Something has Been Watching Us? ||Dr Beatriz Villarroel || NEW PEER REVIEWED PAPER ON TRANSIENT OBJECTS IN SPACE

1:22 Speaker 1: Good evening, seekers of truth, seekers of the unseen. Uh,

1:32 Speaker 1: pull up a chair, dim the lights, and let's talk

1:36 Speaker 1: about the sky's dirty little secrets, the ones that governments

1:41 Speaker 1: tend to whisper about in skiffs, scientists bury in footnotes,

1:47 Speaker 1: and the disclosure movement claws at like a cat. I

1:52 Speaker 1: am Ty Roberts, and I am having trouble with my

1:55 Speaker 1: placement on the microphone tonight. In this unfiltered, you know,

2:02 Speaker 1: kind of solo narration, I just want to take a

2:05 Speaker 1: look and crack open the vault on this no panels,

2:09 Speaker 1: no guests, just me, you and the story that's been

2:14 Speaker 1: literally screaming for attention. It's all over X right now,

2:21 Speaker 1: big debate, and we'll kind of start at the beginning.

2:26 Speaker 1: And I did, so what I what I want to

2:29 Speaker 1: do in this is I also want to God damn,

2:33 Speaker 1: placement on this microphone is terrible, and it looks like

2:38 Speaker 1: the service is coming in and having an issue with

2:41 Speaker 1: the internet here too. I apologize for that. I really

2:46 Speaker 1: just kind of threw this together last minute because everyone,

2:50 Speaker 1: like literally everyone is talking about it and I have

2:52 Speaker 1: some you know, we're gonna talk about it in the

2:54 Speaker 1: live show tomorrow as well. So I mean kind of,

2:59 Speaker 1: I don't want to get too too bogged down in it,

3:03 Speaker 1: but I definitely also uh want to give my like

3:07 Speaker 1: unfiltered and unfettered attention. So like I said, let's start

3:12 Speaker 1: at the beginning of the hypothesis. Uh that, let this

3:16 Speaker 1: feuse and we'll kind of trace it through the the

3:19 Speaker 1: white paper process. Uh. You know, it survived the gauntlet

3:23 Speaker 1: of peer review. Uh, and I think that is a

3:27 Speaker 1: you know, it's it's what people and debunkers have been

3:31 Speaker 1: asking for for so long, you know, like video evidence

3:35 Speaker 1: was no longer good enough, pictures not clearly not good enough.

3:42 Speaker 1: So they what we wanted, and what I think a

3:45 Speaker 1: lot of the community wanted was active like PhD scientists

3:51 Speaker 1: and experts working on this and writing papers. And now

3:55 Speaker 1: that we have that, I mean, it's it's like it's

3:59 Speaker 1: it's the goalpost. Just keep getting pushed back. And I

4:04 Speaker 1: get it, Like I get it, there are things that

4:07 Speaker 1: that we need to be skeptical about. But I mean,

4:12 Speaker 1: come on, who made these people who have made a

4:16 Speaker 1: career out of dismissal are are almost and I'm not

4:21 Speaker 1: gonna name anyone, but some of the debunkers they seem

4:25 Speaker 1: to be just as bad as like the the UFO gurus,

4:32 Speaker 1: and it's just like take them at their word and

4:36 Speaker 1: take them at this and you know what they say

4:39 Speaker 1: is the truth, and you know anything outside of that

4:42 Speaker 1: is uh, your your opposition. Like we can't disagree, we

4:49 Speaker 1: can't sit in the same room disagree, but at the

4:52 Speaker 1: end of the day, shake hands and walk away at

4:56 Speaker 1: least maybe learning something or showing a bit of empathy

5:02 Speaker 1: and being able to at least put yourself in the

5:05 Speaker 1: shoes of the other person. There's no more of that

5:08 Speaker 1: right in the world that we live in right now.

5:11 Speaker 1: It's just if you don't agree, you become the enemy.

5:16 Speaker 1: And this is trickling down in so many different facets.

5:20 Speaker 1: I mean, look at Disclosure tonight and those guys in

5:25 Speaker 1: Red Pandaquala. It's like this stuff is taking over the drama,

5:30 Speaker 1: the inherent chaos that seems to be the UFO ex community.

5:37 Speaker 1: And I'm guilty, Like I I'm not Jeremy Corbel and

5:42 Speaker 1: say that I don't interact with it. I definitely do,

5:46 Speaker 1: but I try to stay as neutral and as impartial

5:53 Speaker 1: as I can be, you know, looking at it from

5:55 Speaker 1: both sides, just like I do on the show. But anyway,

6:00 Speaker 1: I want to look at how every turn the gatekeeper

6:03 Speaker 1: seem to have official disclosure, uh, moving the goalposts, dangling

6:09 Speaker 1: transparency like it's a carrot out a string and it's

6:12 Speaker 1: just always right out of reach. It's maybe not bedtime

6:18 Speaker 1: rereading for the casual stargazer, though, I'll try to keep

6:23 Speaker 1: it kind of simple. No PhD required, wink wink uh.

6:27 Speaker 1: If your knee deep in UAP lore, I think you'll

6:30 Speaker 1: not belong to the frustrations. If you're new, welcome. By

6:35 Speaker 1: the end, you'll see why these vanishing lights aren't just

6:38 Speaker 1: dots on old plates. They're a mirror to our place

6:42 Speaker 1: and the cosmos. And because the universe loves a plot

6:46 Speaker 1: with a twist, we'll cap it with an interstellar wildcard.

6:50 Speaker 1: Everyone's watching right now, and it's three eye outlets. It's

6:53 Speaker 1: the third cosmic drifter crashing our solar party with with

6:58 Speaker 1: anomalies that make the Vasco transient kind of you know,

7:03 Speaker 1: look like not child's play. I wouldn't say that, but

7:07 Speaker 1: I think people are running rampant with the three I

7:09 Speaker 1: Atlas story. There's definitely some oddities. I know. I've been

7:13 Speaker 1: in talks with people like al Vi lobe, Mark D'Antonio.

7:19 Speaker 1: They don't agree at all. But then also, I've been

7:22 Speaker 1: talking with h my NASA that the NASA Chief of

7:26 Speaker 1: Aerospace Medicine, who also you know, uh worked in you know,

7:32 Speaker 1: chemical engineering and was a flight surgeon and uh did

7:36 Speaker 1: did a lot of a lot of a lot of work.

