UFOS & Nukes- Pattern Or Perception? " (TDP-Anomacon) Ft. Eric Burlison, Robert Salas- Dave Schindele, Nancy Mace
In this video, Ty discusses the link between UFOs and nuclear weapons and asks the hard questions:
-Why do UFOs appear near nuclear facilities so often?
-Are declassified military reports and whistleblower testimonies revealing a hidden truth?
-Are we falling victim to pattern recognition and psychological bias?
👽 What You’ll Discover in This Video:
✔️ The history of UFOs near nuclear missile silos and testing grounds
✔️ Newly declassified government documents & whistleblower accounts
✔️ Skeptical perspectives — coincidence, Cold War paranoia, and human psychology
✔️ The broader implications for national security and humanity’s future
Do YOU think UFOs are intentionally monitoring our nuclear arsenal, or is this just human imagination? Drop your thoughts in the comments — let’s get the conversation going.
🔥 Support the Channel & Get Exclusive Content:
👉 Subscribe for more UFOs, Cover-Ups & Conspiracy breakdowns
👉 Become a member for early access, ad-free episodes & merch discounts
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
Support TDP directly: https://www.paypal.me/TDPstudios767?locale.x=en_US
Be A Member On The Audio Feed (Limited Perks: Early Access/Ad Free Content) https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-ufos-coverups-conspiracy--5975113/support
YOUTUBE MEMBER; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
PATREON MEMBER; https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure?fan_landing=true&view_as=public
CONTACT TDP DIRECTLY For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by “TDP” —[email protected]
Special Thank you to all of our PODCAST/YouTube Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to seeking the truth, together. We can’t do this WITHOUT YOU!
-COPYRIGHT-2020-
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Total Disclosure Podcast Copyright 2020 and … segments, early access to interviews, and a yearly gift autographed by yours truly!thank you in advance now, Let's explore the unknown together!
Speaker 1: Hello, anamic On. My name is Ty Roberts. I host
Speaker 1: a podcast and show called Total Disclosure, which is produced
Speaker 1: by TDP Studios in Boston, Massachusetts, where I am right now.
Speaker 1: My presentation is something that is very close to home
Speaker 1: for me, as the UFOs and nuke connection is something
Speaker 1: that I've been working tirelessly with not just Congress, but
Speaker 1: also the nuclear witnesses in an attempt to get them
Speaker 1: on to.
Speaker 2: A public hearing.
Speaker 1: In order to be able better tell the world what
Speaker 1: happened to them and what they experienced. It's been a
Speaker 1: harrowing journey. We've made so many leaps, so many bounds,
Speaker 1: and I am so grateful for, you know, everything that
Speaker 1: I have been able to do for.
Speaker 2: These for these witnesses.
Speaker 1: So I wanted to start off with a couple of
Speaker 1: things before I get into the formal presentation.
Speaker 2: I don't usually do types of.
Speaker 1: Things like this and more of a podcast there a journalist,
Speaker 1: but I am. I just did the Exeter UFO Festival
Speaker 1: contact in the desert, so you know, I'm getting more
Speaker 1: into the rhythm of doing these things in front of people,
Speaker 1: and it's just been such an amazing ride. I am
Speaker 1: really really hoping that you guys get something out of
Speaker 1: this because you know, the phenomena being as complex as
Speaker 1: it is. Uh, we owe it to uh these men,
Speaker 1: We owe it to these men and women who served
Speaker 1: our country at the highest levels. You know, to be
Speaker 1: involved in our nuclear program. You can't just be any
Speaker 1: you know, run of the mill officer. You have to
Speaker 1: be vetted to a very high degree. So, so I
Speaker 1: wanted to start off with a couple things. So this
Speaker 1: is actually from contact in the desert when I weighs.
Speaker 1: I interviewed Bob Salas and Dave Shindelli together. Uh so
Speaker 1: I want to give you a quick look at that
Speaker 1: here we go.
Speaker 3: You know, started up again at a certain particular point
Speaker 3: in the manual. This is his description of his activity,
Speaker 3: all right, And he says, all of a sudden, the
Speaker 3: missile shuts down for no reason, goes down. Okay, So
Speaker 3: he starts over it is checklist, right, gets to that
Speaker 3: same point, that same point in his checklist, and the
Speaker 3: missile goes down again. And he said, during this period
Speaker 3: he felt like there was a beam of static electricity.
