29-Palms MASS UFO Sighting INSIDER Secrets Revealed by Former Marine
TRY BIO MIND BY EDENTIA HERBALS, 25% OFF EXCLUSIVELY FOR TDP LISTENERS-PERFORMANCE MUSHROOM SUPPLEMENT MADE WITH ONLY THE FINEST INGREDIENTS, PEER REVIEWED, AND BACKED UP BY SCIENCE, I USE IT EVERY SINGLE DAY, AND IT HAS CHANGED MY LIFE— WWW.EDENTIAHERBALS.COM & DON’T FORGET TO USE CODE TOTAL DISCLOSURE AT CHECKOUT FOR 25%OFF
Subscribe to the channel on YouTube: www.youtube.com/@totaldisclosure
Support TDP directly: https://www.paypal.me/TDPstudios767?locale.x=en_US
Be A Member On The Audio Feed (Limited Perks: Early Access/Ad Free Content) https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/total-disclosure-ufos-coverups-conspiracy--5975113/support
YOUTUBE MEMBER;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCy2Cra7aLAAMVxkA9rSYCxg/join
PATREON MEMBER;
https://www.patreon.com/Total_Disclosure?fan_landing=true&view_as=public
GET YOUR TOTAL DISCLOSURE: UFO/ALIEN INSPIRED MERCH, OR A GIFT FOR YOUR FAMILY MEMBER, FRIEND, OR TREAT YOURSELF! : https://pop-culture-corner-store.creator-spring.com/?
FOLLOW TDP ON RUMBLE, A growing Platform that Rivals Youtube, and Allows for More Free
Speech: Sign Up And tell them TDP sent you, by using our link;
https://rumble.com/register/TotalDisclosure93/
Follow Us On Twitter: Www.Twitter.com/DisclosurePod
Follow Us On Instagram: www.Instagram.com/Total.Disclosure
USE OUR CODE AND SIGN UP FOR TUBE-BUDDY TO START UTILIZING THEIR AMAZING TOOLS, LET TUBE BUDDY DO THE WORK FOR YOU: https://www.tubebuddy.com/POP
Sign Up for VIDIQ and Get Tons of Creator Content Tools, SEO Boosts, Keyword Scores, Title Suggestions, & So much MORE! VIDIQ can be integrated seamlessly into your Browser and Youtube Channel, Start utilizing this tool now, Sign up with TDP’s Link-www.VIDIQ.com/TotalDisclosure
Movie Palette allows you to put your favorite scene on Canvas, a great gift for your movie-buff friend/relative, or just an amazing piece that will bring a room together, it also won't make your partner flinch when bringing guests to the house;)
Get 15% OFF your order of a new "MOVIE PALETTE" By Using CODE: CultureCorner15 At www.MoviePalette.com
LOOKING TO START YOUR OWN PODCAST? LOOKING TO GO LIVE? SIGN UP FOR STREAM YARD TODAY AND USE OUR REFERRAL CODE TO HELP SUPPORT THE SHOW! : https://streamyard.com/pal/6146221734887424
For Collaboration, Use of Segments/clips, or any other media produced by Studios Contact Us [email protected]
LISTEN DIRECTLY TO THE SHOW ON THE “SPREAKER” App, & help support the show DIRECTLY: https://www.spreaker.com/show/total-disclosure-ufos-cover-ups-and-cons
Listen on Apple: https://www.podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pop-culture-corner/id1544297063?uo=4
Listen on SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/0Yq6Iceyh7o24DG8tq4kvO
LISTEN ON AMAZON(AUDIBLE) https://www.amazon.com/Total-Disclosure-UFOs-Conspiracies-Cover-Ups/dp/B08JJSX9GF/ref=sr_1_1?crid=PJDE10465KZE&keywords=total+disclosure+podcast&qid=1704722670&sprefix=total+disclosure+podcast%2Caps%2C77&sr=8-1
Special Thank you to all of our Channel Members for your continued support, and dedication to our brand!
* Copyright Disclaimer:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use"...
Speaker 1: Welcome back to Total Disclosure. Guys. My name's Ti. I
Speaker 1: am the host and creator of the show Tonight. We
Speaker 1: have a special special recording and this will be going
Speaker 1: out in a few different varieties. We recently, I recently
Speaker 1: have been involved in some debate and podcasts having to
Speaker 1: do with the twenty nine Palms UFO sighting of over
Speaker 1: twenty nine palms and with marines. Over fifty witnesses reported
Speaker 1: a massive response to a what seems to be a
Speaker 1: craft much like the Phoenix lights, a formation in five
Speaker 1: light seen in the sky and then Flair's in a
Speaker 1: massive response were in fact put forth and you know
Speaker 1: the the videos, the testimony. We've pretty much at this
Speaker 1: point gone through all of it. What we haven't done
Speaker 1: is talk to someone who was there, like Fate would
Speaker 1: have it, God's I don't know, aliens who knows, but
Speaker 1: aligned correctly for once and we are gonna be able
Speaker 1: to speak to One of the witnesses was the first
Speaker 1: person reported. The story that ended up on weaponis by
Speaker 1: Jeremy Corbel and George Knapp. The case has been obviously
Speaker 1: been broken by them, so the credit has to go
Speaker 1: to them. Absolutely. They broke this case and the d
Speaker 1: o D in Pentagon's response to it was pretty much
Speaker 1: that this was nothing more than a training exercise, that
Speaker 1: it was Flair's and the community literally just said, look, okay, sure,
Speaker 1: I don't know. For me, it was wild looking back
Speaker 1: on it, but I was one of those people. I
Speaker 1: was one of those people. I think so much was
Speaker 1: happening at the time in your apology that that we
Speaker 1: we let our guard down. We started trying to, you know,
Speaker 1: get transparency, pushed work with the government. Hell, I've had
Speaker 1: congressmen on the show. I mean, I get it, but
Speaker 1: I think we forgot something along the way, and that
Speaker 1: is that we are so bless this day. It is
Speaker 1: so nice to be in this community right now because
Speaker 1: there is stuff to talk about almost on a daily basis.
Speaker 1: But that was the problem for this case. So tonight
Speaker 1: where gonna get to the bottom of it, To the
Speaker 1: bottom of what the witnesses saw, why the DoD response
Speaker 1: is inaccurate and maybe a lie, and what integrity does
Speaker 1: witness testimony have in a world where you can convict
Speaker 1: someone for life in prison or even the death penalty
Speaker 1: in some states, why have we let our fundamentals go?
Speaker 1: Would that be subets introduced not witness military Marine Witness
Speaker 1: number one. It is very nice to have you on
Speaker 1: the show.
Speaker 2: Hey, thanks for having me.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you reached out and you said that you'd
Speaker 1: like to clear the air. That's right, and to clear
Speaker 1: up some of the confusion that the community and specifically
Speaker 1: the debate that angle the whole DoD their response to this.