7:39 Speaker 1: I got him talking to me about it too, saying,

7:41 Speaker 1: you know, certain things don't add up. So uh yeah,

7:45 Speaker 1: buckle up. Uh we're gonna whether you're like it or not, Uh,

7:49 Speaker 1: we're gonna. We're gonna jump into it. So let's rewind

7:53 Speaker 1: uh to twenty seventeen. Ironically, Uh no, not going where

7:58 Speaker 1: you think we're going. Uh. But Beatrice Villa Roel doctor

8:03 Speaker 1: Bia to her ex followers at doctor bea Villa Reale

8:09 Speaker 1: if you're tweeting or ex posting this later, she's a

8:12 Speaker 1: sweetest astrophysicist with a nose for the anomalas. She's not

8:18 Speaker 1: chasing little green men. She's very much a data hound,

8:22 Speaker 1: sifting through dusty archives like a cosmic archaeologist, and she

8:29 Speaker 1: stumbles on something odd in the Palomar Observatory Sky Survey

8:35 Speaker 1: plate posse. I don't know if I'm saying that right,

8:39 Speaker 1: but those black and white snapshots from nineteen forty nine

8:44 Speaker 1: to nineteen fifty eight, and that is what's mapping the

8:47 Speaker 1: northern heavens on glass point like flash stars that blink

8:53 Speaker 1: on for a heartbeat under forty five minutes. Cosmically, that

8:58 Speaker 1: is so quick. Uh and then vanish no trace uh

9:02 Speaker 1: in follow up exposures. Uh, no matches in modern catalogs

9:07 Speaker 1: like sd S S or you know guya natural Uh

9:12 Speaker 1: meteors uh streak, meteors streak. Uh. These are static points.

9:18 Speaker 1: Asteroids move predictably. Yes, that's how I wrote it. So

9:22 Speaker 1: these yeah, these aren't typical. And I know, Uh, I'm not.

9:32 Speaker 1: I don't pretend to know what this all means, which

9:36 Speaker 1: is why I was going to say, I did grab

9:39 Speaker 1: the interview that she did with Ross Coltart's I want

9:44 Speaker 1: to play a couple of clips of that while we

9:46 Speaker 1: go through it. Uh, I actually are. I did talk

9:49 Speaker 1: to her and she did agree to come on the podcast.

9:53 Speaker 1: She has an answered sense. Obviously she's been been super busy,

9:57 Speaker 1: but you know, I really want her to come on

10:01 Speaker 1: and explode it, explain her hypothesis. But it hits like

10:06 Speaker 1: a Roague commet. You know, these are transient objects vanishing

10:12 Speaker 1: and appearing, you know sources during century of observations or

10:19 Speaker 1: VASCO for short over seven years, her team combed six

10:24 Speaker 1: hundred thousand plates on earthing over seventy thousand of those ghosts.

10:29 Speaker 1: But here's what's interesting and kind of what has kept

10:34 Speaker 1: to me interested. They cluster in linear alignments, hugging the

10:40 Speaker 1: geosynchronous Earth Orbit GEO that sweet spot thirty six thousand

10:46 Speaker 1: kilometers up, where as ats like weather birds loiter not

10:51 Speaker 1: random scatter soldiers in formation marching across the sky. You know,

10:57 Speaker 1: early skeptic scoffed and you know said it was play

11:01 Speaker 1: defects and shadow geometry is something I've heard as of

11:06 Speaker 1: recent But it seems that uh or or what what

11:11 Speaker 1: was the other one? Emulsion glitches from the analog era,

11:19 Speaker 1: and and her counter has been statistical rigor. They're not

11:24 Speaker 1: just kind of like fuzzy smudges. They're sharp uh sub

11:28 Speaker 1: This is where I did when I had to look

11:31 Speaker 1: it up like four times. Uh there's sharp sub arc

11:36 Speaker 1: second points with magnitudes that are deliberate and and they

11:41 Speaker 1: vanished too quick for known junk meteors. Planes even early

11:47 Speaker 1: balloons leave trails. And again this is you know, an

11:53 Speaker 1: an era, that is you know, pre the space program,

11:59 Speaker 1: so so you know, nothing's supposed to be up there.

12:03 Speaker 1: So I want to bring in this what is it

12:06 Speaker 1: called this interview that she did and we'll go back

12:12 Speaker 1: to the other part in a minute, but hopefully you

12:16 Speaker 1: guys can hear this. Where is it? Let me know

12:22 Speaker 1: if you can hear.

12:22 Speaker 2: It identified objects into a peer review journal, especially journals

12:28 Speaker 2: as prestigious as the ones you're talking about. Let me

12:31 Speaker 2: do a quick summary. So the study that you did,

12:34 Speaker 2: you were looking at pre satellite transient sky events and

12:41 Speaker 2: you basically stylize nearly three hundred thousand short lived transient

12:46 Speaker 2: events that were captured on red sensitive photographic plates from

12:52 Speaker 2: the first Poloma Sky Survey. And these exposures were all

12:56 Speaker 2: taken between nineteen forty eight and before humans put satellites

13:01 Speaker 2: up in the nine to late nineteen fifties, and each

13:04 Speaker 2: of these exposures lasted about forty five fifty minutes, and

13:08 Speaker 2: you focused on identifying cases where three or more transient

13:12 Speaker 2: points appeared along a straight line during the same exposure.

13:17 Speaker 2: And the reason why those lines matter is if a

13:20 Speaker 2: single flash appears on a skyplate, it could be a glitch,

13:24 Speaker 2: but multiple point like lights perfectly aligned and visible in

13:28 Speaker 2: one long exposure photo that hints at something coordinated, possibly

13:34 Speaker 2: spinning or reflective objects. And you can rule out natural

13:41 Speaker 2: sources like meteors, stars and asteroids. They don't line up

13:45 Speaker 2: and appear simultaneously. You can rule out plate defects because

13:49 Speaker 2: you were able to show, weren't you as you told

13:51 Speaker 2: us previously that when you go into the shadow of

13:55 Speaker 2: the sun, obviously it removes the reflectiveness, so it's it's

14:01 Speaker 2: not a plate defect, and you basically what the only

14:07 Speaker 2: plausible explanation is artificial reflections from flat highly reflective services

14:16 Speaker 2: in geosynchronous orbit. That's that's exactly what explains you're talking about.

14:24 Speaker 2: How many of these objects are we talking about, Beatrice.

14:27 Speaker 3: So we had two candidates that are highly interesting that

14:31 Speaker 3: the paper resulted in, and there's still one little caveat

14:37 Speaker 3: for these two candidates. There's a minuscal chance that it

14:40 Speaker 3: might be something called optical ghosting on the in the instruments.