Speaker 3: He could feel it coming down the tube. You know
Speaker 3: where he was from. Apparently the hair standard apparently from
Speaker 3: this object.
Speaker 2: Wild.
Speaker 1: So this was during this was I was interviewing Bob
Speaker 1: Sallas and Dave Shindily from my not Air Force Base
Speaker 1: in Malmstrom Air Force Base. And right now, as you
Speaker 1: can see, it was the my name was impeccable on
Speaker 1: this one. As Bob points up referencing the story, I
Speaker 1: followed his finger up and I look up. The minute
Speaker 1: I looked up, the siren starts to wail and we
Speaker 1: have to exit the building. It's a huge thing. It
Speaker 1: was really really a weird moment. But let's continue.
Speaker 3: It. So we.
Speaker 4: Exit and walked down.
Speaker 2: Bob's like, let's get out of here.
Speaker 4: Attention, Sorry, we just had a future tiler. We just
Speaker 4: had that fire alarm.
Speaker 1: So as obvious yourself, wait, keep that part where I
Speaker 1: look in because that was kind of funny. So again,
Speaker 1: I it just it really it goes by the way
Speaker 1: telepathy tapes demonstration was also happening at that moment, so
Speaker 1: it was just it was a very mirror of the
Speaker 1: experience that you know, Bob It had in nineteen sixty
Speaker 1: seven in that the Malmstrom case. I I've been able
Speaker 1: to facilitate two briefings now with Bob Sallas and I
Speaker 1: want to show you a clip from the first one. Again,
Speaker 1: I want to show these things before I start the presentation.
Speaker 5: And they also exonrated me if that's sort of work
Speaker 5: from my EDDA, which I had, so really yes, They
Speaker 5: told me, I don't worry, don't worry about your NBA,
Speaker 5: just tell us what you know. And I got a
Speaker 5: letter from stating that my story that I gave him
Speaker 5: is now an official record, historical record in the era archives.
Speaker 5: So I don't know if you can get access.
Speaker 1: To that, but it's was it in the report at
Speaker 1: all that they put together this year, So it's a
Speaker 1: big thing that they left out the left, Okay, So
Speaker 1: it's truly just that reported me totally discounted.
Speaker 3: It's correct.
Speaker 5: Yes, yeah. In fact, my last question to them after
Speaker 5: I gave my presentation is are you going to check
Speaker 5: with the Air Force to verify any part of my story?
Speaker 5: And they said no because they had tried to verify
Speaker 5: a previous account that was Robert Jacobs.
Speaker 3: I don't know if you're familiar with that story.
Speaker 5: He was stationed Vandenberg Air Force Base with a very
Speaker 5: advanced camera video camera, and he shot a video of
Speaker 5: a test flight of a W warhead was on an
Speaker 5: Atlas missile on the Pacific Test range. And so the
Speaker 5: W warhead leaves the final stage and is flying towards
Speaker 5: its so called target and test area, and the UFO
Speaker 5: comes over and fires laser really at this W warhead.
Speaker 5: In fact, it flew circle around.
Speaker 2: This so I will stop that there.
Speaker 1: So that was a briefing that I facilitated after the
Speaker 1: November twenty twenty four hearing.
Speaker 2: That I was at.
Speaker 1: And then I just want to quickly show this one.
Speaker 1: This is the latest one because again working behind the
Speaker 1: scenes with Congress, with members of Congress, I you know,
Speaker 1: first with Mace who chaired that November hearing, now Burleson.
Speaker 1: After the September ninth hearing, I set up a briefing
Speaker 1: for Bob with Eric Burleson. Congressman, I want to show
Speaker 1: you a little bit of that.
Speaker 2: Part two.
Speaker 3: Congressman, thank you so much for sitting down with me
Speaker 3: and allowing me to tell my story, which has been
Speaker 3: a dream of mine for a long time to just
Speaker 3: speak to Congress about it. So thank you for your
Speaker 3: courage and your love for this country. Absolutely. On March
Speaker 3: twenty fourth, nineteen sixty seven, I was part of a
Speaker 3: two man crew assigned to what we called OSCAR Flight.