Speaker 1: I think that is where obviously there's a huge division
Speaker 1: right amongst the community at least.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a lot of misconceptions out there and being
Speaker 2: there myself, I see this on the internet everywhere, and
Speaker 2: I just want to clear some things up and hopefully
Speaker 2: answer a couple questions I haven't been answered yet.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So you gave testimony to Jeremy and George as
Speaker 1: part of that weaponized episode. Correct, Yes, Okay, Now can
Speaker 1: you tell me a little bit about you and your
Speaker 1: military job, what your title is and essentially what you
Speaker 1: were doing and why you were at Camp Wilson.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I joined the Marine Corps in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 2: I actually went to twenty nine Palms twice or Camp
Speaker 2: Wilson twice, So the first time was twenty nineteen, and
Speaker 2: I guess you could call it a home base where
Speaker 2: I was stationed. I was stationed on Campbell Rezuo, North Carolina,
Speaker 2: and to go to the twenty nine Palms. Infantry units
Speaker 2: go there before they deploy. It's kind of part of
Speaker 2: your work up. You go there for about a month
Speaker 2: to a month and a half that time, we were
Speaker 2: there for a month, and it's basically a big training exercise.
Speaker 2: You have people from the East coast, you have people
Speaker 2: from the West Coast, from all sorts of different types
Speaker 2: of jobs. Personally, I was a mortarman, so if you
Speaker 2: don't know what that is, we shoot bombs out of tubes,
Speaker 2: to include illumination rounds, which I guess we'll get into
Speaker 2: a little bit later. Yes, that's pretty much it. I
Speaker 2: got out in twenty twenty two and just been living
Speaker 2: life ever since.
Speaker 1: Okay, so you remember the night in question? Yes? Can
Speaker 1: you give me the date of that? What that was?
Speaker 2: I believe it was April twentieth, in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: So for twenty Yes, that's how.
Speaker 2: I remember it. And we were not smoking that day.
Speaker 2: We actually seen what we saw.
Speaker 1: So, yeah, you're in the Marine Corps, so you're you're
Speaker 1: being drug tested, aren't you?
Speaker 2: Yeah? Occasionally regularly, I should say.
Speaker 1: Was there any alcohol in your system that night?
Speaker 2: I know there was not. They have a pretty tight
Speaker 2: lockdown on that when you're at Camp Wilson.
Speaker 1: And why would someone be at Camp Wilson if I
Speaker 1: was I was a morteman on four twenty twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: tell me why I was at Camp Wilson.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so it offers Camp Wilson as a desert in
Speaker 2: the hobby desert, so it offers a little bit more
Speaker 2: of a realistic and current modern battlefield training for you know,
Speaker 2: to go to the Middle East usually, so as a mortarman,
Speaker 2: I was there to support the infantry guys. So if
Speaker 2: you're a mortarman, you would be shooting arounds and support
Speaker 2: of the guys that are on the ground.
Speaker 1: Oh really, so you uh you? Is it safe to
Speaker 1: say that you have worked with flares immensely?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I mean in and out of the field
Speaker 2: week after week. And we always do night shoots when
Speaker 2: we're in the field. So we're usually in the field
Speaker 2: about a week at a time, and then every night
Speaker 2: we would shoot illumination rounds, which I think a lot
Speaker 2: of people are confusing those lights with illumination rounds or flares.
Speaker 2: So we shot those pretty regularly, so I'm very familiar
Speaker 2: with their patterns and flight times and whatever else. So
Speaker 2: pretty familiar with this type of stuff.
Speaker 1: Right, So let's not waste too much time. I want
Speaker 1: to get right into the heart and soul. So can
Speaker 1: you talk to me about the moment you spotted this
Speaker 1: formation of lights and you did you see it appear?
Speaker 1: How long was the duration of your experience with this?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so this happened at nighttime. We were all done
Speaker 2: for the day. I didn't personally see them appear, but
Speaker 2: there was a guy that was outside. The little buildings
Speaker 2: that we lived in were called hooches, so we were
Speaker 2: all inside the hooch laying down getting ready for bed.
Speaker 2: One of the guys outside that was on the phone.
Speaker 2: He came in and said, hey, guys, come check this out.
Speaker 2: What is this? So I walked out there and I
Speaker 2: seen a triangle of red lights and my first thought was, well,
Speaker 2: those are illumination rounds. But then a couple of minutes
Speaker 2: later I broke out the camera and could see the
Speaker 2: black shape underneath. So yes, I was responsible for a
Speaker 2: few of the photos and videos.
Speaker 1: Someone alerts you to the craft being there. One of
Speaker 1: the things that I think is contested a lot, And
Speaker 1: before I get to my formal questioning, I kind of
Speaker 1: just want to loosely ask this because when you were
Speaker 1: alerted to this and you came outside your hoot, how
Speaker 1: many other people were confused? How often is it that
Speaker 1: you are not alerted to a base wide training exercise,
Speaker 1: like like like what this was going to be? But
Speaker 1: even if it was just you know what you thought
Speaker 1: at first illumine arounds, why wouldn't you have known about
Speaker 1: that previously?
Speaker 2: Yeah, So there were probably fifty plus people in the
Speaker 2: same area that I was in, maybe more. Pretty much
Speaker 2: all of them were amazed and confused, which is strange
Speaker 2: because the area that I was staying in was comprised
Speaker 2: of different moss or jobs. So everyone you know, you
Speaker 2: had mortarman, artillery, regular infantry guys, cooks, you know, you
Speaker 2: name it. They were all there in that one spot.
Speaker 2: But we were all confused.
Speaker 1: So this was a spectrum of different job titles, a
Speaker 1: bunch of people in different skill sets, all confused at
Speaker 1: what the hell was happening. Now again, I want to reiterate,
Speaker 1: because you said in your area there was at least fifty,
Speaker 1: so I think the number probably is higher. But let's
Speaker 1: just start here. One of the questions that I was
Speaker 1: so surprised that that wasn't asked is how far away
Speaker 1: was the formation of lights? Roughly if you had to estimate,
Speaker 1: you know, were they over the mountains or on the
Speaker 1: flats or where were these lights when you first spotted them?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they appeared to me as if they were
Speaker 2: right above those mountains in the video, which I would
Speaker 2: guess is maybe just shot of a mile from where
Speaker 2: I was standing, So maybe three quarters of a mile
Speaker 2: maybe a little bit more.
Speaker 1: So that's how far they were away from you. Okay, Now,
Speaker 1: can you roughly tell me what the altitude would be
Speaker 1: would have been on something like this guesstimate? I know
Speaker 1: it's been a while. I wish it was asked within
Speaker 1: twenty four hours, but if you can try to guestimate
Speaker 1: the altitude of these lights, it would immensely help.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'll try the best I can. I'm not very
Speaker 2: good at guessing altitude, especially from how long ago that's been,
Speaker 2: but I would say probably three or four thousand feet
Speaker 2: and that's just a very very rough estimate.
Speaker 1: So and put your eyes because we often, you know,
Speaker 1: I think all of us have done this right. We've
Speaker 1: pointed our smartphones at the moon and all you see
Speaker 1: is a glowing white dot right, no detail. And by
Speaker 1: the way, that Samsung phone you're using is using AI
Speaker 1: to enhance those photos. So don't tell me you're actually
Speaker 1: for taking photos of the moon. I don't want to
Speaker 1: hear it. But I mean there are lenses that will
Speaker 1: get great you know, moon photos, but they're on actual cameras,
Speaker 1: but smartphones, and that's what you're using to film this. Correct,
Speaker 1: a smartphone.