14:46 Speaker 1: What when when that door keeps doing that, I keep

14:49 Speaker 1: thinking it's in here, So I'm like, what the hell

14:52 Speaker 1: is that? So I hope everyone I got this camera

14:57 Speaker 1: switcher and I'm just so obsessed with the t our

15:01 Speaker 1: feed so fun to do, but yeah, I'm so I'm sorry.

15:07 Speaker 1: I do have to stop it every couple seconds so

15:10 Speaker 1: we don't get copyright straight. But again trying too that

15:16 Speaker 1: was creepy.

15:19 Speaker 3: How do I speaks against it is because we looked

15:23 Speaker 3: at the blue sensitive images and you don't see anything there.

15:26 Speaker 3: If it would be optical ghosting, you would also see

15:28 Speaker 3: with the same setup of the instruments, you would see

15:31 Speaker 3: something there, but we don't. However, we always always leave

15:35 Speaker 3: that little caveat. But what even more talks about these

15:38 Speaker 3: things are little is because when we look at all

15:41 Speaker 3: the transients, not only at aligne ones, but all the

15:44 Speaker 3: transits in the Earth shadow, we do see this huge

15:47 Speaker 3: deficit of transience. And that really speaks for that. What

15:50 Speaker 3: we are dealing with our solar reflections from very flat,

15:55 Speaker 3: very reflective objects in synchronous orbits.

15:59 Speaker 2: Doctor tellby what could this be? What are these objects?

16:04 Speaker 3: Well, these are objects before Sputnik one, when humans have

16:08 Speaker 3: nothing up there, and these things, no matter what they are,

16:11 Speaker 3: they need to be really frat reflective, like a mirror.

16:16 Speaker 3: And I personally don't know anything natural that produces and

16:21 Speaker 3: that looks like that that fulfills.

16:24 Speaker 1: I know something and I've had a vi lobe. Oh

16:29 Speaker 1: this is a good moment for Oh no, I'm already

16:32 Speaker 1: on that camera, so let me go to this camera

16:34 Speaker 1: and say, this is a good moment for a camera.

16:37 Speaker 1: So which I had a vi Lobe in that chair.

16:42 Speaker 1: I have not aired the episode yet, but I had

16:45 Speaker 1: Avi Lobe in that chair a while back, and I

16:49 Speaker 1: need to invite him back in. But a muamua what

16:56 Speaker 1: Avi was saying that oh mulla mula looked like and

17:00 Speaker 1: that it could possibly be a probe and I don't

17:03 Speaker 1: think we got enough data on it. And again I'm

17:06 Speaker 1: not saying that that's exactly what it is. But you

17:09 Speaker 1: know if three eye and that's why I tied three

17:12 Speaker 1: eye at liss In because three iye Atlas is giving

17:15 Speaker 1: that very that nickel with no iron. It's it's giving

17:21 Speaker 1: that signature which is we've never seen we don't see

17:27 Speaker 1: nickel without iron, and you know iron being very heavy

17:30 Speaker 1: and corrosive, we don't use it. We separate it and

17:33 Speaker 1: use that in our space program. So again this is

17:36 Speaker 1: pre space program. So again pointing towards an and uh I,

17:42 Speaker 1: three eye atlasts do I think it's an alien spaceship?

17:47 Speaker 1: Probably not. Is it interesting and could it be some

17:51 Speaker 1: sort of probe that does that that does hide itself

17:55 Speaker 1: as a rock or I think it's totally plausible and

18:00 Speaker 1: just I mean the de Bunkers are like even Mark

18:03 Speaker 1: D'Antonio is an astronomer and a good friend of mine,

18:06 Speaker 1: Like I kind of got a disagreement with them, and

18:08 Speaker 1: I'm like, dude, like stop downplaying it like it's super interesting.

18:16 Speaker 2: It's these requirements, so I like correct in saying there

18:19 Speaker 2: are literally tens of thousands of these objects that you've detected.

18:24 Speaker 3: We see that roughly thirty five thousand transients are belonging

18:29 Speaker 3: to this kind of category, but that is just for

18:31 Speaker 3: the northern hemisphere, which means that we would need to

18:34 Speaker 3: have around seventy thousands of transients around I mean for

18:38 Speaker 3: the whole Earth. And from that we can estimate that

18:43 Speaker 3: maybe tens of thousands, two hundred thousands of objects around

18:47 Speaker 3: the Earth must have been there.

18:49 Speaker 2: So now we know that they were there in pre

18:52 Speaker 2: spot Nick nineteen fifties, what do we know about whether

18:56 Speaker 2: there's still there? Can we rule out the possibility or

18:59 Speaker 2: the problem ability that they're still there in geosynchronous orbit.

19:04 Speaker 3: I have no idea because if these are what they

19:08 Speaker 3: think they are, I mean, if these are artificial object

19:11 Speaker 3: which the signatures are pointing towards, I have no idea

19:16 Speaker 3: what they could have done or if they are there still.

19:18 Speaker 3: I would assume they're there still.

19:21 Speaker 2: But it's a reasonable conclusion, isn't it, doctor, that if

19:24 Speaker 2: these are artificial objects, some civilization has constructed them.

19:31 Speaker 1: Yes, I would say so.

19:33 Speaker 3: I mean it's not ours.

19:35 Speaker 2: And when your peer review colleagues asked you questions, were

19:39 Speaker 2: they aware of the significance of what this paper is

19:42 Speaker 2: these papers are pointing to, I don't know.

19:45 Speaker 3: We were talking about the technicalities, not about the implications.

19:50 Speaker 2: It's interesting because scientists get bogged down, and obviously for

19:53 Speaker 2: good reason, in exploring alternative prosiaic explanations. But when you

19:58 Speaker 2: think about it and step back from them, occasions of

20:00 Speaker 2: what you're saying, this is massive. You are the author

20:06 Speaker 2: or the lead author of two papers which essentially suggest

20:10 Speaker 2: that there are artificial constructed objects in geosynchronous Earth orbit

20:16 Speaker 2: in the nineteen fifties before humans sent up satellites, and

20:22 Speaker 2: to this day we don't know if those objects are

20:24 Speaker 2: still there. But they are indicative of something constructed.

20:33 Speaker 3: Isn't that exciting?

20:36 Speaker 2: Good for you? I mean, the implications are this might

20:39 Speaker 2: be the first scientific evidence of a non human intelligence,

20:44 Speaker 2: and it.