Speaker 3: It was near roy, Montana, about one hundred miles to
Speaker 3: the east of Great Falls, Montana. And what we would
Speaker 3: do on these tour of duties to twenty four hour
Speaker 3: period tour of duty, we would go out and monitor
Speaker 3: our missile systems, which we had at that time ten
Speaker 3: minute man one ICBMs, all targeted ready to go if
Speaker 3: given the order, of course by the president, and to
Speaker 3: make sure that they were in an operational mode and
Speaker 3: ready to go. We had six security people upstairs, security guards,
Speaker 3: and we were underground. So I wanted to show you
Speaker 3: a couple of diagrams just so we'll get the right reference.
Speaker 3: So this is a cutaway, okay cutaway of the what
Speaker 3: we call launch control facility. And you see that capsule underground. Yes,
Speaker 3: that's where we were located as a crew, and that
Speaker 3: we had all the equipment down there that was needed.
Speaker 3: So the buildings on top just looked like simple buildings.
Speaker 3: They were just for the security people we had upstairs,
Speaker 3: so there were rooms, you know, bedrooms for them and
Speaker 3: their facilities. But we as a crew, a launch crew,
Speaker 3: were located sixty feet underground.
Speaker 1: So okay, it is safe to say that I have
Speaker 1: a vested interest in the nuclear connection, and that's what
Speaker 1: I want to talk about today. I've done a lot
Speaker 1: to try to facilitate, you know, meetings with nuclear witnesses
Speaker 1: and members of Congress. I've achieved a lot of those goals,
Speaker 1: but we need more help, more pressure from the people
Speaker 1: and and writing to your members of Congress demanding that
Speaker 1: you know, these these witnesses uh get to speak at
Speaker 1: an open hearing. So that is the point of of
Speaker 1: what I am doing, and it try to further that cause,
Speaker 1: because again, these these men and and and these women
Speaker 1: there are of the the you know, they're they're of
Speaker 1: the highest UH sanctity and the highest of clearance levels,
Speaker 1: and you know, for them to not be taken seriously,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's a shame, it really is.
Speaker 2: It's a it's a shame.
Speaker 1: So to begin here, Seventy nine years ago, on July sixteenth,
Speaker 1: nineteen forty five, a silent desert outside Alamagordo, New Mexico,
Speaker 1: erupted but the first human made nuclear explosion, the Trinity Test.
Speaker 1: In that blinding flash, humanity announced itself as a species
Speaker 1: capable of planetary scale destruction. And if any intelligence human
Speaker 1: or otherwise was monitoring Earth, Trinity would have been a
Speaker 1: beacon brighter than anything we had ever sent skyward. In
Speaker 1: the years immediately following Trinity, strange aerial phenomena began clustering
Speaker 1: around the very places where nuclear secrets were guarded. From
Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight to nineteen fifty one, brilliant zan fireballs
Speaker 1: repeatedly streaked over Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories. The
Speaker 1: US Air Force launched Project Twinkle to investigate, and physicists
Speaker 1: Lincoln Lpez suspected these objects were artificial. Even skeptics admitted
Speaker 1: the concentration over top secret atomic labs was alarming. Through
Speaker 1: the nineteen fifties and the early nineteen sixties, sightings continued
Speaker 1: near and around nuclear test ranges and weapons storage areas.
Speaker 1: Some of the most dramatic incidents were yet to come.
Speaker 1: In September nineteen sixty six, launch control officer Dave Shindily
Speaker 1: at Minot Air Force Base experienced an event he stayed
Speaker 1: silent about for years. A glowing object reportedly hovered near
Speaker 1: his missile silo. Then his nuclear missiles became disabled. Six
Speaker 1: months later, on March sixteenth, nineteen sixty seven at Malmstrom
Speaker 1: Air Force Base, ten minute man missiles in echo flight
Speaker 1: suddenly went on offline within seconds. Launch officer Bob Sallas
Speaker 1: recalls a frantic call from security a glowing disc covering
Speaker 1: over the front gate. Moments later, every missile under his
Speaker 1: watch was rendered inoperable. The Air Force blamed an internal
Speaker 1: power fault, yet no one has been able to fully
Speaker 1: explain how multiple independent systems failed simultaneously. In October nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty eight, another major incident, the mine Not B fifty
Speaker 1: two radar case, A B fifty two crew, ground radar,
Speaker 1: airborne radar, and ground observers all tracked an unknown object
Speaker 1: near mineo's nuclear complex. The documentation remains amongst the most
Speaker 1: detailed multi sensus multisensor cases in history, and it has
Speaker 1: never been resolved.