Speaker 2: It was an iPhone I believe in eleven.
Speaker 1: So an iPhone eleven, even an iPhone fifteen you point
Speaker 1: it at the sky. I mean, these things are made
Speaker 1: for selfies and for pictures and video.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Now they have the cinematic mode. But this is again,
Speaker 1: this is for on the ground kind of stuff. It's
Speaker 1: not for stuff that's in the sky thousands of feed
Speaker 1: up and thousands of feet away. That's that's that's not
Speaker 1: what these cameras are built for. So we all know
Speaker 1: that with our eyes we were seeing a lot more
Speaker 1: than what the camera is showing us in the videos
Speaker 1: that that were shown and given to weaponized which will
Speaker 1: definitely play some of them at least two of them,
Speaker 1: because I would like to walk through them with you.
Speaker 1: But what were you seeing? Were you seeing any definition
Speaker 1: to this?
Speaker 2: So I personally wasn't. But that's just because I wear
Speaker 2: contacts and i'd taken them out to go to bed.
Speaker 2: But I remember someone who was standing beside me said
Speaker 2: you can see a body. And then I didn't see
Speaker 2: the body until I reviewed the picture that I took,
Speaker 2: which is the one that's blasted all over the internet.
Speaker 2: And then I've seen the black shape underneath.
Speaker 1: Oh I don't I haven't heard that the body.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's actually in one of the videos that were
Speaker 2: published on the Weaponize podcast. You can hear the I
Speaker 2: believe you can hear that on there.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, so you actually can't see.
Speaker 2: The body in a video. You can only see it
Speaker 2: through the still photos.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, so that would be through this.
Speaker 2: But in a video, someone didn't mention that you could
Speaker 2: see a body. Hear that in the background.
Speaker 1: Yeah, we don't have to. Okay, that's interesting. So all right,
Speaker 1: I wanna I want to pull up at least one
Speaker 1: or two of these videos, uh, just to watch the
Speaker 1: the uh, the the actual craft as it passes and
Speaker 1: hear some of the people in the background. So I
Speaker 1: bring this one up. Purpose there's more lights around it.
Speaker 1: Can you hear that?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 1: Did you see that other light by the way above
Speaker 1: or below? It was above it, So me and Arthur
Speaker 1: noticed it last time we watched the video. But you
Speaker 1: see a dot of light appear above the craft in
Speaker 1: reference of the frame. It happened so quick, so I
Speaker 1: did see.
Speaker 2: I actually I think there's a video, one of those videos.
Speaker 2: I could see it through my phone and I mentioned it,
Speaker 2: and you mentioned it. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that one
Speaker 2: of those videos. Yeah, right there, I said, there's more
Speaker 2: lights around it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's more lights around it. Oh yeah, that you
Speaker 1: did say, see right there, right there up top. I'm
Speaker 1: an jump a little. I'm just gonna jump ahead. I
Speaker 1: want to keep going. Could could this have been flares?
Speaker 1: In your expert opinion, any type of known flare, whether
Speaker 1: you know whether shot or launched from the sky.
Speaker 2: So to me, I did think so at first, because
Speaker 2: of the color. And usually when you think of a flair,
Speaker 2: you think of red. But usually they fall a lot
Speaker 2: faster than that, and then you can see a smoke
Speaker 2: trail behind them. But these whatever, these lights were they
Speaker 2: were not falling, so.
Speaker 1: They were maintaining their altitude. And if in your expert opinion,
Speaker 1: with flares, it seems that the the longest lasting that
Speaker 1: can remain their formations is around seven to ten seconds, right, yes,
Speaker 1: And then they start to have like the smoke trail. Uh,
Speaker 1: and they kind of they not not saying they look
Speaker 1: like this, but they they they start to those aren't
Speaker 1: I mean, those are a bit of an extreme example,
Speaker 1: but these are flares that you know, look, you know,
Speaker 1: like they're they were in formation, they're coming down, but
Speaker 1: you could see clearly see the smoke trail and that
Speaker 1: these are like headed in a downward angle. We don't
Speaker 1: see that at any time in any of these videos.
Speaker 1: Like it it actually looks like it moves further away?
Speaker 1: Did it? Did it actually did it move? How long
Speaker 1: did you see it for?
Speaker 2: So from the time that I walked out there to
Speaker 2: the time that I put my phone down the walk
Speaker 2: back inside, I would say I've seen it for about
Speaker 2: fifteen minutes.
Speaker 1: But you have to think so again, I just want
Speaker 1: to ask, in your expert opinion, are there any flares
Speaker 1: that can do that stay in formation for that for
Speaker 1: even fifteen minutes most of the videos. There's a big
Speaker 1: contention that, oh, all the videos are like thirty six seconds.
Speaker 1: That's it, that's it, that's.
Speaker 2: It, right. Yeah, so no, not for fifteen minutes plus.
Speaker 2: You have to think the guy that went and got us,
Speaker 2: he stood out there and watched them for a few
Speaker 2: minutes and then came and got us, and then we
Speaker 2: watched them for a few minutes before we started recording,
Speaker 2: and then all those videos. The reason why they're so
Speaker 2: short is because I was taking them and then like
Speaker 2: uploading them on Snapchat and then taking another video uploading
Speaker 2: it on Snapchat. And that's kind of what everyone was doing.
Speaker 2: So there's not really no one really recorded the entire
Speaker 2: length of the thing.
Speaker 1: Okay, is there any way that you could somehow get
Speaker 1: a hold of the metadata for all the timestamps of
Speaker 1: videos that were taken so that we can if because
Speaker 1: if we can add up enough time that these maintained
Speaker 1: as you know, altitude, I think that would that would
Speaker 1: essentially break the the debate, that would break the contention
Speaker 1: that these are flares. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I could do that, and but like I said, you
Speaker 2: have to add a couple of minutes before because someone
Speaker 2: seen them watched them for a few minutes and then
Speaker 2: came and got us. Then we watched them for a
Speaker 2: few minutes and then started recording. So right, right, whatever
Speaker 2: that time adds up to be, add a couple of
Speaker 2: minutes to that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and and and so the number we kept hearing
Speaker 1: in the weaponized testimony was someone There were multiple people
Speaker 1: who said up to thirty five minutes. Now, I'm going
Speaker 1: to go and say that there's fluff to that. So
Speaker 1: I would say twenty five minutes in real time, like
Speaker 1: real expectation. But if these things, if this thing was
Speaker 1: there for twenty eight minutes over a military installation and
Speaker 1: it wasn't dropping, I want to talk to you about
Speaker 1: the convoy. Now, all of a sudden, you guys are
Speaker 1: recording this thing, and you guys look like you're in
Speaker 1: your skibbies in some of the pictures, which is kind
Speaker 1: of funny because it seems like you were getting ready
Speaker 1: to go to sleep, So you were not. Again, I
Speaker 1: want to hammer this home. You were not told of
Speaker 1: any prior training on especially training that would go right
Speaker 1: over your head and right around you, all around you, right,
Speaker 1: nothing like that.