20:44 Speaker 3: Subtainly is going to be. What they like about this

20:47 Speaker 3: is that we are giving exact methods and strategies for

20:51 Speaker 3: people to explore the UFO question and a question if

20:55 Speaker 3: they are here, through just easily available methods many astronomers

21:01 Speaker 3: over the whole world can work with because these play

21:04 Speaker 3: archives exist in so many countries, and you don't need

21:08 Speaker 3: to be part of some very expensive, big collaboration because

21:12 Speaker 3: if you have access to this open data, anyone can

21:15 Speaker 3: go in. They can analyze these data sets, they can

21:19 Speaker 3: download them, and they can check if there's a deficit

21:23 Speaker 3: in the Earth shadow or if they see alignments. It's

21:25 Speaker 3: a very open source way of working. So I think, yes,

21:30 Speaker 3: we're going to be able to really pin down a

21:34 Speaker 3: very secure answer very soon if more people try to

21:37 Speaker 3: replicate this and work with the same questions.

21:40 Speaker 1: So fast forward. Since this interview, we're going to fast

21:45 Speaker 1: forward to twenty twenty five and Beatrice is not hypothesizing anymore.

21:53 Speaker 1: She's publishing white papers and drops them as a preprint

22:00 Speaker 1: on a place called Now I'm not familiar with what

22:04 Speaker 1: this is a R is it x I V or

22:09 Speaker 1: x I N, it's some whatever, it's some group and

22:18 Speaker 1: she co authors. Uh. The co authors on the paper

22:22 Speaker 1: include H Enrique Solano and UH Cadre of International Eyes.

22:28 Speaker 1: The bombshell Uh a twenty two sigma statistical uh deficit.

22:34 Speaker 1: That's not a TYPEO twenty two standard deviations. Uh. So

22:39 Speaker 1: that's the kind of number that makes uh lottery winds

22:43 Speaker 1: look probable. Anyway, the transients during Earth's shadow hours when

22:51 Speaker 1: the plate's caught the night side sky, Uh, sunlight out

22:55 Speaker 1: of glints are off. Uh, They're they're completely off. So

23:01 Speaker 1: what that says, I guess is that these aren't stars

23:05 Speaker 1: or quasars. Their reflections, like she said in the interview,

23:09 Speaker 1: from these flat mirror like uh surfaces, and you know

23:15 Speaker 1: that really again that drives me towards the idea of

23:20 Speaker 1: something like Omuamuha, which Avi said was uh, you know, uh,

23:26 Speaker 1: flat like a pancake. And if it if it was

23:30 Speaker 1: made of you know, these like three iye atlis, which

23:35 Speaker 1: you know was was nickel uh or it has a

23:37 Speaker 1: lot of nickel and no iron. That's a metallic surface,

23:41 Speaker 1: I mean, and that would you know kind of shine

23:44 Speaker 1: uh shine off. But again this is the pre the

23:48 Speaker 1: pre satellite era. So it's that is what is so interesting.

23:53 Speaker 1: But the debunkers, like you know, and and and the

23:58 Speaker 1: debunkers uh are the ones that uh you you you

24:02 Speaker 1: would probably expect. H. I don't wanna. I don't. It's

24:07 Speaker 1: we don't have to name any anyone. But I did

24:11 Speaker 1: bookmark a couple posts and so so Beatrice submitted her paper.

24:19 Speaker 1: It's been peer reviewed, which is again something that we've

24:22 Speaker 1: been asking for in the community for for so long.

24:27 Speaker 1: That that and a VI lobe and Harvard and you know,

24:32 Speaker 1: they were doing their thing with the Galileo project. Uh.

24:36 Speaker 1: Then there's Gary Nolan and the Saul Foundation. They're doing

24:39 Speaker 1: their thing. And it finally seemed like there were real scientists,

24:44 Speaker 1: like they were real, real like brilliant minds coming into

24:53 Speaker 1: this field and coming into it with with really not

24:58 Speaker 1: you know, not not again. They're not chasing little green men,

25:03 Speaker 1: so to say. But they're also not afraid to ask

25:07 Speaker 1: the question what if? And I think every scientist should

25:10 Speaker 1: ask that what if? And I think Beatrice especially has

25:18 Speaker 1: put forth data a peer reviewed paper, a white paper,

25:23 Speaker 1: but then she submits it to this place. Apparently it's

25:27 Speaker 1: like it's where papers go to to live or die,

25:32 Speaker 1: you know, and and some of them aren't even published,

25:36 Speaker 1: but they get put on there so that other scientists

25:39 Speaker 1: can read them and go through them, and you know,

25:43 Speaker 1: so it it apparently gets rejected from this site, which

25:48 Speaker 1: is also a site that or or a server, so

25:54 Speaker 1: to say that had put up and maybe I think

25:59 Speaker 1: I know when it exactly was, but they had put

26:02 Speaker 1: up a paper that you know, was challenging of what

26:12 Speaker 1: Beatrice is saying or putting forth in her paper. And

26:16 Speaker 1: the reasoning they gave her, and I have it, I'll

26:18 Speaker 1: pull it up in one second on Twitter. The reason

26:22 Speaker 1: and they gave her is said one of them was

26:24 Speaker 1: that it was just not of interest. And but they

26:28 Speaker 1: ran in a paper that was in challenging, challenging it,

26:33 Speaker 1: so it was of interest. Then is that what made

26:36 Speaker 1: them not interested in her?

26:38 Speaker 2: You know?

26:39 Speaker 1: And again is that something we see where someone muddies

26:44 Speaker 1: the water right before before the real work can be done.

26:49 Speaker 1: We've been dealing with that in the UFO community for forever, literally,

26:55 Speaker 1: you know this the same time David Grush testifies. Uh,

27:00 Speaker 1: you know, a Miami or or the Las Vegas alien

27:03 Speaker 1: thing happens and it just muddies the water, so no

27:05 Speaker 1: one cares about any of it. Or the Miami Mall

27:08 Speaker 1: happens while you know, this thing's happening, and it's just

27:12 Speaker 1: it happens to us all the time. So anyway, with

27:18 Speaker 1: that being said, it seems like that could be a reason.

27:21 Speaker 1: But this plot, this server does not take her paper

27:24 Speaker 1: and let me share on X Yeah, share this tab instead.

27:33 Speaker 1: I don't know if you can see this. Oh it

27:36 Speaker 1: doesn't show me on the uh on the viewfinder. Oh

27:48 Speaker 1: there it is. Okay, So, dear author, thank you for

27:53 Speaker 1: one second. Let me get this banner. Thank you for

27:55 Speaker 1: submitting your work to Okay, so it isn't a V.

27:59 Speaker 1: I thought I'd mistyped it. H a r xi V.