Speaker 2: In the early.
Speaker 1: Nineteen seventies, Mario Woods, a security policeman at Ellsworth Air
Speaker 1: Force Base, described a bright object hovering over the missilefield,
Speaker 1: code named November five. Ordered to intercept, Woods and his
Speaker 1: teammate could not approach. The object moved silently, and it vanished.
Speaker 1: By nineteen seventy five, Strategic Air Command bases across the
Speaker 1: US and Canada, Loring Wertsmith Malmstrom Mine. Not all reported
Speaker 1: repeated intrusions by unknown lights or helicopters directly over weapons
Speaker 1: storage areas. No Red and National Military Command Center logs
Speaker 1: show scrambles and alerts, Yet no intruder was ever identified
Speaker 1: beyond US borders. After the Soviet Union collapse, journalist George
Speaker 1: Knapp learned of a nineteen eighty two incident in present
Speaker 1: day Ukraine. Witnesses reported a disk hovering above missile silos.
Speaker 1: Sound familiar, it should. Control panels allegedly showed sporadic launch readiness,
Speaker 1: as if someone momentarily seized control and flipped the weapons
Speaker 1: not off, but this time on. The missiles did not fire,
Speaker 1: but for fifteen terrifying seconds, the possibility of an unintended
Speaker 1: nuclear launch and subsequent nuclear World War three became so real,
Speaker 1: all too real. Could imagine being in that room, I,
Speaker 1: you know, just waiting for the world to essentially end,
Speaker 1: and there's nothing you can do about it. The pattern
Speaker 1: didn't stop with the Cold War. On October twenty third,
Speaker 1: twenty ten, fe Warren Air Force Base temporarily lost command
Speaker 1: and control of fifty minute Man three missiles. Let me
Speaker 1: say that again fifty minute man missiles. The Air Force
Speaker 1: blamed a hardware fault, yet multiple witnesses reported a UFO overhead. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: between twenty fourteen and twenty fifteen, dozens of coordinated drone
Speaker 1: overflights targeted French nuclear power plants, again prompting this to
Speaker 1: not be just a local United States issue, but a
Speaker 1: global targeted strategy. Operators were never caught, showing that unidentified
Speaker 1: incursions over nuclear sites remain a present day security risk.
Speaker 1: Statistical studies add weight, a peer reviewed analysis of France's
Speaker 1: national UAP database found sightings disproportionately clustered near nuclear sites,
Speaker 1: even after correcting for population density and geography. And again,
Speaker 1: you know, even if there's a sensor bias, yeah, we
Speaker 1: do have more sensors you know, near our nuclear facilities,
Speaker 1: it doesn't really matter because at our most sensitive facilities,
Speaker 1: at our most dangerous facilities, something happening and we cannot
Speaker 1: ignore that or chalk it up to censor bias. Air
Speaker 1: Force officer Bob Jacobs filmed a dummy nuclear warhead test,
Speaker 1: and according to Jacob's the footage showed a disc shaped
Speaker 1: object maneuvering around the dummy warhead coming into the screen,
Speaker 1: firing a beam of light that appeared to disable the
Speaker 1: warhead before causing it to tumble out of the sky,
Speaker 1: and the craft zipped away the way it came in.