Speaker 2: No, we were not made aware. Usually you would know because.
Speaker 1: I say, how uncommon is that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, kind of, I mean it can happen, but for
Speaker 2: that specific exercise, we usually knew because I was actually
Speaker 2: working for the cooks in the kitchen at the time,
Speaker 2: and we would have to know, so if they came
Speaker 2: back late, we would prepare them mills or you know,
Speaker 2: you name it or this whole exercise was for everyone
Speaker 2: that was staying at Camp Wilson, and everyone was there
Speaker 2: at Camp Wilson, if that makes sense, right, So if
Speaker 2: you're going to the field, you're going to support another element,
Speaker 2: so more than one element would be gone at a time. So,
Speaker 2: but the base was pretty full at that time that night.
Speaker 1: What do you think? What do you think of the
Speaker 1: do O D and Susan Go the spokesperson, as well
Speaker 1: as the Pentagon. What do you think of their attempts
Speaker 1: to say this is this was a train training exercise
Speaker 1: planned well in advanced.
Speaker 2: Well. I did hear that she made a statement within
Speaker 2: twenty four hours of Jeremy Corbell's weaponized episode, And to
Speaker 2: think that she could get that information within twenty four hours,
Speaker 2: it's kind of mind blowing, like that sounds very impossible
Speaker 2: because quick with that stuff.
Speaker 1: Dude, the mill They'll slogan is hurry up and wait
Speaker 1: right right like that essentially I've heard you know, I
Speaker 1: told you I come from a Marine Corps family. They
Speaker 1: they will be the first one to tell you that
Speaker 1: most of unless you're like deployed in an active combat zone,
Speaker 1: most of your life is hurry up and wait right,
Speaker 1: you know, and you know obviously you know you people
Speaker 1: have made immense sacrifices in the military. I am not
Speaker 1: saying that you need to see active combat to serve
Speaker 1: your country, but I'm just saying, like the government, no
Speaker 1: government has ever been oh, within twenty four hours, they
Speaker 1: have the whole answer, right, yeah, from a base that
Speaker 1: conducted the exercise years before.
Speaker 2: Right, they would have to dig up records if they
Speaker 2: had any.
Speaker 1: If right, if so, is it?
Speaker 2: Is it?
Speaker 1: I want to ask you, do you think that there
Speaker 1: is some sort of cover up happening? I hate, I
Speaker 1: hate to ask you out right like this, but if
Speaker 1: they're lying about a training exercise, it's the Phoenix lights
Speaker 1: case again right right, And it slipped under the rug
Speaker 1: this time. And that's tragic because if this thing is,
Speaker 1: why do we why do we keep seeing these over
Speaker 1: our military installations? I just had Robert Sallas on the show.
Speaker 1: You know, the guy who had his hand on the
Speaker 1: key of the nuclear launch at a nuclear lunch facility
Speaker 1: when a UFO shut ten nukes on off and these
Speaker 1: things aren't connected, right, they're separated analog wise, so that
Speaker 1: if one goes down, they all don't go down, and
Speaker 1: it shut these things off one by one.
Speaker 3: And.
Speaker 1: He says, it's a message. Do you think we're getting
Speaker 1: sent a message.
Speaker 2: That I don't know? I don't know. It does seem
Speaker 2: weird that there is a pattern of these UAPs, UFOs,
Speaker 2: whatever you want to call them, being over military bases.
Speaker 2: So it could either be some type of reconnaissance. Maybe
Speaker 2: they are trying to send some type of message that
Speaker 2: I'm not too sure about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well I only asked that because El luel Azandos
Speaker 1: his book just came out, and you know, he claims
Speaker 1: to have run a tip and the program the Pentagon
Speaker 1: had about investing getting UFOs. But there's a lot of contention.
Speaker 1: But it's actually brought up a lot that like we
Speaker 1: have to at least look at it like they are
Speaker 1: doing reconnaissance on our capabilities, because that's what we would
Speaker 1: do if we were to you know, invade at an enemy.
Speaker 1: But we don't have to jump the gun and say
Speaker 1: we just we don't know what these things are here for.
Speaker 1: We just want to know from our government that they
Speaker 1: are here and acknowledgment that this is happening, because in
Speaker 1: your expert opinion, you're saying, there's no way these can
Speaker 1: be illumination rounds. They stayed up for far too long. Information,
Speaker 1: for far too long at altitude. Now, would you say
Speaker 1: they remained at three to four thousand feet the whole time?
Speaker 2: Yes, wherever they were, and again that's just a very
Speaker 2: very roughest the mation of how high they were. But
Speaker 2: where however high they were, they definitely stayed there the
Speaker 2: entire time.
Speaker 1: When they meaning the twenty nine Palms base, like the
Speaker 1: when the base responded and launched the very distinguishable flairs.
Speaker 2: You can see video number five and this is near
Speaker 2: the end of the event after they launched the two flares.
Speaker 2: But if you look closely, you'll you'll also see the
Speaker 2: five light formation. Please tell me this at the end
Speaker 2: of the world. Are you can kind of see it now? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, so they're they're in there for anyone who does, Okay,
Speaker 1: look at the end, can you estimate about how far
Speaker 1: from you those were.
Speaker 2: They looked to be right above the object, so again,
Speaker 2: right around a mile, maybe slightly under a mile.
Speaker 1: Okay, Okay, that gives us a good reference frame. Because
Speaker 1: so when you saw the two flares or whatever, I
Speaker 1: don't know if it was just two or just too
Speaker 1: that was kind of camera. But was that the start
Speaker 1: of this massive response? Yeah?
Speaker 2: I believe so. So I don't remember exact timeframes, but
Speaker 2: I believe the lights disappeared, those illumination rounds came down,
Speaker 2: and then everything went dark. The illumination rounds eventually burned off,
Speaker 2: and then we went back inside and then we heard
Speaker 2: the aircraft coming through, so we went outside to look
Speaker 2: at it, and then that's when we seen the convoy coming.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I believe pretty much immediately after those illumination
Speaker 2: rounds were dropped, that's when the response happened.
Speaker 1: Okay, can you speak to how many how many vehicles
Speaker 1: responded and what other airborne what were the airborne assets
Speaker 1: that were deployed as well? Yeah, so I've seen the
Speaker 1: best of your recollection.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, I remember when we seen the convoy coming through,
Speaker 2: we stood there and counted them, and it was I
Speaker 2: believe fifty to fifty five. Some people say higher, but
Speaker 2: I believe I remember it being around fifty five. And
Speaker 2: I do have a few photos of that, and I
Speaker 2: think you can count at least thirty headlights in the photos.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I have one of the photos up now. I'll
Speaker 1: have it. I'll have it much right now. It's only
Speaker 1: showing like for a half portion of the screen. But
Speaker 1: I will fix that in editing. Guys. Uh, so you'll
Speaker 1: be able to see these pictures and videos. Uh, we'll
Speaker 1: be playing as well like that. But it is up
Speaker 1: right now.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: And I can count one, two, three, four, five, six.
