
Speaker 1: documentary The Last Century and you'll see what it's going
Speaker 1: to do to you when you start thinking about some
Speaker 1: of these clips. This is a podcast. This documentary actually
Speaker 1: shows these people that had the inventions and what happened
Speaker 1: to their lives. I think it's very, very important for
Speaker 1: everybody around the world to watch this. Doctor Stephen Greer,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for coming out. This was fantastic, Shadeed.
Speaker 2: I appreciate you. Take care everybody, Bye bright Okay,
Podbean