28:04 Speaker 1: We regret to inform you that this place moderators have

28:10 Speaker 1: determined that your submission will not be accepted and made

28:13 Speaker 1: public on the website. Our moderators determined that your submission

28:18 Speaker 1: does not contain sufficient original or substance sub why can't

28:24 Speaker 1: I speak substantative scholarly research and is not of interest

28:31 Speaker 1: to r xi V. For more information, YadA, YadA, YadA.

28:36 Speaker 1: Moderators strive to balance fair and this is key fair

28:41 Speaker 1: assessment with decision speed. We understand that this decision may

28:48 Speaker 1: mean decision may be disappointing, and we apologize that due

28:52 Speaker 1: to the high volume of submissions that we receive, we

28:55 Speaker 1: cannot offer more detailed feedback. Some authors have found that

28:59 Speaker 1: asking their personal network of colleagues or submitting it to

29:03 Speaker 1: conventional journal for peer review are alternative avenues to obtain feedback.

29:09 Speaker 1: And that's that. So what you're essentially, what that says

29:17 Speaker 1: to me is that it's so hard to say it

29:25 Speaker 1: without sign without sounding like a complete and utter asshole.

29:32 Speaker 1: But to me, that that is just so blatant, it's

29:37 Speaker 1: so on the it's it's so it's so exactly what

29:42 Speaker 1: you'd accept. I mean, I expect right being in the

29:47 Speaker 1: in the in this community. And you know, it seems

29:53 Speaker 1: whenever we take three steps forward, we're taking eight back

29:59 Speaker 1: at the same time. And there is clearly something that

30:04 Speaker 1: is gatekeeping and and some something, whether it's some individuals,

30:13 Speaker 1: an entity, the deep state as people call it, or

30:17 Speaker 1: just uh, you know, uh stigma alone, whether it's bias

30:23 Speaker 1: actual bias on a human level, there is no place

30:28 Speaker 1: for people who think like that anymore. It's like we

30:35 Speaker 1: we're on a rock flying hurdling through space, and our

30:42 Speaker 1: soul like not only are we as a solar system

30:45 Speaker 1: hurtling through space, but our galaxy is hurtling through space,

30:52 Speaker 1: and that is all hurtling through space. Like the the

30:57 Speaker 1: the fact that we are not chasing down the biggest story.

31:03 Speaker 1: And and as scientists when and I think what another

31:08 Speaker 1: person said, let me go to it. It's Astral. He's

31:11 Speaker 1: a good friend of mine. What he said was he

31:15 Speaker 1: thinks that because in the paper, apparently they get to

31:20 Speaker 1: where the hell is it? Uh, they get to talking

31:24 Speaker 1: about nuclear Newton like nuclear uh connection.

31:32 Speaker 3: Uh.

31:32 Speaker 1: There was also a connection that I know she talks

31:35 Speaker 1: about uh with there was the connection with the Washington

31:40 Speaker 1: d c UH flyover that that, by the way, that

31:47 Speaker 1: is profound to me, that that that that was a

31:51 Speaker 1: connection uh to it, because I find that to be

31:55 Speaker 1: super interesting, super compelling. And I haven't read the whole thing.

32:01 Speaker 1: But if what she's saying is that at nuclear testing,

32:06 Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know how it gets into nuclear.

32:08 Speaker 1: Oh here it is, Astrol said in his opinion the

32:13 Speaker 1: paper by doctor Villa Rouel likely got cut from the

32:17 Speaker 1: server for crossing into too many fields, those fields being

32:22 Speaker 1: astro nuclear physics and UAP data. Uh. The article is

32:28 Speaker 1: tough to classify, so it was rejected on scope. And

32:33 Speaker 1: I don't know if this is a I that he's

32:36 Speaker 1: pulling from here, but he gives some some reasons and

32:42 Speaker 1: moderator views on why he thinks it wasn't So I

32:46 Speaker 1: don't know there could be a rational explanation, uh, for

32:49 Speaker 1: for why it was not accepted. You know, maybe maybe

32:53 Speaker 1: I maybe I am letting my bias show. I don't know,

32:58 Speaker 1: but I thought it again, I find it wonderful. So

33:02 Speaker 1: here's this is Beatrice's post. So she posted wonderful news.

33:08 Speaker 1: Our two new VASCO papers are now peer reviewed, accepted,

33:13 Speaker 1: and published, and they reveal some extraordinary things. She finds

33:19 Speaker 1: statistically significant correlations between short lived transience. Again, this is

33:25 Speaker 1: a pre spot mix, a pre any space program, skyplates,

33:31 Speaker 1: UFO sightings and above ground nuclear tests. Wow. Again, nuclear tests,

33:36 Speaker 1: that's my area of interest. Especially we show a twenty

33:41 Speaker 1: two twenty two whatever that symbol is deficit. Oh that's

33:47 Speaker 1: what I had in the thing that I wrote out

33:50 Speaker 1: that I think I copied it from here deficit of

33:53 Speaker 1: transience inside Earth's shadow consistent And again that's a really

33:59 Speaker 1: interesting aspect of it in Earth's shadow. So they're not

34:03 Speaker 1: again anyway, so consistent with a fraction of these events

34:09 Speaker 1: originating from solar reflections from flat highly reflective surfaces in

34:15 Speaker 1: orbit before the Cuban space age began. Together with her

34:21 Speaker 1: earlier there, earlier U M n r a S paper.

34:26 Speaker 1: Uh these results from trip titch of new methods to

34:31 Speaker 1: investigate U A P using astronomical data. These they're independent

34:37 Speaker 1: HYE level journals and these independent peer review processes. These

34:42 Speaker 1: latest results raise a bold question. And yes, you know which, God,

34:47 Speaker 1: she's good. That was really good. If I had read

34:50 Speaker 1: it and clearly and concisely, that would have come off

34:54 Speaker 1: so much cooler hopefully. Uh So there what she's saying

35:00 Speaker 1: there is And then she explains what this organization is

35:08 Speaker 1: and it's where physicists and astronomers share pre oh pre prints.

35:13 Speaker 1: So if a paper isn't there, can you guys see this?

35:17 Speaker 1: Yeah you can. So it serves as the central hub.