Speaker 3: Seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirty.
Speaker 1: Yeah, upwards of twenty five to thirty at least minimum.
Speaker 1: That's a So again, I'm gonna circle back. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna keep doing it on you. Would you have known
Speaker 1: about this about the if this was a training exercise.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna keep asking because I want to keep
Speaker 1: repeating it because I want people to keep hearing it.
Speaker 1: For this kind of bonds with fifty vehicles and helicopters
Speaker 1: and jets being deployed, would you know about it?
Speaker 2: Yeah? I believe if it was something that were that
Speaker 2: to that scale, we would have known about it. I
Speaker 2: mean we're talking fifty something vehicles, which is very strange
Speaker 2: to see in one convoy, and then we probably would
Speaker 2: have been aware of those aircraft that flew by.
Speaker 1: Now, why is it odd to see that many vehicles
Speaker 1: in a convoy on a training exercise?
Speaker 2: Well, usually if you're in a convoy, it's not fifty
Speaker 2: plus vehicles. It's usually a platoon or maybe company number,
Speaker 2: which would be I don't know, I didn't work with vehicles,
Speaker 2: but it would definitely be around maybe fifteen max that
Speaker 2: you would see at one time.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you wouldn't want to make yourself a huge target, right,
Speaker 1: fifteen seventy vehicles, you can't. That's you know, you know,
Speaker 1: that's not tactical. So do you think that the base
Speaker 1: has more information about what happened that night and they
Speaker 1: went out and tried to figure out what this was?
Speaker 2: Yeah? So I do believe that the convoy and the
Speaker 2: aircraft that came out after were was an attempt to
Speaker 2: see whatever the thing was and not to mention the
Speaker 2: illumination rounds that were popped off above it. So I
Speaker 2: do believe that they were aware of whatever it was,
Speaker 2: and that was their response.
Speaker 1: For it, and I was literally just gonna bring it
Speaker 1: up now if I'm the military, Okay, hear me out
Speaker 1: on this. And I know you know during that debate,
Speaker 1: there was a couple of times where I think you
Speaker 1: were a little upset with your fellow veteran for for
Speaker 1: for you're not not not like I don't want to
Speaker 1: bring I don't want to bring that up. I don't
Speaker 1: want to go too deep into that. But there's that
Speaker 1: camaraderie I know between veterans and you guys are among
Speaker 1: the most credible of the credible of observers. And the
Speaker 1: fact that if I was a military and I was
Speaker 1: in charge and a UFO like that appears above the base,
Speaker 1: I am going to send that massive response for two reasons.
Speaker 1: Number one, I'm gonna check this out. Number two, well,
Speaker 1: that gives me a good reason to say this was
Speaker 1: a training extra size because we did actually launch an exercise.
Speaker 1: But the public doesn't need to know about the other
Speaker 1: like they're not. It's not that they're not telling the truth,
Speaker 1: it's that they're leaving context out. Does that make sense?
Speaker 1: If you can see what I'm saying, you know, they're like,
Speaker 1: it wasn't a training exercise. It was an actual real
Speaker 1: word tasking, just like you know the NIMTZ was. But
Speaker 1: in this case they're just denying it. They're saying, no,
Speaker 1: just a training But we I mean, we have all
Speaker 1: the records of the vehicles we deployed, because we actually
Speaker 1: did deploy them. We're just not going to tell you
Speaker 1: the real reason why.
Speaker 2: Right, So there should be records of those vehicles that
Speaker 2: went out because when you check out a vehicle, you
Speaker 2: have to record there are Yeah, you have to record
Speaker 2: where you're going, how many miles you drove. So they're
Speaker 2: for sure are records out there somewhere, but who knows
Speaker 2: where they are? Who's covering them up?
Speaker 1: No, we we have so there was some that were obtained.
Speaker 2: Oh really, I did not I didn't hear about that. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so I will put them up on the screen.
Speaker 1: I can't do it right now, but so for the
Speaker 1: audience watching, they'll be seeing it. But essentially, I mean
Speaker 1: they responded with within twenty four hours, this was a
Speaker 1: training exercise here, and that's what makes us even crazier
Speaker 1: that we ended up with a list of all the
Speaker 1: stuff and everything that they sent out, right within twenty
Speaker 1: four hours. Like, how often does that happen?
Speaker 2: Never with our government?
Speaker 1: Not with our government. No, it just it doesn't add up.
Speaker 1: None of the timeline adds up for me from the
Speaker 1: d D side. So that's why. And I I really,
Speaker 1: I really want to know your thoughts because in the
Speaker 1: videos you can hear people talking about aliens UFOs. Are
Speaker 1: you or have you been interested in the topic in
Speaker 1: your life before this?
Speaker 2: No, I just left it to the the experts there.
Speaker 2: I didn't really have an interest and I've never seen
Speaker 2: anything that would spark an interest, so I just kind
Speaker 2: of left it alone before this event. And still I'm
Speaker 2: not really super into it. But yeah, so pretty much
Speaker 2: I've never been into it.
Speaker 1: What was the feeling on the ground when you're seeing it?
Speaker 1: What was the atmosphere like between you know, brothers, what
Speaker 1: because you're all grown men, was anyone like confused and scared?
Speaker 1: Or was anyone? I know, there wasn't chaos because we
Speaker 1: can't really hear chaos, and I don't think that that
Speaker 1: that there would be chaos and for a group of
Speaker 1: men like that, But was there anyone that was you know,
Speaker 1: is there anything else that happened on the base that
Speaker 1: night that that that that was weird.
Speaker 2: Other than the triangle itself. And then the response No,
Speaker 2: but as far as the atmosphere on the ground scared, no, confused,
Speaker 2: And like I said, that whole area was full of
Speaker 2: different types of jobs, people that had different types of jobs,
Speaker 2: So someone would have not been confused if they knew
Speaker 2: what it was, but none of us knew what it was,
Speaker 2: and we were just very confused talking it over, recording it,
Speaker 2: a little bit excited. But that wouldn't happen with something
Speaker 2: that you see every day. If that was something we
Speaker 2: saw every day and training, we would have blew it
Speaker 2: off and not even brought our phones out. But as
Speaker 2: you can see, I think in one of the videos
Speaker 2: there's a row of those hootos that I spoke about. Yes,
Speaker 2: anywhere from ten to fifteen marines inside, so you do
Speaker 2: the math on that. Everyone came outside. So if that
Speaker 2: was something we would have seen before, you would not
Speaker 2: have had that response from big guys on the ground,
Speaker 2: if that makes sense.