Speaker 1: Taken together, these incidents suggest a consistent theme. Whether humanity's
Speaker 1: nuclear capabilities are concentrated, unidentified objects sometimes appear behaving as
Speaker 1: if to observe or interfere Skeptics argue this reflects that
Speaker 1: that sensor bias, we watched nuclear sites most closely, so
Speaker 1: that's where anomalies tend to be noticed. The Pentagon Arrow
Speaker 1: has acknowledged as possibility, and as of its twenty twenty
Speaker 1: four report found no verified evidence of extraterrestrial craft note
Speaker 1: the word extra terrestrial. But even collection bias cannot easily
Speaker 1: explain multi sensor cases like mine not sixty eight or
Speaker 1: simultaneous missile shutdowns like Malmstrom sixty seven. The national security
Speaker 1: implications are enormous. Even if every case we're foreign drones
Speaker 1: electronic warfare tests, it would mean adversaries have penetrated the
Speaker 1: heart of nuclear deterrent from the NATO countries and maybe
Speaker 1: even the Bricks countries. So again, even if a fraction
Speaker 1: represents something beyond our known technolog the stakes rise drastically
Speaker 1: and exponentially from national security to planetary security. Now imagine disclosure,
Speaker 1: a confirmation of a non human intelligence arriving in the
Speaker 1: middle of a nuclear crisis, a radar anomaly over missile fields,
Speaker 1: a sudden missile glitch. Social media erupts with videos of
Speaker 1: strange lights. Leaders fearing sabotage, they go on high alert.
Speaker 1: Then comes the announcement these objects are not ours. That
Speaker 1: is ontological shock. Under maximum stress, civilians would face the
Speaker 1: twin terrors of nuclear war and at the same time
Speaker 1: proof that we are not alone and we never have been.
Speaker 1: Political systems could fracture under that panic.
Speaker 2: Adversaries might miscalculate.
Speaker 1: We might miscalculate interpreting unknowns as attacks. Even if extraterrestrial
Speaker 1: visitors meant no harm, the timing trigger catastrophe.
Speaker 6: This is why we must act. We must take the
Speaker 6: testimony of the men like Sallas, like Shindily, like woods,
Speaker 6: like Jacobs, and others very seriously. These were trained, cleared professionals,
Speaker 6: trusted with the world's most dangerous weapons. They reported what
Speaker 6: they saw because they believed it mattered. Seventy nine years
Speaker 6: after Trinity, nuclear weapons remain vanity's brightest and most dangerous beacons.
Speaker 6: Whether the intruders are foreign drones, black projects, or something
Speaker 6: beyond our understanding the pattern, it's undeniable. We need open data,
Speaker 6: rigorous investigation, and somber analysis before an unidentified object over
Speaker 6: a missile silo becomes the match that lights the nuclear fuse.
Speaker 6: Because if disclosure ever comes in the heart of a
Speaker 6: nuclear standoff, it will not feel like the word wonder
Speaker 6: or triumph. It will feel like the world cracking open again.
Speaker 2: My name's Ty.
Speaker 1: I host the podcast and show Total Disclosure. I really
Speaker 1: hope that you can take something out of this. The
Speaker 1: nuclear connection is something that I mean, it's so clear
Speaker 1: and present in a phenomena that not many conclusions can
Speaker 1: be drawn from. We tend to see the same things
Speaker 1: happening over and over. Not to mention the craft that
Speaker 1: are being described by Sallus, by Shindily, by Mario Woods,
Speaker 1: by Bob Jacobs, by Bob Jamison, so many people, Jeffrey Nuctelli,
Speaker 1: They're all describing these orange orb craft that are gaseous,
Speaker 1: don't have super form, you know, they look like like
Speaker 1: a gaseous material, like you know, consistently floating like no
Speaker 1: solidarity to it in the Mario Woods case. You know,
Speaker 1: as they approached the missile site code named November five,
Speaker 1: the atmosphere in the car that they were approaching in
Speaker 1: became so thick that Mario and his his teammate Michael,
Speaker 1: they were not able to breathe, and subsequently they passed
Speaker 1: out after waking up, you know, some hour hour or
Speaker 1: two after the event, where that caused them to go
Speaker 1: to sleep, if you will, you and Mario tried to
Speaker 1: climb out of the car, but he was just too weak,
Speaker 1: and the atmosphere was so thick all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: and it seemed like it was purposefully done. They woke
Speaker 1: up and Michael was in a catatonic state, right, and Mario.
Speaker 2: Gains you know, gains semblance.
Speaker 1: Of of cognition and realizes that they are miles from
Speaker 1: where they were when the event took place, when they
Speaker 1: were approaching the missile silo. They woke up and their
Speaker 1: car had been transported, their truck had been transported over
Speaker 1: a mile away from the nuclear missile silo, and they
Speaker 1: were facing the opposite way towards you know this this
Speaker 1: cliff or canyon, and and you know Mario's story is
Speaker 1: unique in the sense that he was hypnotically regressed and
Speaker 1: uh subsequently remembered uh being.