35:25 Speaker 1: So this server serves as the central hub for open

35:28 Speaker 1: scientific exchange. We're unpublished, newly accepted, and even rejected manuscripts

35:35 Speaker 1: are shared so that other researchers can read tests. So

35:40 Speaker 1: there you go. Debunkers who are saying that these need

35:45 Speaker 1: to be replicated, Well, that's what she's saying. Test and

35:51 Speaker 1: build upon the work. It's how ideas circulate rapidly and transparently,

35:57 Speaker 1: long before and sometimes regardless of ah true formal publication. Now,

36:02 Speaker 1: both of our accepted in peer reviewed papers in PASP

36:05 Speaker 1: and scientific reports have been rejected from the server in

36:11 Speaker 1: one case, she was told at least an older work

36:15 Speaker 1: in the other, and that's the one that I mentioned

36:18 Speaker 1: that research was quote not of interest to the server

36:24 Speaker 1: and a platform impeer girl results, peer review and publication

36:30 Speaker 1: in high quality journals are no longer enough to satisfy

36:35 Speaker 1: ooh the gatekeepers. Scientists are being prevented from reading new results.

36:41 Speaker 1: The UFO stigma remained strong, and again I think I

36:44 Speaker 1: talked about that as well. So she is chalking it

36:49 Speaker 1: up to UFO stigma and maybe a little bit of

36:53 Speaker 1: gate keeping. What do you guys think in the comments?

36:58 Speaker 1: Let me know, I really you know, we're gonna be

37:01 Speaker 1: diving in this tomorrow into the live show, h and

37:05 Speaker 1: I'm super excited about it. I really am because I

37:08 Speaker 1: think this is I have so much to say on this,

37:10 Speaker 1: and it's it's really fascinating to me, this whole thing,

37:17 Speaker 1: the transience. And I'll play a little bit more of

37:19 Speaker 1: that clip, but I want to get something to hear

37:22 Speaker 1: so vetted. So I have had Mick I almost said,

37:28 Speaker 1: Mick wasp Mick West. I've had him on the show

37:33 Speaker 1: multiple times. And I say that because I I I'm

37:38 Speaker 1: having Tim Phillips on as well, and people have been

37:42 Speaker 1: pretty upset at me for that one for some reason,

37:45 Speaker 1: and then asking me to, you know, get involved in

37:48 Speaker 1: other drama ish stuff not maybe not drama. Maybe it's

37:53 Speaker 1: not drama, but like, I just want to have my

37:58 Speaker 1: discussions with these people. I want to ask them the

38:00 Speaker 1: hard questions about stuff like the Wall Street Journal article

38:03 Speaker 1: and Malmstrom and this bogus idea that an EMP like

38:09 Speaker 1: the directed EMP was used to and so that was happening.

38:13 Speaker 1: And I'm going a little off tangent here, But so

38:16 Speaker 1: you're telling me that that hazing ritual was used against

38:21 Speaker 1: are uh, the hazing ritual was used against people that

38:26 Speaker 1: were entering special access programs. You fucking lie to them

38:31 Speaker 1: and tell them that there's UFOs show them pictures, right,

38:34 Speaker 1: and then never tell them, never tell them that it

38:38 Speaker 1: was a hazing ritual. Just forget that the best part

38:42 Speaker 1: of it is them finding out that it's a hazing

38:44 Speaker 1: ritual or or a joke. Like it doesn't make sense

38:48 Speaker 1: that part, right, because eventually the person that gets hazed

38:52 Speaker 1: becomes the hazer, so they get let in on it all,

38:56 Speaker 1: and that's not what's happening, clearly. Then to say that

39:00 Speaker 1: Malmstrom was a an e mp, like if you don't

39:04 Speaker 1: think I'm gonna ask him about that kind of stuff, like,

39:09 Speaker 1: then you don't. Uh, I don't know if I want

39:13 Speaker 1: to get involved with this other stuff. It's not my place,

39:17 Speaker 1: like it's it's not so you know, and uh, we

39:22 Speaker 1: had to move the date because of all this nonsense

39:26 Speaker 1: and that upsets me because you know, uh, it's it

39:31 Speaker 1: just upsets me. But I want to do what's right.

39:33 Speaker 1: So like I'll run it by and I'll ask, like, hey,

39:36 Speaker 1: do you want to talk about this? But if he

39:38 Speaker 1: says no, I'm gonna respect that, Like you know, I'll ask,

39:43 Speaker 1: but if he doesn't want to, then I'll respect it.

39:47 Speaker 1: I I I'm there for for total disclosure, but vetted

39:53 Speaker 1: vetted commented, So there's this thing. So Mickwest is saying that.

39:58 Speaker 1: So Mick West did get like attacked by a lot

40:02 Speaker 1: of the believers about And I don't think we should

40:07 Speaker 1: be attacking, uh Mick, because Mick Mick's doing Mick Mick.

40:11 Speaker 1: This is what Mick does all all the time. This

40:14 Speaker 1: is what he does. This is Mick, right. He tries

40:18 Speaker 1: to find the prosaic explanation and and that's what he does.

40:22 Speaker 1: Like if we need that kind of stuff, and it,

40:28 Speaker 1: you know, UFO X can already feel not like an

40:36 Speaker 1: echo chamber. I don't want to call it an echo chamber,

40:39 Speaker 1: but you know, if you're in spaces with the same

40:42 Speaker 1: people every night, you're you're going to create the same

40:45 Speaker 1: conversations and the same you know, then there's going to

40:48 Speaker 1: be the narrative split. And that's where I get, like

40:52 Speaker 1: I said, I get a little dicey because if we're

40:55 Speaker 1: defending you know, defending Elizondo, like he's your you know,

41:01 Speaker 1: fantasy football team, and I say this maybe ad nauseum

41:05 Speaker 1: that like that's a problem. Right, if you're defending Steven Greer,

41:09 Speaker 1: like you know, like if you're staking your mortgage on it,

41:17 Speaker 1: like that kind is like, if that's the hill you

41:20 Speaker 1: want to die on, Like it just doesn't make sense

41:23 Speaker 1: to me. Like we should understand that one person isn't

41:28 Speaker 1: going to drive disclosure. It's going to be a group effort,

41:34 Speaker 1: and it's going to take you know, the general public.

41:38 Speaker 1: That's what these hearings are for. That's what you know.

41:41 Speaker 1: People often get upset with these hearings that they're not

41:44 Speaker 1: going as deep as they could be. And yeah, I agree, right,

41:48 Speaker 1: but it's also for the general public to get involved

41:52 Speaker 1: and to see that it's being discussed. And that's why

41:55 Speaker 1: each one is so monumental. You know, we had one

41:58 Speaker 1: in seventy years, and then we've had four in the

42:03 Speaker 1: last you know, five or six years. So the needle

42:07 Speaker 1: is moving, the stigma is shedding, the scientists are getting involved,

42:11 Speaker 1: white paper like everything that Carl Sagan was asking for. Right,

42:17 Speaker 1: with great I almost said, with great power comes great responsibility. Oh,

42:27 Speaker 1: it's been a day. It's also late, and I this

42:31 Speaker 1: is I gotta go soon. We'll be talking about this

42:34 Speaker 1: again tomorrow. But yes, with great power does come great responsibility. However, uh,

42:43 Speaker 1: I honestly can't remember the real saying right now, does

42:46 Speaker 1: anyone have it in the chat for me, no extraordinary proof.