Speaker 1: No, No, absolutely, I can absolutely agree. We showed it
Speaker 1: in the podcast as well, and that's when I made
Speaker 1: the comment, Look, they're out there and they're skiddies, like
Speaker 1: their underwear like they it seems like they were caught
Speaker 1: off guard. You said you were about to go to sleep,
Speaker 1: you took your contacts out and everything. If you were,
Speaker 1: you know, if there was a training exercise like this
Speaker 1: being conducted over your heads, I think maybe you guys
Speaker 1: would have all stayed out or maybe talked. It would
Speaker 1: have been passed down and like, hey, guys, you know,
Speaker 1: just you know, I know you might be trying to
Speaker 1: get some sleep tonight. Like I said, if this, if
Speaker 1: there were a case where training happened in this weird
Speaker 1: fashion where you guys weren't involved, you would at least
Speaker 1: know something about it and that you wouldn't be out
Speaker 1: there and your skippy's like taking your contacts out and
Speaker 1: brushing your teeth and being like wait, what is that?
Speaker 1: Why wait? Why is our base responding like did that?
Speaker 1: That didn't confuse anybody?
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I mean yeah, Like you said, we got
Speaker 2: ready for bed, we were laying down, heard nothing of
Speaker 2: of an exercise happening, and you know, usually you hear, hey,
Speaker 2: this company is going to the field today, they're going
Speaker 2: to be there tonight, or this company is going to
Speaker 2: support then we didn't hear anything about that. And then
Speaker 2: for the past few nights or the nights before that,
Speaker 2: nothing was really happening.
Speaker 1: You.
Speaker 2: It was unusual to see any aircraft flying by, and
Speaker 2: then this just happens out of nowhere.
Speaker 1: So it was right out of nowhere, you have. And
Speaker 1: about how many times or how many helicopters were deployed.
Speaker 2: I don't remember an exact number, but I remember seeing
Speaker 2: groups of them, and we've seen at least three to
Speaker 2: four groups, and then there would be three to four
Speaker 2: in each group.
Speaker 1: So three to four groupings at the least, yes, So
Speaker 1: about twelve twelve helos anything else.
Speaker 2: Deployed, I believe, and my memory is getting the best
Speaker 2: of me for this one, but I believe there were
Speaker 2: jets that came maybe five minutes after the helicopters.
Speaker 1: Now, how were they flying at an altitude that alarmed you?
Speaker 2: Not necessarily because we would see them. The airfield is
Speaker 2: pretty close to Camp Wilson, so you would see them
Speaker 2: pretty low if you did see them, Okay, but nothing alarming,
Speaker 2: but other than them being there in the first place.
Speaker 1: Right, Oh uh, that in itself would be out of
Speaker 1: the ordinary, right, But yes, and they were headed towards
Speaker 1: this object.
Speaker 2: Correct.
Speaker 1: Wow, So again I wanted to when you made contact,
Speaker 1: when you made eye contact, when you made eye contact
Speaker 1: with this object? Did you.
Speaker 3: Did?
Speaker 1: Did it? Some people say they feel like a peacefulness
Speaker 1: or serendipity, and it's like the world around them kind
Speaker 1: of goes away and they're very honed in. Did you
Speaker 1: experience anything like that?
Speaker 2: I wouldn't say peacefulness or serendipity, but I was very
Speaker 2: focused and tunnel vision toward this.
Speaker 1: Thing, right right.
Speaker 2: But other than that, no weird emotions or feelings.
Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, a lot because those triangle craft there's a
Speaker 1: lot of people that think those are ours. Do you
Speaker 1: think there's a possibility that the United States is testing
Speaker 1: its own craft against the best of the best? I
Speaker 1: have to ask.
Speaker 2: I don't know if I have an opinion on that,
Speaker 2: but I've definitely heard some compelling arguments for that, And
Speaker 2: it would make sense.
Speaker 1: It would it would right? Who would who else to
Speaker 1: test it on?
Speaker 2: Like?
Speaker 1: And and you know this might have been an actual training,
Speaker 1: but a training of Hey, we're gonna fly in advance
Speaker 1: UH technology systems over you UH our own reverse engineered UFO,
Speaker 1: and your base is gonna respond to it, and you know,
Speaker 1: only those who need to know, which would be now
Speaker 1: have you. So did you ever ask the base commander
Speaker 1: that like or or try to talk to the base commander?
Speaker 2: Uh? No way?
Speaker 1: Uh why why?
Speaker 2: I guess there was sort of abe, yes, So I
Speaker 2: did not take it any higher than myself as far
Speaker 2: as rank goes.
Speaker 1: I just you, honestly that scared to report it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because I knew it was going to be sort
Speaker 2: of hey, I've seen this thing in the sky. Any answers, Yeah,
Speaker 2: it's just this or just that. Go away. It would
Speaker 2: be that type of thing. No one would entertain it.
Speaker 1: David Grush spoke about people being hurt over this topic threatened.
Speaker 1: You were never threatened by anyone to do not speak
Speaker 1: about this.
Speaker 2: No, So there were no briefings at the time or afterward.
Speaker 2: And I've kept my name away from this for that reason.
Speaker 2: So no, no one's contacted me, and I've just kind
Speaker 2: of kept kept on the down low for this.
Speaker 1: I really like, I really really really really really like
Speaker 1: that that you that you've you know you're doing this.
Speaker 1: It is answer because I had so many questions like
Speaker 1: the altitude and and now what what what are your
Speaker 1: typical flares? Uh? What what are there? What are there
Speaker 1: max out altitudes? And if they're like say they're dropped
Speaker 1: from a plane, a plane or jet or however they
Speaker 1: claim to have dropped these, what would be the altitude
Speaker 1: they would drop them, you know, And why aren't these
Speaker 1: flares again like but from this perspective.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I don't know exactly how high they would
Speaker 2: drop them or what the altitude would be. But what
Speaker 2: I do know is that they would fall. If they
Speaker 2: were dropped, either sought out of a gun or dropped,
Speaker 2: they would have the smoke trail behind them and they
Speaker 2: would eventually fall. These things never fell, and they just
Speaker 2: went away. The type of illumination rounds that I fired
Speaker 2: out of mortar tubes, you could see them and sometimes
Speaker 2: you could see the parachutes open on them. You could
Speaker 2: see the smoke trail, you could see them move with
Speaker 2: the wind. And these things just set there. And it's
Speaker 2: in the desert, so there's a lot of wind rolling
Speaker 2: through the desert. So you would think that they would move.
Speaker 2: You sat there in the same formation roughly, and they
Speaker 2: just didn't. They never fell, They just stayed in the
Speaker 2: exact elevation.
Speaker 1: From my perspective, people argue that in the videos you
Speaker 1: can see a change in altitude but I bring up
Speaker 1: the point that I think it's perspective that this craft
Speaker 1: was moving back once the base responded. Did this craft
Speaker 1: seemed like back off?
Speaker 2: Yeah? So from what I remember, within a few seconds
Speaker 2: of those illumination rounds popping off over top of it,
Speaker 2: it disappeared within somewhere within ten seconds, it just completely
Speaker 2: just the lights went out.
Speaker 1: Huh, just phased out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know. I didn't see it move like
Speaker 2: try to run away. I didn't see the lights flickering out.
Speaker 2: I just seen the lights gone. They just disappeared.
Speaker 1: And would any chemical flare do that? It doesn't sound
Speaker 1: like it, right, They wouldn't just go out like that.