Speaker 2: Brought aboard the ship.
Speaker 1: So I just want to say this, You know, there
Speaker 1: is so much more going on that meets the eye.
Speaker 1: And maybe the world isn't ready for that, that the
Speaker 1: the abduction stuff, and maybe that Congress isn't ready for that,
Speaker 1: but there's a very clear and apparent uh you know, uh,
Speaker 1: there there's a very clear pattern to these types of things,
Speaker 1: and these these events happening near our most stritigue, our
Speaker 1: most secure facilities, and generally the craft that are being
Speaker 1: seen are all, you know, resembling each other. So you know,
Speaker 1: this is something that I think the world needs to
Speaker 1: pay attention to.
Speaker 2: It really really does.
Speaker 1: Because we have the vantage point of someone who is
Speaker 1: in the capsule, you know, sixty feet underground with Bob Salas.
Speaker 1: We have the vantage point of a top side guard
Speaker 1: in Dave Shindily, we have a military policeman's perspective about
Speaker 1: responding to a missile silo that had one of these
Speaker 1: crafts over it with Mario Woods. And then we have
Speaker 1: Bob Jacob's testimony filming a dummy warhead being launched so
Speaker 1: you know, we we have a lot of ground and
Speaker 1: a lot of perspectives from the nuclear program covered, and
Speaker 1: we have people from all of these walks saying, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: something weird is going on, and we owe it to
Speaker 1: the public, to national security, to global security to take
Speaker 1: a take a look, investigate with serious rigor and serious,
Speaker 1: serious tone. The stigma of the aliens, you know, needs
Speaker 1: to go away. And again that word extraterrestrial. When AERO
Speaker 1: says they have no evidence of extraterrestrial beings, well there's
Speaker 1: a reason we call them UFOs. You know, no one,
Speaker 1: no one should be saying that a UFO equals alien.
Speaker 1: The U stands are unidentified. So you know, just because
Speaker 1: they're saying that they haven't found evidence of extra terrestrial craft,
Speaker 1: I mean that could be a very carefully chosen statement,
Speaker 1: you know, not per se lying, but omitting the general
Speaker 1: fact that these things we don't know where they're coming from.
Speaker 1: Maybe their ultra ress trial. Maybe they you know, evolved
Speaker 1: alongside us or before us. And you know, this world
Speaker 1: isn't ours like we think it is. Maybe they're inter dimensional.
Speaker 1: You know, there are so many, so many possibilities that
Speaker 1: limiting it to one I mean, it's a it's a
Speaker 1: very clear tactic by the Department of Defense. They don't
Speaker 1: want to look in EPTH. They don't want people knowing that.
Speaker 1: You know, these crafts are basically sending a message. They're
Speaker 1: sending a message to humanity, and they're saying, these might
Speaker 1: be your most powerful weapons, but we can take control
Speaker 1: them at any moment and shut them off or turn
Speaker 1: them on.
Speaker 2: Your move.
Speaker 1: All right, guys, make sure to think Ryan Sprague somewhere
Speaker 1: in the skies in a novoc on twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: I want to say say a special thank you to
Speaker 1: the crew for letting me speel on about nukes and
Speaker 1: UFOs and nukes. It is a wonderful uh. You know,
Speaker 1: it's a wonderful platform to be able to utilize and
Speaker 1: get this presentation out there. Uh, And for people to
Speaker 1: hear the views of you know, a plethora of different
Speaker 1: types of people and different views. This is what we
Speaker 1: need more of. We need more discourse, you know, skeptics, believers.
Speaker 1: It shouldn't matter if you don't necessarily believe right. What
Speaker 1: matters is that we have the conversation and we're humble
Speaker 1: when we're wrong. If we make mistakes, we need to
Speaker 1: be able to say we made that mistake and move
Speaker 1: on from it. Yet this community has a real issue
Speaker 1: with that. They think that if they make a mistake
Speaker 1: with one little aspect of one little story and that
Speaker 1: comes out, then everything they've ever said will will cease
Speaker 1: to be true. And you know, that's not the right
Speaker 1: way to look at this, because we're dealing with something
Speaker 1: that is so far out of the realm of normal
Speaker 1: that we have to be able to be wrong.