42:51 Speaker 1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I don't like that saying

42:57 Speaker 1: personally because evidence is evidence. But the claims and Mitch Yukaku,

43:07 Speaker 1: where's he gone? He like disappeared? Where the fuck that

43:11 Speaker 1: that guy go? He was in like every UFO thing,

43:14 Speaker 1: and then all of a sudden he just disappeared. And

43:16 Speaker 1: I haven't seen him since, but he's he said something

43:20 Speaker 1: that I always really liked, and that was the burden

43:23 Speaker 1: of proofs as has shifted to the non believer. We've

43:28 Speaker 1: got the videos, We've got the pictures. Right, it's getting

43:32 Speaker 1: a little bit more challenging with the videos and pictures

43:36 Speaker 1: with you know AI and you know the advent of

43:39 Speaker 1: of like really really good special effects at a very

43:49 Speaker 1: accessible uh and anyone can learn Blender and and anyone

43:54 Speaker 1: can learn how to do like it's like the Cousin

43:57 Speaker 1: Brothers for me, are a good example, like a bunch

44:00 Speaker 1: of their stuff, like come on, like they made a

44:06 Speaker 1: whole career off of it. And you know, don't hate

44:08 Speaker 1: the player. I hate the game, right, hate. I hate

44:11 Speaker 1: that every time I'm on UFO X or or on

44:14 Speaker 1: some Facebook group. Yes, I do sometimes peruse the Facebook

44:20 Speaker 1: groups because I'm apparently old. Someone said, but I I

44:29 Speaker 1: was using the Facebook or scroll in the Facebook group

44:33 Speaker 1: and it just it was really it gets really like toxic.

44:44 Speaker 1: And I came from the world of movies in Hollywood

44:47 Speaker 1: and that was toxic. This is a little bit less toxic,

44:51 Speaker 1: believe it or not, but it's it's still highly like

44:56 Speaker 1: people are at each other's throats. And you know, it's

44:59 Speaker 1: like the Star Wars fan base, like they can't ever

45:02 Speaker 1: seem to agree. And maybe that's just something, but I

45:05 Speaker 1: think that you and I I what I The point

45:09 Speaker 1: for what I'm saying is, I don't think the UFO

45:12 Speaker 1: community should be something like the Star Wars community because

45:17 Speaker 1: what we're dealing with is real. It's real, like we

45:22 Speaker 1: this should be the cutting edge. It's one of the

45:25 Speaker 1: most like basic fundamental questions as as an existentially capable being, right,

45:33 Speaker 1: what happens after death? Are we alone in the universe?

45:37 Speaker 1: These are things that we ponder because we're conscious. What

45:41 Speaker 1: is consciousness? Why can I sit here and have this

45:44 Speaker 1: conversation with you? Why can I reflect and make noises

45:48 Speaker 1: out of my mouth that are sent through digital waves

45:52 Speaker 1: to right now? One hundred and ninety six people total

45:57 Speaker 1: on Accent and YouTube that are able to hear me.

46:02 Speaker 1: You know, maybe with a little delay because the internet

46:04 Speaker 1: in the studio, we have to have the guy come out,

46:08 Speaker 1: so there could be a little delay. See I work

46:11 Speaker 1: that in, but pretty much instantaneously. Like look at the

46:16 Speaker 1: fact that we're here as a fucking miracle. The fact

46:19 Speaker 1: that we're not like on some like we didn't, we

46:22 Speaker 1: weren't just born into some apocalyptic fucking hellscape is because

46:27 Speaker 1: of love. It's because of compassion, It's because of structure,

46:33 Speaker 1: you know, religion and society and you know, love it,

46:37 Speaker 1: hate or love it. But I mean we got it

46:40 Speaker 1: pretty good. And you know, u pho disclosure. It shouldn't

46:44 Speaker 1: be like a movie community. It should be like, uh,

46:48 Speaker 1: you know something that's again And I think we are

46:51 Speaker 1: getting there finally, where real real experts like a VI

46:55 Speaker 1: Lobe like riswan Vik, like uh, Brian Keating, like Jesse

47:05 Speaker 1: might Well I don't know if Jesse's an expert so

47:08 Speaker 1: to say, but he's a genius when it comes to

47:11 Speaker 1: research and retaining information connecting dots. So yeah, Jesse, I

47:16 Speaker 1: mean I think Jesse does a great job. And yeah,

47:20 Speaker 1: so I mean, I think we are getting to a

47:23 Speaker 1: place that's that's awesome and it's amazing, but it's it's

47:27 Speaker 1: not coming without its challenges. And I think the digital

47:30 Speaker 1: age is really it's something that I mean, when you

47:39 Speaker 1: give everybody a voice, you give everybody a voice. So

47:44 Speaker 1: that's just the way the Internet's always going to be,

47:46 Speaker 1: I suppose, but it can be. And that's why I

47:49 Speaker 1: really advise people like the UFO community. It's intoxicating because

47:53 Speaker 1: again we are talking about like real real the implications

47:59 Speaker 1: are so outstandingly paradigm shifting, right, So I understand that,

48:08 Speaker 1: you know, when we talk about these things, it's it's

48:10 Speaker 1: it's easy to become enamored and to like this is

48:14 Speaker 1: the only topic that people just throw themselves into and

48:17 Speaker 1: they just never come up for air. But like, go

48:21 Speaker 1: on a hike, Like I know that the cliche like

48:24 Speaker 1: go touch grass, troll comment, but actually go touch grass.

48:29 Speaker 1: Like go out on a hike, go out with your friends,

48:32 Speaker 1: get away from UFOs for a while and go try

48:35 Speaker 1: to you know, maybe you'll see one and then you know,

48:39 Speaker 1: I don't know, something amazing will happen, but you have

48:42 Speaker 1: to have you have and and Chris BLOODSOE at the

48:46 Speaker 1: time got ridiculed for saying this. But if you're not looking,

48:51 Speaker 1: and if you're not willing to see, then you're not

48:54 Speaker 1: gonna see. And I do believe that. I do. I

48:59 Speaker 1: think that's why a lot of children see these things.