Speaker 2: No, So usually they they flicker a little bit before
Speaker 2: they go out, but these did not flicker. It's almost
Speaker 2: like turning off a light switch.
Speaker 1: Right. That's that's That's kind of what we hear in
Speaker 1: the other witness the people other witnesses as well, is
Speaker 1: that it was like it was there one minute and
Speaker 1: it was just gone the next. It wasn't like it
Speaker 1: phased out. It wasn't like it it blinked out. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: it was more like it blinked out rather than it
Speaker 1: like phased out. And dimmed. It was just there and gone,
Speaker 1: and we see that that in a lot of cases
Speaker 1: in instantaneous acceleration. You know. Uh, it's part of the
Speaker 1: five observables that that they came up with from the
Speaker 1: Pentagon UFO office. So I, you know, I it's weird.
Speaker 1: It's weird to me because I think this case. Do
Speaker 1: you think the timing of this case had had an
Speaker 1: effect on the way the community took it?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I'm not really too big into the community,
Speaker 2: but I did see a lot of I guess, shunning
Speaker 2: of this case. Most people just kind of glanced at
Speaker 2: it without listening to in the witness testimony and kind
Speaker 2: of you know, shoved it away immediately. So I don't
Speaker 2: know if it was timing or what, but it definitely,
Speaker 2: uh was gone as fast as it came up.
Speaker 1: And you I need you to do something that's a
Speaker 1: little off the beaten path. But if anyone were to
Speaker 1: ask or question a hoax being perpetrated, why then? Now,
Speaker 1: first off, it doesn't really even make sense because you're staying,
Speaker 1: you're trying to keep your identity hidden and you're not
Speaker 1: trying to make money off of this. But people have
Speaker 1: posed that you guys hoaxed this? Did you guys hoax this?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: I just gotta ask, right, why? Why not just just
Speaker 1: straight up ask, did you guys? I mean hoax a
Speaker 1: training exercise and try to get Jeremy Corbel to get
Speaker 1: riled up and show something, you know, on TV?
Speaker 2: Absolutely not. I mean I didn't even really want to
Speaker 2: be associated with this, and I still really don't. They
Speaker 2: know you don't answer questions. The only reason I'm really
Speaker 2: even doing this is I see so many ridiculous responses
Speaker 2: online and I just want to clear the air on
Speaker 2: them and answer those, you know, simpler questions. But no,
Speaker 2: there's no reason to hoax this. And if I did,
Speaker 2: I definitely put my name out there coming. I mean,
Speaker 2: this thing's been on Rogan's podcast, It's been on the
Speaker 2: New York Times or New York Post, It's been everywhere.
Speaker 2: So I would if I were to hoax this, I
Speaker 2: would want my name out there.
Speaker 1: I would think, right, you'd be doing what every other
Speaker 1: UFO grifter does. You would put your name right there,
Speaker 1: and you would go do the UFO lecture circuit. I
Speaker 1: saw I'm a marine, I'm credible. I saw UFO want
Speaker 1: to hear about it. Let me tell you all about
Speaker 1: it my research I've done. That's or write a book.
Speaker 1: I mean that that seems to be the trend of
Speaker 1: the the opologist, right, but you're you guys aren't trying
Speaker 1: to do that, did you. Are you responsible for getting
Speaker 1: the five witnesses together? Uh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, so the first I got the guy that came
Speaker 2: in and got us the one who've first seen it,
Speaker 2: and then those witnesses were all in the same hooch
Speaker 2: as me. So I still I still have their numbers,
Speaker 2: and I sent them over to Jeremy Corbel and he's
Speaker 2: the one that did the interviews with them.
Speaker 1: Would they be willing to speak again?
Speaker 2: Uh? Probably, I could ask then, yeah.
Speaker 1: If you if you would mind, I want to. I
Speaker 1: want to. I want to awaken this case because I think, yeah,
Speaker 1: I know you don't know Ufo Lure, but I'm sure
Speaker 1: people have mentioned the Phoenix Lights to you a lot.
Speaker 2: Yes I have. I have heard that. Yes.
Speaker 1: Well no, I highly advise that you go watch the
Speaker 1: documentary by doctor Lynn Katie. She's actually gonna be a
Speaker 1: guest on the show in the future coming up. It's
Speaker 1: called the Phoenix Lights Documentary. Uh. Watch it, man, Uh,
Speaker 1: and you will be blown away at the similarities not
Speaker 1: only in the sighting, but the response. That's that's like,
Speaker 1: that's what we have to look at is the military
Speaker 1: narrative that they try to put out there. Right, it's
Speaker 1: the military or or the military industrial complex and the media.
Speaker 1: And you know, when they don't want stories out, stories
Speaker 1: don't go out when they don't want them. You know,
Speaker 1: the United States government is pretty good about keeping tabs
Speaker 1: on the media. Uh, it's it's the mainstream media is
Speaker 1: I mean, it's falling apart. I think more people watch
Speaker 1: Rogan than than CNN now. But like what we consider
Speaker 1: mainstream media is is dying. It's dying, and people are
Speaker 1: awakening to their news, not the news, their news. And
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's a good thing or a
Speaker 1: bad thing, but it gives you the opportunity to tell
Speaker 1: your side of the story, at least to I mean,
Speaker 1: you've done it a weaponized which is arguably one of
Speaker 1: the biggest UFO platforms. But you know, I would you
Speaker 1: swear to would you if it ever? If Congress not
Speaker 1: not maybe maybe not Congress, but if AERO, uh, the
Speaker 1: All Domain Resolute Resolution, All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, if
Speaker 1: they asked you to testify, Uh in in secrecy, would
Speaker 1: you give them testimony? Uh?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I have nothing to hide.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: If they want answers from me, then I'd be more
Speaker 2: than willing to give it to them.
Speaker 1: So you you would again, like I'm not gonna say
Speaker 1: like you're gonna go David fravor It and go in
Speaker 1: front of Congress or Ryan Graves, but you would be
Speaker 1: willing to to present the evidence to the all the
Speaker 1: the public channels that are available supposedly for people like
Speaker 1: you that don't want to get in trouble for reporting
Speaker 1: something and having it ruin their career, because that is
Speaker 1: absolutely the furthest thing, and and and and that is
Speaker 1: what the problem is. The problem is the waters are
Speaker 1: muddied so long ago, buddy, that we are desperately, desperately
Speaker 1: trying to emerge and and keep breathing.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: With this UAP topic, you know, change the moniker to
Speaker 1: u I P not UFO.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: Gets. We shouldn't be using the word alien anymore either.
Speaker 1: I think it is a bad connotation. It makes people
Speaker 1: think of little green men that probe Southern folk, you know,
Speaker 1: in the cornfield. So I think we need to remove
Speaker 1: ourselves from baggage like that. But do you think what
Speaker 1: you saw is a what is classically identified not or
Speaker 1: or class of as a UFO an unidentified flying object?