Speaker 2: We have to be humble, we really really do.
Speaker 1: And it's going it's not going to if you're defending
Speaker 1: your favorite UFO guru, like it's your fantasy football.
Speaker 2: Team, there's probably an issue. We can't do that.
Speaker 1: It's not going to be one person that that runs
Speaker 1: this across, you know, across the field. It is going
Speaker 1: to take a full team, right, offense, defense, special teams, right, everybody,
Speaker 1: everybody down to the ball boys and you know, towel guy.
Speaker 1: It's gonna take the every every single person to get disclosure.
Speaker 2: And it's gonna take you.
Speaker 1: It's gonna take you getting off X, getting out there
Speaker 1: make a difference. My name's Ty Roberts. I hope you
Speaker 1: check out Total Disclosure. I interview a range of people
Speaker 1: all the way from members of Congress to scientists like
Speaker 1: Alvi Lobe, Riswan.
Speaker 2: Verk I, experiencers, researchers.
Speaker 1: You name it, I've probably had them on And the
Speaker 1: show is everything for me because I did have a
Speaker 1: sighting when I was younger, and I had another experience
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one in the room that my mother
Speaker 1: died in, like at the time of her death, and
Speaker 1: that birthed the show Total Disclosure because at the time
Speaker 1: I was doing a different podcast about movies. I was
Speaker 1: in the Hollywood era, I mean Hollywood area, and I
Speaker 1: worked in movies and film and my mom was.
Speaker 2: Always that guiding light for me.
Speaker 1: And you know, I won't get into the story, but
Speaker 1: you know, I know what I saw, I know what
Speaker 1: I've seen.
Speaker 2: This is real, guys.
Speaker 1: You know, whether we can make jokes right about little
Speaker 1: Green men and probing and all that kind of stuff,
Speaker 1: but at the end of the day, this is real.
Speaker 1: Something's happening, and we can't just put our head in
Speaker 1: the sand and pretend it's not, because that's when a
Speaker 1: chaotic disclosure might occur. And that ontological shock that these
Speaker 1: people feel when they have these sightings imagine the world
Speaker 1: goes through that together. That would be horrendous. That would
Speaker 1: be horrendous. So we need, we need to come together. Guys,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. I will catch you on the
Speaker 1: flip side. I hope you enjoyed this presentation. UFOs and nukes,
Speaker 1: pattern or perception. Thank you again to Ryan Sprague, to
Speaker 1: somewhere in the skies and to anolokon twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: We'll get you on the flip side.
Speaker 7: I think it's just a mutual distress of government, you know.
Speaker 7: I mean, I say all the time, both parties are crooked.
Speaker 7: Is a dog's leg, you know. They just do it
Speaker 7: different ways, different definitions. But I think too that we've
Speaker 7: got to take it past of the point of flying
Speaker 7: saucers and little green men. We've got to take it
Speaker 7: to disclosure, because everybody.
Speaker 3: Agrees we need disclosure.
Speaker 7: People that don't believe in UFOs, don't believe in any
Speaker 7: of this stuff, they still want to know where we're
Speaker 7: spending the tens of millions of dollars. And I think
Speaker 7: that's our most compelling argument that brings everybody. But I
Speaker 7: think in Congress people have heard enough, They've seen enough.
Speaker 7: I've had members come up to me that have said
Speaker 7: that they've seen something in their youth or in the
Speaker 7: military or several years ago, and they are all curious.
Speaker 7: And then when the government says, when you have one
Speaker 7: department say they don't exist, and then you have another
Speaker 7: department says we've got we've got a recovery team, you know, well,
Speaker 7: what are they recovering if they don't exist? And where's
Speaker 7: all the money going to? And then they say, well,
Speaker 7: they don't exist, and then they release a report that's
Speaker 7: so redacted it just looks like somebody shot it with
Speaker 7: a twelve gate shutgun. You know, just so many holes
Speaker 7: in it.
Speaker 1: It's pathetic.
Speaker 7: And that's you know, that's why I mean, what started
Speaker 7: me on all this. I've been I've resetart started reading
Speaker 7: about UFO
Apple Podcasts
Castbox
Castro
Goodpods
Moon FM
Overcast
Pocket Casts
Podbean
Podcast Addict
Podcast Republic
Spotify