49:04 Speaker 1: I was a child, you said, you could say when

49:07 Speaker 1: I saw mine at ten or eleven years old. But

49:11 Speaker 1: we're in a new place. We are in uncharted territory

49:17 Speaker 1: right now as a species with AI and the advancement

49:20 Speaker 1: of AI and the scariness of the existential crisis that

49:25 Speaker 1: you know that it's like we're facing down the barrel

49:30 Speaker 1: of a gun, but we're also pointing the gun. That

49:33 Speaker 1: paints a weird picture to sketch that. But you know

49:37 Speaker 1: what I mean, We're about to create God, not we.

49:42 Speaker 1: I'm not about to create God like some other conscious being.

49:46 Speaker 1: It probably is AI already sentient. I don't know. Maybe anyway,

49:52 Speaker 1: I'm going off on tangents here. So what was the

49:57 Speaker 1: last thing I wanted to say was so vetted? Was

49:59 Speaker 1: bringing it an up. Mick West was saying the gold

50:02 Speaker 1: standard of science is not peer review, which really does

50:07 Speaker 1: fucking frustrate me because now so he says it is

50:12 Speaker 1: independent replication, and of course, of course, like that's part

50:18 Speaker 1: of the process, but why why come at it from

50:24 Speaker 1: that angle. It's a peer reviewed paper with really compelling

50:31 Speaker 1: data in it. It's everything that people have wanted for

50:35 Speaker 1: so long. And this one isn't like some crazy weird

50:39 Speaker 1: like you know, interdimensional galactic federation. Like this is literally

50:45 Speaker 1: you know, as cut and dry as it gets, accounting

50:50 Speaker 1: for error. And I think that's great, you know, I

50:56 Speaker 1: think the fact that this is even happening, that Scientiss

50:59 Speaker 1: certain involved, and we're getting to these points, these things

51:03 Speaker 1: that twenty years ago, if any one of these events happened,

51:08 Speaker 1: and we seem to be getting them on a weekly basises,

51:10 Speaker 1: these big whistleblower things or and again I don't I

51:14 Speaker 1: use that term loosely whistleblower, but these great witness accounts

51:17 Speaker 1: from the military and you know, private sector and contracting

51:22 Speaker 1: and special forces and you know, yeah, so on and

51:25 Speaker 1: so forth. We're getting these amazing accounts, some of them.

51:28 Speaker 1: Of course, take a grain, take what a grain of salt.

51:30 Speaker 1: These amazing events are happening. Any one of these things

51:34 Speaker 1: twenty five years ago would have been the highlight of

51:37 Speaker 1: the ten year period. And like so there is a

51:41 Speaker 1: lot happening. It's a lot to keep track of. But

51:43 Speaker 1: that's again, that's why we did the live show on

51:45 Speaker 1: Thursdays now and we'll we'll dive deeper into this. But

51:50 Speaker 1: I wanted to uh just watch like maybe like two

51:53 Speaker 1: three more minutes of the Actually no, I don't. I

51:59 Speaker 1: don't want to. I don't want to get copyright striked

52:02 Speaker 1: or anything like that, So I'll just probably end it there.

52:08 Speaker 1: I really, uh impromptu kind of threw this together. It

52:11 Speaker 1: was like, let's just do I want to get more

52:14 Speaker 1: engaging with the audience, the video audience especially, you know,

52:19 Speaker 1: I want to play with the camera switcher. Uh, admittedly

52:23 Speaker 1: I want to play with the camera switcher. But anyway,

52:27 Speaker 1: and that's why I bought, you know, the studio is

52:30 Speaker 1: to to do these things, and uh yeah, so I

52:35 Speaker 1: expect more of it the debunkers. I guess the moral

52:41 Speaker 1: of the whole I probably said that three times. The

52:44 Speaker 1: moral of this is we should be really happy that

52:50 Speaker 1: serious people are involved. And don't attack Mick West. Don't

52:58 Speaker 1: don't attack Mick for having the the Mick West like

53:04 Speaker 1: it's that's what Mick does. Don't get mad at him

53:07 Speaker 1: over it. Just like don't engage with them if you

53:10 Speaker 1: don't want to. But also don't engage with the other

53:13 Speaker 1: people that are you know, uh echo. You know, don't

53:21 Speaker 1: surround yourself with an echo chamber. And you know, if

53:24 Speaker 1: someone has opposing or conflicting you know, views, bounce ideas

53:30 Speaker 1: off of each other, right, you don't have to agree

53:34 Speaker 1: and and they get you know, no one's perfect, no one,

53:38 Speaker 1: no one's perfect. So you know, I liken it to

53:44 Speaker 1: the neighborhoods, the neighborhoods I grew up in. It was

53:47 Speaker 1: like open door policy. Right from the city I lived

53:51 Speaker 1: in a city to living in the suburbs. There was

53:54 Speaker 1: an open door policy in both of the areas. And

53:58 Speaker 1: that's without saying it takes a village came from. Now

54:04 Speaker 1: people don't know their neighbors. They hate their neighbors, you know,

54:09 Speaker 1: one as a Trump sign, one as of this sign.

54:12 Speaker 1: And like there's no kids outside playing trick or treating

54:18 Speaker 1: is like less every year, Like we are headed and

54:22 Speaker 1: there's so much isolation going on that it doesn't scare me.

54:27 Speaker 1: And and we can maybe we can get into this

54:30 Speaker 1: one day on the podcast or at the live show.

54:32 Speaker 1: But like the way things are going needs to change,

54:38 Speaker 1: like ready player one. We need to all like the

54:41 Speaker 1: I think the Internet needs to shut down on one

54:44 Speaker 1: day a week, like you can have access to basic

54:48 Speaker 1: functions like calling anything that would require like like an

54:53 Speaker 1: emergency like that. But we should be I think the

54:56 Speaker 1: Internet for the most part, like all everything should shut

55:00 Speaker 1: out for a day and everyone gets unplugged and we

55:04 Speaker 1: just societally we agree to that, like just unplugged. All right, guys,

55:13 Speaker 1: thank you so much for being here. Pretty good turnout

55:16 Speaker 1: for like no but no promotion. Thank you, guys. I

55:21 Speaker 1: appreciate it. And again We're gonna be live tomorrow at

55:24 Speaker 1: six thirty with my co host Corey Lindsay also is

55:27 Speaker 1: the editor of the of the podcast like the actual

55:31 Speaker 1: weekly podcast with a you know, a great guest that

55:34 Speaker 1: we have every single week. The episode coming up is

55:40 Speaker 1: a special one. Yeah, it's a special one, so definitely

55:45 Speaker 1: look out for it. We'll see you guys on the

55:47 Speaker 1: other side. And att