Speaker 2: Yeah, if you want me to answer it literally from
Speaker 2: the literally, Yeah, so from the definition of UFO unidentified.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that that's what we should be doing. Again, if
Speaker 1: anyone is as you know, if anyone out there listening
Speaker 1: or viewing, if you're adding baggage to the word UFO,
Speaker 1: then you're doing yourself a disservice. What he is saying
Speaker 1: is that the craft was unidentifiable, meaning they don't know
Speaker 1: what it.
Speaker 2: Is, right, And that's why this is blown up to
Speaker 2: what it is is because it's unidentified.
Speaker 1: And it was not flares. You worklaers, You worked with flares.
Speaker 1: You know these were not flares?
Speaker 2: Correct?
Speaker 1: How long did you work with flares? So?
Speaker 2: I was a Morderman the entire time, the entire length
Speaker 2: of my contract, which was four years.
Speaker 1: Okay, So not only do you have a good idea
Speaker 1: about flares, but do you have a good idea about
Speaker 1: aircraft that are in our inventory? Uh?
Speaker 2: Not in great detail, but yeah, I am pretty much familiar.
Speaker 2: If I've seen something, I would know if it's ours
Speaker 2: or not.
Speaker 1: So the craft that you were seeing was either unknown
Speaker 1: technology or other.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so I could not identify it with anything in
Speaker 2: the United States Military inventory, and neither could fifty plus
Speaker 2: people around me at the time. So I have no
Speaker 2: reason to believe that it was ours.
Speaker 1: In one of the videos, you hear a gentleman say,
Speaker 1: I've been doing I knew this research was wasn't for nothing.
Speaker 1: This is a UFO aliens exist. That guy. A lot
Speaker 1: of people point to that and say, well, there's bias.
Speaker 1: There's observer bias right there, it's out the open. Uh
Speaker 1: what would you say to that.
Speaker 2: I mean, that guy was just a goofball. Still, I
Speaker 2: know exactly who that is. He's just a funny guy.
Speaker 2: There was nothing mischievous behind that. Yeah, it was just
Speaker 2: a joke at the time.
Speaker 1: Is he one of the five?
Speaker 2: No, he's not interesting.
Speaker 1: Maybe, uh, maybe we can find him, because I would
Speaker 1: I would love to hear if he's actually into the subject.
Speaker 1: I'd like to hear his thoughts on what this thing was.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not sure if he actually is. Like I said,
Speaker 2: he's a goofball, So maybe he was just making a joke,
Speaker 2: like about the research and everything, or maybe he isn't
Speaker 2: to it. I don't know, but I remember him being
Speaker 2: a funny guy, so that was just a joke.
Speaker 1: How long did you spend with these guys at that facility?
Speaker 2: Well, they were part of my unit, but they weren't
Speaker 2: in my platoon. I know a lot of military lingo here,
Speaker 2: but I didn't see them every day afterwards, but there
Speaker 2: we were there for about a month. So but when
Speaker 2: we got back to North Carolina, I did, you know,
Speaker 2: come across them every once in a while, and then
Speaker 2: one or two of them I still speak to this day.
Speaker 1: Interesting. I would love to, like I said, I would
Speaker 1: love to talk to more witnesses about this case. I
Speaker 1: think you've done a great job of clearing up some
Speaker 1: of the the the misrepresentation that's happened with this case.
Speaker 1: And I really just want to thank you for your time.
Speaker 1: I know you just took an hour, a little bit
Speaker 1: more than an hour out of your day to do this.
Speaker 1: More if not, and I'm sure you know, we'll be
Speaker 1: talking more and hopefully setting up, you know, more interviews
Speaker 1: and getting trying to build the bigger picture, build the
Speaker 1: defense beyond a reasonable doubt that something extraordinary happened that
Speaker 1: night on twenty nine pounds face because that's what you think,
Speaker 1: Is that what you're sticking by? Oh yeah, okay, and
Speaker 1: I really love that man. Stick to your guns, like,
Speaker 1: don't waiver, don't waiver for a second.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: James Fox has a great documentary called I Know What
Speaker 1: I Saw, And I told you my UFO story before
Speaker 1: we started recording. I Know what I saw. You know
Speaker 1: what you saw? You know people like John Greend from
Speaker 1: the Black Vault who do a lot of Foier requests.
Speaker 1: You know, he emailed Susan go got this information within
Speaker 1: twenty four hours. The DoD has all this information on
Speaker 1: a training our size that a half for three years
Speaker 1: prior when we know COVID like was screwing everything up.
Speaker 1: Like the timeline just doesn't add up. The narrative doesn't
Speaker 1: add up. But can you understand what's the last thing
Speaker 1: you would say to a skeptic about this case?
Speaker 2: What's the last thing I would say to a skeptic?
Speaker 1: Yeah, before you just walked away and said there's no more,
Speaker 1: There's nothing else I can tell you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean I would say, like you said, I
Speaker 2: know because I was there. Don't listen to the narrative
Speaker 2: that's out there right now because a lot of these
Speaker 2: deniers or skeptics, they are misinformed. They haven't listened to
Speaker 2: podcasts like this. They just see the pictures and you know,
Speaker 2: shun it away as being flares, and then that's the
Speaker 2: end of their story. So I would say dig into
Speaker 2: this a little bit more and listen to podcasts more
Speaker 2: like this one and listen to the actual testimony of
Speaker 2: the people that were on the ground, which there are
Speaker 2: quite a few out there. So that was beautiful.
Speaker 3: Man.
Speaker 1: Sorry, I lost my voice over the past couple of
Speaker 1: days I've been having I stayed home from work yesterday
Speaker 1: because I've been having a terrible cough. But I want
Speaker 1: to say thank you from me to you for your
Speaker 1: service to this country, thank you for your continued effort
Speaker 1: to try to raise awareness of this case, and thank
Speaker 1: you for reaching out to Thanking you. Thank you for
Speaker 1: reaching out to me, because that was the goal, was
Speaker 1: to inevitably get someone who was on the ground. So
Speaker 1: I just want to say thank you for being the
Speaker 1: first person to come and speak with me personally about
Speaker 1: the twenty nine Bob's case. And I would say, in
Speaker 1: my humble opinion, case aren'tgoing not case closed.
Speaker 2: Far from it, right. There's so many voices out there
Speaker 2: like mine that I haven't been heard yet, so it's
Speaker 2: never closed until we have for sure answer.
Speaker 1: So and for everybody who is watching, sorry for my
Speaker 1: cough and my horsey voice. I I'm trying to get
Speaker 1: over this. Thank you so much for watching, Thank you
Speaker 1: for being here, and thank you to our members. You
Speaker 1: guys are the lifeblood of this community. But we are
Speaker 1: continuing to build our network. Eventually, we want to have
Speaker 1: a discord and a place for people to congregate and
Speaker 1: share stories, collaborate and connect and network, so all that
Speaker 1: is coming. If you want to help support the channel
Speaker 1: as well, you can buy something from our merch store,
Speaker 1: which is obviously linked below. Thank you so much everyone
Speaker 1: for tuning in in the future. I love y'all and
Speaker 1: we'll see you next time. Thank you again.
Speaker 3: Mister Marine Witness number one.
Speaker 1: In Center and stollent And
Podbean